On Wed, 2006-07-12 at 11:06 +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was trying smbmount (SuSE's samba-client-3.0.20b-3.4). The mount command
> replied:
> cli_negprot: SMB signing is mandatory and we have disabled it.
> 9451: protocol negotiation failed
> SMB connection failed
>
> No I'd suggest t
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 12:43:54PM +0500, Dmitry Melekhov wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Is there tdb format changes between 3.0.22 and 3.0.23?
>
> I get after upgrade from smbstatus:
Yes the format changed. You must use the new smbstatus
that shipped with 3.0.23.
Jeremy.
--
To unsubscribe from this lis
>If the only reason for the UPN is so its more like MIT, then I'm inclined
to push back and say just precreate
>the machine account with a UPN before joining the domain.
>Or I could add a switch to 'net ads join' that said "create the UPN". I
don't really want to make it default
>behavior. Woul
Jerry,
>> I used the convention which I'm accustomed to which is that the host
>> should be added in fqdn form since I was modifying the code myself.
>> i.e. host/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Help me understand how you use 'kinit -k' What kind of cron jobs are these?
>And why can't you use 'kinit -k mac
Checkout this link
http://forums.us.dell.com/supportforums/board/message?board.id=pv_nas&message.id=341&query.id=16070#M341
_
This mail sent using V-webmail - http://www.v-webmail.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL
I've verified that this patch solves my problem. Although I note that
there are two copies of the patch in the attachment.
==
M. D. Parker
Systems Administrator
General Atomics / Electromagnetic Systems
+1 858 455 2877
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original M
No I really mean DOMAIN\user = user
BTW, the patch provided to me works successfully.
==
M. D. Parker
Systems Administrator
General Atomics / Electromagnetic Systems
+1 858 455 2877
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Gerald (Jerry) Cart
Jerry,
Things still worked fine for existing domain members. I only noticed it
because I added a new system to the domain. Lines 962-964 of utils/net_ads.c
have comments about the upn but it's never being added. I rarely program in
"C" so this may not be the best way to do it but I modified line 97
Just for the record, I did find a workaround that seemed to work after
looking at the debug files a little more closely.
In the smbusers file (mapping account names to local names), I put in the
line
DOMAIN\user = user
And that seemed to work too. Not really the best solution for me
operationa
Hi,
I was asked to implement logon and logoff control in our network. I read
in the link below that those parameters are no used (unless not yet). Is
there any other way to do it? Or any hope that it will be implemented soon?
http://samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/passdb.html
Hello!
Is there tdb format changes between 3.0.22 and 3.0.23?
I get after upgrade from smbstatus:
131209 794911341 unknown-please report ! e->share_access =
0x44b5eb35, e->private_options = 0x2314d
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
Hi all,
I've setup a samba server that use vfs extd_audit module and I got a
problem with Japense file name and folder name. After being written to
syslog, all those Japanese name are changed to
æ\226°ã\201\227ã\201\204ã\203\225ã\202(c)ã\203«ã\203\200
Is there anyone that have same problem? How d
No offense intended, but what is the purpose of
adding the variations of case especially with respect to
the FQDN?
Too much guessing IMO.
True. Very true. But I'll chime in with "we got there after
numerous authentication failures at different sites".
It always seemed there had to be a diffe
On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 14:23:14 -0800
Damien Hull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > And yes, I did it with '/usr/bin/passwd %u' too. No success, no traces.
> >
> > Maybe the developers have some light the shed on this. (anyone?,please?)
> >
> > Still waiting for directions...
> >
> I'm seeing the same
Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ben Greear wrote:
While working on adding support for local-binding, I found this piece of
code
in libmsrpc.c. Maybe I'm confused..but should that strcmp maybe be
compared to != 0?
/*change the server name in the se
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ben Greear wrote:
> While working on adding support for local-binding, I found this piece of
> code
> in libmsrpc.c. Maybe I'm confused..but should that strcmp maybe be
> compared to != 0?
>
>/*change the server name in the server handle if neces
While working on adding support for local-binding, I found this piece of code
in libmsrpc.c. Maybe I'm confused..but should that strcmp maybe be compared to
!= 0?
/*change the server name in the server handle if necessary*/
if(srv && hnd->server && strcmp(hnd->server, srv) == 0) {
S
Hello,
I'm using SaMBa to share homedirs of a linux server. Since version
3.0.23, when i try to reach the home dir of a user that have the
server's name i have this error:
auth/auth_util.c:create_token_from_username(1059)
[user_name_here] is a Domain, not a user
This happens only with securi
Hello,
I've seen other folks posting with this problem, but I think my issue is a
bit different (thus the super long subject).
