Fenal, Jérôme wrote:
Test user login name is ssi
The output of id -a ssi command is
uid=225(ssi) gid=1(other) groups=112(support),1000(users)
Nevertheless samba has found only 1 group (gid=1)
Ok, I don't see anything beside the following :
Define the right suffixes and ous (should be Peopl
Remove the "use default domain" line from smb.conf
Try doing an "id DOMAIN\\user" to see if you get usefull info out of it.
Likewise, " chmod DOMAIN\\user file "
Cheers
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Kashif Awan
> Sent: February
hello everyone
i have installed samba and joined it to active directory domain according to the docs
in the tarball.But when I run wbinfo -u it shows the users but just user names not
domain+user format and the same problem with the group too and it is also not creating
the home directories in
yOn Tue, 24 Feb 2004, Vladimir Pekkel wrote:
> Dear John.
>
> I looked through several threads @samba list-server. Still no answer to my
> question - How to map several UNIX group to a single "ntgroup" with Samba
> 3.0.2 Something identical to old smb.conf entry: domain admin
> [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Hi,
I'm building my system on a LDAP backend, but I wan't to have full
control over the user creation-process. I have developed a backend in
php, to handle most of my needs. Except for calculating the uidnumber,
from where i calculate sambaSID...
My question is, can I call a function somewhere t
Would a FreeBSD jail situation help?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of John H Terpstra
> Sent: February 23, 2004 10:03 PM
> To: w w
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba multiple domains on single linux machine
>
>
>
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, Ephi Dror wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am wondering:
> Is it possible for a windows client to use separate tcp/ip connection per
> share.
Yes. This will happen if you use different NetBIOS names for the same
server, or if you connect via the NetBIOS name first, and then use an IP
"Stumpfl Markus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I extracted the following weird error from the sys-log regarding pdu and
> schannel (have the same PID):
>
> Feb 24 10:40:37 s-svr01 smbd[31833]: [2004/02/24 10:40:37, 0, pid=31833,
> effective(65534, 65533), real(65534,
Hi All,
I am wondering:
Is it possible for a windows client to use separate tcp/ip connection per
share.
Meaning that if we have SAMBA server that shares let's say three shares,
then each client that connect to those shares (tcon) will end up having
three tcp/ip connections with the server and of
Would not the first action to be to test transmitting data with
another application than Samba? For example trying NFS, FTP or
something similar.
I have also problems with Samba when transmitting larger amounts of
data (100MiB or so) to the Samba machine. Samba (or something)
Dan,
Though I don't use the Solaris-packaged ldap libs (I am using OpenLDAP), locating the
libraries for Samba was a big problem. I did a lot of fiddling with compiler and
preprocessor flags, including some which I didn't think we should need; these mods are
shown below. (I put all my config
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, James Bowes wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I had seen a posting from another user with the same issue.
>
> Here's question 1:
>
> For some reason when the guest account = guest, browsing is not
Make that "guest account = nobody", also make sure that the account
'nobody' is in you /etc/pass
Anson,
Can you try setting the NIC to 10Mbps/Half
and Full Duplex to see if the transfer times
improve?
I put in a switch a while back , and have a
Lexmark Optra printer with a NIC capable\
of 10/100. The LAN cabling is shielded CAT3.
The Optra would negotiate to 100Mbps with
the switch, b
Thank you for subscribing to DM Direct!
