> -Original Message-
> From: Dragan Krnic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Since I've updated McAfee to version 8 many applications
> which open file chooser dialogs report "Access denied"
> when trying to open a Samba share, including the users's
> own home directory.
Is this the version of M
> -Original Message-
> From: JLB [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Having Windows" and "transmitting emails from a Windows
> machine" are two
> totally different things.
>
> Many Windows users use Hotmail, Gmail, Yahoo, corporate Webmail, etc.
Actually, according to p0f, Hotmail is running
> -Original Message-
> From: JLB [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I'd go further and cut down on membership to people emailing from
> non-Windows systems (including Webmail systems, until someone
> invents a worm that spreads through those...)
Okay, I'm sorry, but that's the dumbest idea yet
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Pyeron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> And add the reply-to [EMAIL PROTECTED], there is too much
> accidental off
> list traffic.
I disagree. Changing it will create accidental on-list traffic, which
inconveniences far more people. It's not like replying
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Earnshaw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Use 3.0.14 (just released). There have been so many bug reports for
> 3.0.13, and so many impromptu
> patches, that I've put off my own upgrades from 3.0.11 (works
> perfectly
> on my RHAS3 sites) to 3.0.14 - and eve
> -Original Message-
> From: Javier Cano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Our Samba file server has a share with an visual basic application,
> there are 8 XP clients working with this share.
> The problem is that connections are very slow when accessing mdb
> databases... we are using MS Acc
> On Thu, 3 Mar 2005, David Sonenberg wrote:
>
> > First off I'm talking about through the windows interface,
> or using smbcacl.
> > Second let me rephrase my question. Shouldn't
> non-privileged users be able
> > to modify ACL's for files that they own?
Yes, I think so. You said "for file
> -Original Message-
> From: Deryck Hodge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Or: California - the CIFS file and print server -- Opening
> Windows to a
> narrow, though sunny and beautiful, stretch of the west-coast world.
I was hanging around the Camp Pendleton area last week and I sure didn't
> -Original Message-
> From: JLB [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I believe you mean "cracked".
> Please don't confuse "crackers" with "hackers".
I think you lost that debate a long time ago. From www.m-w.com:
Main Entry: hack·er
Pronunciation: 'ha-k&r
Function: noun
1 : one that hacks
2 : a
> -Original Message-
> From: David Sonenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Shouldn't regular users be able to modify ACL's for files they have
> write access to? I get the same error when I try to run the smcacl
> program with Domain Admin priveleges.
I think you have to be either root
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan G. Weichinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> My question:
>
> Does the WINS-Server also have to be the Master Browser?
I don't think so. On my network I have an NT 4 server acting as a WINS
server that's separate from our PDC. It seems to work fine. Ju
> -Original Message-
> From: Adam Williasm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > I understand the spirit, but, as far as my application is
> concerned (print server only for windows boxes), don't I have
> a way of not having to include winbind in nsswitch ?
>
> Currently I think the answer is n
> -Original Message-
> From: Markus Wollny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> By the way, the wait-period before the write access is
> "committed" or whatever is always precisely 30 seconds, so I
> believe, that there may be some timeout issue before samba is
> actually doing what it's suppose
I thought, just to close out this old thread, that I'd mention that I
recently switched from ext3fs to xfs and my ACL problems went away. I
haven't had any default ACLs fail to propegate in the last couple of weeks.
Before it was happening several times a week.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go
> -Original Message-
> From: Beschorner Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 3.0.8 has an evil file attribute bug if your samba server has
> ACL support.
> Try 3.0.10.
What are the details on this? I thought I'd been carefully watching the
release announcements for anything ACL-related, bu
> -Original Message-
> From: Lane Beneke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> A simple upgrade from 3.0.5 to 3.0.8 broke file
> sharing on a MSAccess 2k database (Win2k and WinXP
> clients.) There are Paradox databases on the same
> file-share that are working fine. The log files show
> no errors
> -Original Message-
> From: tom burkart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> The thing to use is a DHCP server that also provides clients
> with the IP
> address of the PDC through the netbios-name-servers option in the ISC
> DHCP server.
