Hi,
> After join computer to domain then log on to Windows Xp with local
> administrator account and go to control panel -> addusers (select
> account from your domain) -> Grant access level to your domain account
> as "Administrator".
I missed the begining of the discussion, but I am using the
2009/7/10 Regis Niggemann :
> IF (and it's a big IF) a user HAS to have admin rights on the local machine,
> then grant that user those rights only on their primary machine. I
> acknowledge that it can be a pain to administer if you have a lot of users
> that use different machines. But in most c
IF (and it's a big IF) a user HAS to have admin rights on the local machine,
then grant that user those rights only on their primary machine. I
acknowledge that it can be a pain to administer if you have a lot of users
that use different machines. But in most circumstances, a single user uses
a s
2009/7/10 Regis Niggemann :
> Of course the problem with this method is you are granting that group admin
> rights to all those computers. If a single account in that group with those
> rights becomes infected with some malware, it is possible for that malware
> to infect ALL the computers.
>
Do
Of course the problem with this method is you are granting that group admin
rights to all those computers. If a single account in that group with those
rights becomes infected with some malware, it is possible for that malware
to infect ALL the computers.
Just saying...
> If you have 500 compu
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 2:18 AM, supha...@gmx.com wrote:
> Hi,
> This works for me ,you can try.
>
> After join computer to domain then log on to Windows Xp with local
> administrator account and go to control panel -> addusers (select
> account from your domain) -> Grant access level to your doma
Hi,
This works for me ,you can try.
After join computer to domain then log on to Windows Xp with local
administrator account and go to control panel -> addusers (select
account from your domain) -> Grant access level to your domain account
as "Administrator".
Or you can use "net" command to do t
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Norberto Bensa wrote:
> Forwarding this one to the list:
>
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 8:16 PM, Mohsen
> Pahlevanzadeh wrote:
>> Mylove is my netbios name & my workgroup name.
>
> Oh... That's a violation of the smb protocol :-)
>
> Your netbios name can't be your workg
Forwarding this one to the list:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 8:16 PM, Mohsen
Pahlevanzadeh wrote:
> Mylove is my netbios name & my workgroup name.
Oh... That's a violation of the smb protocol :-)
Your netbios name can't be your workgroup/domain name.
Try that on Windows if you don't believe me.
--
Thanks for the replies. I have modified the share portion of my
smb.conf file as shown below. Still no luck.
[test]
path = /home/2CP/darmstrong
browseable = yes
read only = yes
inherit permissions = yes
valid users = "2CP\darmstrong","buexec","test",itadmi
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 03:47:31PM +0200, dese...@linuxbox.cz wrote:
> i have problem with share with parametr "force user"
>
> Here i my settings of VFS modul recycle
>
> vfs object = recycle
> recycle:repository = .recycle/%u
> recycle:maxsize = 5000
>
My log.nmbd:
/
Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2008
[2009/07/10 03:16:29, 0] nmbd/nmbd.c:main(879)
standard input is not a socket, assuming -D option
[2009/07/10 03:16:29, 0] nmbd/nmbd_subnetdb.c
When i run net rpc join mylove -U root i see following log
in /var/log/samba/log.mylove :
[2009/07/10 02:54:12, 0]
passdb/pdb_interface.c:pdb_default_create_user(336)
_samr_create_user: Running the command `/usr/sbin/smbldap-useradd -w
mylove$' gave 9
when i saw it, i wanted to add to add by ha
Quoting steve :
New to this windows domain stuff, sorry ( at my age learning new stuff
can take a while ).
I've set up a domain and joined a couple of XP workstations to is and
all is fine. What I want to do now is to ensure that the users of these
PCs still have administrative rights on their
New to this windows domain stuff, sorry ( at my age learning new stuff
can take a while ).
I've set up a domain and joined a couple of XP workstations to is and
all is fine. What I want to do now is to ensure that the users of these
PCs still have administrative rights on their PC's.
Can anyone
Hello fellow Samba Users and Developers ...
Recently I have been struggling to clearly understand the current
documentation for IDMAP. There seems to be the old way of doing things
and the new way of doing things...and the documentation is not very
clear as to which way is appropriate for whi
[test]
path = /home/2CP/darmstrong
valid users = 2CP\darmstrong,2CP\buexec,2CP\test,itadmin
write list = 2CP\darmstrong,2CP\buexec,2CP\test,itadmin
read list =
Try setting up your share like this, I am not sure that you need the quotes
except of groups w
I've never seen this but the problem is that ld cannot find crt1.
Doing some searching it seems its part of the libc library. So for
some reason ld cannot find it. I'd say find where crt1 is located on
the system and make sure the path is right in ld.so.conf.
And just to be sure, install libc-deve
I am attempting to build 3.4.0 from source on my Ubuntu 8.04 box. I
have gcc installed. When I run ./configure it returns "C compiler
cannot create executables".
I have been looking through the config.log file and I think I found the
error message.
configure:3304: gccconftest.c >&5
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 4:18 AM, supha...@gmx.com wrote:
> Thank you for the clarification .
> Does it help if I add ROOT in a group of invalid user ?
>
I don't know. I never tried.
Why don't you just modify the uid for Administrator?
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and r
Hello everyone,
I have setup Samba 3.0.28a on an Ubuntu 8.04 server. The setup that I
am working with is an exact copy (as far as I can tell) if an identical
installation that I did on a test box. Kerberos is setup and working
properly. I can use kinit to issue tickets. The box has been
suc
All,
New to the list, but have used samba off and on over the years, though
not recently.
