On 02/08/12 20:57, NdK wrote:
Il 02/08/2012 18:42, steve ha scritto:
The shares are mounted via kerberized nfs on the client and _did_ map
correctly before this thread started.
Are you sure you updated /etc/nnsswitch.conf to use winbind after
purging the old Samba install?
BYtE,
Diego.
Hi
Using usrmgr.exe, the domain user manager from XP on a W7, I try to admin users
in a domain.
What I can do:
- list users and groups
- change existing users
What I cannot:
- add a user or a group
- make a user a groupmember.
Error: No permission
What settings do I need to change?
How can I
You think about something like this (it is tricky beware with windows 7 it
is quiet different), done with kixtart, redirect all folders for clients
other than windows 7:
EX:
;we redirect folders tot he server
;wir setzen ein reg eintrag um zu prüfen ob wir schon was kopiert haben
;zunächst
Forget about usrmgr on windows 7!!!
---
EDV Daniel Müller
Leitung EDV
Tropenklinik Paul-Lechler-Krankenhaus
Paul-Lechler-Str. 24
72076 Tübingen
Tel.: 07071/206-463, Fax: 07071/206-499
eMail: muel...@tropenklinik.de
Internet: www.tropenklinik.de
Il 03/08/2012 08:01, steve ha scritto:
getent passwd/group works fine. I get the names and coresponding uid:gid
numbers within the range specified in smb.conf but all I get when I list
files on the nfs share, are numerical uid:gid values. I want those
values to be DOMAIN\username DOMAIN\group
On 03/08/12 09:01, NdK wrote:
Il 03/08/2012 08:01, steve ha scritto:
getent passwd/group works fine. I get the names and coresponding uid:gid
numbers within the range specified in smb.conf but all I get when I list
files on the nfs share, are numerical uid:gid values. I want those
values to be
On 03/08/12 10:22, steve wrote:
On 03/08/12 09:01, NdK wrote:
Il 03/08/2012 08:01, steve ha scritto:
It looks as though it's this:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8676
Ubuntu 12.04 ships with 3.6.3 :-(
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
On 03/08/12 07:01, steve wrote:
On 02/08/12 20:57, NdK wrote:
Il 02/08/2012 18:42, steve ha scritto:
The shares are mounted via kerberized nfs on the client and _did_ map
correctly before this thread started.
Are you sure you updated /etc/nnsswitch.conf to use winbind after
purging the old
2012-08-03 10:22 keltezéssel, steve írta:
On 03/08/12 09:01, NdK wrote:
Il 03/08/2012 08:01, steve ha scritto:
getent passwd/group works fine. I get the names and coresponding
uid:gid
numbers within the range specified in smb.conf but all I get when I
list
files on the nfs share, are
On 03/08/12 11:03, Gémes Géza wrote:
2012-08-03 10:22 keltezéssel, steve írta:
On 03/08/12 09:01, NdK wrote:
Il 03/08/2012 08:01, steve ha scritto:
getent passwd/group works fine. I get the names and coresponding
uid:gid
numbers within the range specified in smb.conf but all I get when I
Il 03/08/2012 10:22, steve ha scritto:
It doesn't seem to matter. I can have the same id range on both server
and client. What is uid 327 on the server becomes uid 302 on the
client.
Remember to delete all .tdb files and rejoin the machine between tests
w/ different backends, or you'll
Three unfathormable questions:
1.
What's the difference between:
idmap_ldb : use rfc2307 = Yes
and
idmap config * : backend = ad
2.
Do the terms in (1) above apply equally to Samba4 beta6 and Samba 3.6.3?
3.
If I specify either in (1) then
idmap config : range = abc-xyz
becomes meaningless.
On 03/08/12 13:07, NdK wrote:
Il 03/08/2012 10:22, steve ha scritto:
It doesn't seem to matter. I can have the same id range on both server
and client. What is uid 327 on the server becomes uid 302 on the
client.
Remember to delete all .tdb files and rejoin the machine between tests
Il 03/08/2012 13:18, steve ha scritto:
Thanks for the tip. In fact, Samba4 defaults to 30-40 which I
think is pretty safe?
Only for a small domain... In our tree it would be WAY too small (could
contain no more than about 20% of the groups we have in a single domain...).
My main
2012-08-03 13:07 keltezéssel, steve írta:
Three unfathormable questions:
1.
