If you've Python there are plenty of webdav options:
http://akadav.sourceforge.net/ (under Twisted)
and
https://code.google.com/p/pywebdav/
seem to be the most mature.
Best of luck;
Ben
On 24 July 2013 20:59, Paul D. DeRocco wrote:
> > From: Chris Weiss [mailto:cwe..
you've got the RAM to make it work smoothly.
http://zfsonlinux.org/
Has anyone tried this configuration?
Ben
On 1 March 2013 23:46, Gregory Sloop wrote:
> Thanks. I asked this a few weeks back and didn't get much response.
> The half-hearted consensus was that rsync wou
regards
simon
--- On Sat, 10/13/12, simon ben wrote:
From: simon ben
Subject: [Samba] How can I show only the shares that user have access to in
SAMBA
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Date: Saturday, October 13, 2012, 1:58 PM
Dear All,
As I have a issue to display only those shares the users
your help
regards
simon
--- On Thu, 10/11/12, simon ben wrote:
From: simon ben
Subject: Re: [Samba] How can I show only the shares that user have access to in
SAMBA
To: "Björn JACKE"
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Date: Thursday, October 11, 2012, 1:04 PM
Dear Bjorn,
Indeed so gr
show only the shares that user have access to in
SAMBA
To: "simon ben"
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Date: Thursday, October 11, 2012, 2:10 AM
On 2012-10-11 at 01:22 -0700 simon ben sent off:
> but when I do a testparm it gives a error
> ---
> [root@kmsha
> i am using yes for all. that is when a unix user is created automatically
add a samba user likewise for groups.
apprecite your help and advise
regards
simon
--- On Wed, 10/10/12, Björn JACKE wrote:
From: Björn JACKE
Subject: Re: [Samba] How can I show only the shares that
Dear All,
I have implemented samba to right now in test environment to be implemented in
production as samba file server
so far its working grt
but I have one issue
i have right now one share and want only the users who have access to the share
to see it
and the others should not
when I lo
Dear All,
Below I had earlier posted this issue but its solved
I accutally forgot about going to unused modules and then configure quota
sorry for this
regards
simon
Dear All,
I have just implemented a new setup of centos 5.8 server to be used as a Linux
file server using sambais
The ser
Dear All,
I have just implemented a new setup of centos 5.8 server to be used as a Linux
file server using sambais
The server is partitioned with the defaults
below is a df -k output
---
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00
Is site support on the road map? Very useful for WAN-connected branch
offices with local servers, or doing manual load-balancing with cloud
servers.
On 21 Sep 2012 07:34, "Matthieu Patou" wrote:
> On 09/19/2012 12:02 PM, Kristofer wrote:
>
>> I have several Samba 4 AD controllers set up at multip
Assuming samba 4 supports them, watch out for your FSMO roles; each role
will be specific to one server in the domain. Recovering from the loss of a
server that currenty owns one or more of the FMSO roles is a little
trickier than just booting another peer-DC to handle requests.
On Wednesday, 11 J
en bridge their
physical local ethernet with a tap device (using a utility such as brctl on
Linux), then VPN the tap device to another similar setup at the other end.
This allows OpenVPN to route ethernet broadcasts and non-IP protocols such
as Windows NetBios over the VPN..."
-Ben.
On 8 July 20
Seconded (thirded? fourthed?)
On 4 July 2012 05:40, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 04:32:16PM +1200, Jason Haar wrote:
> > On 04/07/12 02:11, Luiz Gustavo dos S. Costa wrote:
> > > Hi all..
> > >
> > > Is possible use the s3fs with ZFS (freebsd) ? how ?
> >
> > Is the Samba team
-with-samba-emc-servers-nas-devices.aspx
or just ask him to search as follows:
https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=RoundUpWriteTimeOnSync
and he'll be convinced.
