I am not sure if this is the correct list but I am having some issues with
CTDB and configuring it properly. I have gone through all the documentation
many many times and am still not able to get it setup and running correctly.
Is there a howto on setting up CTDB in a RedHat GFS cluster out there?
>maybe you are interested in using the 3.0.34 SerNet
>packages available at ftp://ftp.sernet.de/pub/samba/tested/
>(as a yum repo).
Thanks for the tip, Karolin!
--
Eric Robinson
Disclaimer - February 13, 2009
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely
At 10:52 AM Friday, 2/13/2009, Walter Mautner wrote -=>
Am Friday 13 February 2009 14:01:43 schrieb Ed Kasky:
> Over the past 2 days, my smbd processes are multiplying worse than
> rabbits. At least with rabbits it's easy to tell why you wind up
> with so many...
>
> Here's the setup:
> Samba ve
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 12:26:11PM -, Eddie Humphries wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I have been looking for a Windows alternative for File & Print servers.
> Currently, we are using Win 2003. Patching overhead and virus outbreaks
> are becoming problematic with reducing head count. I have looked
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 01:58:02PM -0800, Ed Kasky wrote:
> All the old ones say the same thing:
>
> # strace -p 22122
> Process 22122 attached - interrupt to quit
> write(22, "q", 1
>
> In the last hour they have increased from 3 to over 40 that are
> inactive. Smbstatus shows some locked files
At 06:18 AM Friday, 2/13/2009, you wrote -=>
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 05:01:43AM -0800, Ed Kasky wrote:
> It took two attempts to stop them all from the init script - the
> first run seemed to only kill about 2 or 3 and the second one
> finished the job. So I restarted and monitored the situation
Am Friday 13 February 2009 14:01:43 schrieb Ed Kasky:
> Over the past 2 days, my smbd processes are multiplying worse than
> rabbits. At least with rabbits it's easy to tell why you wind up
> with so many...
>
> Here's the setup:
> Samba version 3.2.8-0.24 installed via rpm on a FC6 box with 2 nic
Hello,
I'm having trouble connecting to an Apple Time Capsule's smb shares.
The connection doesn't work, and with "dmesg" I see the following
message, repeated every time I try:
[26937.531511] CIFS VFS: RFC1001 size 39 bigger than SMB for Mid=4
[26937.531580] Bad SMB: : dump of 48 bytes of data
On 2/13/2009, John Drescher (dresche...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Go figure.. Also, nothing really changed on the system apart from upgrading
> the samba package from 2 to 3.2.8, that's the strange thing..
Considering that is a HUGE jump in versions, should you really be
surprised that there are some is
Try with the "Force create mode" (or something similar to that, check the
man page) option in smb.conf. Set it to 0777
> I update to the version Version 3.0.33-3.7.el5 and change the directory
> permision to 2775, i can't solve the problem, however if i cut and paste a
> file in this share, work
I update to the version Version 3.0.33-3.7.el5 and change the directory
permision to 2775, i can't solve the problem, however if i cut and paste a
file in this share, work fine.
I think that the problem is in the file mask. When i create a file (rigth
click > create new > new text file) the perm
I add this users to the nobody group and add @nobody to "valid user" and
"write list" however i can't modify the file content, rename files or
create dirs, i can delete file.
thanks!
Javier
David Wells
13/02/2009 10:59
Para
Javier Arancibia
cc
samba@lists.samba.org
Asunto
Re: [Samba]
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 05:01:43AM -0800, Ed Kasky wrote:
> It took two attempts to stop them all from the init script - the
> first run seemed to only kill about 2 or 3 and the second one
> finished the job. So I restarted and monitored the situation and all
> seemed okay for a few hours and t
Rob Shinn skrev:
Did you try 'net use x: \\servername\loginname'? If that doesn't work
the other command won't work either.
Yes I did.. And both variants worked yesterday with Samba 2...
On 2/13/09, Anders Norrbring wrote:
Is 'net use x: /home' deprecated nowadays? I just upgraded a v
> It works alright, and all users have full access to their own home
> directories. Also, say user "elsa" logs in. She won't get a mapping to
> \\server\elsa via the 'net use j: /home' command, but she will get full
> access with 'net use j: \\server\elsa'
>
> Go figure.. Also, nothing really chang
John Drescher skrev:
Is 'net use x: /home' deprecated nowadays? I just upgraded a very old Samba 2
to 3.2.8 and suddenly no workstations at all can use that command to map to
their home directories.