The environment is Solaris 9 09/05, running Samba 3.0.22/Sun DS 5.2/idealx
scripts 0.9.1, but I can translate openldap/linux/samba-ese if you think of
a solution that wou
Ethy H. Brito (by way of Ethy H. Brito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 10:18:13 -0500
Adam Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ls -l /tmp/teset results in what? mayve you should comment that out and
uncomment the /ur/bin/passwd %u line.
Mr. Willians
Thank you for y
zdennis wrote:
> Ok, Here is my samba log. Authentication succeeds but my user still
> gets "The system could not log you on. Make sure your User
> name and domain are correct..." Any ideas?
>
same problem here..
>
> --
> Regards,
> Dariusz Dwornikowski Network Administrator
> Cognifide Pola
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Scott Armstrong wrote:
>> Or I could add a switch to 'net ads join' that said
>> "create the UPN". I don't really want to make it
>> default behavior. Would that be acceptable?
>
> That would be fine although if you can allow the format
> of the h
On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 10:18:13 -0500
Adam Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ls -l /tmp/teset results in what? mayve you should comment that out and
> uncomment the /ur/bin/passwd %u line.
>
Mr. Willians
Thank you for your time.
As I said earlier, 'passwd program' is not called!
But answer
Paul Henry skrev:
Hi all,
Are these still the best ways to automate software installs and
updates via a Samba/LDAP Domain?
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=samba&m=111598734205575&w=2
Thanks,
Paul.
you can try altiris too
http://www.altiris.com/
--
Venlig Hilsen (Best Regards)
Rune Tønnesen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Scott Armstrong wrote:
>> And why can't you use 'kinit -k machine$'?
>
> I probably could do that but I had been trying to keep
> things as close to the way I had been creating machine
> principals when using an MIT KDC - host/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ok, Here is my samba log. Authentication succeeds but my user still gets "The
system could not log you on. Make sure your User
name and domain are correct..." Any ideas?
[2006/07/13 15:56:06, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(1194)
Transaction 40 of le
At 01:15 PM 7/13/2006, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Don Meyer wrote:
> Were it up to me, I'd post the RPMs for RHEL with
> a prominent disclaimer on the support issue. (But
> then I'd probably want to separate builds
> for RHEL3/RHEL4...) Many p
Hello!
My company makes testing software that, among other things, can be used
to generate file-system traffic. In order to better support Samba, I need
to make a few changes to the way samba mounts file systems:
1) I need to be able to specify the local IP address for the socket connection.
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 01:49:46PM -0500, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Andreas Hasenack wrote:
>
> >>I got the following patch (inline) attached from Volker's
> >> original message, hope it helps. Kind regards,
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > I t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
M. D. Parker wrote:
> No I really mean DOMAIN\user = user
I guess that makes sense... clever. Hmmm
jerry
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFEtpeS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andreas Hasenack wrote:
>> I got the following patch (inline) attached from Volker's
>> original message, hope it helps. Kind regards,
>
> Thanks
>
> I think there is a new one, though:
>
> http://viewcvs.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/branches
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Scott Armstrong wrote:
> Things still worked fine for existing domain members.
> I only noticed it because I added a new system to
> the domain. Lines 962-964 of utils/net_ads.c have
> comments about the upn but it's never being added.
> I rarely pro
Hello: I'm away on holidays right now!
If this is an Urgent ticket please submit a repair ticket
herehttp://ts.sd57.bc.ca
I will be checking my mail still every few days
Or Page #613-4732
Thanks
Benny.nerd
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 02:43:31PM -0300, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 07/13/2006 01:27 PM, Andreas Hasenack escreveu:
> > On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 01:01:27PM +0200, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> >>The attached patch adds the S-1-22-1- to the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Scott Armstrong wrote:
> I've been using the built-in keytab management and it looks
> like the updated code no longer creates the userPrincipal
> in Active Directory.
I'm still working on the keytab code. There will be more
updates. Sorry I couldn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Don Meyer wrote:
> Were it up to me, I'd post the RPMs for RHEL with
> a prominent disclaimer on the support issue. (But
> then I'd probably want to separate builds
> for RHEL3/RHEL4...) Many people aren't aware of
> the improved ability to buil
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 12:53:19PM +0200, Thijs Hakkenberg wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> One particular user is kicked quite often (espescially during the usage
> of Outlook). When she tries to login she isn't very succesfull. The
> serverlog show this:
>
> Jul 13 10:41:14 server smbd[12277]: [2006/07/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Felipe Augusto van de Wiel wrote:
> On 07/13/2006 01:27 PM, Andreas Hasenack escreveu:
>>> On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 01:01:27PM +0200, Volker Lendecke wrote:
The attached patch adds the S-1-22-1- to the user's
token. It is a bit larger than str
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alan Munter wrote:
> I just patched our domain controllers with MS06-035
> because it said it was just fixing a couple of memory
> leak problems with SMB in srvsvc.