What's the difference between:
idmap_ldb : use rfc2307 = Yes
It is a samba4 winbind setting, so you need it on the Samba4 AD
controller only
and
idmap config * : backend = ad
the correct form is:
idmap config
On 03/08/12 13:54, NdK wrote:
Il 03/08/2012 13:18, steve ha scritto:
Thanks for the tip. In fact, Samba4 defaults to 30-40 which I
think is pretty safe?
Only for a small domain... In our tree it would be WAY too small (could
contain no more than about 20% of the groups we have in a
Hi
I (deliberately for test purposes) have only one object with:
posixAccount
uidNumber
gidNumber
and only one object with:
posixGroup
gidNumber
The gidNumbers are the same for both.
getent passwd and getent group still however list all users and all
groups regardless.
Is there a cache I
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 9:06 AM, John Drescher dresche...@gmail.com wrote:
I am back with yet another issue. I am currently running a Samba
3.5.10-125
PDC on RHEL 6.2. My backend is LDAP, and I am using the smbldap scripts
for
dealing with ldap profiles related to my samba instance.
On 03/08/12 13:39, Gémes Géza wrote:
2012-08-03 13:07 keltezéssel, steve írta:
Three unfathormable questions:
1.
What's the difference between:
idmap_ldb : use rfc2307 = Yes
It is a samba4 winbind setting, so you need it on the Samba4 AD
controller only
and
idmap config * : backend = ad
the
Hello
Since SP1 of Windows 7, the Registry Settings of:
HKLM\System\CCS\Services\Netlogon\Parameters
DWORD RequireSignOrSeal = 1
DWORD RequireStrongKey = 1
Are not longer required to set to 0 and back 1 after join.
This symptoms seems the me comming more from a
Samba4 4.0.0beta4, CentOS 6.3
I have a 3*DC Samba4 domain in which everything tested so far appears to
be working OK: ldap, kerberos, dns, windows client joins, replication,
etc.
My question concerns binding Linux clients (CentOS 6) to the Samba4 LDAP
server using sssd. If in
Hello list, Iam using samba 4 beta6, I have problem with my GPO in my BDC,
I create a GPO in my PDC and I update with rsync this GPO to my BDC, when
the client windows xp under my BDC try to update the GPO, say me Denied
Access to .INI, I think the cause is my client windows xp try to search
the
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 04:11:53PM +0200, Arkadiusz Bubała wrote:
Hello,
I've got problems with Samba 3.6.0 up to 3.6.6. Forked smbd
processes are closing unexpectedly and sometimes smbd server exits.
(In Samba 3.5.16 everything works).
When invoke smbd from gdb and turn off SIGPIPE passing
2012-08-03 18:46 keltezéssel, steve írta:
On 03/08/12 13:39, Gémes Géza wrote:
2012-08-03 13:07 keltezéssel, steve írta:
Three unfathormable questions:
1.
What's the difference between:
idmap_ldb : use rfc2307 = Yes
It is a samba4 winbind setting, so you need it on the Samba4 AD
controller
Hi all,
Hope this isn't off-topic, but I thought the lists
might be interested in a video interview I did with Eben
Moglen, the head of the Software Freedom Law Center. Eben
has given legal advice and help for Samba for many years,
and is a very interesting person to listen to.
Hope
The branch, master has been updated
via d12831d docs-xml: fix pid directory example
via 5beb345 docs-xml: fix dfree cache time example
via 8dafdb5 s4:dsdb:replicated_objects: do not move 'instanceType' to
the end of msg-elements on RODC replication
via d642831 s4:
The branch, master has been updated
via cff3ad4 lib/dbwrap: rewrite lock order check to ease debugging
from d12831d docs-xml: fix pid directory example
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log -
The autobuild test system has detected an intermittent failing test in
the current master tree.
The autobuild log of the failure is available here:
http://git.samba.org/autobuild.flakey/2012-08-03-1359/flakey.log
The samba3 build logs are available here:
The branch, master has been updated
via 764f2f9 s3-ctdb: return proper exit code
via 0a45e9c s3-ctdb: adjust a loglevel
via 6cfe6e9 s3-ctdb: Fix ctdb_serverids_exist for target nodes that died
via 6d83e35 s3-ctdb: Add debugs to ctdb_serverids_exist
from
29 matches
Mail list logo
