Yes.
rpm -Fvh simply did not worked. I have made a backup of important files,
uninstalled samba and installed the new version.
TNX alias Jan Kovar
-Original Message-
From: Heath Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 4:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The are the binary packages of samba 3 for solaris 8?
Bye Giovanni
On Wed, 2003-10-15 at 08:05, Gavin Davenport wrote:
wbinfo --set-auth-user=Administrator%password
NEVER do this.
There is never a good reason to do this. The wbinfo command is for NT4
trusted domains, that are running 'restrict anonymous'. If you are
joined with ADS, and there are ADS
On Tue, 2003-10-14 at 21:47, Ronny Adsetts wrote:
jean-marc pouchoulon said the following on 14/10/03 12:10:
they sould be created
on the fly as they were with 3.0.0beta1.
As I can see, with 3.0 stable this is not done.
pdbedit -a -m testonsddd$ -D99
...
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 07:56:18 -0500, tvsjr wrote:
Helpful suggestions (although its too late for those of us already
subscribed): Quit forwarding the list onto Usenet, at least with email
addresses exposed (what's the real use of this, considering it's not that
big of a deal for people to
Now that I also get about 150-200(!) Messages of 156KB Mails each day
about half an hour(!) after my first posting to this list for the first
time in my life I must admit that there IS something terribly wrong.
Fact is that I subscribed to the list half a year ago. I also subscribed
to OpenLDAP-,
On Wed, 2003-10-15 at 16:50, jean-marc pouchoulon wrote:
It is quite possible that your LDAP libs do not support that syntax.
What exactly is the version are you using?
Netscape Directory server 4.16.
I mean on the client - the libraries that Samba links against.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Fortunately my ISP has a firewall wich blocks the virus attachments
from most spam message I get since I subscribed for AND mailed to
the samba list. But there are about 100 to 150 messages a day reaching
my mailbox.
The simpliest way to catch all the email addresses of the list is to
become
I upgraded from samba 2.2.1a to 2.2.8 a while ago and suddenly started
getting corrupt outlook 2000 .pst files the next morning (all pst files are
stored in shares on the samba server). Out of about 500 users I got about 3
corrupt pst files per day.
I just upgraded again to samba 3 + ldapsam and
Rpm found :
openldap-2.0.27-8
nss_ldap-202-5
ldd /usr/sbin/smbd
libcom_err.so.3 = /usr/kerberos/lib/libcom_err.so.3
(0x40027000)
libk5crypto.so.3 = /usr/kerberos/lib/libk5crypto.so.3
(0x40029000)
libkrb5.so.3 = /usr/kerberos/lib/libkrb5.so.3 (0x40039000)
Hi,
thank you for your report. I had the same problem, tried almost everything
but found no solution.
I hope this bug will be fixed in Samba 3.0.1
Viele Gre
Hubertus
-Ursprngliche Nachricht-
Von: buc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 14. Oktober 2003 17:26
An: [EMAIL
Hiya Tim, Thanks for helping.
Can you post your
smb.conf
/etc/pam.d/login
wbinfo -g
wbinfo -u
getent passwd
getent group
Here we go:
# Global parameters
[global]
workgroup = MYDOMAIN
realm = MYNETWORK.ISP.CO.UK
server string = Linux Samba Server
security = ADS
Hello,
I want to :
- include a smbauto.conf in smb.conf (I guess it is possible),
- allow a non root user to modify smbauto.conf with SWAT.
No matter if, as a consequence, SWAT could not be used by root.
After some research, I haven't found a way to do so (without modifying
source code). Can you
Andrew Bartlett said the following on 15/10/03 07:22:
So called 'non unix account' support was removed prior to release. It
is not intended to return - certainly not in the guise perviously seen.
You need an 'add machine script' and 'add user script' to fill in the
bits of LDAP.
Thanks for this
Hi, i had install ther samba-3.0.0-15 in a Redhat 8.0 and I want to join to a Active
Directory Domain.
When i make net ads join -U administrator i receive the following error
net: relocation error: net: undefined symbol: krb5_cc_initialize
Any suggestions
Thanks
A.O
--
To unsubscribe
First of all: we don't disclose the subscriber addresses to anyone.
The roster of list members is not available from the web page. If you
subscribe and do not post, nobody will know your address.
A mailing list that you can't post to? How useful.
Just to be absolutely clear:
- We don't
I think I finally have gotten my XP machines to log into the samba
controlled domain. Thank you all to have provided feedback and support.
I am wondering though if the solution was something that I just glossed
over, or if I just solved a portion of the problem.
