> Pls send more details about connecting FC3 machine to ADS.
Please visit
http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Pls send more details about connecting FC3 machine to ADS.
thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RH 3.0 ES
krb5 1.2.7
Samba 3.0.9
I am trying to use Samba, Winbind and Kerberos to configure single sign
in and allow users from both Windows and Linux (RH 3.0 ES) platforms to
use shares from either platform. I can not see users from my primary
domain but can see the trusted NT4 groups and use
Hi all, I have found and error on my log.nmbd shown below that I do not know
how to get rid off. I have been using the server with IP 192.168.13.1 and I
have changed to 192.168.1.1. Now although it works, it brings that error
message. It seems that it stores somewhere that it have been using su
The missing domains do show up in "net rpc trustdom list -U Administrator"
linuxeast:/etc/pam.d # net rpc trustdom list -U administrator
Password:
Trusted domains list:
W2K1 S-1-5-21-(X)15
W2K2 S-1-5-21-(X)30
NT4_missing_1 S-1-5-21-(X)88
NT4_missing_2
Ben Vaughan wrote:
Hello Christian,
Here at Iowa State, we have experienced exactly this behavior, although
we haven't noticed any of my samba servers loosing their domain
membership. It appears that samba is still functioning via the rpc
methods.
We compiled samba.org's srpms and haven't had any
If I use any of the binary packages for SuSE SLES9 greater than 3.0.7
I can not see some of my NT4 trust domain via winbind.
We have 5 regular NT 4 domains that trust each other. Two of them our
within our LAN (local subnet), one of these domains the samba machine
is within ... security = domain.
T
Hello Christian,
Here at Iowa State, we have experienced exactly this behavior, although
we haven't noticed any of my samba servers loosing their domain
membership. It appears that samba is still functioning via the rpc
methods.
We compiled samba.org's srpms and haven't had any problems.
I can'
i've configure my samba server as pdc but when i try
to connect win client using win XP, it said that no
network path found. i've double check and recheck the
permission of the configuration file and the file used
by the smb.conf..but the result is still the same.
please help me..what should i do??
Anyone that can offer some insight? This now happens to me on two sites,
both HP-UX PA-Risc-2.0.
_ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _
|Y#| | | |\/| | \ |\ | | | Ryan Novosielski - User Support Spec. III
|$&| |__| | | |__/ | \| _| | [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 973/972.0922 (2-0922)
\__/ Univ. of Med. and Den
I'm trying to create/update DNS records on a Windows 2003 server from a
Linux (Debian) client. The situation is this:
- a Linux workstation, that gets its IP from a DHCP server
- a completely separate Windows 2003 AD server, that handles DNS for
workstations (mainly laptops) in our domain
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004, [ISO-8859-1] Gémes Géza wrote:
> Charles N Wyble írta:
>
> > i like it. i like it a lot. sounds wonderful. lets get this going. the
> > time is NOW to kill exchange.
> >
> > -charles
> > http://www.thewybles.com/~charles
> > www.oserproject.org
> >
>
> Yes it realy sounds wond
On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 09:32:27AM -0600, bryanw wrote:
> My samba PDC is using the tdbsam backend and, for the most part
> is working flawlessly. However, when using smbpasswd to add samba accounts,
> I always get the following error:
>
> tdb_update_sam: Failing to store a SAM_ACCOUNT for
Some preliminary testing indicates that there may be problems in the
newly released Red Hat 3.0.9 packages (not samba.org's) in regard to
joining an AD as a full member (w/kerberos). This may also affect
maintaining current membership in such an environment. If anyone has
already upgraded and
Its just "frezzing", you cant do anything so a manual reboot is needed!
Christian Merrill wrote:
Daniel Wilson wrote:
Hi,
Im using samba 3.0.9 with LDAP (Sun Iplanet 5.2 directory Server).
On an XP client, im trying to add "Domain Users" group to the Local
"Power Users" group (For windows updates e
no, I used cifs instead of smbfs in fstab, see man mount.cifs. But I'd guess
that there are others on this list that know more about this, or not???