Actually, the address you want to give them is the addr
> -Original Message-
> From: Tomasz Chmielewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Schott, Erik J Mr ANOSC/FCBS wrote:
> > Not quite that elaborate, Tomasz. Many of these lists are archived
> > elsewhere on other websites (i.e. archives.neohapsis.com,
> et al) and all the
> > spammers have to d
> -Original Message-
> From: David Brodbeck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> If it's in a 64 bit slot, you can double those numbers, but
> you're still not leaving much of a margin.
That should say "in a 66 MHz slot".
--
To unsubscribe from this list go t
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Morrow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On the windows side, the network utilization monitor says
> that network
> load stays around 25-30%. It occasionally gets as high as 40%. CPU
> usage on the windows side is negligible. On the linux side,
> top repo
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Konold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Also, do you have a default ACL set
> > on the directory?
>
> No. All files in the directory have very different ACLs. What
> would the default ACL be good for?
It wouldn't do any good, in that case.
--
To unsubs
> -Original Message-
> From: Adam Tauno Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> If you have ACL support enabled on you Samba server make sure your
> backup solution supports backing up meta-data and extended
> attributes.
> 99 of out 100 do NOT.
The latest version of NovaNET (http://www.no
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Konold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I am experiencing the problem as described in
> http://us1.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-Guide/kerberos.html#
> id2562652
>
> Unfortunately the remedy/workaround as described there does
> not work in the more genera
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Ok, I've tried all the "common" fixes, such as turning oplocks off on
> the share. Twice a day the database has to be repaired.
How many users? My experience suggests that once you get over four or five
users, Access d
ng Samba 3.0.5-Debian, but the error has persisted for several
versions. I'm using ext2fs ACL support.
---
David Brodbeck, System Administrator
InterClean Equipment, Inc.
3939 Bestech Drive Suite B
Ypsilanti, MI 48197
(734) 975-2967 x221
(734) 975-1646 (fax)
--
To unsubscribe from t
> -Original Message-
> From: David Brodbeck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Okay, I tried the patches at
> http://samba.org/~jerry/patches/post-3.0.6/.
> Now I can connect fine via smb, but ssh authentication via
> PAM still doesn't
> work.
Finally I just ga
> -Original Message-
> From: David Brodbeck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I upgraded one of our systems from 2.2.8a to 3.0.6.
> Authentication via
> winbindd is not working. "wbinfo -t" gives a good result, and 'getent
> passwd' and 'getent gro
I'm still being frustrated on this one. I can't seem to come up with a way
to reproduce it. But I've got some more details, now. The default ACL
appears to be being created properly at first, then removed later.
For example, I have this folder:
# file: WasteManagement
# owner: INTERCLEAN+Susan
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Andrewjeski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I am seeing this problem too,
>
> Though we're using winbind.
Are your users making any folders available offline? I've seen some odd
interaction problems with Samba and XP's offline folder feature.
--
To uns
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeremy Allison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Can you reproduce this ? I'd like to see a reproducible case for it
> in order to be able to work on it.
Unfortunately I haven't been able to reproduce it intentionally yet. :( It
keeps happening at random intervals
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeremy Allison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> When I used to work on problems like that for Vantive all I did was
> put a sniffer on client and server and look for dropped packets. Once
> I found one or more on a lan segment I knew there was an equipment
> problem
patch up permissions by hand. I've set
"inherit acls=yes", but it doesn't seem to have completely solved the
problem.
---
David Brodbeck, System Administrator
InterClean Equipment, Inc.
3939 Bestech Drive Suite B
Ypsilanti, MI 48197
(734) 975-2967 x221
(734) 975-1646 (fax)
--
To
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hi, just a thought
>
> Are the LINUX permissions on the directory set correctly ?
