in your example
>Accessing sysvol works through: \\ip\sysvol and >\\dc.domain_name\sysvol
Ipadres
Hostname.domainname_local
>Doesn´t work through \\domainname\sy
My windows clients all use the same wins servers, samba4wins in replication
mode, even the w2008 server wins replicates data with
the samba4wins. My both samba PDC and BDC are registerd in wins. And I can
look up the Samba NT domain in the database of the w2008
wins.
The only thing that is differe
Quoting alexander.gardi...@canterbury.ac.uk
(alexander.gardi...@canterbury.ac.uk):
> Hello.
>
> I have successfully built and installed samba from source under Ubuntu
> Desktop 10.10, but can't find the location of the source header files for
> compiling a special VFS that I'd like to use.
>
>
Dear all,
I set up /etc/fstab to allow users to map their network drive (provided by a
windows file server) via cifs on a linux server.
The lines in /etc/fstab looks like:
//windows/drive/A/ /home/userA/W cifs
rw,username=win_userA,noauto,suid,users 0 0
//windows/drive/B/ /hom
Hello.
I have successfully built and installed samba from source under Ubuntu Desktop
10.10, but can't find the location of the source header files for compiling a
special VFS that I'd like to use.
Can anybody point me in the right direction/give any pointers.
AG
--
To unsubscribe from this l
Hello,
I'm Oliver and I need help for a experiment.
I have a sharing with Samba version 3.2.5, my distribution Linux is
Debian(Lenny) and the acl version is 2.2.47.
Below my configurations files:
#/etc/fstab
/dev/sda3 /shared reiserfs defaults,acl 0 1
#smb.conf
[data]
comment
Hello,
I'm Oliver and I need help for a experiment.
I have a sharing with Samba version 3.2.5, my distribution Linux is
Debian(Lenny) and the acl version is 2.2.47.
Below my configurations files:
#/etc/fstab
/dev/sda3 /shared reiserfs defaults,acl 0 1
#smb.conf
[data]
comment
Hi All
This one is baffling me, so I'd be glad of another pair of eyes..
Rhel 6 standard install with selinux and ran: -
# semanage fcontext -a -t samba_share_t '/var/eng(/.*)?'
# restorecon -R -v /var/eng
For my particular instance which works fine on the 8TB storage partition bu
Daniel,
On May 18, 2011, at 12:00 AM, Zabel, Daniel wrote:
I've looked at that file; it's empty. (Not a single entry.) I run
my tests with "winbindd -n -d 10 -D".
Try to add to your smb.conf:
log level = 3 idmap:10 winbind:10
to force idmap Logging also to Debuglevel 10.
I've discovered
Hello!
Attached a trace file while running gpupdate.
Accessing sysvol works through: \\ip\sysvol and \\dc.domain_name\sysvol
Doesn´t work through \\domainname\sysvol
- Ursprungligt meddelande -
Från: "Matthieu Patou"
Till: samba@lists.samba.org, "samba-technical"
Skickat: torsdag,
Quoting John Maher (j...@chem.umass.edu):
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello,
>
> I cannot find anything in the documentation or mailing list that
> addresses this oddity.
>
> I've installed Samba Version 3.4.7 on Ubuntu Server 10.04, and I'm
> utterly confused by samba'
On 6/2/2011 2:24 PM, Juan Pablo wrote:
> Hi Stan,
>
> Thanks for your feedback and suggestions!
You're welcome. Let's hope they're beneficial.
> The disk subsystem is composed by:
>
> - 8 WD2002FAEX SATA 2TB hard drives (7200 RPM, 64MB cache, 4.2 ms avg latency)
> - 1 Intel RAID controller RS2
Hi Stan,
Thanks for your feedback and suggestions!
The disk subsystem is composed by:
- 8 WD2002FAEX SATA 2TB hard drives (7200 RPM, 64MB cache, 4.2 ms avg latency)
- 1 Intel RAID controller RS2BL080 with 512 MB configured with 1 virtual drive
12.7 TB (hardware RAID 5 with 1 MB stripe size, c
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 02:33:21PM +0400, TLoD,Snake wrote:
> > error packet at smbd/reply.c(2637) cmd=6 (SMBunlink)
> > NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED
>
> Also I think I have to say that all files on remote server are owned by
> remote server's 'nobody'. As I saw in logfile samba tries to locate such
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I cannot find anything in the documentation or mailing list that
addresses this oddity.
I've installed Samba Version 3.4.7 on Ubuntu Server 10.04, and I'm
utterly confused by samba's behavior regarding permissions.
Users on the server have ho
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/01/2011 04:24 PM, Terry wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Terry wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have a problem that just propped up after our windows admin did some
>> work. �He introduced some new domain controllers and upgraded the
>> domain t
Thanks a lot for the advice. It will run these tests and try to find
meaningfull
information from them. I will post back results.
Thanks
Juan Pablo
From: Volker Lendecke
To: Juan Pablo
Cc: Jeremy Allison ; samba@lists.samba.org
Sent: Thu, June 2, 2011 3:49
On 5/25/2011 10:02 PM, Juan Pablo wrote:
> OS access:
> Simultaneous read (4 processes): 118 MByte/s average
> Samba local access:
> Simultaneous read (4 processes): 102 MByte/s average
> Samba server from Windows 7:
> Simultaneous read (4 terminals): 70 MByte/s average
The first
I am able to change owner from User1 to Administrator at Domain
Controller/active-directory machine.
And after that from linux box, using smbcacls -C DOMAIN\\User1 .. command I
am able to change owner from Administrator --> User1.
But changing owner from User1 to Administrator using smbcac
On 06/02/2011 02:23 PM, TLoD,Snake wrote:
> On 06/02/2011 03:58 AM, Jeremy Allison wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 02:02:03PM +0400, TLoD,Snake wrote:
>>> On 05/31/2011 10:26 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 07:43:16PM +0400, TLoD,Snake wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I have
On 06/02/2011 03:58 AM, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 02:02:03PM +0400, TLoD,Snake wrote:
>> On 05/31/2011 10:26 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 07:43:16PM +0400, TLoD,Snake wrote:
Hello!
I have samba share on my sshfs-mounted folder. All work
> Given that I have currently have 6 member servers, I think that amount
> of ldap replication would be over-kill. I was considering one ldap
> slave. I will consult the Docs that Louis pointed me to and look at
> the winbind config.
You do not have to make every server an ldap server.
John
--
T
Given that I have currently have 6 member servers, I think that amount
of ldap replication would be over-kill. I was considering one ldap
slave. I will consult the Docs that Louis pointed me to and look at
the winbind config.
Thanks,
Dp.
On 1 June 2011 19:04, Dale Schroeder wrote:
> Dermot,
>
>
23 matches
Mail list logo