Chris
On Tuesday 14 December 2004 23:54, Des Dougan wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-12-14 at 22:37 +0100, C. Hurschler wrote:
> > I had the same errors with
> -Original Message-
> From: Beschorner Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 3.0.8 has an evil file attribute bug if your samba server has
> ACL support.
> Try 3.0.10.
What are the details on this? I thought I'd been carefully watching the
release announcements for anything ACL-related, bu
first of all, thanks for the help!
thats just how im mounting it right now.
i've installed the whole stuff from debian packages, and i've installed smbfs
everytime, so i thought that would be up to date too.
but as i recall there is a kernel module named smbfs too, so there must be one
named c
I took Peachtree's suggestions into account while developing our Samba 3 PDC standard some months ago. Thus far not a single locking issue with many applications including database systems. There are
both some client and server side settings. Please see my presentation on our configuration for the
Daniel Wilson wrote:
Hi,
Im using samba 3.0.9 with LDAP (Sun Iplanet 5.2 directory Server).
On an XP client, im trying to add "Domain Users" group to the Local
"Power Users" group (For windows updates etc...) However when i try to
add the group it just crashed the windows.
Also if i use the usrmgr.
I am having problems with storing Peachtree Complete Accounting on a Samba
share. I know people have reported issues like this before but I have yet to
see a solution.
Is there anyone here who has successfully set this up (without getting the lock
errors)? Any help would be greatly appreciate
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thomas Bork wrote:
| Gerald Carter schrieb:
|
|> This is the latest stable release of Samba. This is the version
|> that production Samba servers should be running for all current
|> bug-fixes. This is primarily a security release to address
|> CAN-200
Hi,
Im using samba 3.0.9 with LDAP (Sun Iplanet 5.2 directory Server).
On an XP client, im trying to add "Domain Users" group to the Local
"Power Users" group (For windows updates etc...) However when i try to
add the group it just crashed the windows.
Also if i use the usrmgr.exe to edit groups, t
Hi,
I am having problem preventing renaming and deleting files owned by
someone else. Idea is to have directory where some people can save files
and only admins in that share can read files.
Now the problems is that users must be able to write those files and
directory permissions need to have
> OK, so what I am hearing is that:
> 1. It is still a problem.
> 2. But it isn't a Samba problem, it is an nss_ldap problem.
> 3. There might be some work arounds.
> Possible workarounds:
> A. Burry the Two OU's one deeper and do a subtree search on the parent
> OU. Works but not scaleable.
I dis
Csere MÃtyÃs wrote:
hello
i have this strange problem:
i've ounted up a windows share on my linux machine, and tryign to copy a file to it, which is bigger than 2gbs, and it fails with a "maximum file size exceeded" error.
the linux is running ext3, and windows is ntfs, so the size limit must be
Hi,
Im using samba 3.0.9 with LDAP (Sun Iplanet 5.2 directory Server).
On an XP client, im trying to add "Domain Users" group to the Local
"Power Users" group (For windows updates etc...) However when i try to
add the group it just crashed the windows.
Also if i use the usrmgr.exe to edit groups
3.0.8 has an evil file attribute bug if your samba server has ACL support.
Try 3.0.10.
Daniel.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Hello all,
Thought I'd let you know what I've been trying in addition to the mail below to
get this thing to work. This morning, I installed a second copy of the samba
server, and got it to run simultaneously with the existing one. ss1 serves DOM1
and ss2 serves DOM2. ss2 has a copy of the smb.c
Csere MÃtyÃs wrote:
hello
i have this strange problem:
i've ounted up a windows share on my linux machine, and tryign to copy a file to it, which is bigger than 2gbs, and it fails with a "maximum file size exceeded" error.
the linux is running ext3, and windows is ntfs, so the size limit must be
hello
i have this strange problem:
i've ounted up a windows share on my linux machine, and tryign to copy a file
to it, which is bigger than 2gbs, and it fails with a "maximum file size
exceeded" error.
the linux is running ext3, and windows is ntfs, so the size limit must be
somewhere in samb
31 matches
Mail list logo