On Jun 25, 2011, at 1:32 AM, Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org wrote:
Quoting Linda W (sa...@tlinx.org):
I regret misinforming anyone.
I don't think you did..:-)
You mentioned xfs as a very well supported FS and we later were
reminded that its support was developed by Jeremy. I
Yes I do that using:
valid users = @ad\securitygroupname
works like a charm.
also in my config, don't know if it relates:
workgroup = AD
realm = AD.MYDOMAIN.XXX
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 5:57 AM, julien mabillard j...@mbuf.net wrote:
Hello,
I post here my question after having spent time on
I forgot to mention that I also use along with the other:
write list = @ad\securitygroupname
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 8:19 AM, grant little grantlid...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes I do that using:
valid users = @ad\securitygroupname
works like a charm.
also in my config, don't know if it relates
added a local root account as you said. When I type:
[root@sambafs1 ~]# net rpc rights grant X.Y\Administradores
SeAddUsersPrivilege -U sambafs1\root
Enter sambafs1\root's password:
Successfully granted rights.
[root@sambafs1 ~]# net rpc rights list privileges SeAddUsersPrivilege
-U
On Nov 15, 2010, at 12:28 PM, Larry lar...@artonagroup.com wrote:
HI
Does anyone have any guide for the samba on mac os x?
I found a lot of things missed on mac
Thanks
Larry
On my Mac it just works as installed with the OS, no guide needed. Point and
click.
What is missing on
On Sep 22, 2010, at 9:24 AM, Madhusudan Singh singh.madhusu...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
Server: Ubuntu Lucid server version
Role: Samba file server (I administer it)
Authentication: Against a Windows AD (I do not administer it) using winbind.
No other authentication scheme is
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 1:36 AM, Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.comwrote:
Volker Lendecke put forth on 9/18/2010 12:44 AM:
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 12:22:53AM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Pol Hallen put forth on 9/15/2010 9:36 AM:
debian stable (samba version 2:3.2.5-4lenny9)
from
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Matt Richardson maric...@csusb.edu wrote:
On 09/05/2010 05:14 PM, Ken D'Ambrosio wrote:
1) Are there any known issues with BTRFS?
2) Which version of Samba would be most appropriate for this?
3) AD integration: I've never really done it (with success); any
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 12:32 AM, Jean-Yves Avenard jyaven...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi there.
I have a FreeBSD server running Samba 3.3, connected to a domain who's
PDC is a MacOS 10.6 server running Samba 3.0.28 (ancient I know).
Working all fine, except for one thing I find annoying.
MacOS
On Sep 6, 2010, at 11:19 PM, Derek Lewis dle...@mtu.edu wrote:
snip/
When I run testparm, only the map archive, and map readonly are listed for
some reason
testparm -sv will show everything that is being set including defaults
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and
2010/9/7 Olivier PAVILLA olivier.pavi...@univ-orleans.fr
Before everything. Please forgive my poor english. It is not my fault I'm a
french :(
I have samba/ldap server with windows users.
On my Samba/ldap server , I'm using GQ. If I look about groups. There is :
'iatoss, exterieurs, other
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 1:29 PM, grant little grantlid...@gmail.com wrote:
what flag from smbd -b confirms ldapsam is built in?
I see:
# smbd -b | grep -i ldap
HAVE_LDAP_H
HAVE_LDAP
HAVE_LDAP_ADD_RESULT_ENTRY
HAVE_LDAP_INIT
HAVE_LDAP_INITIALIZE
HAVE_LDAP_SASL_WRAPPING
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 12:39 AM, DUPEYRAT, PIERRE (PIERRE)** CTR **
pierre.dupey...@alcatel-lucent.com wrote:
Hello,
I am using NIS groups , so the nsswitch.conf is configured as a NIS
client.
passwd files nis
group files nis …
With the same smb.conf , it works fine with the
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Daniel Müller muel...@tropenklinik.dewrote:
On Sun, 5 Sep 2010 20:14:03 -0400 (EDT), Ken D'Ambrosio k...@jots.org
Pherhaps it helps: My Thread: HOWTO samba4 centos5.5 named dnsupdate drbd
simple failover
what flag from smbd -b confirms ldapsam is built in?
I see:
# smbd -b | grep -i ldap
HAVE_LDAP_H
HAVE_LDAP
HAVE_LDAP_ADD_RESULT_ENTRY
HAVE_LDAP_INIT
HAVE_LDAP_INITIALIZE
HAVE_LDAP_SASL_WRAPPING
HAVE_LDAP_SET_REBIND_PROC
HAVE_LIBLDAP
LDAP_SET_REBIND_PROC_ARGS
help me ?
Regards.