Workstations are W2k, Win XP and Vista in a mix. Neither work.
It works for me (in my de
> Is 'net use x: /home' deprecated nowadays? I just upgraded a very old Samba 2
> to 3.2.8 and suddenly no workstations at all can use that command to map to
> their home directories.
> Workstations are W2k, Win XP and Vista in a mix. Neither work.
>
It works for me (in my department) and has be
Over the past 2 days, my smbd processes are multiplying worse than
rabbits. At least with rabbits it's easy to tell why you wind up
with so many...
Here's the setup:
Samba version 3.2.8-0.24 installed via rpm on a FC6 box with 2 nics,
both on the same subnet. The samba server acts as a PDC i
Javier,
If you mean to have usr1 and usr2 access this share I believe you
should have them as members of the nobody group and in the valid users
and write list have nobody group expressed as @nobody because plain
nobody refers to the nobody user, not the nobody group.
Best regards, Dav
Is 'net use x: /home' deprecated nowadays? I just upgraded a very old Samba 2
to 3.2.8 and suddenly no workstations at all can use that command to map to
their home directories.
Workstations are W2k, Win XP and Vista in a mix. Neither work.
Samba use LDAP as back end, and the related posts in sm
Hello to all,
I am running an older suse 8.2 PC with samba 2.27a. I configured suse to
work as an ldap client (the ldapserver runs on another machine) .
Getent passwd and getent group gives me all the ldap users and groups and
this users and groups can take ownership of files and folders.
Is
I configure Samba in Share mode, I can see the files but i can't
write/delete files in the directory "agenda"
The directory /o/aplic/NACSEG/agenda have this permission drwxrwxr-x and
the owner and group is agendaglm nobody
I have all valid users in the smbpasswd and /etc/passwd
This is the smb
Hi Derwyn!
Even though I don't have any experience with Samba4 I don't think
deploying software upgrades is even planed to be a part of the samba
core. That's why I wanted to point you to www.wpkg.org where you can
find a great piece of software that can help you with this matter.
Davi
Hi,
I've managed to get samba4 up and running with some of the group
functionalities tested and working.
What I did get stuck on and asking for help is that I wanted to set up a
users "Roaming" profile like in ADS.
and also if it is possible to control software updates like AD.
Just wanted to
NOBODY ?? Noone here with successfull experience on User Lockout using
Samba+LDAP ??
It is working here. Samba 3.2.7 and 3.2.8 with LDAP, over CentOS 5.2.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 10:33:03AM +0100, Axel Werner wrote:
> Is yours an OFFICIAL Answer to this problem ?? I cannot find ANY
> documents telling about not used or not implemented functionality on
> user lockout or those ldap attributes neither. So its hard to believe
> that those things are "
Hi Christian, thanks fer Answer.
Is yours an OFFICIAL Answer to this problem ?? I cannot find ANY
documents telling about not used or not implemented functionality on
user lockout or those ldap attributes neither. So its hard to believe
that those things are "spare" or "unused" even after YEAR
Hi,
not all Samba-LDAP attributes that are listed in the Samba3-LDAP-Schema are
working yet. IMHO the only source that mentions it clearly is the Samba HOWTO.
Please refer to
"http://de3.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/passdb.html#id2582136";
and search for "LDAP Special Attri
NOBODY ?? Noone here with successfull experience on User Lockout using
Samba+LDAP ??
i cant believe this.
Am 12.02.2009 16:24, Axel Werner schrieb:
Hi,
im trying to setup a password policy with samba and openldap. while
lockout works perfect on openldap it looks like it does not work with
m
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 06:22:00PM +0100, Helmut Hullen wrote:
> how and where can I set the "Logon hours" (shown with "pdbedit") to
> another value as "..."?
>
> I can work as (Linux) root. I need this option for some users.
Nope, not from what I can see in the code. Standard reply:
Feel f
Linux Addict wrote:
>
> Once for all, go ahead with rid and keep the smb.conf consistent across
> OR use rfc2307. RID is easier to manage.
Thanks very much for the advice Dale & Linux Addict.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to
31 matches
Mail list logo