You have been subscribed to DM Direct with the following information
MS Corporation Public Services <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructi
Hello,
I have a Samba server running 3.0. Whenever I run smbstatus, I get a
messages about sessionid.tdb not being initialized, and don't see anything
about the multiple users that are connected. I've seen many posts about
this, but never a solution. What is the solution? How do I initialize the
f
"Andrew Bartlett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is that the right user? If so, then this is just a matter of unix file
> permissions, or possibly smb.conf settings. (ie, it looks like you have
IDMAP working)
D'oh. Having fixed all the hard problems, it was of course a trivial mistake
in smb.con
On Tue, 2004-02-24 at 13:43, Anson Rinesmith wrote:
> fxp1: flags=8843 mtu 1500
> inet 192.168.69.24 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.69.255
> inet6 fe80::2e0:81ff:fe20:ea29%fxp1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2
> ether 00:e0:81:20:ea:29
> media: Ethernet 100baseTX
>
On Wed, 2004-02-25 at 01:23, geralds wrote:
> Hi
>
> I tried to log in on the Samba server as a normal user but failed . The
> followingKDE error message displayed out;
>
> "could not read network connection list
> /home//.DCOPserver_linux-server_0
> Check to see if DCOPserver program is running
On Wed, 2004-02-25 at 01:00, Brad Langhorst wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-02-24 at 04:17, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
>
> > The blank password is the default password when "automatically" joining
> > the domain. The preferred mechanism is to join interactively using an
> > administrator account and this will
On Wed, 2004-02-25 at 00:59, JonR wrote:
> Slowly making progress with Active Directory integration. I have Samba 3.0.2
> as an ADS member, and I can see shares, including user home directories. My
> linux boxes run Debian unstable, and use the PAM and NSS LDAP backends,
> against an Active Directo
Thank you for subscribing to DM Direct!
You have been subscribed to DM Direct with the following information
MS Corporation Public Services <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructi
On Wed, 2004-02-25 at 08:23, James Bowes wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I had seen a posting from another user with the same issue.
>
> Here's question 1:
>
> For some reason when the guest account = guest, browsing is not
> possible. When set to guest = root, no problem. I'm not sure what this
> guy did to
On Tue, 2004-02-24 at 21:14, Ghe Rivero wrote:
> Hi people!
> We are deploying a new scenario for out University, mostly based in
> Samba. The purpose is the use of a single password for every service.
> But we have found a little problem.
>
> The ADS are a cluster of 3 Win2003 servers
On Tue, 2004-02-24 at 23:18, Alan Munday wrote:
> Hi
>
> I've searched the archives but did not spot this particular issue there.
>
> Config. RH8, Samba 3.0.2a. Auth via smbpasswd.
>
> I have a small office network where one of the accounts has had there
> password expire and resetting the passw
Hi.
I had seen a posting from another user with the same issue.
Here's question 1:
For some reason when the guest account = guest, browsing is not
possible. When set to guest = root, no problem. I'm not sure what this
guy did to fix it but I'd love find out...
Here's question 2:
Unfortunatel
env CPPFLAGS='-I/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.4.2/include
-I/usr/kerberos/include
-I/usr/local/ssl/include'
LDFLAGS=-L/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.4.2/lib
/configure -enable-ldbm
be sure that you have /usr/local/ssl/lib in
your /etc/ld.so.conf
and run ldconfig
BLOCKQUOTE { BORDER-LEFT:#1F4687 1px solid; padd
Mario Fernandez wrote:
Hi Jerry -
I'm just e-mailing you regarding the Exchange SP4 upgrade error when using a
Samba 3.0 PDC. We presently have a Samba 3.0 PDC and using Exchange 5.5 SP4
without a problem, however we are in the process of migrating to Win2K3 and
Exchange 2K3 and are setting up a
I am getting below errors when running "configure --with-ldap --with-ldapsam
--with-ads" on Solaris 8:
Begin ***
ld: warning: option -YP appears more than once, first setting taken
Undefined first referenced
symbol in fil
fxp1: flags=8843 mtu 1500
inet 192.168.69.24 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.69.255
inet6 fe80::2e0:81ff:fe20:ea29%fxp1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2
ether 00:e0:81:20:ea:29
media: Ethernet 100baseTX
status: active
> -Original Message-
> From: Craig
Thank you for your suggestion. I turned on Debugging and was able to
troubleshoot my problem.