On 28 June 2012 21:08, Todor Fassl wrote:
> From: "Ben Metcalfe"
> To:
> Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2012 2:24 PM
...and apologies for doing the "reply to sender/reply to list" thing as
well. :)
On 28 June 2012 20:15, Ben Metcalfe wrote:
> "That's the point. I am
> pushing the idea that our problem is not using folder redirection and the
> Windows guy is pushing the idea that i
users don't actually roam more
than once every six months...
On 28 June 2012 20:09, Ben Metcalfe wrote:
> Here's a decent summary of roaming profiles on the latest windows
> iterations.
> http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh848267
>
> "Branche cache" m
I am out of the office until 19/10/2011.
Eitan Ben-Amos is prepared for DELETION (FREEZE)
Note: This is an automated response to your message "samba Digest, Vol
114, Issue 4" sent on 4/6/2012 21:00:03.
This is the only notification you will receive while this person is awa
> Indeed.
> No need to guess or waste time. Pinpoint the exact file and process /
> network transaction with pSexec and process monitor.
>
> HOWTO:
> http://blogs.technet.com/b/markrussinovich/archive/2010/01/13/3305263.aspx
>
> On Thursday, 17 May 2012, Cain, Marc wrote:
>
>>
>> On May 12, 2012, a
There's a thread here:
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en/winserverDS/thread/a9ef96fb-1e20-469c-b1ea-306846f46181
...that implicates the winlogon process, and indicates a few possible fixes
and troubleshooting options. Aside from the ideas mentioned, I've had good
results in similar si
r an Openindiana Dom0; way too complex).
On 1 May 2012 04:06, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:44:25PM +0100, Ben Metcalfe wrote:
> > Would the following be workable:
> >
> > Run Samba 3 binaries in one linux OpenVZ instance to serve files.
> > Run Sam
Would the following be workable:
Run Samba 3 binaries in one linux OpenVZ instance to serve files.
Run Samba 4 binaries in another, separate OpenVZ instance as an AD domain
controller.
...all on the same physical machine?
http://wiki.openvz.org/
Separate note: I'd really like to see transparent
Would the following be workable:
Run Samba 3 binaries in one linux OpenVZ instance to serve files.
Run Samba 4 binaries in another, separate OpenVZ instance as an AD domain
controller.
...all on the same physical machine?
http://wiki.openvz.org/
Separate note: I'd really like to see transparent
uld* be able to alter permissions
on Samba 4 shares from XP Pro; don't need Windows 7 to administer?).
Thanks,
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
ting, this is sending me a bit
crazy. Has anyone else encountered a similar situation and solved or
worked around it? Or does anyone have any insight into possible causes?
Many thanks,
Ben Clayton
Irax Ltd.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: h
one have any feel for what the
issue / solution might be, of have any useful links or suggestions as to
how to take this further?
Many thanks for any help you can give.
Ben Clayton
--
Ben Clayton
Director
Irax Ltd.
50C Bolton Street
Bury
Lancs
BL9 0LL
-
Tel: 0161 761 0077
Fax: 0161 797 2394
--
- I suspect I have missed something silly,
and now can't see the wood for the trees. Insight or experience would be
appreciated.
Many thanks,
Ben
--
Dr. Ben Clayton
Director
Irax Ltd.
-
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
On Jul 14, 2011, at 2:52 PM, Gaiseric Vandal wrote:
> On 07/14/2011 04:31 PM, Ben Sigman wrote:
>>
>> On Jul 14, 2011, at 7:13 AM, Gaiseric Vandal wrote:
>>
>>> On 07/14/2011 01:21 AM, Ben Sigman wrote:
>>>> After upgrading to 3.4.0, I can no longe
On Jul 14, 2011, at 7:13 AM, Gaiseric Vandal wrote:
> On 07/14/2011 01:21 AM, Ben Sigman wrote:
>> After upgrading to 3.4.0, I can no longer add new users. Any users that were
>> added beforehand work fine. Any users that I attempt to create cannot login
>> (error: NT_STA
/0)
...And authentication over smb works (auth.log):
Jul 13 21:42:53 server smbd[3684]: pam_unix(samba:session): session opened for
user ben by (uid=0)
...In samba.log:
[2011/07/13 21:42:53, 4] auth/auth_sam.c:137(sam_account_ok)
sam_account_ok: Checking SMB password for user smbuser
[2011/07
Thanks John,
I had seen that but I did not get the error that it mentioned, so I was
wondering if something had changed. Thanks for your help!