> Make sure it's
> owned by your group, I got caught out by that a few times
> when I created a
> new directory as "root" and then
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Lidstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> You've probably only put them in because of the problem you're having,
> but "writeable/writable" and "read only" are actually the same setting
> but reversed. E.g. "writeable/writable = yes" is the same as
> "read on
yes
read only = no
Here are the permissions on /var/www:
# file: www
# owner: root
# group: INTERCLEAN+Domain Admins
user::rwx
group::rwx
other::r-x
I'm in the Domain Admins group. Why doesn't this work? I'm sure there's
something silly I'm overlooking, b
> -Original Message-
> From: tms3 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >This rumour seems to have kicked around the Internet a bit,
> but do you
> >have anything more than the old BSD copyright notice on
ftp.exe to base
>it on?
>
Yeah...grc.com has articles on it.
>
>Certainly netcraft and nmap h
> -Original Message-
> From: John Dollar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Samba used to work fine. Now, I can copy files out of my linux samba
> server to my windows machine at full speed. However, when I try
> copying a file over 5 or 6 Megs from my windows XP machine (or even
> in DOS) to t
Make sure your network doesn't have any problems with mismatched duplex
settings, excessive collisions, etc. I had this problem once and it
crippled anything that tried to copy a large file to the server. It showed
up worst with AutoCAD because it generated the most network traffic.
--
To unsubs
> -Original Message-
> From: EXT-Auleta, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I think I've narrowed down my problem, but I still don't know
> where to fix it. It appears that scanning the
> users.map file strips out the apostrophes and the Windows ID
> never matches:
> The entry in the
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeremy Allison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Yes they plague Windows fileservers as well. Search in MSDN for
> knowledge base articles relating to turning off oplocks in
> data-critical situations (ie. when you care about files not
> being corrupted :-).
I end
> -Original Message-
> From: Ken D'Ambrosio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> While I know that ReiserFS 4.x
> does, indeed, have the hooks for ACLs, it won't much matter if Samba
> isn't making use of them. Does anyone know if/when Samba and Reiser4
> will live in ACL-based harmony?
Samb
It caused me grief, too. I finally gave up on using the List-ID header to
sort mail and started using the [Samba] tag in the subject line instead. It
looks like I can't count on the header to stay the same.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http
> -Original Message-
> From: Rashkae [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> You might want to consider enabling and configurins WINS for your
> network, rather than rely on the serendipity of broadcast browsing.
I'll second this suggestion. When I turned on WINS on our network (which is
about the
> -Original Message-
> From: Preisinger Áron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> All of the files what we want to use(example .xls, .doc,
> .txt, and other
> files of not M$ specific apps). Sometimes the big files are doing the
> same with one user only.
> I'll try the veto oplocks for the mo
> -Original Message-
> From: Preisinger Áron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I am in a very big trouble. I migrated our Novell to samba
> 3.0.2a a week
> ago. It works, but it is very-very slow!
The first thing I would do is rule out a network problem. Try using FTP or
SCP to copy a file t
> -Original Message-
> From: Hans Wilmer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Jonas Almquist wrote:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > I´m having trubbles with the speed on my samba server,
> > Realtek 8169 Gigabit NIC
>
> Avoid Realtek NICs wherever you can.
If FTP is fast and Samba is slow, I doubt the prob
> -Original Message-
> From: James McDonald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In fact it seems that the anti virus servers are
> sending back message denied signals also, which makes the
> traffic worse.
These days, when almost every virus spoofs its return address, anyone
running an anti-v
> -Original Message-
> From: Pirkka Luukkonen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Has anyone got any "success story" or any good advice of
> using Posix ACLs
> (or Enhanced Attributes) with Samba? I'm using Debian woody
> with 2.4.22
> linux, ext3fs and Samba 3.
I've been playing with this on
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Kasak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> But ... the list server keeps locking my account, because
> messages are
> bouncing. That's how CanIt works - it bounces spam and viruses.