>
> Now, this afternoon, one of my colleagues tried to
> join a FC5 machine to our
On Thursday July 13 2006 12:39 pm, you wrote:
> Dimitri Yioulos wrote:
> > Serious apologies if this has been discussed before,
> > but my search didn't turn up much:
> >
> > I have samba (kept up-to-date with latest) running on
> > several CentOS 3 and 4 boxes as part of a Win2k3
> > domain. On o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/13/2006 01:27 PM, Andreas Hasenack escreveu:
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 01:01:27PM +0200, Volker Lendecke wrote:
>>The attached patch adds the S-1-22-1- to the user's
>>token. It is a bit larger than strictly necessary, but the
>>minimum diff size
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Doug,
> File a bug report if you believe this to be true. I'm
> not at 3.0.23 right now and don't have the time to try it
> here. I wouldn't want to lose this. I did see a mention
> they dropped support of joins from machines where
> the domain dif
Hi,
During testing I discovered something interesting with different mount
methods. This is the environment:
PDC = RedHat rhel4, 2.6.9-34.0.2ELsmp kernel, samba version 3.0.10-1.4E.6
Client = SuSE sles9, 2.6.5-7244-smp kernel, samba version 3.0.20b-3.4-SUSE
I have a share (shareB) with att
Upgrading krb5 seems to solve the problem. No more errors and wbinfo
does not seg fault winbind.
krb-1.5.1
Toan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ngo,
Toan
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 1:58 PM
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: RE: [Samb
Dear all,
Hi. I'm a Samba user from Taiwan. I'm running Samba 3.0.23,
Debian GNU/Linux 3.1r2, Linux kernel 2.6.16.14, gcc 3.4.4. I encounter
the following strange message when using smbmount:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/tmp % smbmount //cotton/share ~/tmp/cotton
added interface ip=192.168.0.1 bcas
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 01:01:27PM +0200, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> The attached patch adds the S-1-22-1- to the user's
> token. It is a bit larger than strictly necessary, but the
> minimum diff size would have made the code a bit clumsy.
I think the patch was removed, or you forgot to attach it.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Trimble, Ronald D wrote:
> It looks like the latest release does work. Thanks
> for the help guys!
:-) Great! One less bug :-)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozd
On Thursday July 13 2006 12:28 pm, you wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 11:28:29AM -0400, Dimitri Yioulos wrote:
> > Serious apologies if this has been discussed before, but my
> > search didn't turn up much:
> >
> > I have samba (kept up-to-date with latest) running on several
> > CentOS 3
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Griffith wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am in the process of upgrading from v3.0.20a to
> v3.0.23 with our local passdb plugin. The plugin
> complies without any issues.
Have up dated your code? The passdb interface has
modified pretty heavily for 3.0.23.
It looks like the latest release does work. Thanks for the help guys!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Trimble, Ronald D
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 3:49 PM
To: Gerald (Jerry) Carter
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE
I was doing a netstat and grepping for winbind so I missed the entry.
Thanks.
Toan
-Original Message-
From: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 9:40 AM
To: Ngo, Toan
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [SAMBA] winbind: how can I tell which DC
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ngo, Toan wrote:
> Following up again to see if anyone can point me in
> the right direction.
netstat.
jerry
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFEtndQI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dimitri Yioulos wrote:
> Serious apologies if this has been discussed before,
> but my search didn't turn up much:
>
> I have samba (kept up-to-date with latest) running on
> several CentOS 3 and 4 boxes as part of a Win2k3
> domain. On one partic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
My windows xp clients do not have the groups Domain Users, Domain Groups,
Domain Admins, etc... Are they supposed to have those
groups?
My windows xp laptop has joined my domain, but I cannot login (even though my
LDAP backend is getting queried suc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rex Dieter wrote:
> Dietrich Streifert wrote:
>
>> I found a bug in nsswitch/pam_winbind.c which I reported to
>> https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3916
>> I submitted shortly a patch which solves the issue.
>
> I can confirm that patch work
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 03:39:33PM +0200, Dietrich Streifert wrote:
> Hello List,
>
> is there any documentation of pam_winbind.conf for pam_winbind.so in
> samba-3.0.23.