Thanks again,
Linda
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
I am getting below error when running "configure --with-ldap --with-ldapsam
--with-ads":
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
boy, I would love it if I could solve this...anyone got any suggestions?
On Mon, 2004-02-23 at 11:33, Craig White wrote:
> PDC log for specific machines typically has this entry each day for each
> machine...
>
> groupdb/mapping.c:init_group_mapping(139)
> Failed to open group mapping database
On Tue, 2004-02-24 at 12:13, Anson Rinesmith wrote:
> I have SLOW file transfers across samba to my Windows Server 2000 domain.
>
> I am using a built in 100bT Intel Pro NIC, I have tried the built in gigabit
> NIC and a PCI 3com, all with the same results.
>
> Using iperf, I get about 45-90Mb of
Dear User,
the message with following attributes has not been delivered,
because contains an infected object.
Sender = [EMAIL PROTECTED] (may be forged)
Recipients = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject = something for you
Message-ID = i1OK4sac009347
Antivirus filter report:
--- Dr.Web report ---
Followin
Hello,
Trying to configure OpenLDAP, for a Samba PDC server, but I keep getting the
following error;
checking for openssl/ssl.h... no
checking for ssl.h... no
configure: error: Could not locate TLS/SSL package
However, ssl.h is located in /usr/local/ssl/include/openssl/ssl.h
The enveloped confi
Slowly making progress with Active Directory integration. I have Samba 3.0.2
as an ADS member, and I can see shares, including user home directories. My
linux boxes run Debian unstable, and use the PAM and NSS LDAP backends,
against an Active Directory on Windows 2000 SP4, using the MS Services For
I have SLOW file transfers across samba to my Windows Server 2000 domain.
I am using a built in 100bT Intel Pro NIC, I have tried the built in gigabit
NIC and a PCI 3com, all with the same results.
Using iperf, I get about 45-90Mb of bandwidth from my PC's to my samba
server.
I can pull it up by
Your post is read by me
Could you send us your smb.conf ??
BLOCKQUOTE { BORDER-LEFT:#1F4687 1px solid; padding-left:20px;
margin-left: 0px; }-Original Message-
From: "Kairam, Raj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, 24. Feb 2004 10:34 -0800
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [Samba] No resu
I am at a loss to find out why my posts to this list never show in my in-box while
everybody else's does.
I verified my options in my profile for this list but no luck yet. What should I do ?
Could you please reply to me so I know that my post is at least read by you, John H
Terpstra.
I have done
Hi,
suse 8.2 runs perfect with acl ( but it is no included in minimal install at
8.2 )
there is no failure with acl suse 8.2 and samba 3
everything works as descriped i run
4 machines acting as pdc for months.
did you check your ldap setting , group mapping,
?
Best Regards
- Original Message --
I've found that with roaming profiles enabled, some users experience
extremely slow logoffs when using NT/XP/2000. I've discovered that
this is usually due to very large email folders in the user's profile.
OUTLOOK:
As Outlook saves ALL messages in a single .pst file, any activity in
Outlook will
I'm assuming you're running w/o ACL support. Samba tries as best as
possible to map UNIX owner/group/other permissions to Windows ACL's,
however, the only way to have multiple users assigned permissions to a
file or folder is to have ACL support on your filesystem. I don't know
if SuSE 8.2 comes
I also get this error in my logs. I'm not sure if it's related to a
problem I'm having with roaming profiles at the moment. A Windows XP
computer with all the most recent updates from Windows Update has
intermittent problems with roaming profiles returning "DETAIL - The
network name cannot be fou
Hi
I have noticed the following behaviour:
If I get a kerberos ticket as a domain admin user using kinit and then do a
net join to an ADS domain, then this works fine and net ads testjoin and net
ads leave work too.
