Dustin C. Hatch quatschte am Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at
05:58:51PM -0600:
> On 2/22/2013 15:22, Peter Beck wrote:
> >Dustin C. Hatch quatschte am Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at
> >12:31:05PM -0600:
> My samba server works perfectly fine for all AD DC roles (including
> Kerberos) except DNS. In my real and test
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 7:17 PM, jimc wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I got my first Samba 4 system up and running. {No applause, just throw
> money. Paper please, coins hurt}
>
> It is just a home network of about a dozen or so boxes.
>
> I have noticed that when I do a testparm, the result is not the same as t
On my network, I'm finding that if I run
host saffron
on any machine on my network, I see saffron's IPv4 address, but not
its IPv6 address. This is true regardless of which joined machine I
run. I'd like to figure out how to fix this...
For any other machine on the network,
host $hostna
Hi!
I got my first Samba 4 system up and running. {No applause, just throw
money. Paper please, coins hurt}
It is just a home network of about a dozen or so boxes.
I have noticed that when I do a testparm, the result is not the same as
the file I created.
I'm fairly certain it isn't anythi
On 2/22/2013 15:22, Peter Beck wrote:
Dustin C. Hatch quatschte am Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at
12:31:05PM -0600:
On 2/22/2013 11:13, Sérgio Henrique wrote:
I guess the comunication beetween MS AD and Samba4 is by kerberos, i have
copied the /opt/samba/private/krb5.conf to /etc after joined to domain
I too have been experiencing the same issues with my Samba server and
Windows 8. I am currently running Samba 4.0.3. My Windows 7 client's
profiles are synchronizing, but I am receiving that same error on my
Windows 8 machines. The user has full permissions over their roaming
profile directory, so
On Wed, 2013-02-20 at 12:53 +, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
>
> Thanks Andrew. Will do. Just for my own understanding - is it still
> possible to run Samba 4 as (just) a workgroup? If yes - does one just
> specify security=user in smb.conf and still uses the "samba" binary - or
> the "smbd" bina
On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 13:12 +, Dominic Evans wrote:
> On 22 February 2013 11:48, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > Indeed, if the domain originally came from windows, then
> > upgradeprovision should NOT be run. Indeed, I would have hoped that the
> > tool would detect this and would not attempt an
Dustin C. Hatch quatschte am Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at
12:31:05PM -0600:
> On 2/22/2013 11:13, Sérgio Henrique wrote:
> >I guess the comunication beetween MS AD and Samba4 is by kerberos, i have
> >copied the /opt/samba/private/krb5.conf to /etc after joined to domain
> >
> >I have installed a windows
Touche. Although my goal is replication, not proxying.
- Original Message -
From: Adam Tauno Williams
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, 21 February 2013, 11:59
Subject: Re: [Samba] LDAP recommendations please
On Thu, 2013-02-21 at 16:36 +, ray klassen wrote:
> Actually
On 2/22/2013 11:13, Sérgio Henrique wrote:
I guess the comunication beetween MS AD and Samba4 is by kerberos, i have
copied the /opt/samba/private/krb5.conf to /etc after joined to domain
I have installed a windows server at 2003 forest level as PDC then
installed samba4.0.3
join domain but ever
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Diego Remolina
wrote:
> I think a lot of your work was probably prior to RHEL 6.4, but have you
> tried looking at their new SRPM for samba 4.0.0 and adapting it to 4.0.3?
Unfortunately somewhere between 4.0.0 and 4.0.3. they introduced now
related package depend
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 10:01:11AM +, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
> Hi Jeremy. Thanks for the reply. Would that mean that it is not
> possible to use the recycle bin in the ADS domain mode?
