For some reasons and tried it many times. I did not have any problems
joining windows 7 with samba 3.2.15 and up with:
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\services\LanmanWorkstation\Para
meters]
"DomainCompatibilityMode"=dword:0001
"DNSNameResolutionRequired"=dword:
[HKEY_
Anyone could help me? :(
--
Andrea Ciani
cianiand...@me.com
Inizio messaggio inoltrato:
> Da: Andrea Ciani
> Data: 12 gennaio 2011 20.09.32 GMT+01.00
> A: Samba List
> Oggetto: Reloading smb.conf smdb only
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm new in this list a
As per previous message, I thought it might be the size of the path or
something, so I just set up another fresh 10.10 ubuntu, built 3.5.6 from
source and tested with changenotify exe using a short path
(\\smbtest\tmp
)
This is on a different win7 box to the one I was using last time, which
elimina
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
linux 2.6.34.7-0.7-desktop x86_64
smbclient 3.5.4-5.1.2-2426-SUSE-SL11.3
I issue this command:
smbclient -L SMA-STN14L -U jmoe
I get:
Connection to SMA-STN14L failed (Error NT_STATUS_BAD_NETWORK_NAME)
is that name in DNS? H
Hi all!
After upgrading samba from 3.4.3 to 3.5.4 (during upgrade opensuse 11.2
to 11.3) wince3.0 client does not see any files/dirs in the user share;
The config is the same as worked with 3.4.3.
Connecting with smblclient or windows from different machine still works
as expected. Disabling
I managed to track down a bunch of missing include files, and made sure they
were visible via symbolic links in /usr/include. That only generated a
different set of errors
One thing I noticed, is that the makefile generated when I ran configure is
"Makefile-noincludes". Is that significant?
On 2011/01/13 14:13 (GMT-0700) James Moe composed:
linux 2.6.34.7-0.7-desktop x86_64
smbclient 3.5.4-5.1.2-2426-SUSE-SL11.3
I issue this command:
smbclient -L SMA-STN14L -U jmoe
I get:
Connection to SMA-STN14L failed (Error NT_STATUS_BAD_NETWORK_NAME)
In [globals] sectio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
linux 2.6.34.7-0.7-desktop x86_64
smbclient 3.5.4-5.1.2-2426-SUSE-SL11.3
I issue this command:
smbclient -L SMA-STN14L -U jmoe
I get:
Connection to SMA-STN14L failed (Error NT_STATUS_BAD_NETWORK_NAME)
In [globals] section:
workgrou
sorry, accidentally hit reply instead of reply all
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Gareth Evans wrote:
> Okay I guess the recursive thing makes sense, I hope IIS establishes
> watches on the specific directories it's interested in.
> The tree could indeed be very deep.
> I guess the only way
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 02:36:58PM -0500, stan.pietkiew...@statcan.gc.ca wrote:
> I've run into an error when trying to compile libnet/libnet_join.c:
>
> cc: "libnet/libnet_join.c", line 111: error 1588: "LDAP_NO_MEMORY"
> undefined.
> cc: "libnet/libnet_join.c", line 111: warning 563: Argument #2
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 08:26:13AM +1300, Gareth Evans wrote:
> 1) Create a guest only share
> 1a) Make sure the windows box can access the share just using explorer
> 2) Start ChangeNotifyTestingConsole.exe \\path\to\share -r
> 2a ChangeNotifyTestingConsole will connect to the share and register f
I've run into an error when trying to compile libnet/libnet_join.c:
cc: "libnet/libnet_join.c", line 111: error 1588: "LDAP_NO_MEMORY"
undefined.
cc: "libnet/libnet_join.c", line 111: warning 563: Argument #2 is not
the correct type.
The source below is what triggers it (line 111 is marked):
st
Brandon,
I used this as my template in Debian:
http://www.enterprisenetworkingplanet.com/netos/article.php/10951_3502441_2
From my limited experience with Ubuntu, I seem to remember that they
put most of their directives in the common-* files,
so you may have to adjust locations.
Dale
On 01
Ok. I'm still not able to lock out the account, but now that I've got the pam
restrictions line in the smb.conf, I'm seeing messages appear in
/var/log/secure related to samba:account and samba:session
So, that means that the login session is doing SOMETHING with pam, but I'm not
abl
I use the following with Office XP/Office 2003, and it works very well.
Access in 2000 compatibility mode is the front end to MySQL server.
kernel oplocks = No
veto oplock files = /*.doc/*.xls/*.mdb/*.ldb/*.DOC/*.XLS/*.MDB/*.LDB/
Dale
On 01/13/2011 8:39 AM, compdoc wrote:
What version of Acce
nslookup on windows machines does require the FQDN name- i.e.
"pdc1.mydomain.com."
ping does not (windows will appropriately add the domain name.)
I have not tried "net use \\pdc1.mydomain.com" from a VPN connection.
