/shares/scripts
read only = no
admin users = "@Domain Admins"
[wpkg]
comment = wpkg
path = /shares/wpkg
valid users = "@Domain Admins"
read only = no
(END)
--
Éric LE HÉNAFF
École normale supérieure de Paris, rue d'ulm - RUBENS
Informaticien, Ingénieur dév
I have to mention too that the workstations are windows XP.
Message original
Sujet: HUGE delays during logon time
Date : Wed, 16 Feb 2011 15:47:36 +0100
De :éric le hénaff
Pour : samba@lists.samba.org
Hello list
i recently replaced (1st of january) our old samba
i think your kernel needs EA (extended attributes) for acls inheritance
to work.
regards
S. J. van Harmelen a écrit :
To my knowledge the 'inherit acls' option should make new files inherit
the default acls from the containing folder... Please correct me if I'm
wrong!
But when I turn this setti
hello
> I'd recommend dropping valid users from [profiles]
> altogether.
ah! it's interesting since the valid users line is recommended in
idealx's linux samba-openldap howto. could u explain why u'd drop it ?
thank you
ELH
Gerald (Jerry) Carter a écrit :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Has
éric le hénaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hello
is it possible to have a samba pdc and a samba domain member connected
to that samba pdc ?
i installed a samba pdc. it replaced an NT4 pdc. there is a samba domain
member with winbind which worked fine with the NT4 pdc. but it doesnt
work a
k = 0770
force directory mode = 0770
browseable = No
Miguel Da Silva - Servicio de Informática a écrit :
On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 18:54:57 +0200
éric le hénaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hello
is it possible to have a samba pdc and a samba domain member connected
to that samba pdc ?
i in
hello
is it possible to have a samba pdc and a samba domain member connected
to that samba pdc ?
i installed a samba pdc. it replaced an NT4 pdc. there is a samba domain
member with winbind which worked fine with the NT4 pdc. but it doesnt
work anymore.
elh
--
Éric LE HÉNAFF
École normale
thank you for your quick answer.
from where should i try deleting the printers ? from the cups web
interface ?
elh
Gary Dale a écrit :
éric le hénaff wrote:
hello
i was uploading drivers and renamed a printer by error with the name
of an other existing one.
now, when i rename one of them
y the same problem ?
how should i fix that ?
thanks
ELH
--
Éric LE HÉNAFF
École normale supérieure - Centre de ressources informatiques
Informaticien, Ingénieur développements et systèmes auprès des bibliothèques de
l'ENS
Préférez firefox! http://www.mozilla-europe.org/fr/
SVP, évitez de m&#
location doesn't show up in printers' list.
comments and models are visible bit not the location
elh
--
Éric LE HÉNAFF
École normale supérieure - Centre de ressources informatiques
Informaticien, Ingénieur développements et systèmes auprès des
bibliothèques de l'ENS
Préfére
onned
any more.
Michael Gasch a écrit :
éric le hénaff wrote:
hello
i tried to do a fresh start with erasing all tdb files but when i
restart samba it still remembers the old domain name i used for testing
net getlocalsid gives domain B and should give domain A.
how to fix it ?
thank you
hello
i tried to do a fresh start with erasing all tdb files but when i
restart samba it still remembers the old domain name i used for testing
net getlocalsid gives domain B and should give domain A.
how to fix it ?
thank you
--
Éric LE HÉNAFF
École normale supérieure - Centre de ressources
hello
what is the right way to purge samba ?
i did some testing and i want now to erase everything and do a fresh
start for a production server.
my configuration is PDC with ldap.
samba 3.0.22 , openldap 2.2.23, smbldap-tools 0.8.7
should i erase everything in /var/lib/samba and /var/cache/samb
could this problem comes of the migrated accounts i 'net rpc vampired'
from our future ex NT4 domain server ?
ELH
Message original
Sujet: USRMGR and 3.0.23a
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 11:55:26 +0200
De: éric le hénaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Foru
hello
i cant manage groups with usrmgr and the configuration below
debian sarge, samba 3.0.22, openldap 2.2.23, smbldap-tools 0.8.7.
usrmgr reports he cant find the groups.
is it solved by samba 3.0.23a ? does anybody report enhancement after
upgrading to 3.0.23a ?
Regards
ELH
--
Éric LE
iles/%U
regards
ELH
Message original
Sujet: profile question
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 18:52:07 +0200
De: éric le hénaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Forums de discussion: gmane.network.samba.general
hello,
i have a profile question
here under is my profile definition. it's nothing
nly = no
create mask = 0600
directory mask = 0700
browseable = No
guest ok = Yes
profile acls = yes
csc policy = disable
# next line is a great way to secure the profiles
force user = %U
# next line allows administrator to access all profiles
valid users = %U @"Domain Admins"
--
Éri
i built a samba/ldap pdc.
i have the same 'net groupmap list' as holger wesser.
it was made by a 'net rpc vampire' because i have to migrate from an NT4
domain. so if i understand well, 'net rpc vampire' creates unix groups
with blank spaces but shouldnt ?
unix groups are at the right of the gr
i answer to my own question : everything i need to know about locking is in
the HOWTO :
http://sambafr.idealx.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/locking.html
regards
"éric le hénaff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit dans le message de
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> hello,
>
"Martin Schmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit dans le message de
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
i posted the same problem 3 weeks ago, I was afraid, I am the only one
having
this problem.