As a recap, I am running samba
Dear Sir
We are the user of Samba ver 1.9.15p6 running on Sun OS 4.1.x platform. We
have recently found that our Samba not working anymore. After a whole day
checking, we have found that the problem is caused by the system date. If
the system date is set to today date, the Sun Machine
(trimming the CC list yet again)
-Original Message-
From: J. Frisbie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nevertheless, (I stand corrected) POSTING to the samba list is the
kiss of death for an email account. There is a direct causal
relationship.
You know, I've been posting to the samba
-Original Message-
From: Martin Pool [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't think viruses read Usenet.
Some people have seen a correlation. Maybe the viruses are grabbing email
addresses out of people's USENET news caches.
Of course, correlation doesn't prove causation, something I
OK, maybe I don't know what I'm talking about... of course, look at the
number of people confirming my story.
You'll discover that Outlook the mail client and Outlook the news reader
are very much intermingled - if someone is using Outlook to browse the
newsgroups and is infected, they will
-Original Message-
From: tvsjr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
As a consultant, I can not afford to have
customer email ending up in the trash because the server
thought it was spam.
I think this is the risk you take if you use a vital email address to post
to public forums. I would
-Original Message-
From: VR-Bug Support
Sent: 15 October 2003 13:42
To: 'Gavin Davenport'
Subject: RE: [Samba] Re: domain groups accessing samba share
Hi Gavin,
This is what I have for my /etc/pam.d/login
#%PAM-1.0
auth required pam_securetty.so
auth sufficient
-Original Message-
From: Ray Simard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The most effective step to reduce this is to restrict posting to
subscribed list members.
I don't think this will help much, though it may be a good idea for other
reasons.
I've never seen a virus arrive *through* the
At 08:46 AM 10/15/2003 -0400, David Brodbeck wrote:
I've never seen a virus arrive *through* the list. I think what people are
complaining about is viruses being sent to them directly.
There have been a very few that came through the list, according to memory.
The vast majority are going direct.
Hi,
I am currently trying to configure Samba 3.0 as PDC in our Domain.
Through which parameter can I tell Samba who is member of the
Domain Admin group ? In the old version it was domain admin group =
@adm...
but this parameter has obviously been dropped in 3.0 . I just joined
a machine to the
On 15 Oct 2003, David Brodbeck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've also seen bursts of virus traffic for no apparent reason. It could be
a coincidence. Correlation != causation.
There's also always the question of what your ISP is doing. My
ameritech.net account gets vast quantities of spam,
I was wondering if anyone has gotten samba to authenticate to
Edirectory? If so is there any good docs anywhere online on how to do
it? I've done some searching, but can't seem to find a whole lot.
Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
-Original Message-
From: Ray Simard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The most effective step to reduce this is to restrict posting to
subscribed list members.
This will stop spammers sending to list, but also will hurt people
incidently asking questions, without being subscribed. Depending
I am also interesting in good docs on this...
anyone got any? Is it in the grand howto?
:-)
Troy
Joe Stuart [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/15/03 08:27AM
I was wondering if anyone has gotten samba to authenticate to
Edirectory? If so is there any good docs anywhere online on how to do
it? I've done some
Hello, I am at my wits end with this...
could someone please post a working /etc/pam.d/login and system-auth
file for RedHat 9.
I have followed various howto docs, and looked at quite a few
configuration examples. None of them seem to work on my system.
I am trying to get Redhat 9 clients to
I am running debian testing with samba 2.2.3a
all users are XP/win2k some usernames are first and last. i.e. john smith
So those with a 2 part username in windows have to enter a second username
and password to access samba shares.
How can I get samba to use these usernames? currently I have samba
I am trying to upgrade samba to samba-3.0,
I have source rpm from samba site and I have been trying to recompile
rpm with spec as following
--with-mmap \
...
--with-ldap \
--with-ldapsam\
--with-ssl \
--with-acl-support
But compile is throwing error
This was a great read (see link). Makes all the 'pain' of getting one of
these things up and working properly, all the more worth while.
Read on.
http://www.itweek.co.uk/News/1144289
Many congrats guys, very impressive.
Simon
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Here is the issue, and why the Samba list is basically unable to do
anything:
If you send a message to the Samba list, it gets resent to everyone on
the list. This message will contain a FROM: line, showing an email address.
There are people on this
Tom Dickson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Here is the issue, and why the Samba list is basically unable to do
anything:
If you send a message to the Samba list, it gets resent to everyone on
the list. This message will contain a FROM: line, showing an
I would have to agree with Tom. I use Mozilla 1.5a out of the box, and
I have never seen a spam or virus message on this list. Granted, I've
only been on the list for about 8 months.