It's nothing to do with the ADS domain mode, it's to
do with what fileserver backend you're using.
smbd ==
I guess the comunication beetween MS AD and Samba4 is by kerberos, i have
copied the /opt/samba/private/krb5.conf to /etc after joined to domain
I have installed a windows server at 2003 forest level as PDC then
installed samba4.0.3
join domain but everytime i am getting problems with forest and d
I'm in the process of setting up a samba file server, and I'd like to
set it up so users can authenticate with their Kerberos realm
credentials. It seems that every article I read wants me to bind the
thing to a domain, and authenticate that way. The only problem with that
is user accounts aren
Are you using kerberos to authenticate ?
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 7:10 AM, Sérgio Henrique wrote:
> Awesome i will try to replicate in my test environment.
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 2:23 AM, Peter Beck wrote:
>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> weehoo! Samba4 rocks ! Great work!
>>
>> if someone is intereste
I Peter i had just one problem i am unable to replicate ForestDns and
DomainDns zones!? How do you manage to do that?
also dns recursive queries = yes its being ignored...
Thank you in advanced.
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Peter Beck wrote:
> Federico Nan quatschte am Fri, Feb 22, 2013 a
I think he's seeing this with both S4 and WS2003 as a DC, so I don't know
that setting up the domain again will solve the problem. Provisioning a
domain on WS2003 (or S4 TBH) is a very simple process. It's hard to say
with such little info, but I'm guessing it's a client network configuration
- is
I did quite a bit more research on this. Everything I read says an AD DNS
should automatically set up those entries. I found a few trouble-shooting
documents that suggested checking them, but nothing indicating why they
might be wrong, and what to do about it.
I agree that tearing down the domai
Hi,
My goal is to make use of samba 4 and freeradius to authenticate user to use
wifi network (WPA2 enterprise).
The setup is to setup Samba 4.0.3 in machine A and setup freeradius in machine
B.
By reading:
Document A: http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/beyond
Document B:
https://wiki.sa
Maybe you can try to do a setup domain again.
2013/2/22 Lee Allen
> That also fails:
>
> lal...@oi.allenlan.net:~$ host -t SRV _ldap._tcp.allenlan.net.
> Host _ldap._tcp.allenlan.net. not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
>
> lal...@oi.allenlan.net:~$ host -t SRV _ldap._tcp.dc._msdcs.allenlan.net.
> Host _lda
Hi Sebastian,
If you run ps ax | grep smbd while samba is running and see running smbd
processes, then most (probably all even) vfs objects should run (including
recycle).
Ricky
On Feb 22, 2013 4:01 AM, "Sebastian Arcus" wrote:
> On 21/02/13 23:26, Jeremy Allison wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013
Am 2013-02-22 08:36, schrieb Günter Kukkukk:
Am Freitag, 22. Februar 2013, 05:09:58 schrieb Günter Kukkukk:
Am Freitag, 22. Februar 2013, 04:18:33 schrieb Günter Kukkukk:
> Am Montag, 18. Februar 2013, 20:16:15 schrieb Ray:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I suppose this question must have been posted a hundred
Federico Nan quatschte am Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at
08:36:56AM -0300:
> Wouw!
>
> And how do you handle the GPO and sysvol volumes? Did you copy them to the
> samba sysvol?
>
> I´ve been trying and it always fails in the fsmo transferring. Did you do
> this on the Windows MMC?
Hi Federico,
It was
That also fails:
lal...@oi.allenlan.net:~$ host -t SRV _ldap._tcp.allenlan.net.
Host _ldap._tcp.allenlan.net. not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
lal...@oi.allenlan.net:~$ host -t SRV _ldap._tcp.dc._msdcs.allenlan.net.
Host _ldap._tcp.dc._msdcs.ALLENLAN.NET. not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
I can manually add these re
Andrew Bartlett samba.org> writes:
>
> On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 09:30 +, Mario Giammarco wrote:
> > Sorry I checked better: it is 4.0.3.zentyal.
>
> At this point due to other commitments I can't help you much more.
