I have found in the past that restarting samba has corrected this particular issue
I had similar problems in the past where a flaky network would lead to a
users connection dropping out. I used reset on zero vc, it greatly
improved the situation (and we are slowly replacing the dodgy
Gary Dale schrieb:
No. XP is closing your mapped drives, not your profile share. That's
something that Windows knows about, just like it knows which server to
validate your password against.
I doubt that the server speed is an issue either. However, I am
concerned about you running the
Hello!
Looks like this policy doesn't work for win2000 domain members.
Could somebody confirm this?
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Hello,
I can use wbinfo -u or wbinfo -g to see all AD accounts, getent
group or getent passwd also can see all AD accounts, but after added
one new user in AD, I can use wbinfo -u to see this user, but getent
passwd cannot.
Thanks
--
By linking web mail system
--
To unsubscribe from
It would help if you stated the exact version of samba on the both
machines.
smbd --version
cheers,
henrik
14 mar 2007 kl. 15:47 skrev Doug Tucker:
Nobody?
Forwarded Message
From: Doug Tucker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: [Samba] problem writing
Hi,
Gerry's response explain the why. Here is a possible fix, but beware
the added load...
use
hostname lookups = yes
in section [global]
Charles
On 12 mars 07, at 09:44, Robert Smol wrote:
Hi,
I would like to have [backup] service hosted on samba machine,
resolving
each
Hello
i'm trying to export the old passwd/smbpasswd account to the ldap directory
with pdbedit :
pdbedit -e tdbsam:test
pdbedit -i tdbsam:test
but when i do that there is no posix informations.
what is the way to have those informations ?
thank you
--
Originally, I set up a PDC with Debian and Samba 3.0.14a. Users and
groups (both unix and Samba) are in Openldap.
There are a couple of Samba domain members which get users and groups
via winbind from my PDC. In order to have consistent user/group ids an
Ldap Idmap is used by all Samba
hi list,
we have plans to implement GPFS in our heterogeneous environment (win,
linux and mac clients; many linux servers) to scale better in file
serving and improve availability.
are there any recommendations regarding samba and GPFS and samba
co-existing with NFSv4 (ACLs!) on GPFS on the same
Gary Dale schrieb:
No. XP is closing your mapped drives, not your profile share. That's
something that Windows knows about, just like it knows which server to
validate your password against.
I doubt that the server speed is an issue either. However, I am
concerned about you running the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/15/2007 04:02 AM, Dmitry Melekhov wrote:
Hello!
Looks like this policy doesn't work for win2000 domain members.
Could somebody confirm this?
Sorry, I can't, but if nobody replies, you should think
about reporting a bug.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/14/2007 12:50 PM, drweb wrote:
Hello!
I found at my smbd.log many record, like this:
[2007/03/14 18:15:00, 0] lib/util.c:close_low_fds(668)
Didn't get file descriptor 0
What this means?
Sorry, I don't think that it will
Hello Volker and List
This is exactly the same as discussed a couple of weeks ago:
for me it seems that cluster support in samba gets more and more
important. i know that there´s already a lot of work done and in
progress. and also it´s really a big challenge to implement these
HA-services.
i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/14/2007 11:06 AM, Paul Traylor wrote:
[...]
os level = 35
[...]
Any chances that you have a Windows machine around (like
a 2000 server or a 2003) that could win the election and answering
the domain requests instead of you samba
Felipe Augusto van de Wiel пишет:
On 03/15/2007 04:02 AM, Dmitry Melekhov wrote:
Hello!
Looks like this policy doesn't work for win2000 domain members.
Could somebody confirm this?
Sorry, I can't, but if nobody replies, you should think
about reporting a bug.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jason Haar wrote:
Hi there
We just had a problem where a user couldn't connect to a Samba server
that is a full ADS member. The same user could successfully connect to
Windows2K3 servers.
The problem was obvious - their clock was 5 hours out,
Hello all,
Got a problem with samba (from what I can tell) and is similar to some
KB items here:
With version 3.0.4-6.3E of Samba, why do completed print jobs stay in
the print queue when printing to a Samba-shared printer from other Samba
or Windows clients?
And
I have Samba version 3.0.24
I'm having a randomly occurring problem with some of the laptops that
we maintain. They are joined to our Samba domain (samba-3.0.14a-1).
Every once in a while when they are disconnected from the local network
they will drop their cached domain passwords and will not allow the
user to log back
Hi,
thanks for reading, would be great if you could help me out with two
strange reoccuring problems.
Problem 1:
Currently we are running an IBM 206m with Debian Etch and Samba 3.0.24.
We have about 25 Clients which are running Windows XP SP2 or 2000 SP4.
3 of those Clients (XP) open and
On 3/7/07, Mark Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
3.0.23c-1
I am currently having 2 strange re-occuring issues, that seems to happen
sporadically. I am not sure if they are related.
Users are advised when trying to save a file that the Drive is full,
even though there is alot of free
Hi all,
i have some problems with the ldap replication of the samba database.