Currently not, I should write a manpage for that though.
> Especially what value is necessary for krb5_ccache_type to
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 11:28:29AM -0400, Dimitri Yioulos wrote:
> Serious apologies if this has been discussed before, but my search
> didn't turn up much:
>
> I have samba (kept up-to-date with latest) running on several CentOS 3
> and 4 boxes as part of a Win2k3 domain. On one particula
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Basso Stefano wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I upgrade SAMBA from 3.0.22 to 3.0.23 release
>
> Samba version 3.0.22-0.1.10-SUSE-SL10.0
>
> -rwxrwx---+ 1 test Domain Users 1150816 Apr 19 20:14 snap.bmp
> -rwxrwx---+ 1 test Domain Users654096 Apr 19 20:2
On Thu, 13 Jul 2006, Dimitri Yioulos wrote:
Serious apologies if this has been discussed before, but my search
didn't turn up much:
just so you dont feel like you're the only one. my winbind also crashes
quite regularly
Not that it is the right thing to do but, I have set up a cron job to s
Following up again to see if anyone can point me in the right direction.
Thanks,
Toan
Ngo, Toan wrote:
> Winbind appears to lose connections every once in a while.
> Is there a way to tell which Domain Controller winbind is making
> connections to? I have 3 DCs currently and trying to track down
Dietrich Streifert wrote:
> I found a bug in nsswitch/pam_winbind.c which I reported to
> https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3916
> I submitted shortly a patch which solves the issue.
I can confirm that patch works as advertised, and fixes the issue for me.
Many thanks Dietrich.
-- Rex
Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
o Winbind IDMAP integration with RFC2307 schema objects supported
by Windows 2003 R2.
Is there any documentation on this feature. I currently use Sun's ISW
sync to sync my LDAP source with my ADS source outside of the scope of
Samba. So my all my users are
Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
o Winbind IDMAP integration with RFC2307 schema objects supported
by Windows 2003 R2.
Is there any documentation on this feature. I currently use Sun's ISW
sync to sync my LDAP source with my ADS source outside of the scope of
Samba. So my all my users a
On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 12:14 -0300, Ethy H. Brito wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 18:53:56 -0300
> "Ethy H. Brito" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi again
>
> Can anyone help me with this, please?
> Any doc, FAQ, whatever? I am not afraid reading these.
> Google was not my friend this time (or maybe
Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
o Winbind IDMAP integration with RFC2307 schema objects supported
by Windows 2003 R2.
Is there any documentation on this feature. I currently use Sun's ISW
sync to sync my LDAP source with my ADS source outside of the scope of
Samba. So my all my users are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
M. D. Parker wrote:
> Just for the record, I did find a workaround that
> seemed to work after looking at the debug files a
> little more closely.
>
> In the smbusers file (mapping account names to local
> names), I put in the line
>
> DOMAIN\use
Serious apologies if this has been discussed before, but my search
didn't turn up much:
I have samba (kept up-to-date with latest) running on several CentOS 3
and 4 boxes as part of a Win2k3 domain. On one particular box,
winbind dies on a regular basis (all the other installations run
flawle
I am subscribed to another list for the Exim MTA.
I have been experiencing a similar problem to it for quite a long time.
I believe the patch supplied by Alain Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and
his discussion on the list mail could be quote relevant to Samba.
Here is the start of the thread.
http
On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 10:40 -0400, Eric Evans wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a minor problem wherein Samba is creating roaming profiles for users
> who logon to our lab's domain. I don't want roaming profiles. Since I'm
> not using the "logon path" command in my smb.conf, and I don't have a
> [pr
CentOS4 RPMS for x86-64 would be awesome.
---
Tony Hoover, Network Administrator
KSU - Salina, College of Technology and Aviation
(785) 826-2660
"Don't Blend in..."
---
Hi,
I am in the process of upgrading from v3.0.20a to v3.0.23 with our
local passdb plugin. The plugin complies without any issues.
Our User DataBase contains all our users accounts but not system
accounts. With Samba v3.0.20a this wasn't a problem.
Why th change between v3.0.20a and v3.0.23 ?
On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 18:53:56 -0300
"Ethy H. Brito" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi again
Can anyone help me with this, please?
Any doc, FAQ, whatever? I am not afraid reading these.
Google was not my friend this time (or maybe I did not know how to ask).
Regards
Ethy
>
> Hi all
>
> I trying t
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 11:44:05AM +0200, Marc Petitmermet wrote:
> I was wondering if samba-3.0.10-1.4E.6-x86_64, which is now available
> through the RedHat Network channel, includes the necessary patches or
> not.