Further, I would suggest using SpamAssassin, MIMEDefang, and ClamAV for
those of you that have control over your
I've a little problem starting winbindd.
using It on a redhat 9 linux, compiled from source.
I've configured nsswitch.conf with winbind and kerberos. Naturally joined my
ADS realm with the following command: net ads join -U administrator
successfully.
now the problem is that smbd and nmbd work
Can someone explain to me what ADS buys me over Domain for a member
server?
We just started implementing Samba 3.0 and want to understand what the new
ADS security buys us.
Errol Fouquet - UNIX SysAdmin
Minerals Management Service, DOI
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 10:14:22 -0400, Greg Louis wrote:
We have a problem with shares that we would like to keep read-only for
some users; it worked with 2.2.8a, but with 3.0.0 there is this odd
behaviour: Users with read-only privilege can browse the files, can
copy them out of the share (eg
It gives native membership to Windows 2K (Active Directory) domains which is required
to participate in a W2k domain if you are not running in mixed mode. Also gives
kerberised authentication to Samba shares which is nice for security and single
sign-on.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Ok - I replaced my /etc/pam.d/login with the one you've posted.
getent still lists me just local machine users and groups.
Trying to attach to the machine results in this in the hosts samba log:
Doing spnego session setup
NativeOS=[Windows 2002 2600 Service Pack 1] NativeLanMan=[Windows
But there's no way for it to filter the data server-side, so my server account still
fills up, I still have to deal with the large transfers for each mail, etc. That's not
a solution, it's barely a fix.
Terry
-Original Message-
From: Tom Dickson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Oct 15, 2003
Hi,
On my 2 Debian boxes the option winbind use default domain = yes
doesn't make any difference any more where as it dit work just before
the rest works fine, but not this option in smb.conf.
I've discussed the matter on the French Samba mailing-list and I seem
not to be the only one who's
Hey, all. I've upgraded my workstation (Debian) to the Debian Samba 3.x
install. I decided to start from scratch with my smb.conf, because I didn't
know enough to be wary of what parameters were deleted, etc. So I put
password server = sambapdc
into my smb.conf, and figured it would Just Work.
Is there anyway to support NFTS security on linux. it might mean
compiling a new file system into the kernal? I don't know. Is there a
how to that anyone can point me to.
Sorry for the basic question,
Michael
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
Additional note: I like the idea of using a Hotmail account for lists,
the rampant propagation of email worms is the fault of poor design by
Microsoft, let Microsoft deal with the wasted bandwidth. I don't have to
view/download any emails I don't want to on hotmail. :)
my two more cents?
Erik
From: Erik Soderquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 12:18:51 -0400
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Samba] [OT] SPAM
I've been watching this thread with amusement. On one side, I see people
with calm collected reasoning explaining how email works, how lists
work, etc. and on
Testing. Please ignore.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 07:33:04AM -0400, J. Frisbie wrote:
The point is (and I've been on hundreds of lists over the years) that other
lists do not have this problem, so clearly there are solutions. Why aren't
you using any of them?
Still pissed,
Joe Frisbie
Unsubscribe, go away, stop
On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 09:52:13AM -0500, Mark Warner wrote:
I would have to agree with Tom. I use Mozilla 1.5a out of the box, and
I have never seen a spam or virus message on this list. Granted, I've
only been on the list for about 8 months.
The spam this person is complaining about isn't
On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 05:01:06PM +0200, Dr. Peter Hopfgarter wrote:
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 10:14:22 -0400, Greg Louis wrote:
We have a problem with shares that we would like to keep read-only for
some users; it worked with 2.2.8a, but with 3.0.0 there is this odd
behaviour: Users with
wbinfo --set-auth-user=Administrator%password
NEVER do this.
There is never a good reason to do this. The wbinfo command is for NT4
trusted domains, that are running 'restrict anonymous'. If you are
joined with ADS, and there are ADS trusts to these machines, then Samba
can use
hi
i'm upgrade to samba 3. I have problem with symbol .
for example i can't create files with names which contains . also smbclient
cant access directories(with symbol ) in ms windows shares.
how can i solve this problem?
thx
ps sorry for my english
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the
1) where's this list archived? i looked through my joining email
and the web pages it sent me to, it says i might be better off reading
the archives, but i can't find 'em i've got a feeling my problem
is old news, if i could just find the archives.