I have a samba installation with one PDC and one BDC. Both have their
local running openldap server.
The Ldap on the PDC should be the Master LDAP and the one on the BDC the
slave.
Replication works with slurpd
Hi,
I am facing a similar problem to what I faced sometime ago with Excel 11
when saving a modified xls file on a smb share: the application was
saying the file is already used by another user (although this was not
the case). The Excel problem was solved by adding a registry string
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 09:09:48AM -0500, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jason Haar wrote:
Hi there
We just had a problem where a user couldn't connect to a Samba server
that is a full ADS member. The same user could successfully connect to
Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 09:09:48AM -0500, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jason Haar wrote:
Hi there
We just had a problem where a user couldn't connect to a Samba server
that is a full ADS member. The same user could
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeremy Allison wrote:
Do you mean the CLOCK_SKEW returned in the SessionsetupX
call ? If so I'm testing a patch that will allow smbd
to return the same error
I'd have to go back and check traces again. It's been a while
since I looked at
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 03:27:16PM +0100, Michael Rignaz wrote:
Hi,
thanks for reading, would be great if you could help me out with two
strange reoccuring problems.
Problem 1:
Currently we are running an IBM 206m with Debian Etch and Samba 3.0.24.
We have about 25 Clients which are
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 11:07:04AM -0500, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeremy Allison wrote:
Do you mean the CLOCK_SKEW returned in the SessionsetupX
call ? If so I'm testing a patch that will allow smbd
to return the same error
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 11:07:04AM -0500, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeremy Allison wrote:
Do you mean the CLOCK_SKEW returned in the SessionsetupX
call ? If so I'm testing
My main file server is FC3 w/ samba running that lots of users have been
mapping to for years without any problem.
Just in the last week, this little problem popped up. The mappings from the
client side computers (win2k pro sp4) are still there and work, but M$ Office
(2k) doesn't want to
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 12:02:03AM -0400, Knox, Bill wrote:
We have updated our long-standing Samba install on a Solaris 8 box to
3.0.24 and are interested in making use of the Windows ACL mapping
capabilities to help take over a Windows share. However, there is a
snag - the pre-existing box
Hello,
We have a RHEL 4 Update 4 server that was configured to store its
Samba passwords in eDirectory via LDAP. This was accomplished by
adding the following three lines to the [Global] section of smb.conf:
ldap admin dn = cn=admin,o=budget
ldap suffix = o=budget
passdb backend =
I'm unable to mount a windows share on my linux box. I can use the
samba client to browse the share, but the mount fails:
$ smbclient //server/users -U domain/isillight
Password:
Domain=[DOMAIN] OS=[Windows Server 2003 3790 Service Pack 1] Server=[Windows
Server 2003 5.2]
smb: \
smb: \
Hi,
I have a Samba PDC with LDAP backend and the domain works quite well, except
for the permissions on the main data share...
I have been able to grant full control for my domain admin user, and read
access works fine for other users/groups, but any write access I grant seems
to get ignored.
Jeremy Allison wrote:
I'd have to go back and check traces again. It's been a while
since I looked at it. Is you patch assuming then that the
Samba server has correct time and the client does not?
I think the original problem was that the Samba server's clock
was off.
No I checked
Do all of the files you have problems with have strange characters in them? I had
this problem back when I upgraded a samba server and I think it had to do with the
new server's i18n character support or something like that. In particular, the
character for the 1/2 symbol was a problem.
I
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 07:47:12AM +1300, Jason Haar wrote:
It was a Win2K3 client with its clock hours off connecting to a Samba
server (with Win2K3 domain controllers at the back end) - with correct
clocks.
It was a nasty case. The problem was that it was a CentOS4 server
running
Mark Nienberg schrieb:
Do all of the files you have problems with have strange characters in
them? I had this problem back when I upgraded a samba server and I
think it had to do with the new server's i18n character support or
something like that. In particular, the character for the 1/2
Jeremy Allison wrote:
It truely is a strange case. I find that if I change
the clock on the client and log in it re-syncs the
time from the DC and all connections to servers work
(as you'd expect with the correct time).
If I log in then change the client time and then attach
to the Samba
Yes, in the security-tab when I am trying to add an ACL to a file on
the Samba share.
Let me extend the example a bit to explain what we are doing:
The server has a local username freddy, and the domain contains a user
fred_smith
The usernamemap file contains:
freddy = DOMAIN\fred_smith
When I
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 08:58:19AM +1300, Jason Haar wrote:
That is our situation. Whatever this VMware bug is, it is stopping the
virtualized OS from slewing the time. So I'd guess the OS fails to be
able to re-sync against the DC, and so it fails later when it tries
connecting to the
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 08:58:19AM +1300, Jason Haar wrote:
Jeremy Allison wrote:
It truely is a strange case. I find that if I change
the clock on the client and log in it re-syncs the
time from the DC and all connections to servers work
(as you'd expect with the correct time).