I am glad, that there others thinking about that problem too, so maybe we
will
get it fixed.
One try was also to s
forget it, it's not a good idea, itried it and it doesnt work.
"éric le hénaff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit dans le message de
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> i want to upgrade smbd from 3.0.2a to 3.0.6 but keep winbindd at 3.02a
> because of a bug in winbindd 3.0.6.
&g
. the one proposed is for tdbsam setup.
regards
"éric le hénaff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit dans le message de
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I'm wondering if i really need a tdbsam ? i'm using winbindd and the users
> and groups base is on a windows NT4 PDC.
> may b
how to get a better stack backtrace ?
regards
"Jeremy Allison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit dans le message de
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 02:24:04PM +0800, Juer Lee wrote:
> > Hi Guys,
> >
> > I am trying samba 3.0.6 for the moment, but I found some issues
sometime.
> >
> > Wh
i want to upgrade smbd from 3.0.2a to 3.0.6 but keep winbindd at 3.02a
because of a bug in winbindd 3.0.6.
Do you think it's possible ?
"Jeremy Allison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit dans le message de
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 11:46:45AM +0200, ?ric le h?naff wrote:
> hello,
is the panic action generated by the oplock problem ?
"Jeremy Allison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit dans le message de
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 12:08:37PM +0200, ?ric le h?naff wrote:
> hello
> i have "oplock_break failed " in logs, see below. should i consider
removing
> opl
I'm wondering if i really need a tdbsam ? i'm using winbindd and the users
and groups base is on a windows NT4 PDC.
may be i should delete those three lines from smb.con :
passdb backend = tdbsam, guest
passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u
passwd chat = *Enter\snew\sUNIX\spas
hello
i have "oplock_break failed " in logs, see below. should i consider removing
oplocks ?
regards
---
[2004/09/09 11:08:53, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(705)
ul_55 (129.199.59.202) connect to service users initially as user
DOM_BIBLIO+Daniele (uid=10029, gid=1) (pid
hello,
server : debian sarge on a dell pe 1750 . Secondary file server holding
homes and groups shares documents. the pdc is a windows nt 4.
clients are NT4, w2k some xp. about 100 clients.
i want to upgrade smbd from 3.0.2a to 3.0.6 but keep winbindd at 3.02a
because of a bug in winbindd 3.0.6.
D
hello,
can anybody explain or point me to a document that explain the locked files
section produced by smbstatus -L (see below).
what means denymode ? access ? what means exclusive+batch in the oplock
section ?
can anybody point me to a document explaining the way file locking works ?
regards
# sm
hello,
i tried to upgrade from 3.0.2a to 3.0.6 tonight. my smb.conf is below. (i
upgraded by apt-get install "samba samba-common winbind" )
it didnt work : i was asked for a username and password for everything even
when i tried to acces the shares' root with its unc name ( \\server ).
do u have an
i solved my problem by downgrading winbind to 3.0.2a.
i downgraded samba first but it didnt change anything.
i used the packages that are stored in /var/cache/apt/archives/
"éric le hénaff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit dans le message de
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> is your
i solved my problem by downgrading winbind to 3.0.2a.
i downgraded samba first but it didnt change anything.
"éric le hénaff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit dans le message de
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> i may have a related problem too.
> i recently upgraded from 3.0.2a to 3.0
i solved my problem by downgrading winbind to 3.0.2a.
i downgraded samba first but it didnt change anything.
"éric le hénaff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit dans le message de
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> i may have a related problem too.
> i recently upgraded from 3.0.2a to 3.0
is your system a debian one ?
how did you get back to 3.0.2a-1? what is the recommended way to downgrade a
package ?
thanks
i may have a related problem too.
i recently upgraded from 3.0.2a to 3.0.5. the server's os is debian sarge.
it provides more disk space to the domain.
before the upgrade, i
i may have a related problem too.
i recently upgraded from 3.0.2a to 3.0.5. the server's os is debian sarge.
it provides more disk space to the domain.
before the upgrade, i was able to use a very usefull copy tool : scopy.exe.
this tool runs on the pdc (window NT4). i use it to copy files from the
i may have a related problem too.
i recently upgraded from 3.0.2a to 3.0.5. the server's os is debian sarge.
it provides more disk space to the domain.
before the upgrade, i was able to use a very usefull copy tool : scopy.exe.
this tool runs on the pdc (window NT4). i use it to copy files from the
Hello list,
I installed a domain member server with linux debian sarge and samba 3.02a
as fileserver. I experimented with an ext3 with acl extension filesystem
partition and with an xfs partition.
I'm trying to do so that the file and directory management is as similar as
possible as with a windows
37 matches
Mail list logo