2) config:
samba 3.0.0
red hat 9.0
i
I have a Samba 2.2.7a PDC (with an OpenLDAP backend) that seems to be giving
me trouble. Here's the scoop:
I have Windows 2000 Pro clients running Word 2000. Over the past several
days, a lot of them have had trouble with their documents - most of the time
during a save.
The most critical of
Is there anyway to support NFTS security on linux. it might mean
compiling a new file system into the kernal? I don't know. Is there a
how to that anyone can point me to.
The bad news is that, no, there is no way to give the fine-grained control
that NTFS has to most _stock_ 2.4.x kernels.
-Original Message-
From: Lists [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is there anyway to support NFTS security on linux. it might mean
compiling a new file system into the kernal? I don't know.
Is there a
how to that anyone can point me to.
It depends on what you mean by 'NTFS
Yay, I finally got my samba 3 PDC working!
Following a variety of indirect hints I used the root account to join,
rather than trying to mess around with various groups and group
mappings. I had done this before, with no good effect, but checked more
carefully this time and found that it was my
For backward compatability, you want passdb backend = smbpasswd, most
likely. Not that I'm sure that this is even used when password server is
used, but this is the old passdb backend.
_ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _
|Y#| | | |\/| | \ |\ | | | Ryan Novosielski - Jr. UNIX Systems Admin
|$| |__| |
Sun SAS and DM Review Present
Business Intelligence Building Blocks: Enabling the Agile Enterprise
Date: Tuesday, October 28, 2003
Time: 11:00 a.m. PDT/2:00 p.m. EDT
Duration: One hour
Tune into Sun Microsystems' BIDW Network Series
Hosted by DM Review, 4th in a 6-part series
Today, more than
Oh Wise Ones,
For the past two days, I have contested with the Samba documentation and
other sources of lore in a vain attempt to achieve Samba/LDAP integration.
My test system is running RedHat 9 with updates applied, along with OpenLDAP
OpenSSL from redhat-rawhide, and the Samba 3.0.1pre1 RPM
I've used samba for the better part of 4 years now.
Never had any real problems that were not easily
resolved. Samba has become the single most important
piece of software in our lab. It has reduced my
administrative headaches considerably.
However, now I have a real problem that I have no clue
-Original Message-
From: James Kreuziger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Now the problem. I have VERY intermittent connectivity
to my PDC. When I show up in the morning, I can't log in
more than half the time because it tells me the
domain is unavailable.
The most frustrating thing(s)
Well, I've checked the results of ifconfig -a, and
this is what I get:
lo0: flags=1000849UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4 mtu 8232 index 1
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff00
hme0: flags=1000843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4 mtu 1500 index 2
inet 10.200.236.51 netmask ffe0
After reading through the documentation, I realized that as a part of the
migration process from Samba-2.2.X to Samba-3.0.0 I needed to convert
everyone in my smbadmin group (previously domain admin group = @smbadmin) to
the Domain Admins group w/rid=512. So, I issued the following command:
Hi folks:
I've asked this question before and the answer didn't seem that clear. Let's
try again - shall we?
Yes or no - is OpenLDAP required to be on the SAMBA 3.0 server in order for
Active Directory support to work? Active Directory support == security =
ads.
Thanks
--
Ronald R. Gage
On Wednesday 15 October 2003 16:20, Kaleb Pederson wrote:
What am I doing wrong? How come I'm an administrator without any
administrator permissions?
I think I had to restart Samba after doing this to make it effective.
--
Chris
Do not reply to the email address.
Please use the contact page
On Wednesday 15 October 2003 01:29 pm, you wrote:
On Wednesday 15 October 2003 16:20, Kaleb Pederson wrote:
What am I doing wrong? How come I'm an administrator without any
administrator permissions?
I think I had to restart Samba after doing this to make it effective.
Thanks Chris, that
I have been having a problem that has had me scratching my head for the
last week and a half. I have searched with google, read the 13th hour
troubleshooting guide (stopped when it got to the sniffer diagnostics),
and have even upgraded samba to 3.0.0. I will post a description followed
by a
Hi,
It's become almost routine now to reboot the server every morning. If
we are able to log in, after a lag of ~10 seconds, we see the load
average is usually 3.0.
As I am writing this, it just went down again. The console had a bunch
of text on it, the very bottom reading:
o Kernel panic
Kaleb Pederson a écrit :
After reading through the documentation, I realized that as a part of the
migration process from Samba-2.2.X to Samba-3.0.0 I needed to convert
everyone in my smbadmin group (previously domain admin group = @smbadmin) to
the Domain Admins group w/rid=512. So, I issued
On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 03:01:19PM -0700, Francis Buxton wrote:
Hi,
It's become almost routine now to reboot the server every morning. If
we are able to log in, after a lag of ~10 seconds, we see the load
average is usually 3.0.