Ben Arthur
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 10:16 AM, John Drescher wrote:
> > I was wondering if anyone knew if Samba version 2.2.3a ran on Red H
compatible
with Red Hat 7.3 Thanks for your time.
Ben Arthur
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
ling, some Wireshark
packet examination, etc. End result submitted in the hope of saving
someone else some work.
Ben
--
Ben Clayton
Director
Irax Ltd.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
tore
valid users = user1 user2 user3 user4
write list = user1 user2 user3 user4
create mask = 770
force create mode = 770
security mask = 770
force security mode = 644
directory mask = 770
force directory mode = 770
directory security mask = 770
force directory security mode = 770
read only =
olker Lendecke
wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 10:32:15AM -0600, Ben Cone wrote:
> >
> > I will note that Samba installed from Ubuntu's repositories does not
> include
> > the file ntlmssp.c on my system. I did grab a copy of the file, put it
> in
> > the proper
this going I am
hoping to not have to do any real work on it again for a couple of years.
Ben
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 4:01 AM, Volker Lendecke
wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 05:00:52PM -0600, Ben Cone wrote:
> > Installed Samba 3 with Winbind on Ubuntu server 10.04 x64.
> >
>
alid Users =...@office.domain.com+officecomputers
public=yes
writable=yes
browseable=yes
force create mode = 0755
force directory mode = 0755
force group = @OFFICE.DOMAIN.COM+officeComputers
guest ok = yes
guest account = nobody
Where am I going wrong?
Ben
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the
have been trying to find a good
guide to configure the smb.conf file but haven't really found anything.
By the way, successful install on ubuntu 10.04 x64 server that formally had
samba 3 and winbind on it that were installed from aptitude.
Any help would be appreciated.
Ben
--
To unsubs
OSX
client is trying to do something with the samba share between each
file that Windows is not; but I really have no idea.
Any suggestions appreciated, thank you in advance.
--
Ben XO / Last.fm / Bassdrive / DI.FM
http://www.last.fm/user/ben-xo
http://twitter.com/benxo
--
To unsubscribe from
hi
this is my smb.conf
[global]
workgroup = SRE
server string = Samba Server
security = ads
log file = /var/samba/log/log.%m
max log size = 50
dns proxy = No
realm = SRE.COM
winbind separator = +
winbind enum users = yes
HI
Friends please check my problem
http://bentgeorge.com/samba/
Thanks
Ben.T.George
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Hi
please check with this link
http://bentgeorge.com/samba/
>
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Gaiseric Vandal > wrote:
>
>> But your output shows
>>
>>
>> params.c:pm_process() - Processing configuration file
>> "/etc/sfw/sm
i tried to telnet to sun1(unix) machine..but login failed.
i tried benvin user on AD..not ben
/var/samba/log
[2010/10/04 15:24:06, 6] nsswitch/winbindd.c:(641)
accepted socket 23
[2010/10/04 15:24:06, 10] nsswitch/winbindd.c:(326)
process_request: request fn INTERFACE_VERSION
[2010/10/04
Support contract..? how much for that
the thing i am doing this is to fix my job..because this this my 1st
project.
i didn't get salery to..anyway can u please give your rate for this..