However if I do it as a user with full control on a particular ou within the
AD
> -Original Message-
> From: Dmitry Monakhov
> To: Jérôme Fenal
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 2/24/2004 3:43 PM
> Subject: Re: [Samba] Re: Supplementary Group Issues
>
> Test user login name is ssi
>
> The output of id -a ssi command is
>
> uid=225(ssi) gid=1(other) groups=112(support)
I could not duplicate this behavior with W2003 Terminal Server and Samba
2.2.8a. Try reading the whitepaper about the differences of Terminal
Server on NT4 versus W2000 and 2003, and how Samba is affected. The
paper is at:
http://swflug.org/modules.php?name=Downloads&d_op=viewdownload&cid=4
Hi,
I try to get a connection with an Pocket Loox with Windows mobile 2003 to a
samba 2.2.8a but it doesn´t work...
I reach a Win2k workstation from the PDA, there everything works fine. I
also reach the Samba server from the win2k. I also reach the standard gateway
for the PDA and have an inter
Hi,
I try to get a connection with an Pocket Loox with Windows mobile 2003 to a
samba 2.2.8a but it doesn´t work...
I reach a Win2k workstation from the PDA, there everything works fine. I
also reach the Samba server from the win2k. I also reach the standard gateway
for the PDA and have an inter
Hi,
I try to get a connection with an Pocket Loox with Windows mobile 2003 to a
samba 2.2.8a but it doesn´t work...
I reach a Win2k workstation from the PDA, there everything works fine. I
also reach the Samba server from the win2k. I also reach the standard gateway
for the PDA and have an inter
John H Terpstra schrieb:
On Mon, 23 Feb 2004, Michael Kuznik wrote:
Andrew Bartlett schrieb:
On Thu, 2004-02-19 at 21:40, Michael Kuznik wrote:
Hi,
I'm testing the migration of an NT4 Domain onto a Samba-Server.
Now I'm at the point to migrate users and maschine accounts.
It works fine for s
Dmitry Monakhov wrote:
I have the same problem using samba 3.0.2a SUN Solaris-9 SUN One
Directory Server 5.2
Supplementary groups are recognized quite correct under unix shell
environment, but samba can recognize them only from /etc/group file
ignoring content of /etc/nsswithch.conf
Is it bug
Hi
I tried to log in on the Samba server as a normal user but failed . The
followingKDE error message displayed out;
"could not read network connection list
/home//.DCOPserver_linux-server_0
Check to see if DCOPserver program is running"
ANYbody to help me out of this problem?
Thanks.
RGDS,
Quoting "Ben Jensz"
> So basically because it won't even work via smbpasswd from the
> machine
> as the unprivileged user, then changing from Windows won't (and
> doesn't)
> work either.
I'm running SuSE 9.0 samab-2.2.8a, and the default settings for
"passwd program" are NOT correct.
I had to a
test
--
Regards,
Jens Strohschnitter
-
*!!!LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX!!!*
* http://www.jens-strohschnitter.de *
-
Set the controls for
the heart of the sun
---
On Tue, 2004-02-24 at 04:17, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> The blank password is the default password when "automatically" joining
> the domain. The preferred mechanism is to join interactively using an
> administrator account and this will automatically create the machine
> accounts when joining the
I have the same problem using samba 3.0.2a SUN Solaris-9 SUN One
Directory Server 5.2
Supplementary groups are recognized quite correct under unix shell
environment, but samba can recognize them only from /etc/group file
ignoring content of /etc/nsswithch.conf
Is it bug or samba-3.* feature?
Hello.
Now that I'm able to change passwords at all ;), I'd like to implement
password syncing with Samba.
Problem is, that we're using NIS for our Unix network. Right now I don't
yet have an idea what I'd set for the passwd program.