This is something which you should ask RedHat.
Volker
pgpxKTm2Z7RXd.pgp
De
Hello,
I have a minor problem wherein Samba is creating roaming profiles for users
who logon to our lab's domain. I don't want roaming profiles. Since I'm
not using the "logon path" command in my smb.conf, and I don't have a
[profile] share in my smb.conf either, I cant' figure out why Samba
Hi,
Brief history:
Ive got a domain controller with domain logons, users and
passwords are kept in a normal smbpasswd file.
Normally users can log in, but only those, who previously could
log in to the domain.
New users cannot log to domain on the client machines.
Ho
Hello List,
is there any documentation of pam_winbind.conf for pam_winbind.so in
samba-3.0.23.
Especially what value is necessary for krb5_ccache_type to create a
ticket file for the user in /tmp?
Thank you for your help.
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Dietrich Streifert
Visionet GmbH
--
To
we use http://www.wpkg.org
i would suggest you check it out.
Excellent! Thanks.
Paul Henry wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Are these still the best ways to automate software installs and
> updates via a Samba/LDAP Domain?
>
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=samba&m=111598734205575&w=2
>
> Thanks,
>
> P
we use http://www.wpkg.org
i would suggest you check it out.
Paul Henry wrote:
Hi all,
Are these still the best ways to automate software installs and
updates via a Samba/LDAP Domain?
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=samba&m=111598734205575&w=2
Thanks,
Paul.
--
To unsubscribe from this lis
"Piotr Legiecki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hi
>
> I have samba 3.0.14a (debian/stable) and wonder where the problem is
> that running this command:
>
> # net groupmap add ntgroup="Domain Admins" unixgroup=ntadmins rid=512
> type=d
> gives:
> adding entry for grou
Hello: I'm away on holidays right now!
If this is an Urgent ticket please submit a repair ticket
herehttp://ts.sd57.bc.ca
I will be checking my mail still every few days
Or Page #613-4732
Thanks
Benny.nerd
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
"zdennis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Jamrock,
>
> Thanks for your reply. I just got my windows xp client to join the domain.
After some alterations that Robert had me make in
> another thread, I believe that fixe
Hi List,
One particular user is kicked quite often (espescially during the usage
of Outlook). When she tries to login she isn't very succesfull. The
serverlog show this:
Jul 13 10:41:14 server smbd[12277]: [2006/07/13 10:41:14, 0]
lib/util_sock.c:write_data(554)
Jul 13 10:41:14 server smbd[1
Hi all,
Are these still the best ways to automate software installs and
updates via a Samba/LDAP Domain?
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=samba&m=111598734205575&w=2
Thanks,
Paul.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailma
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 09:04:22AM -0700, M. D. Parker wrote:
> Ok...ok...I'll appologize to the everybody. And yes I do understand that
> bugs unreported cannot be fixed, but on a 'beta' you cannot be very sure
> that maybe what you built was not quite right. I remember this because I
> tried on
Martin Zielinski writes:
although this should not occur on W2k client machines, please take a
look at the "Windows XP SP2 slow printing solution" thread.
http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2004-November/096146.html
and http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2004-November/096492.html
The symp
I found a bug in nsswitch/pam_winbind.c which I reported to
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3916
I submitted shortly a patch which solves the issue.
In _pam_parse (pam_winbind.c) there are two for statements which consume the
parameters argc and argv. The first loop decrements argc a
Dear List Members
We are currently using samba-3.0.10-1.4E.2-x86_64 on RedHat AS 4. And
it seems that we are suffering of the same problems reported here:
http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2005-April/104335.html
problems with the service pack 1 for windows 2003
[2005/04/25 02:06:33, 0]
Hi Piotr
I had all these problems too... and posted here, but no solution. The only
solution I found was to delete the group/user entirely, and specify the RID
at the same time as you create the group/user. It's ok then. However, once
I had the error (although the RID changed), I had a corru
Scott Armstrong wrote:
First thing - I'd like to say a big "THANK YOU" to the developers.
I just upgraded to samba-3.0.23 and I've noticed an alarming issue with
respect to my configuration.
I've been using the built-in keytab management and it looks like the updated
code no longer creates the us
Hi
I have samba 3.0.14a (debian/stable) and wonder where the problem is
that running this command:
# net groupmap add ntgroup="Domain Admins" unixgroup=ntadmins rid=512
type=d
gives:
adding entry for group Domain Admins failed!
but (note changed rid)
# net groupmap add ntgroup="Domain Admins
90 matches
Mail list logo