:(
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 1:08 PM, wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 12:24:50PM +0300, Ben Geor
ing configuration file
> "/etc/sfw/smb.conf"
>
>
>
>
>
> On 10/01/2010 07:26 AM, Ben George wrote:
>
>
> yes sunfreeware samba installed under
>
> /usr/local/samba
>
> configuration file
>
> /usr/local/samba/lib i exported this lib PATH
>
&g
2010 8:22 PM
> To: samba@lists.samba.org
> Subject: Re: [Samba] samba with AD help.
>
> Can you post the global part of your smb.conf, your nsswitch and your
> kerberos.conf?
>
> On 9/29/10 5:33 AM, Ben George wrote:
> > when i try to join the domain in UNIX (Sun Solaris
hould see it looking
> for nss_winbind.so.1 - ideally it will look in /usr/local/samba/lib before
> /usr/lib. If it uses /usr/lib/nss_winbind.so.1 that will probably NOT
> work. You may want to rename that file just to make sure.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 09/30/2010 10:57 AM,
Sun Solaris 10 (under SPARC)
local users in /etc/passwd
samba 3.4.2 from sunfreeware.com
getent passwd
*ramana:x:100:1::/export/home/ramana:/bin/sh
teju:x:101:1::/export/home/teju:/bin/sh
user1:x:102:1::/export/home/user1:/bin/sh
ben:x:103:1::/home/ben:/bin/sh
*like this*
**
*Thanks
amana:/bin/sh
teju:x:101:1::/export/home/teju:/bin/sh
user1:x:102:1::/export/home/user1:/bin/sh
ben:x:103:1::/home/ben:/bin/sh*
"you already have a "unix" ben and a "ADS" ben defined?"
Yes i defined the ben user in Unix and ADS...bcoz i don't have much
k
7;SUN1' to realm 'sre.com'*
and Wbinfo shows the users and groups from the AD
*bash-3.00# ./wbinfo -u
SUN1+ramana
SUN1+user1
SUN1+ben
administrator
guest
support_388945a0
krbtgt
teju
ben
ramana*
*bash-3.00# ./wbinfo -g
helpservicesgroup
telnetclients
domain computers
domain controllers
7;SUN1' to realm 'sre.com'*
and Wbinfo shows the users and groups from the AD
*bash-3.00# ./wbinfo -u
SUN1+ramana
SUN1+user1
SUN1+ben
administrator
guest
support_388945a0
krbtgt
teju
ben
ramana*
*bash-3.00# ./wbinfo -g
helpservicesgroup
telnetclients
domain computers
domain controllers
ob LaRose wrote:
>
> Hi Ben,
>
> Which version of AD are you using? We had no luck integrating Solaris
> Samba w/ AD 2008 last year, and were forced to use a third-party
> authentication product called Centrify DirectControl to facilitate.
>
> This may have changed by no
when i try to join the domain in UNIX (Sun Solaris 10 SPARC),i got error
message like this
bash-3.00# ./net ads -d3 join -U administra...@sre.com
[2010/09/29 14:26:02, 3] param/loadparm.c:(5055)
lp_load: refreshing parameters
[2010/09/29 14:26:02, 3] param/loadparm.c:(1440)
HI
my name ins Ben.T.George
i am new to samba and active directory integration
my machine ins Sun Slaris SPARC (solaris 10).
the unix side samba and all deps are installed...from this link
http://www.sunfreeware.com/programlistsparc10.html#samba
now i want to sync samba with active directory..
x27;t have permission to access this network...like that...
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 8:58 PM, Dale Schroeder <
d...@briannassaladdressing.com> wrote:
> Ben,
>
> If I understand you correctly, you are describing expected behavior. Using
> "valid users" means only
> th
Hi
My Name is Ben.T.George
i successfully installed samba and other all dependencies on my Solaris 10
(SPARC) machine.
i stopped the default samba and swat and enabled these 2 from the installed
location (/usr/local/samba/sbin)
then i edited the smb.conf using swat.after that i got a smb.conf l
call from samba to a different nsswitch.conf file than the
api uses when called from everywhere else?