_
Pierre DUPEYRAT
--
*De :* grant little [mailto:grantlid...@gmail.com]
*Envoyé :* jeudi 2 septembre 2010 19:38
*À :* DUPEYRAT, PIERRE (PIERRE)** CTR **
*Objet :* Re: [Samba] valid users option
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 4:32 AM, Ian Stirling stirl...@uk.ibm.com wrote:
I recently reinstalled a system running Samba as a WINS/Time server and I
can no longer get Windows systems to access it correctly.
I see the following now
[D:\Temp]net time \\timeserver
System error 5 has occurred.
I searched and found this from Volker in 2007 same error message but the fix
didn't fix in my case:
http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2007-March/130093.html
my system: ubuntu 10.04 LTS server samba 3.4.7
error:
[2010/09/01 23:57:17, 5] winbindd/idmap.c:169(smb_register_idmap)
Successfully
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 5:51 AM, Luca Ferrari fluca1...@infinito.it wrote:
Hi all,
I'm running version 3.0.28a on Ubuntu linux, and apparently from a day to
another I got performance issues: without any change in smb.conf (except a
few
added shares) I have mac osx and linux clients getting a
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 12:25 AM, grant little grantlid...@gmail.com wrote:
I searched and found this from Volker in 2007 same error message but the
fix didn't fix in my case:
http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2007-March/130093.html
my system: ubuntu 10.04 LTS server samba 3.4.7
error
pam.d/samba
@include common-auth
@include common-account
@include common-session
auth required pam_unix.so nullok_secure
auth sufficient pam_krb5.so minimum_uid=1000 use_first_pass
account sufficient pam_ldap.so use_first_pass
session sufficient pam_ldap.so
Thanks for your insight.
Grant
On Aug 27, 2010, at 7:59 AM, Josh Coombs jcoo...@staff.gwi.net wrote:
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Josh Coombs jcoo...@staff.gwi.net wrote:
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Josh Coombs jcoo...@staff.gwi.netwrote:
I'm turning my logging up to lvl 3, it looks like I'm seeing the
-- Forwarded message --
From: grant little grantlid...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 10:19 PM
Subject: Re: [Samba] Users mapping in security tab
To: tizo tiz...@gmail.com
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 7:37 AM, tizo tiz...@gmail.com wrote:
it seems like it may be a case
this:
acl group control
dos filemode
nt acl support (default=yes)
this might also have something to do with the behavior:
username level
I'm hoping that someone who knows more about this might coment.
Cheers,
Grant
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read
If you don't have that then you need the SSL certs fir the LDAP server on your
samba box.
It's a lot easier to debug initially with it off...
On Aug 3, 2010, at 3:18 PM, Norberto Bensa nbe...@flacso.org.ar wrote:
I'm sure that setting is there only to simplify the how to
El 03/08/2010
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 2:32 AM, grant little grantlid...@gmail.com wrote:
~:=) woohoo! I am pleased to report, that samba 3.5.0rc3, just released
yesterday for debian, appears to have fixed this problem.
I just installed the experimental version of that and at least on the
initial test I
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 1:39 AM, Thierry CONSTANT thierry.consta...@free.fr
wrote:
Hi,
I am using samba 3.0.24
Is it possible to grant access to a samba share
to an Active Directory group ?
yes. look at the various docs. There's a bunch of ways to do this.
I have a samba share, I want
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 10:01 AM, t...@tms3.com wrote:
On Tuesday 06/07/2010 at 8:03 am, Khaled Blah wrote:
It seems you didn't even read my initial question. Quoting myself here:
It seems you are asking for the answer to the ultimate question, the answer
of which is 42. However, you
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 1:16 AM, Moray Henderson
moray.hender...@ict-software.org wrote:
Whit Blauvelt wrote:
With smbd Version 3.0.33-3.14.el5 on two different CentOS 5.4 64-bit
boxes,
/etc/init.d/smb start reports OK for both nmbd and smbd, but an
instant
later smbd stops running, with
I used to join the laptop to the domain with. And it
did join, as I see the laptop machine account in AD. So I think it
must be something else ...
On 4/23/10, grant little grantlid...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Mike Leone tur...@mike-leone.com
wrote:
I set up
Also you say that other systems work fine. Are they the same version of
samba on the same OS and version? As in are we comparing apples with
apples...
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 12:14 PM, grant little grantlid...@gmail.comwrote:
maybe, but have you also tried
smbclient -L workhorse -Uturgon
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Mike Leone tur...@mike-leone.com wrote:
I set up an old laptop with Xubuntu 9.10. I configured Samba as to work
with my Win2003 AD domain that has MS Services for Unix installed.
I can get a Kerberos ticket. I successfully added the laptop to the AD
domain.
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 1:11 AM, David van Laatum da...@vanlaatum.id.auwrote:
snip/
Only thing Ive noticed is that I can't seem to change permissions from
windows
on a file/directory unless I personally own the file but not sure if that's
a
samba problem or a file system thing?
snip/
I'm
I had that problem with samba 3.4.X on ubuntu 9.10, the only way I could
get it to work was to use 777 folder permissions as you describe. The fix
for me was to go to samba 3.5.X which fixed that and several other problems
like not being able to login to samba from OS X.