You should really change this behavior and drop the viruses instead.
Viruses
> -Original Message-
> From: John H Terpstra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Eric,
>
> Suggest you replace the ethernet card and/or the network cable.
> Sounds like a hardware issue.
Mismatched duplex settings (full vs. half) can also do this. Not all
hubs/switches auto-detect the etherne
> -Original Message-
> From: James Kreuziger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Now the problem. I have VERY intermittent connectivity
> to my PDC. When I show up in the morning, I can't log in
> more than half the time because it tells me the
> "domain is unavailable".
> The most frustrating
> -Original Message-
> From: Lists [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Is there anyway to support NFTS security on linux. it might mean
> compiling a new file system into the kernal? I don't know.
> Is there a
> how to that anyone can point me to.
It depends on what you mean by 'NTFS secu
> -Original Message-
> From: Ray Simard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> The most effective step to reduce this is to restrict posting to
> subscribed list members.
I don't think this will help much, though it may be a good idea for other
reasons.
I've never seen a virus arrive *through* t
> -Original Message-
> From: tvsjr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> As a consultant, I can not afford to have
> customer email ending up in the trash because the server
> thought it was spam.
I think this is the risk you take if you use a vital email address to post
to public forums. I wo
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Pool [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I don't think viruses read Usenet.
Some people have seen a correlation. Maybe the viruses are grabbing email
addresses out of people's USENET news caches.
Of course, correlation doesn't prove causation, something I t
(trimming the CC list yet again)
> -Original Message-
> From: J. Frisbie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Nevertheless, (I stand corrected) POSTING to the samba list is the
> kiss of death for an email account. There is a direct causal
> relationship.
You know, I've been posting to the samba
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I have to agree with the others on the need for the mailing
> list to do something.
I suspect the main culprit is the USENET gateway. Any post to USENET with a
valid email address seems to immediately attract lots of
(Paring the CC list a bit.)
> -Original Message-
> From: J. Frisbie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Do not send messages to the list with machine parseable
> return addresess.
> Make the reply to address the mailing list, not the person
> who sent the message.
This is a bad idea. See: htt
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Werschke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sounds great. Thanks. But are you also confirming that I have to use
> roaming profiles to use cached credentials? I have read some of the
> possible scenarios where roaming profiles can cause loss of
> informati
> -Original Message-
> From: Lynn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hi. Please help me how to resolve a Samba bug
>
> The Time stamp in Samba is 11 hours behind time stamp in Linux
Is the Windows machine set to the same time zone as the Linux machine?
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to th
> -Original Message-
> From: Tim Uckun [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Yesterday I notices this in my syslog. This does not look
> good to me. Can
> anybody shed light on what this message might mean...
>
>
> Aug 25 08:02:20 secure smbd[11638]: [2003/08/25 08:02:20, 0]
> rpc_client/cli_
> -Original Message-
> From: Bob Sully [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Methinks it's time to install an antivirus utility on this server!
That wouldn't do anything to stem the tide of anti-virus software replies to
spoofed messages, which is what I've been seeing. Have any actual cop
> -Original Message-
> From: Dragan Krnic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> It is strange enough that Administrator's access
> should also change the ctime but what you report about
> mtime being changed is beyond the pale. I suspect ext3
> is the problem.
You can test this. Just remount yo
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Orrok [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 4:16 PM
> The trouble is, I don't know how to create a "virtual"
> interface to which I
> can associate the 172.16.0.0/16 network and still be able to
> have pptpd use
> it.
I recall seeing
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Eggleton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> The problem with this is a lot of spammers use false return
> addresses or impersonate real addresses.
Yes. This is highly annoying because bounce messages to those idiots stack
up in the mail queue of our mail gat
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthew Stier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> If the recipient's email address is not listed in the To: or
> Cc: lines of the
> message, don't reply.
Unfortunately Outlook doesn't offer this capability, as far as I know.