> Perhaps be in contact with Zentyal to understand more how your package
> is
On 22 February 2013 11:48, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> Indeed, if the domain originally came from windows, then
> upgradeprovision should NOT be run. Indeed, I would have hoped that the
> tool would detect this and would not attempt an upgrade, but clearly
> this fails.
Ah. It might be worth adding
On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 09:30 +, Mario Giammarco wrote:
> Mario Giammarco gmail.com> writes:
>
> >
> > Thanks for hint, now I see that in ppa there is samba 4.0.3. I was pretty
> > sure
> > that I have samba 4.0.3 but apparently ubuntu refused to upgrade it and I
> > have
> > 4.0.0.alpha!
I must add, that from the Windows client, if I go to the directories
where the eventvwr says there is a failure creating the folders, I can
create the folders just fine manually, so it is not really a permissions
issue, at least not when trying to use explorer to create the folders,
however dur
On Wed, 2013-02-20 at 09:09 -0800, Gregory Sloop wrote:
>
> DE> Originally I had a Win 2003 DC. I added a samba 4.0.0 DC to the
> DE> domain, allow full replication to take place and then transferred all
> DE> the roles to the samba 4.0.0 dc. Finally I removed the Windows DC from
> DE> the domain.
On Thu, 2013-02-21 at 13:11 +, Chris Lewis wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Today I tried to upgrade from samba 4.0.0 to 4.0.3 on my test environment.
>
> I patched the source with the diffs patch-4.0.0-4.0.1.diffs,
> patch-4.0.1-4.0.2.diffs, patch-4.0.2-4.0.3.diffs , then make, make install.
>
> # samb
You can try to find your record doing: (taking from the official how-to)
host -t SRV _ldap._tcp.samdom.example.com.
2013/2/22 Lee Allen
> This isn't exactly a Samba problem, but I am hoping the experts here can
> help me.
>
> I have been trying to get my OpenIndiana system to join a Samba4 d
Wouw!
And how do you handle the GPO and sysvol volumes? Did you copy them to the
samba sysvol?
I´ve been trying and it always fails in the fsmo transferring. Did you do
this on the Windows MMC?
2013/2/22 Sérgio Henrique
> Awesome i will try to replicate in my test environment.
>
>
> On Fri, F
This isn't exactly a Samba problem, but I am hoping the experts here can
help me.
I have been trying to get my OpenIndiana system to join a Samba4 domain and
I was running into multiple problems. So I decided to test against a true
Windows Server (2003) domain, to see if there is something wrong w
Awesome i will try to replicate in my test environment.
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 2:23 AM, Peter Beck wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> weehoo! Samba4 rocks ! Great work!
>
> if someone is interested - I finally managed to replace a Windows DC
> successfully.
> (at least i hope so ;-)
>
> this is what I have
On 21/02/13 23:26, Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 07:24:26PM +, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
Just a quick check here before I file a bug report. I've just
checked if I can use the recycle VFS object in Samba 4 like I do in
Samba 3 - and it seems that is not implemented yet. Should I
Mario Giammarco gmail.com> writes:
>
> Thanks for hint, now I see that in ppa there is samba 4.0.3. I was pretty sure
> that I have samba 4.0.3 but apparently ubuntu refused to upgrade it and I have
> 4.0.0.alpha!!
>
Sorry I checked better: it is 4.0.3.zentyal.
--
To unsubscribe from this
Andrew Bartlett samba.org> writes:
> There is no --fix option to samba-tool gpo aclcheck. What does
> 'samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck' give?
>
Sorry wrong cut&paste I mean:
samba-tool dbcheck --fix
The command you tell me give this result:
lp_load_ex: refreshing parameters
Initialising glob
Something weird...
I connected one notbook to another samba (v3.5.5) network. Logged in as
a local user on the notebook and guess what. The complete network
environment is shown.
The main difference between these two networks, apart form the version
number of smbd, is that the working network is
39 matches
Mail list logo