I just installed 3.3.3 on a FreeBSD 7.1 box, and joined it to our Win2k3 domain.
It seems to work just fine, though initially I got an error.
I did:
it-kbuff-fbsd# kinit _serv...@mycomany.com
The
Hi,
Sometimes I do not see the changes of domain group memberships with "getent
group" until I restart winbindd.
Is there a possibility to flush the cache? In smb.conf we set up "winbind cache time
= 60".
Winbindd-Version:
Version 3.0.28-0.5-1657-SUSE-CODE10
Thanks
smime.p7s
Description: S
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Norberto Bensa wrote:
> http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Ldapsam_Editposix
>
>
> Everything works. I can add users, list users, delete users (and
> groups) with "net rpc user..." I can join clients, etc.
>
> *But* wbinfo -u and -g gives:
>
> zool...@kvm-test-samba1:~
It seems leaving password server = * on the domain member causes it to
fail after a while as it fails to find any servers. Setting it to
explicitly saying password server = BISHOP ROSS gets it working again
but it still only talks to the PDC(in a different subnet).
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 10:53 AM,
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Mohsen
Pahlevanzadeh wrote:
> Can i hope to solve this problem?
It would help if you posted the samba log from the PDC that showed
what happened when you tried to join the domain. Also have you setup
your nss_switch.conf and are you running nscd?
John
--
To unsub
Can i hope to solve this problem?
On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 17:56 +0530, VIJAYAN wrote:
> Ok Millian thanks Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh
>
> Regards,
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh [mailto:moh...@pahlevanzadeh.org]
> Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 5:01 PM
> To: Adam Williams
> C
Hi,
have you some idea?
Lukas
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 08:27:53 +0200
From: dese...@linuxbox.cz
To: Dale Schroeder
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] VFS recycle & force user
I tried both - recycle:repository = .recycle/%U and also recycle
OPC oota wrote:
> Now, TOSHARG-StandAloneServer.xml translate to Japanese finished(3.3.4 base).
>
> and 1 typo found.
>
>
> If all that is needed is a server for read-only files, or for
> printers alone, it may not make sense to effect a complex installation.
> For example, a drafting office nee
The default setting for LDAP StartTLS changed between those versions,
watch out for that. Also, if you communicate with an AD, you will need
to configure your /etc/krb5.conf file with the newer one.
I've been running SerNet Samba for about a year, with excellent results.
It is a Repo, so when you
Hi
We have had a Samba 3.x PDC + OpenLDAP backend for a number of years,
but we are finding that there are some things we would like to do
which really require us to have an Active Directory Server.
I was just wondering is there any way I can import my Samba OpenLDAP
user objects (especially
Dear Adam,
I changed my machine & install Samba & Ldap in other machine with new
configuration.
Even getent paaswd & getent shadow is work well.Ldap doesn't has
problem.
Even i invoke :smbldap-useradd -w mylove
then i run net rpc join mylove -u root
Enter root's password:
Creation of workstation
Hi,
I have a samba server which should be part of domain, and have a one
share accesibile by a group from AD.
How can this done?
I tried to put samba in domaine, comunicate with AD but i cpuldn't
make the AD users to autehniticate and access the share.
I am using ubuntu, and despite of several
Hi guys,
On Jul 9, 2009, at 10:47 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
It is recommended to use rpm packages, since Centos only provides
very old version, many people are using samba from sernet repository:
On Jul 9, 2009, at 10:29 AM, Waltari Harri wrote:
Maybe you would take a look at Sernet Samba r
Niklas Saers kirjoitti:
Dear Sirs,
I'm running a vanilla CentOS 5.3 server, and yum there has Samba 3.0.33.
What's the recommended way to install Samba 3.4 as an upgrade over
3.0.33? Just ./configure && make && sudo make install ?
Cheers
It is recommended to use rpm packages, since Centos
Hi Kasper,
On Jul 9, 2009, at 9:13 AM, Kasper Sacharias Eenberg wrote:
In my humble opinion it's wise to choose the package from your
distribution.
I would, but I need functionality that was introduced with Samba 3.2,
and since the only package I can find is 3.0.33, that's not an option.
A
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 06:04:53PM -0500, Jonathon Doran wrote:
> I'm still working on figuring out why some accesses to profile data are
> failing.
> We are running 3.3.2-0.33.fc11 (the latest release for FC11).
>
> I saw this in the log file
>
> stat_cache_lookup: lookup succeeded for name [US
Now, TOSHARG-StandAloneServer.xml translate to Japanese finished(3.3.4 base).
and 1 typo found.
If all that is needed is a server for read-only files, or for
printers alone, it may not make sense to effect a complex installation.
For example, a drafting office needs to store old drawings and ref
Thank you for the clarification .
Does it help if I add ROOT in a group of invalid user ?
[global]
..
...
invalid users = root bin daemon adm sync shutdown \
halt mail news uucp operator gopher \
mailnull rpm ntp
Thank you and Best
On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 08:57 +0200, Niklas Saers wrote:
> Dear Sirs,
>
> I'm running a vanilla CentOS 5.3 server, and yum there has Samba
> 3.0.33. What's the recommended way to install Samba 3.4 as an upgrade
> over 3.0.33? Just ./configure && make && sudo make install ?
>
> Cheers
>
>
Dear Sirs,
I'm running a vanilla CentOS 5.3 server, and yum there has Samba
3.0.33. What's the recommended way to install Samba 3.4 as an upgrade
over 3.0.33? Just ./configure && make && sudo make install ?
Cheers
Nik
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and rea
41 matches
Mail list logo
