I have a fedora core 5 server running samba-3.0.23c-1.fc5 from fedora
updates. Recently I changed smb.conf to use security=domain instead of
security=user. The server that it authenticates against is running
fedora core 4 with samba-3.0.14a-2.
Anyway, this setup worked just fine for a couple
Guido Lorenzutti wrote:
Maybe I can do this with the "check password script". But I only found
the cracklib example. Anyone knows a way of doing this? Becouse the
cracklib example only check agains a dictionary.
Tnxs in advance.
Just make a simple script that can check the input password must
Hi Guido,
There are a set of ways to accomplish such task.
Some I use is:
1) Set obey pam restrictions = yes in the smb.conf file.
2) Set check password script = /usr/sbin/crackcheck -d /usr/lib/cracklib_dict
This check the user password against a dictionary. Crackcheck can be
downloaded from sam
On Thu, 2006-11-30 at 19:17 -0500, Sebastien wrote:
> Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz a écrit :
> > CHAP and any other varian wont work because password does not fly accross
> > internet, CHAP use a hash to crypt one way password and sends that to
> > server.
> > Because server have a hash also (no sa
Maybe I can do this with the "check password script". But I only found
the cracklib example. Anyone knows a way of doing this? Becouse the
cracklib example only check agains a dictionary.
Tnxs in advance.
Gary Dale wrote:
I think you'll find at least some of these are Windows Policies and
wo
On Tue, 2006-12-26 at 16:28 -0600, James A. Dinkel wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Andrew Bartlett
> > Sent: Saturday, December 23, 2006 3:42 PM
> >
> > The biggest thing users will notice is that the error message system
> > returns contextual errors, with the actual reason for th
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeremy Allison
> Sent: Monday, December 25, 2006 12:03 AM
>
> It's true I'm leaving Novell, but why do you think this means
> I'm not going to be on any Samba lists ? I'm joining Google on
> 2nd Jan, and believe me when I tell you they're *very* interested
> i
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Bartlett
> Sent: Saturday, December 23, 2006 3:42 PM
>
> The biggest thing users will notice is that the error message system
> returns contextual errors, with the actual reason for the failure, not
> just the translated code. It often includes the vita
Hi,
I have Samba 3.0.13 running on Suse 9.2 on an i586.
I can browse and connect to the Samba shares on the Linux machine from Windows
XP and Mac OSX.
However, about 1 min after connecting, the shares are lost and gone from the
network environment - same for Windows XP and Mac OSX. From time
Hi,
I have Samba 3.0.13 running on Suse 9.2 on an i586.
I can browse and connect to the Samba shares on Windows XP and Mac OSX.
However, about 1 min after connecting, the shares are lost and gone from the
network environment - same for Windows XP and Mac OSX.
The Windows shares mounted on th
On Tuesday 26 December 2006 15:40, Chris Worley wrote:
> The attached message is 2001, but was the top of the list in a Google
> search for the error message.
>
> The same solution fixed a SuSE 9.3 Samba/Cups problem for a Brother
> MFC 3360C printer.
No longer necessary unless you're running old
On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 02:45:49PM -0600, Chris Garrigues wrote:
>
> What I really meant is "Why are they very interested in Samba?" I'm having a
> hard time imagining the Samba-based offering that Google might have in mind,
> but the idea is intriguing enough that I can't stop thinking about i
> From: Jeremy Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 12:42:03 -0800
>
> On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 12:54:52PM -0600, Chris Garrigues wrote:
> >
> > I must admit to being intrigued as to why they're *very* interested in your
> > working on Samba fulltime. Is it just to poke at the f
On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 12:54:52PM -0600, Chris Garrigues wrote:
>
> I must admit to being intrigued as to why they're *very* interested in your
> working on Samba fulltime. Is it just to poke at the folks in Redmond or is
> there more to it than that?
Not everything is about Microsoft :-). No
The attached message is 2001, but was the top of the list in a Google
search for the error message.
The same solution fixed a SuSE 9.3 Samba/Cups problem for a Brother
MFC 3360C printer.
Thanks!
Original message:
Bill Schoolcraft bill at wiliweld.com
Sat Dec 29 13:36:02 GMT 200
> From: Jeremy Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2006 22:02:32 -0800
>
> It's true I'm leaving Novell, but why do you think this means
> I'm not going to be on any Samba lists ? I'm joining Google on
> 2nd Jan, and believe me when I tell you they're *very* interested
> in me spendin
Whew.. God that's good news. Best of luck in the new office!
--
David C. Rankin, J.D., P.E.
510 Ochiltree Street
Nacogdoches, Texas 75961
(936) 715-9333
(936) 715-9339 fax
www.rankinlawfirm.com
--
- Original Message -
From: "Jeremy Allison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "david ran
I think you'll find at least some of these are Windows Policies and
would not be reflected in the smb.conf file. If you check the Samba
Howto collection and the Samba by example documents at samba.org, you'll
find examples of how to set some of the policies.
To be honest, I've never gone beyon
Hi people! I have a few problems with the password strength in Samba.
I have a PDC with LDAP on Debian Stable, with a few packages from backports.
The problem is that I can't find a way to enforce strenght to the
passwords of the users. I can't define a policy to force things like:
number of upp
Asier Baranguán schrieb:
> Hi all!
>
> I've a computer acting as a PDC in a network with Samba+OpenLDAP working
> fairly well ina Debian Sarge for several months (Samba servers, XP
> cients). It's working so well that my company wants to deploy this
> system to all the offices (five offices physic
Hi all!
I've a computer acting as a PDC in a network with Samba+OpenLDAP working fairly well ina
Debian Sarge for several months (Samba servers, XP cients). It's working so well that my
company wants to deploy this system to all the offices (five offices physically separated).
Each office has
21 matches
Mail list logo