As I am writing this, it just went down again. The
Yes or no - is OpenLDAP required to be on the SAMBA 3.0 server in order for
Active Directory support to work? Active Directory support == security =
ads.
Are you trying to make Samba act as an Active Directory server? If so, then
Samba won't do that, you're SOL.
If you're trying to make your
- Original Message -
From: Gavin Davenport [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 12:14 PM
Subject: RE: [Samba] Re: domain groups accessing samba share
Ok - I replaced my /etc/pam.d/login with the one you've posted.
getent still lists me just local
- Original Message -
From: Fabrice Clerc [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 12:01 PM
Subject: [Samba] winbind use default domain doesn't work on samba 3.0.0
Hi,
On my 2 Debian boxes the option winbind use default domain = yes
doesn't make
you were so close. It's a combination of the two.
/usr/local/bin/smbldap-useradd.pl -a -w computerName
from smb.conf
add machine script = /usr/local/bin/smbldap-useradd.pl -a -w %m
-=Carl=-
J B Bell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe from this list
Is there a way to use User Manger for Domains against a Samba PDC?
I'm running Samba 2.2.8 on Suse 8.0 with a Win2k workstation as a
testbed.
I can open UMfD and view all users as well as all groups, however when
trying to change group memberships or add users, I am given the message
incorrect
I can compile samba fine...I start to do a make and it fails
soonpassdb/pdb_ldap.c:64: invalid macro name ... anybody see this before.
Thanks
Jason.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Hi folks (again)...
I have Samba 3 installed (compiled from source) with Kerberos 5v1.3.1 also
installed (from source).
My problem is that none of the domain users can use any resources from the Samba
server. The Samba server is (trying to be) in Domain mode (security = ads).
The Samba server
may want to check if this is uncommented in your smbldap-useradd.pl file
if (!$with_smbpasswd) {
# (jtournier)
# Objectclass sambaSAMAccount is now added directly by samba when joigning
the domain (for samba3)
if (!add_samba_machine_mkntpwd($userName, $userUidNumber)) {
die $0: error while
On Wed, 2003-10-15 at 17:11, Carl Weiss wrote:
may want to check if this is uncommented in your smbldap-useradd.pl file
if (!$with_smbpasswd) {
# (jtournier)
# Objectclass sambaSAMAccount is now added directly by samba when joigning
the domain (for samba3)
if
Hi all.
We're doing a major network upgrade, and I'm considering setting up
Samba-3 as a PDC.
The computer I want to install it onto already has Samba-2 running (
just a member of an NT4 domain ), and I *need* to keep it up 24/7 until
I finish the upgrade. Therefore, I'd like to do the install
Markus,
Thanks for your message.
I changed the debug level as you suggested and restarted CUPS. I then
tried Print test page from the Windows PC, which should be seen in the
extract below. Note that 192.168.0.65 is my desktop, to which the
Lexmark is connected.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] cups]# tail -f
Date: Wed Oct 15 17:41:25 2003
Author: idra
Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/include
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv4654/include
Modified Files:
.cvsignore
Log Message:
created a new target: genparse
this target will build parse file with genstruct
it is the duty of the
Date: Wed Oct 15 17:41:25 2003
Author: idra
Update of /data/cvs/samba/source
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv4654
Modified Files:
Makefile.in
Log Message:
created a new target: genparse
this target will build parse file with genstruct
it is the duty of the developer to commit
Date: Thu Oct 16 00:45:15 2003
Author: jra
Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/smbd
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv17703/smbd
Modified Files:
lanman.c
Log Message:
Ensure error code path doesn't free unmalloced memory. Bug #628.
Jeremy.
Revisions:
lanman.c1.96
Date: Thu Oct 16 00:45:17 2003
Author: jra
Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/smbd
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv17707/smbd
Modified Files:
Tag: SAMBA_3_0
lanman.c
Log Message:
Ensure error code path doesn't free unmalloced memory. Bug #628.
Jeremy.
Revisions:
lanman.c
Date: Thu Oct 16 05:10:18 2003
Author: tpot
Update of /data/cvs/samba/source
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv12004
Modified Files:
Tag: SAMBA_3_0
Makefile.in
Log Message:
Build fix for wrepld. From MORIYAMA Masayuki.
Revisions:
Makefile.in 1.468.2.185 =
89 matches
Mail list logo