Thanks for any advice,
Ben Cohen
Programmer/Analyst (STS)
Scripps Institution of Oceanography
nco...@ucsd.edu
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instruct
nctioning"
I'm running Samba 3.4.5, and OpenLDAP 2.4.21 on FreeBSD 8.0
Here's the relevant config files:
smb.conf -> http://pastebin.com/VSUXFDst
slapd.conf -> http://pastebin.com/u8b0Hw8U
Any help would be great! Let me know if any further information about
the configuration would
hydr...@bran ~ $ cat /proc/config.gz |gunzip|grep -i cifs
CONFIG_CIFS=m
# CONFIG_CIFS_STATS is not set
# CONFIG_CIFS_WEAK_PW_HASH is not set
# CONFIG_CIFS_UPCALL is not set
CONFIG_CIFS_XATTR=y
CONFIG_CIFS_POSIX=y
# CONFIG_CIFS_DEBUG2 is not set
# CONFIG_CIFS_EXPERIMENTAL is not set
François Lega
That's not a the problem. I know the extensions are compiled in and
running on the client machine. I can see the ACLs over the cifs mount
from the client machine. It only becomes an issue when I try to write
files over the cifs mount. At that point it writes the wrong
uid/gid/perms. It even ov
What type of file processors are you running along with samba?. Are you
running the virus checking plugin or VFS(recycle bin)? Virus checking is
very cpu and disk I/O intensive these can really slow down a samba
server. I can't expect VFS is all that cheap either when moving big files.
Raghu A wro
Hello all,
I've been dealing with this problem for years now and I am a bit fed
up with it. Maybe some of you all can shed some light on the situation.
I am having problems with my samba server setting the
uid/gid/permissions incorrectly when a file is written to the server
filesystem over cif
i am getting the following im my logs at the same time when a client
disconnects and reports network name not available error.
sys_get_vfs_quota() failed for mntpath[] bdev[/dev/gpfs] qtype[*] id[*]: No
such device
Also can someone tell me what (numopen=3) mean? On my samba server which are
ma
No joy upto now. Is there anything buggy in latest version of sofs-1.5.2? i.e
samba-3.2.7-ctdb.54
--- On Fri, 6/2/09, Ben Chitambira wrote:
From: Ben Chitambira
Subject: Fw: [Samba] specified network path no longer available
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Date: Friday, 6 February, 2009, 5:34 PM
Linux Addict wrote:
>
> Once for all, go ahead with rid and keep the smb.conf consistent across
> OR use rfc2307. RID is easier to manage.
Thanks very much for the advice Dale & Linux Addict.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to
ppose I
could back up the relevant tdb files, do a leave on the existing server,
join the new one and copy the tdbs into place? Still, if I can use
idmap_rid without undue hassle it's clearly a better solution.
Best,
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
i
as to where to start looking to debug this?
Many thanks in advance.
Ben Tisdall
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
clustered samba or I am describing a false scenario?
Does inreasing DNS TTL for Smb_Srv or these specific nodes help?
Why do the windows clients have to query the dns within such a short space of
time
Thanks
--- On Thu, 5/2/09, Ben Chitambira wrote:
From: Ben Chitambira
Subject: [Samba] specifi
I am having the "network path no longer available" issue and below is the log
for the XP client concerned. This happens when copying a file from XP to the
samba share. This is Centos 5, Sofs 1.5.2. with 3 nodes serving smb,nfs and
ftp. domain controller is a separate linux samba pdc. auth is lda
Name, else only one box will be able
> to successfully join to AD + export Samba shares.
>
> Cheers,
> -Kums
>
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 1:18 AM, Ben Tisdall <mailto:b...@redcircleit.com>> wrote:
>
> tim clusters wrote:
> >
> > What i
tim clusters wrote:
>
> What is your id backend? AD or RID? Can you post your smb.conf?
>
Hi Tim & thanks for replying.