> A bit more considerate vacation progr
> -Original Message-
> From: Maciej Huetter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Probably I found a very ugly bug. I tried to delete a directory named
> '*' from a folder shared from a Linux server. The name of the
> directory
> shown in Windows was ~0%. When I deleted the file, ALL FILES
> I
> -Original Message-
> From: djfogbr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> My problem is: when I try to mount an w2k share in this
> machine using smbmount, I can't see big files correctly. I
> suspect that the problem happens with files bigger then 2GB.
> I have a file in the w2k machine that'
> -Original Message-
> From: chris Bouchet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >auth required /lib/security/pam_securetty.so
>
> >auth sufficient /lib/security/pam_winbind.so
>
> >auth sufficient /lib/security/pam_unix.so use_first_pass nullok
>
> >auth required /lib/security/pam_stack.so se
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Wharton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> What's more I can't do:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] tmp]# setfacl -m u:root:rwx test.txt
> setfacl: test.txt: Operation not supported
>
> I don't even know where to begin... Mandrake 9.1 kernel, XFS...
Is there a mount opt
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Why is this? Is it by design for some reason or a bug? It
> seems like a bug to me.
I agree it sounds like a bug. But...
> Every client PC on campus has
> Norton Anti Virus installed and I think my huge incremen
> -Original Message-
> From: Larry McElderry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 10:45 AM
> To: Rashkae; Robert Adkins II
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Samba] Ext3fs/ReiserFS Performance Enhancing
>
>
> I tend to agree. Perhaps a duplex mismatch between
> -Original Message-
> From: Jon Niehof [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Same diff; any ext2-based tools work just fine with a clean
> ext3 partition. So just make sure to shut down cleanly
> before using ghost.
Not always true.
Partition Magic 4.0 works great for resizing ext2 partitions
> -Original Message-
> From: FRANCO [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Can you help me please?
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] init.d]# smbpasswd -r cleo.surson -j surson
> -UAdministrator%camais
> Joined domain SURSON.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] init.d]# ./smb start
> Iniciando os serviços SMB:
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthew Daubenspeck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Should ext2 perform better then ext3?
Yes. Less overhead on writes. I don't believe there should be any
difference on reads, though.
It gets impractical on large drives, of course, because an fsck takes
fore
I'm using NovaNET Alliance to back up our mixed LAN of Windows and Linux
servers. Hard to beat the site license price if you have a lot of machines.
The only disadvantage I've seen is it doesn't (yet) support Linux ACLs.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instr
Is anyone else seeing Andrew's posts as blank messages like this with text
files attached? How can I get around them showing up this way? I like to
read his posts but this makes it pretty aggravating. :)
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thurs
;t
seem notably different from what I have set on some other shares. Here's
the entry for it in smb.conf:
[Shared]
comment = Files shared between departments
path = /export/shared
writable = yes
printable = no
Samba 2.2.7a, RedHat 7.0, kernel 2.4.19 + ext2 a
> -Original Message-
> From: Tobias Leers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> If a user stores an existing office document on a samba
> share, he takes
> ownership of it automatically. Office writes a new file. (Different
> inode, same name) Is there a possibility of going this round
> and kee
> -Original Message-
> From: Jean-Paul ARGUDO [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Many times a day, clients here when oppening a MS Word 97
> document have
> it in "READ ONLY" mode, but seems no reason fort that!!
Make very, very sure that you have no network problems. I had a very
similar p
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris de Vidal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Great! Did you learn anything new? Or did you cut
> and paste?You can use the patterns I
> described to add winbind support for any pam-aware
> service (e.g. NetAtalk and Webmin), which is very
> groovy.
Anoth
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Wrosch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> pam_winbind.so doesn't seem to exist. I even did a 'find' to
> see if it
> did somewhere else, but not such luck. The libnss_winbind.so
> was there
> though. Just the pam_winbind.so isn't there.