First, the program must be run on the NIS master. Fine. It mu
Quoting "John H Terpstra"
> On Mon, 23 Feb 2004, flinchlock wrote:
>
> > Later, I changed 'logon path' to \\%L\profiles\%U\%m
> >
> > When 'logon path' is \\%L\%U\.msprofile and I click on
> "Command
> > Prompt", I get a command window that says: H:\
> >
> > When 'logon path' is \\%L\profiles\%U\
Dmitry Monakhov wrote:
Hi, All
I was wondering if any one else is having issues with supplementary
groups
not being recognized. It seems as if Samba is ignoring the
sup.groups. I'm
using RH9.0 on Intel with samba-3.0.0-2_rh9 and OpenLDAP 2.0.27. When
I do
a "id -a username" the user is in a
Thank You for contacting customer service, your matter is important to us. A
representive will be reviewing your inquiry shortly.
GREAT NEWS FROM IDT CUSTOMER SERVICE:
Now you can access your Global-Call account information online at our interactive
account center. Visit us at www.global-call.n
Am Tue, 24 Feb 2004 10:34:16 +0100 schrieb Alexander Skwar:
> [2004/02/24 10:07:01.944528, 0, pid=7813, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)]
> lib/util_sec.c:assert_gid(113)
> Failed to set gid privileges to (-1,-2) now set to (0,0) uid=(0,0)
I searched some more, and found that this is the "core erro
On Tue, 2004-02-24 at 05:43, Van der Spuy , Gian. wrote:
> Hi
>
> I've just upgraded to 3.0.2 from 2.2.8 and was hoping to use the Backup
> Operators group in Windows XP for backup of windows data directories. I
> set up a Linux 'backup' group and a 'backup' user who is a member of it
> and then
Hi
I've just upgraded to 3.0.2 from 2.2.8 and was hoping to use the Backup
Operators group in Windows XP for backup of windows data directories. I
set up a Linux 'backup' group and a 'backup' user who is a member of it
and then mapped the backup group to 'Backup Operators' with type=d.
The data d
Hi
I've searched the archives but did not spot this particular issue there.
Config. RH8, Samba 3.0.2a. Auth via smbpasswd.
I have a small office network where one of the accounts has had there
password expire and resetting the password just went round in loops.
I've tried removing the password
Nope, but according to the docs anyway, when doing a unix password sync,
Samba as root calls the passwd command. So in terms of root operating
the passwd command, it won't obey password charateristic restrictions
anyway as root changing passwords overrides that anyway (at least on the
Linux sy
Hi,
is it possible to use "encrypt passwords=yes" in the main server
configuration and "encrypt passwords=no" in the virtual server
configuration?
My current smb.conf looks like this:
workgroup = AGPC101
netbios name = AG-pc101-Server
server string = PC101-Server
Greetings. A suggestion for the "smbtar" script (could be considered
a nano-bug):
The "echo" commands that list the options selected (activated when
using the "-v" option) should also be in the form 'echo >&2 ...'.
This then becomes consistent with other usages of "echo ..." in the
s
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Sten Sletbak wrote:
> The "hide unreadable = yes" option gives strange results with samba 3.x.
> Everything works fine when the server runs as a domain controller. Users
> see the directories they are supposed to (unix group permission) in the
> share. Turning off do
Hi, All
I was wondering if any one else is having issues with supplementary groups
not being recognized. It seems as if Samba is ignoring the sup.groups. I'm
using RH9.0 on Intel with samba-3.0.0-2_rh9 and OpenLDAP 2.0.27. When I do
a "id -a username" the user is in all the necessary groups but
Hi people!
We are deploying a new scenario for out University, mostly based in
Samba. The purpose is the use of a single password for every service.
But we have found a little problem.
The ADS are a cluster of 3 Win2003 servers. The file servers are
RHAS3.0, and all the clients are
On Tue, 2004-02-24 at 20:56, Stumpfl Markus wrote:
> I extracted the following weird error from the sys-log regarding pdu and
> schannel (have the same PID):
>
> Feb 24 10:40:37 s-svr01 smbd[31833]: [2004/02/24 10:40:37, 0, pid=31833,
> effective(65534, 65533), real(65534, 0)]
> rpc_server/srv_pip
On Tue, 2004-02-24 at 20:10, Beast wrote:
> Is it possible to have samba adminitrator account with non zero uid?