This is very minimal smb.conf - the history is that it was copied
verbatim from a Guardian snap appliance & worked perfectly well on 'Box A'.
workgroup = OURDOMAIN
security =
uid 10082
Storing response for pid 14257, len 3240
Destroying timed event 2ae2266d45b0 "async_request_timeout"
Retrieving response for pid 14257
uid2sid_recv: uid 10082 has sid S-1-22-1-10082
Could not find domain for sid S-1-22-1-10082
Ben Tisdall wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
one (same lib versions, same
conf file).
//ben...@testukmcsstor1//:~$ rpm -qa | grep nss-
nss-tools-3.12.2.0-2.el5.centos
nss-3.12.2.0-2.el5.centos
pkinit-nss-0.7.3-1.el5
nss-3.12.2.0-2.el5.centos
Looks like this may be more of a libnss problem than a samba one, but
can anyone suggest how I can
Greetings!
* Patrick Ben Koetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > Yes it is the full log and yes it's weird. Excuse my ignorance, the log
> > > level
> > > setting is a copy and paste setting:
> > >
> > > log level = 3 passdb:5 auth:10 winbin
* Volker Lendecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 10:42:21PM +0100, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> > Yes it is the full log and yes it's weird. Excuse my ignorance, the log
> > level
> > setting is a copy and paste setting:
> >
> &
* Volker Lendecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 10:42:21PM +0100, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> > Yes it is the full log and yes it's weird. Excuse my ignorance, the log
> > level
> > setting is a copy and paste setting:
> >
> &
* Volker Lendecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 09:24:36PM +0100, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> > I am trying to let a Konica-Minolta Copy-Scanner-Printer store scanned stuff
> > to a file.
> >
> > It works at once, if I let it send the file
I am trying to let a Konica-Minolta Copy-Scanner-Printer store scanned stuff
to a file.
It works at once, if I let it send the file to a SMB share provided by a W2K
workstation that is part of a (Samba) domain.
It doesn't work, if I want it to store the messages on a share provided by the
Samba s
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 03:26:39PM +0100, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> > I've configured a Samba server based on Ubuntu packages. It uses LDAP as
> > backend.
> >
> > The server announces itself using two netbios (?) names - OFFICE and SERVER.
> > Originally I ha
I've configured a Samba server based on Ubuntu packages. It uses LDAP as
backend.
The server announces itself using two netbios (?) names - OFFICE and SERVER.
Originally I had planned to use OFFICE. Then I switched to SERVER.
I've looked at the config files and search for any occurences of OFFICE
Shot in the dark, it's not app-armor related is it?
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
ay be relevant:
The files with accents were created by windows.
I have read that "mount -t smbfs" should be synonymous with
"smbmount". Well it isn't for me - I can't mount the network drive at
all with the former command.
Any help at all very much appreciated!
Cheers
I've set up a Samba Server using OpenLDAP as backend.
The sambaDomainName is "JOJO". When I reboot (not upon restarting the samba
services) a second sambaDomainName, "SERVER", entry is added automatically.
The hostname of the machine running the Samba services is "server". This makes
me think that
comment = "STAFF read/write, others read"
path = /space/data1/orgdata
valid users = root, @staff
read only = No
create mask = 0664
force create mode = 0664
directory mask = 0775
force directory mode = 0775
Thanks,
--
Ben Tisdall
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[14752]:#16 winbindd [0x552aaff5aa]
Mar 14 16:12:45 firefly winbindd[14752]: [2008/03/14 16:12:45, 0]
lib/fault.c:dump_core(181)
Mar 14 16:12:45 firefly winbindd[14752]: dumping core in
/var/log/samba/cores/winbindd
Mar 14 16:12:45 firefly winbindd[147
--
Ben
--
To unsubscribe from this list go
Bonjour,
J'ai lus un article sur smbmnt et j'ai cru comprendre que ce programme permet
de monter le partage des dossiers uniquement sous linux.
Est ce que vous pouvez m'éclairé sur ca ?
Merci d'avance.
