Re: [Samba] Is 2.2.6 Final?

On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 09:17, Markus Schabel wrote: > John H Terpstra wrote: > > >On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, William Jojo wrote: > > > >>Just tought I'd follow up and see if 2.2.6 is truly the last release of > >>samba_2_2 CVS branch. > >> > >> > >Yes, 2.2.6 is the latest stable release. > > > So the

RE: [Samba] 2 samba's?

It's probably safest to remove the rpm's and re-install them if you need them. rpm -e --allmatches On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 00:01, Elliot wrote: > Ok guys, I looked that the files associated with those 2 packages. It > does seem to conflict with my source samba. > > > Wish me luck guys... Hope no

Re: [Fwd: [Samba] Re: [K12OSN]Re: [Lrlug-discuss]emergency....file/directory recovery]

y fast. It's better than Netware's Salvage though as it does revisioning. And since it's a standard directory instead of a "special place" it's actually easier for me to browse the files to recover the right ones. Chris Tooley On Tue, 2002-06-04 at 09:49, Barry Smo

Re: [Samba] Linux to Windows Dfs

s never been requested before. I have wished for this for a long time. The ability to mount some directory down the tree without making a ton of shares would be great. Chris Tooley > > > However, smbfs doesn't support dfs either so even with "submounts" I > think

Re: [Samba] Re: Can't get samba 2.2.3a to compile with ACL support(with logs)

On Thu, 2002-04-25 at 19:03, Nathan Scott wrote: > On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 03:28:53PM -0500, Steve Lord wrote: > > On Thu, 2002-04-25 at 15:22, Chris Tooley wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, 2002-04-25 at 15:06, Gerald Carter wrote: > > >

Re: [Samba] Re: Can't get samba 2.2.3a to compile with ACL support(with logs)

On Thu, 2002-04-25 at 15:06, Gerald Carter wrote: > On 25 Apr 2002, Chris Tooley wrote: > > > Actually this is fixed in the acl rpms and new makefile. No change to > > Samba was required. > > > > Chris Tooely > > Cool. :-) Thanks for the update. I'l

Re: [Samba] Re: Can't get samba 2.2.3a to compile with ACLsupport (with logs)

On Thu, 2002-04-25 at 14:51, Chris Tooley wrote: > Actually this is fixed in the acl rpms and new makefile. No change to > Samba was required. > > Chris Tooely Of course what do I know, I can't even spell my own name. Chris Tooley > > On Thu, 2002-04-25 at 14:50, Gera

Re: [Samba] Re: Can't get samba 2.2.3a to compile with ACL support(with logs)

Actually this is fixed in the acl rpms and new makefile. No change to Samba was required. Chris Tooely On Thu, 2002-04-25 at 14:50, Gerald Carter wrote: > On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Nathan Scott wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 12:02:44PM -0500, Chris Tooley wrote: > > >

[Samba] Re: Can't get samba 2.2.3a to compile with ACL support (with logs)

r ACL support... no checking whether to build winbind... yes checking configure summary configure: error: summary failure. Aborting config error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.71265 (%build) Chris Tooley On Fri, 2002-04-19 at 19:02, Nathan Scott wrote: > hello, > > On Fri, Apr 19,

Re: [Samba] Invalid pass after win98 ug?

network you'll probably want to use plaintext passwords to start and figure out how to move everyone to encrypted passwords. Chris Tooley On Sun, 2002-04-21 at 14:20, Frank DiPrete wrote: > > Hello all > > I've had samba up and running for a while now. > All was perfect unt

RE: [Samba] Exchange Replacement (OT)

thing that you get from using Exchange is the calendaring/schedule process, which was supported quite nicely when the product was maintained by HP. Hopefully this helps. I know there is a demo that lasts 30 days for Linux (at least I am running one on a laptop to test it on). Chris Tooley Austin