Hmm. Odd. I wo
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Wrosch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> When I did the other box, I did a binary distribution, so the file had
> apparently already existed. In following the instructions in
> the above
> link, this command doesn't seem to do anything:
>
> root# make n
> -Original Message-
> From: John H Terpstra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Well Chris, I to invite you to help answer more newbie
> questions. If you
> can spare that time, then please do try to help others who have not
> attained our level of proficiency in doing our home work before we
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Adkins II [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> I have read a few more of your responses. It appears that you
> believe wholeheartedly that your more advanced questions are going
> unanswered simply because of the volume of lower skilled questions.
I se
My own unscientific speed testing, back when we did our conversion, found
that Samba was slightly faster than the NT4 server we replaced. The old
server was on slower hardware, though, so it wasn't entirely a fair
comparison. I timed copies of a large file to an NT4 Workstation client to
test.
I
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert A Wooldridge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> I am using Samba version 2.2.5 on debian stable (but not
> debian package,
> we just build it). Autocad version is 2002. Our office has about 15
> draftsman and designers who are heavy autocad users. Severa
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert A Wooldridge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> I am having problems with autocad file corruption. My users are
> draftsman and access project files via samba over the network. This
> problem occurs after a file has been worked on and someone
> attempts o
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Milburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> and here is what the log.winbind is saying
>
>
> Could not look up dc's for domain SPORTODDS
> [2003/01/02 12:59:59, 3]
> nsswitch/winbindd_cm.c:get_connection_from_cache(406)
> Could not open a connection to
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Wittenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> I'd like to use the advanced ACL's, so was curious if anyone
> has patches
> for ACL's aginst a stock RH kernel?
Is there any particular reason you need to use a RedHat kernel? I've never
had any problems runn
Forgot to CC this to the list, so I'm sending it again. Sorry for the
inconvenience.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I have not been able to make the new version work
> without using the UNIX password file for vaildation as yet.
> If you could
> offer some advise or ti
Hmm...have you joined the Samba machine to the domain, using smbpasswd -j?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:13 PM
> To: David Brodbeck
> Subject: RE: [Samba] Re: Winbindd question/proble
Sorry, my bad. I meant 'wbinfo -t'.
Didn't mean to confuse you. :)
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:10 PM
> To: David Brodbeck
> Subject: RE: [Samba] Re: Winbindd quest
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I have just installed Samba 2.2.7 with Winbindd. I have been
> following a
> document called "Unified Logons between Windows NT ans UNIX
> using Winbind"
> Everything has gone smooth untill I got to the wbinfo
> command. When I run
> w
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Ehle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Why? MySql and MyOBDC are free, and perform much better than
> Access. You still use access to, well, access the MySQL server. The data
> sits on the server and MySQL handles the transactions. You can even put
MySQL on
> -Original Message-
> From: David Morel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> I don't have any MSAccess on my machines, so I can't test it, and I
> would like to backup or invalidate that claim: if i have an MS Access
> database open by several people on a windows share (say on a w2k
> machin
> -Original Message-
> From: Kurt Pfeifle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Good idea. I will give this a try after business hours.
> Right now there's
> > so much traffic on the system that the debug output is
> overwhelming at level
> > 3.
Okay, I tried this and didn't see anything t
> -Original Message-
> From: Kurt Pfeifle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> *Seems*...
>
> I tell you what mine is doing: It *uses* the printing system.
Okay. I know the one Linux Journal talked about a while back did not -- it
was just a shell script that was run as a 'print command'. T
> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Griffith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> It may be a "cups thing".
> If smb.conf has printing = cups, any manually set print
> commands are ignored.
One other thing -- I know my manually set 'print command' is being executed
because I get debugging output
> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Griffith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> It may be a "cups thing".
> If smb.conf has printing = cups, any manually set print
> commands are ignored.
Yeah, I thought of that too, so I commented out the printing = cups line
(actually, the whole generic [prin
1 - 100 of 133 matches
Mail list logo