This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is
the prope
And the correct answer is...
Using a valid users line that looks like this:
Valid users = +DOMAIN\group
Many thanks to "irda" on the #samba IRC channel.
Ben
Ben Vaughan
Globalcom IT Infrastructure Support Team
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
312 673 4116
-Original Message-
Fr
_sysadmins
gc_sysadmins:*:10001:bvaughan
# getent passwd bvaughan
bvaughan:*:1812:100:Ben Vaughan, IT Systems Overlord:/home/bvaughan:/bin/bash
When trying to access the [sysadmins] share defined as above, samba logging
says this:
user 'CORP\bvaughan' (from session setup) not perm
_
Feel like a local wherever you go.
http://www.backofmyhand.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
ed domain with both linux
and windows clients?
> I am probably going to go with a kerberos and winbind mechanism to get this
> working. Hold out guys - Anything is possible!
Ben
_
Feel like a local wherever you go.
http://www.b
a installs without result. I feel there is a way forward
buy my lack of knowledge of linux services is letting me down.
Regards,
Ben
IT Tech Springfield School, Portsmouth, UK
_
Feel like a local wherever you go.
http://www.backof
Mark Nienberg wrote:
> Ben Tisdall wrote:
>> I made a post a few weeks ago regarding this but was unable to find a
>> solution. This is the situation:
>>
>> + I'm attempting to upgrade from samba 3.0.23a (Fedora core package
>> 3.0.23a-1.fc4.1) to the lat
e silly error or
omission on my part. Unfortunately I'm stuck as to what this might be &
any pointers to further debugging would be very much appreciated.
--
Ben Tisdall
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
- 2 jdomDomain Users 4096
> 2007-07-01 09:32 jdom/
>
[homes]
comment = Home Directories
valid users = %S,root <--
read only = no
create mask = 0600
directory mask = 0700
browseable = no
The UNIX perms/ownerships ca
Eric J. Feldhusen wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ben Tisdall wrote:
Hi I'm trying to upgrade from Samba 3.0.23c on FC4 to 3.0.25b from Samba
sources.
Everything appears to function correctly until an MS word document is
opened from a share - the file opens but the
0
force directory mode = 0770
[WebForms]
path = /var/www/html/_docs_
valid users = xxx,xxx,xxx
read only = No
create mask = 00
force create mode = 0664
--
Ben Tisdall
RedCircle IT Ltd, London NW1.
www.redcircleit.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+44 (0)20 7387 0351
+44
servers.
>
Thanks for your input here Andrew:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ smbd -b | grep LDAP
HAVE_LDAP_H
HAVE_LDAP
HAVE_LDAP_ADD_RESULT_ENTRY
HAVE_LDAP_DN2AD_CANONICAL
HAVE_LDAP_INIT
HAVE_LDAP_INITIALIZE
HAVE_LDAP_SET_REBIND_PROC
HAVE_LIBLDAP
LDAP_SET_REBIND_PROC_A
official Samba sources failover works fine.
Unfortunately I'd already made a slightly embarrassing regression from
3.0.25b to the Fedora package on Monday due to resource utilisation
issues I haven't yet had time to diagnose. All the more reason to get
back on the case!
Cheers,
--
Be
John Drescher wrote:
> On 8/8/07, Ben Tisdall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> John Drescher wrote:
>>
>>> Is 1389 the real port on the master ldap server?
>> Yes (I have Scalix running it's own LDAP-like directory on the standard
>> port).
e.com
Both work individually, but not both at once.
> Have you configured
> the ldap server to use ldap ssl?
Previously, but I'm currently testing without in the interest of
simplicity, ie:
ldap ssl = off
Thanks.
--
Ben Tisdall
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the foll
nything useful.
Version is Samba 3.0.23a-1.fc4.1
Probably something very silly but I'm out of ideas!
Cheers,
--
Ben Tisdall
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
1 - 100 of 332 matches
Mail list logo