I know that "nslookup" and "ping" in Windows have separate name
resolution
2011/1/13 Bob Tanner :
> Windows 7 Professional 32-bit
> HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion: 7600
>
> Ubuntu-8.04.4 LTS
> samba-3.0.28a-1ubuntu4.13
>
> I applied the Registry settings as documented at
> http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Windows7
Windows 7 can join to Sam
2011/1/11 Dan Burkland :
>I have everything
> working however I have noticed when I boot a RHEL client or restart the
> Samba & Winbind services (in that order) I get a bunch of log entries in
> /var/log/messages like the following:
>
> Jan 11 08:04:27 mn4s34052 winbindd[10980]: ERROR: Initializa
2011/1/14 Kevin Taylor :
> I did give it a try with no luck. However, I'm not sure that the way the pam
> rules I have set out would cause that to trip anyway.
>
> On most of our linux machines, we'd have the system-auth looking like this
> (what is the default generated by system-config-authent
2011/1/13 Konstantin Boyandin :
(snip)
>It all works well, but the task it to force users to use
> unique password every time they have to change it.
Use user rights.
Perhaps "pdbedit -P 'password history' -C 999" will help you.
// "999" is an example of very big number. In source, that value is
I did give it a try with no luck. However, I'm not sure that the way the pam
rules I have set out would cause that to trip anyway.
On most of our linux machines, we'd have the system-auth looking like this
(what is the default generated by system-config-authentication)
authrequired
2011/1/14 Kevin Taylor :
> Unfortunately, that doesn't work. Since we're using an LDAP backend, we had
> to turn on 'encrypt
> passwords=yes' which bypasses the pam checking.
Have you actually tried it?
To set "obey pam restrictions = yes", Samba obeys PAM's restriction.
For example, try:
---
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 02:07:12AM +, Jules wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Having a very odd problem with a printer that I've had up and
> running for over a year now with no previous issues. There have
> been no software or hardware updates recently that should have
> affected it. The printer is managed
Unfortunately, that doesn't work. Since we're using an LDAP backend, we had to
turn on 'encrypt passwords=yes' which bypasses the pam checking.
> Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 02:51:58 +0900
> Subject: Re: [Samba] another question about account locking
> From: mo...@monyo.com
> To: groucho.64...@hot
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 02:51:58AM +0900, TAKAHASHI Motonobu wrote:
> 2011/1/13 Kevin Taylor :
> >
> > Is there a way that we can increment the samba bad password count, when a
> > user fails a password on a linux system? I'm looking for ways to get both
> > Windows and Linux to simultaneously lo
2011/1/13 Kevin Taylor :
>
> Is there a way that we can increment the samba bad password count, when a
> user fails a password on a linux system? I'm looking for ways to get both
> Windows and Linux to simultaneously lock out accounts if they fail so many
> times. We're using an LDAP backend.
H
2011/1/13 Gaiseric Vandal :
> Adding pdc1 to the hosts file (c:\windows\system32\drivers\etc\hosts) did
> not make a difference. After adding pdc1 to lmhosts, "net use \\pdc1" did
> work. So in the case of pdc1 one, the name is being resolved as a netbios
> name (i.e. via lmhosts) not a tcp/ip t
I mentioned zfs , not because linux uses zfs specifically, but some of
the issues you might run into using a "unix" file system that supports
ACL's.
Sometimes a file may be created that then can't get deleted, or a file
may be created and then MS Office CHANGES the perms on the file so that
y
2011/1/14 TAKAHASHI Motonobu :
2011/1/13 Robert Fitzpatrick :
If your Samba's version is 3.3.2 - 3.3.4, then the additional settings
below are needed:
HKLM\System\CCS\Services\Netlogon\Parameters
DWORD RequireSignOrSeal = 0
DWORD RequireStrongKey = 0
I am
2011/1/14 TAKAHASHI Motonobu :
> 2011/1/13 Robert Fitzpatrick :
>>> If your Samba's version is 3.3.2 - 3.3.4, then the additional settings
>>> below are needed:
>>>
>>> HKLM\System\CCS\Services\Netlogon\Parameters
>>> DWORD RequireSignOrSeal = 0
>>> DWORD RequireStron
Hello,
My company has a Windows file server that I attempting to setup a
Samba server as an Active Directory domain member to replace. I have
migrated one of the shares to the Samba server but am having some
problems. I installed Ubuntu Server 10.04.1 LTS on a new server for
the sole purpose of re
2011/1/13 Robert Fitzpatrick :
>> If your Samba's version is 3.3.2 - 3.3.4, then the additional settings
>> below are needed:
>>
>> HKLM\System\CCS\Services\Netlogon\Parameters
>> DWORD RequireSignOrSeal = 0
>> DWORD RequireStrongKey = 0
>>
>
> I am using Samba 3.5.6
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 1:34 AM, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> I just forwarded your mail to Steve and I think he'll make sure this
> reaches the right folks in Ubuntu server team.
Thank you. Would be nice to see these startup scripts work properly.