No. Not if you want to administer smbpasswd or ldap accounts.
We are working to reduce this restriction, but for now that's the way it
is.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartlett
Symantec AntiVirus found a virus in an attachment you ([EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To ensure the recipient(s) are able to use the files you sent, perform a
virus scan on your computer, clean any infected files, then resend this
attachment.
Attachment: misc.e
I extracted the following weird error from the sys-log regarding pdu and
schannel (have the same PID):
Feb 24 10:40:37 s-svr01 smbd[31833]: [2004/02/24 10:40:37, 0, pid=31833,
effective(65534, 65533), real(65534, 0)]
rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_pipe_netsec_process(1371)
Feb 24 10:40:37 s-svr01 smbd[
Hello,
We have *samba 3.0.2a* server running winbindd and
security=ads in smb.conf.
The authentication of ads users works fine.
However, our environment requires using *both Domain
and Local* users at the same time.
Is there a way to make *samba 3.0.2a* authenticate local users
and domain users?
-
Hello.
I'm having some difficulties with Samba 3.0.2a on a HP-UX 11.00 machine.
I compiled Samba with gcc:
vz6tml_tc51:/u/vz6tml/tmp/tc51-misc/Source/Samba/samba-3.0.2a/source/ >
/usr/local/bin/gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 3.3.1
Copyright (C) 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software;
Hi List,
I'm using Samba 3.0.1 as PDC and Openldap 2.1.23 as backend on a Suse 8.2
System, both are build from scratch.
Nearly everything is fine, expect I'm not able to change the security
setting of subfolders on my shares via my Win2k box.
More details:
Changing the security setting of my to
Hello,
I'm running samba 3.0.1 on RHEL ES3.0 and I'm trying to use the recycle vfs
module.
The samba share has been expanded with symlinks and the recycle module seems
to have problems with this.
Below you can see logging from debug level 3.
Is there a way to workaround this?
[2004/02/24 10:05:06
Is it possible to have samba adminitrator account with non zero uid?
I have a problem with email if admin is root. creating alias in postifx is somehow not
a good option in my case.
Tks.
--beast
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.
We have recieved your email. We try to answer you as soon as possible.
To buy more telefon cards please visit:
www.telefonkort.net
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Hello
We use samba 2.0.7 on Solaris 2.6.
After upgrade domain from NT4 to 2003 AD we start to get problem on our terminal
server windows 2000. First user connect to samba server and other cannot do it.
I tried to use samba 2.2.8 - same problem.
Any suggestions?
Best regards,
Vadim Fattakhov
Fr
On Tue, 2004-02-24 at 05:02, Moe Hans wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I installed samba on a SCO system . All the demons comes up
> properly without any error. But wen we try to mount any thing I saw
> following messages
>
> ERROR: root did not create the semaphore
> [2004/02/23 09:59:10, 0] locking/loc
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, fred wrote:
>
> I have set up my samba server to act as the domain controller of my
> domain.
> When I try to join a windows workstation to this domain, the machine can
> actually see the domain but when I type in my root and root password, I
> get the message "wrong Usename o
System Antywirsowy na Glownym serwerze pocztowym Wydzialu Zarzadzania i Ekonomiki
Uslug - Uniwersytetu Szczecinskiego, wykryl wirusa lub blad w wiadomosci, ktora
zaadresowales do jednego z naszych uzytkownikow.!!!
Raport zostal wyslany do Adresata!
Sprawdz swoj komputer aktualnym oprogramowanie
I have set up my samba server to act as the domain controller of my
domain.
When I try to join a windows workstation to this domain, the machine can
actually see the domain but when I type in my root and root password, I
get the message "wrong Usename or password"
When I change encrypt password o
85 matches
Mail list logo
