On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 12:27:04PM -0500, Scott Mayo wrote:
> My current samba version is 3.0.10.1 and here is my smb.conf.
There have been some DFS related Vista fixes lately. Please
try the current SAMBA_3_0_25 branch or wait for the 3.0.25c
due very soon.
Volker
pgp1j073wm6Dw.pgp
Description
Hello,
I want to configure share for Windows like Postboxes. A user has a directory.
He could do with content what ever he want. All the world could only put in
files in the user directory.
I think this must be the Unix permissions: rwx --- -w-
How should i configure this share in samba ? I wo
Hi again,
In working on my previous problem with joining a domain, I'm trying to
join with AD instead of NTLM. I've got openldap v2.3.19 installed, and
the libraries are in my LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
configure --with-ads fails:
checking for LDAP support... auto
checking ldap.h usability... yes
che
I think you have 2 alternatives:
1 - configure this samba server out of your ad and create a thrusted
relationship allowing users from you ad domain access to this share.
2 - Configure your samba as a domain member of you ad comain and configure a
user in you ad with restricted access and give h
Favero Roger skrev:
Hi all,
that's my first post in this mailing list. I'm looking for a very
special and strange samba configuration (at least from my point of view
and my experience) and I'm not sure it is possible to reach this goal.
Anyway, this is my request:
I'm running a M$ Windows 2003
Hi all,
that's my first post in this mailing list. I'm looking for a very
special and strange samba configuration (at least from my point of view
and my experience) and I'm not sure it is possible to reach this goal.
Anyway, this is my request:
I'm running a M$ Windows 2003 Serve as PDC with Act
Hello,
Felipe Augusto van de Wiel schrieb:
> Have you tried "Interdomain Trusts"?
Yes. The problem is that I need to run winbind to get the accounts of each
other domain. But I can't run winbind on a PDC. I allready tried and found
the information from Gerald (Jerry) Carter:
http://www.gatago.co
I was just setting a Windows Vista machine up on my network and have the
following problems.
If the user logs into the domain, then there are no network drives
showing. It is as if the script is not executing.
If I logon locally with an administrator and then run '\\server-name' to
get a li
I suspect you are using Ubuntu (and/or Debian), which have a bug
regarding the Winbind cache.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/118977
On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 11:24 +0100, Simon Ashford wrote:
> Have just upgraded from 3.0.14a to 3.0.25b.
>
> On starting winbindd it puts the fol
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Marc Muehlfeld wrote, On 24-07-2007 09:26:
> Hello,
>
> I have two samba domains and I want to let users of each domain
> connect to shares of each other PDC.
>
> As long as I use samba <=3.0.22 it works fine (DOM1\user1 is
> automatically mapped to
Actually in this case userPrincipalName and sAMAccountname are different.
Is it possible that Samba only displays the sAMAccountname?
Also if those differ, is it possible that Samba will have problem
authenticating against AD using win2k name of the user?
On current version of samba that's whats h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Simon Ashford wrote:
> Have just upgraded from 3.0.14a to 3.0.25b.
>
> On starting winbindd it puts the following in /var/log/messages:
>
> initialize_winbindd_cache: clearing cache and re-creating with version
> number 1
>
> All the winbind UID/
Suppose I have a linux machine which has user abc (belongs to group def).
I mount a cifs share from a Windows server as user ghi.
The share has files with owner/Group domain1-jkl/mno, domain2-jkl/prq, prq/rst.
Now if these files were to be listed on the linux machine which
mounted this share,
wha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Felipe Augusto van de Wiel wrote:
> Imagining that Samba3 is not as good as Samba4 with AD
> and that Samba3 gives preference to NT4-style domains, probably
> it is using the pre-win2k names. If you create a user without
> "all the options that A
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> - Samba 3.0 (latest)
> - Samba 3.0 (older) - someone can remind me when we changed the join
> code
The join code was rewritten in 3.0.23 IIRC.
cheers, jerry
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (Darwin)
Hello,
I have two samba domains and I want to let users of each domain connect to
shares of each other PDC.
As long as I use samba <=3.0.22 it works fine (DOM1\user1 is automatically
mapped to DOM2\user2) , but later versions won't (DOM1\user1 is shown as
DOM1\user1 on PDC2).
How can I do
Ok, Seems I better do it.
So, which part of documentation I should start from? What information
normally user need?
Or probably I just teach them how to build from samba source, setup dns
server, join windows into domain and use dsa.msc?
Regards,
Ks
Regards,
Ks
在 2007-07-24二的 11:55 +0200,Ludek F
Hello,
I'm trying to get samba 3.0.25a working in a freebsd 6.2 jail. I believe
i had samba working previously on another system in a jail, but this time
i'm getting an error "No available network interfaces found". An ifconfig in
the jail shows he network interface and i can ssh in to the j
Hi,
after rebooting the server last weekend, we're still getting the same error
messages from winbind.
Jul 24 13:10:01 cvk027 winbindd[20648]: [2007/07/24 13:10:01, 0]
lib/util_str.c: safe_strcpy_fn(659)
Jul 24 13:10:01 cvk027 winbindd[20648]: ERROR: string overflow by 1 (256 -
255) in safe
Have just upgraded from 3.0.14a to 3.0.25b.
On starting winbindd it puts the following in /var/log/messages:
initialize_winbindd_cache: clearing cache and re-creating with version number
1
All the winbind UID/GID mappings are lost and it starts again from
scratch. Hence all file ownership /
> Regarding the documentation, I affraid my lousy english make user become
> more confuse. Sorry for that.
Don't affraid. A lot of people have problem with english. It's better to
have some documentation instead of no one. It's easiear (less time
consuming) to correct existing doc ;o)
I think a l
>On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 06:01:06PM +0100, Mac wrote:
>> >On one previous occasion, the whole thing seemed to grind to a virtual
>> >halt, and we suspected (but couldn't prove) that a locking battle over
>> >(something like) secrets.tdb was to blame.
>
>Can you just start winbind on that box? No li
Sure, and I will keep maintaining the live CD, and probably I'll make a
1 day work shop with few of my friend at end of next month(or next 2
month) to have a heavy test at Samba 4. Hope this help.
Regarding the documentation, I affraid my lousy english make user become
more confuse. Sorry for tha
On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 15:56 +0800, KS Tan wrote:
> Hi all,
> Ok, now I able to open up active directory via windows 2003
> 'dsa.msc' (you need to download and install adminpak if you use windows
> xp pro). However seems like it not yet stable and we can't add new OU.
Yeah, that's bug 4806: https:
Hi all,
Ok, now I able to open up active directory via windows 2003
'dsa.msc' (you need to download and install adminpak if you use windows
xp pro). However seems like it not yet stable and we can't add new OU.
I can't wait for newer version come out! Anything I can help to make the
progress beco
25 matches
Mail list logo