I'll be happy to provide any additional informatio
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 1:38 AM, Christian PERRIER wrote:
>> And I have seen reported instances of Samba issues on Ubuntu being
>> resolved by avoiding the distro packages and compiling from source.
>
> Hmmm, could be interesting to learn about which ones.
The reports I allude to I've read on thi
On 1/13/2011 6:42 AM, TAKAHASHI Motonobu wrote:
Read at:
http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Windows7
And remember Samba 3 PDC is compatible with Windows NT Server, not with
Active Directory.
Thanks, I was able to join the domain, but when trying to logon, I get
another error...
the trust relati
>> What version of Access? I find that, in general Office 2003 plays a
little nicer with Samba than Office 2007 (Office likes to change file perms
on files.)
Office 2000 - ack!
>> Does Microsoft even supply security patches for Windows 2000 anymore?
No new patches. But you can patch daylight sa
I need to have a server built and ready to install by this weekend,
and I'm
trying to decide whether to use the customer's copy of Windows 2000
Server,
Seriously?
http://blogs.technet.com/b/windowsserver/archive/2010/01/14/windows-2000-server-approaching-end-of-life.aspx
or Ubuntu or
PS
I should clarify that I have not especially noticed problems with MS
Access 2003/2007 on Samba but we don't use it heavily.
I WOULD expect that you will need to spend a little time tweeking file
permissions. I use Samba 3.4.x and 3.0.x with Solaris 10 and ZFS file
system. ZFS supports f
What version of Access? I find that, in general Office 2003 plays a
little nicer with Samba than Office 2007 (Office likes to change file
perms on files.)
Does Microsoft even supply security patches for Windows 2000 anymore?
(For me, when MS did not provide patches for extended daylight sa
Is there a way that we can increment the samba bad password count, when a user
fails a password on a linux system? I'm looking for ways to get both Windows
and Linux to simultaneously lock out accounts if they fail so many times. We're
using an LDAP backend.
I've updated samba from
Samba version 3.0.24 ( config file in testparm-oldsrv1.txt)
to
Samba version 3.0.33-3.29.el5_5.1 ( config file in testparm-newsrv1b.txt)
I've used samba to share a directory which is used to windows 2000 serve
as mapped drive.
All works fine with samba 3.0.24, but i've
In my case the performance was still bad. But use a normal windows client as
domain member with a share where the access database
is on. With 20 User there should be no problem. And this should be much
faster than an old W2000.
---
EDV Daniel Müller
Lei
I need to have a server built and ready to install by this weekend, and I'm
trying to decide whether to use the customer's copy of Windows 2000 Server,
or Ubuntu or Centos. I think Ubuntu would have a newer version of samba.
The problem is, for this one server, about 20 users hammer MS Access
data
>> Read at:
>> http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Windows7
>>
>> And remember Samba 3 PDC is compatible with Windows NT Server, not with
>> Active Directory.
>
> Thanks, I was able to join the domain, but when trying to logon, I get
> another error...
>
>> the trust relationship between this workstati
I've updated samba from
Samba version 3.0.24 ( config file in testparm-oldsrv1.txt)
to
Samba version 3.0.33-3.29.el5_5.1 ( config file in testparm-newsrv1b.txt)
I've used samba to share a directory which is used to windows 2000 serve
as mapped drive.
All works fine with samba 3.0.24, but i've
I also tried changing the Local Policies - Security Options as
documented at
http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/75-63-windows-samba-issue
Control Panel - Administrative Tools - Local Security Policy
Local Policies - Security Options
Network security: LAN Manager authentication level
Send LM &
Windows 7 Professional 32-bit
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion: 7600
Ubuntu-8.04.4 LTS
samba-3.0.28a-1ubuntu4.13
I applied the Registry settings as documented at
http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Windows7
HKLM\System\CCS\Services\LanmanWorkstation\Parameters
Hallo, Henri,
Du meintest am 13.01.11:
>>> What is the best way to proceed to make this migration as seamless
>> as
>>> possible for all users (more than 200 user accounts with more than
>>> 200 PC in the domain) ?
>> My usual way:
>>
>> - copy/overwrite "/etc/samba" to the new machine
>> -
Hallo, Konstantin,
Du meintest am 13.01.11:
> I have also added a call to cracklib to check password strength prior
> to applying it. It all works well, but the task it to force users to
> use unique password every time they have to change it. A typical
> scenario I must prevent is this: user cha
Quoting Chris Smith (smb...@chrissmith.org):
> OK, not exactly a samba issue but maybe the Ubuntu maintainer reads
> this list and can provide some input.
There is not exactly such thing as "the Ubuntu maintainer". As far as
I can tell (with my Debian package maintainer hat), samba packages in
Ub
Quoting Chris Smith (smb...@chrissmith.org):
> And I have seen reported instances of Samba issues on Ubuntu being
> resolved by avoiding the distro packages and compiling from source.
Hmmm, could be interesting to learn about which ones. Since 2-3 years,
we made great efforts in Debian to avoid
51 matches
Mail list logo