If
Jeremy Allison wrote:
The only way Windows servers could be handling this
situation is to ignore clock-skew errors on incoming
AP_REQ messages. I actually believe they're doing this,
and I can't let Samba do the same.
I suspected Windows was ignoring clock-slew events. Doesn't that mean
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 09:32:26AM +1300, Jason Haar wrote:
Jeremy Allison wrote:
The only way Windows servers could be handling this
situation is to ignore clock-skew errors on incoming
AP_REQ messages. I actually believe they're doing this,
and I can't let Samba do the same.
Hello,
I have two Samba PDCs and each trust each other. Users need to access both
server from each domains. To do this, I need the accounts of both domains
on each PDC.
When I run winbind on a memberserver, I get the users of both domains. But
not on the PDCs. Running winbind there, I see only
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 03:16:47PM -0400, Knox, Bill wrote:
Yes, in the security-tab when I am trying to add an ACL to a file on
the Samba share.
Let me extend the example a bit to explain what we are doing:
The server has a local username freddy, and the domain contains a user
fred_smith
Yes - I assumed that is what is allowing it to work if I create a
fred_smith user on the Unix box (which then works fine), and what is
letting wbinfo work. It seems to really be the mapping that would be
required to make winbindd know that fred_smith in the domain is the
same as freddy on the Unix
Hi all!
I've a running Samba PDC (LDAP backend) with windows clients. All the users
are in the LDAP, including the 'guest' user. All except the 'root' user which
is a regular user. Then change in the smb.conf
ldapsam:trusted = yes
ldapsam:editposix = yes
and noticed some speed-up when listing
I'm experiencing some problems with Samba-LDAP and I wanna know a little
more about the structure of SSID.
Does anyone know where I can find information about this?
--
Allysson Steve Mota Lacerda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.stevelacerda.net
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following
Author: metze
Date: 2007-03-15 07:22:49 + (Thu, 15 Mar 2007)
New Revision: 21842
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=21842
Log:
fix typo in comment
metze
Modified:
branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/repl_meta_data.c
Changeset:
Author: metze
Date: 2007-03-15 13:21:54 + (Thu, 15 Mar 2007)
New Revision: 21843
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=21843
Log:
the computer_dn isn't needed anymore because we don't manually reset the
password
anymore
metze
Modified:
At file:///home/jelmer/bzr.samba/4.0-envs/
revno: 11689
revision-id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
parent: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
parent: svn-v2:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
committer: Jelmer Vernooij [EMAIL PROTECTED]
branch nick: 4.0-envs
timestamp: Thu
Author: jra
Date: 2007-03-15 19:01:48 + (Thu, 15 Mar 2007)
New Revision: 21844
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=21844
Log:
Janitor for Stevef :
mount.cifs compile on old libc missing bind mount #define
Thanks to Thomas Jarosch for pointing this
Author: jra
Date: 2007-03-15 19:18:18 + (Thu, 15 Mar 2007)
New Revision: 21845
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=21845
Log:
Refactor the sessionsetupX code a little to allow us
to return a NT_STATUS_TIME_DIFFERENCE_AT_DC error to
a client when there's
Author: jra
Date: 2007-03-15 20:45:27 + (Thu, 15 Mar 2007)
New Revision: 21846
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=21846
Log:
Try and fix the Darwin build which seems to have a strange krb5.
Jeremy.
Modified:
Author: jra
Date: 2007-03-15 21:53:53 + (Thu, 15 Mar 2007)
New Revision: 21847
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=21847
Log:
Fix memory leaks in error paths (and in main code path in one case...)
in sasl bind. Wonder why coverity didn't find these ?
Author: jerry
Date: 2007-03-15 22:09:03 + (Thu, 15 Mar 2007)
New Revision: 21848
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=21848
Log:
add a comment about gss_import_name() and when to free the krb5 principal data
Modified:
Author: vlendec
Date: 2007-03-15 22:48:30 + (Thu, 15 Mar 2007)
New Revision: 21851
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=21851
Log:
Obvious typos...
Modified:
branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/libaddns/dnsgss.c
branches/SAMBA_3_0_25/source/libaddns/dnsgss.c
Author: mimir
Date: 2007-03-16 00:19:40 + (Fri, 16 Mar 2007)
New Revision: 21852
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=21852
Log:
Further work on initialising libnet context from netmgr.
rafal
Modified:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
+ if (typeof(parentNode.credentials) == object)
+ {
+ var creds = parentNode.credentials;
+ var request = _this.callRpc(samba.ejsnet, NetContext, [ creds ]);
+ request.setUserData(requestType, NetContext);
+ }
+ else
+ {
+
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 10:52:34PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
+ if (typeof(parentNode.credentials) == object)
+ {
+ var creds = parentNode.credentials;
+ var request = _this.callRpc(samba.ejsnet, NetContext, [ creds ]);
+
60 matches
Mail list logo