Tried the same on a
lifetime. It seems that Lucid is still
at 3.4.7 tantalizingly close to 3.5 For ubuntu 9.10 samba 3.4.0 is not up
to much since it cannot do the mac OS X login described or windows 7.
My vote is for 3.5 on both debian squeeze and ubuntu lucid. Faint hope...
Grant.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 2:52 AM, irfaan khan k.irf...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have a strange issue and wanted some help to resolve , I had searched on
google but couldn't found suitable answer for the same.
Well, Let you know the scenario and details of my setup.
1. I am using Centos 5.4
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 7:59 AM, grant little grantlid...@gmail.com wrote:
OOPS! I misread what you were trying to do. I thought you were using LDAP.
Sorry. Please ignore my message
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 8:13 AM, Karsten Römke k.roe...@gmx.de wrote:
grant little schrieb:
snip/
OOPS! I misread what you were trying to do. I thought you were using
LDAP. Sorry. Please ignore my message
Hi Grant,
I'm not sure if you misunderstand me.
As far as I know ADS is nothing
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 6:51 AM, Wikked one wikk...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
If you've using yum and have added ftp.sernet.. to your
yum.repos.d
the paths have changed.
The documentation on the Samba site is no longer accurate,I'm hoping
someone will update this once I mention
, grant little grantlid...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Alex.
I'm not using winbind, just kerberos and LDAP and I have in all cases tried
both domain\username as well as username.
Here's a better dump of the ip log that appens on a failed login attempt
that seems to show that the authentication
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 9:20 AM, alansecker a...@asandco.co.uk wrote:
The user section of one of my smb.conf files looks like this yet when I
bring
up XP (a guest under VirtualBox) on my system, all linux dot files are
visible. Am I missing somethng?
[fred]
comment = Alan's service
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 5:55 AM, Michael Wood esiot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 February 2010 12:02, grant little grantlid...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 9:20 AM, alansecker a...@asandco.co.uk wrote:
The user section of one of my smb.conf files looks like this yet when I
bring
with these permissions:
drwxrwsrwx 8 root root 87 2010-02-20 00:17 shares
drwxrws--- 2 grant ASGSFileUsers 18 2010-02-20 00:21 asgs
here's smb.conf:
[global]
unix extensions = no
disable spoolss = Yes
disable netbios = yes
name resolve order = hosts
workgroup = AD
realm
] NativeLanMan=[SMBFS 1.6.0] PrimaryDomain=[]
[2010/02/20 13:13:17, 3] libsmb/ntlmssp.c:745(ntlmssp_server_auth)
Got user=[grant] domain=[AD] workstation=[GRANT] len1=24 len2=126
[2010/02/20 13:13:19, 3] smbd/oplock.c:911(init_oplocks)
init_oplocks: initializing messages.
[2010/02/20 13:13:19, 3] smbd
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 9:57 AM, cjay c...@engr.colostate.edu wrote:
Running Samba 3.4.5 on Solaris 10 Sparc platform. I can't seem to get rid
of the following errors:
log.b104d1:rlimit_max: rlimit_max (10020) below minimum Windows limit
(16384)
I've tried adding ulimit -n 16384 to the
to setup...should it have been, or am I
missing something that created a big security hole?
TIA,
-Grant
P.S. I AM reading all the howtos and Faqs and things!
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Stephane, have you issued a smbpasswd -w new_ldap_Manager_pwd ??
Cheers, GrantB
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
= yes
inherit owner = yes
; inherit group = yes
dos filetimes = yes
map acl inherit = yes
store dos attributes = yes
vfs objects = audit
I plan to test this on x86 arch also, but expect the same unless this is
an endian bug.
Cheers, Grant
Nathan, get pid of the smbd process and enter the following command:
smbcontrol PID debug 10
You can also check the current loglevel by doing a:
smbcontrol PID debuglevel or a
smbcontrol smbd debuglevel # to list debuglevel for all smbd's
Cheers, Grant
--
To unsubscribe from this list go
to this share (IE's History folder is a good one to
experiment with).
Cheers, Grant
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
)
Any help would be appreciated. I expect that this may be an Samba issue
that might need to be looked at by the samba-technical gods.
Cheers, Grant
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
do stop occurring.
This is samba-3.0.9-1.3E.2 on RHEL 3.0
Any clues, suggestions, rants, etc are most welcome.
Thank you,
-Grant
--
This electronic message transmission is a PRIVATE communication which contains
information which may be confidential or privileged
Hi list.
I don't know if this made it through the first time, as I've gotten no
responses, so I'll try it again.
Anyway, I'm new to this list, so please bear with me. I've got samba 2.2.8a on
Solaris 9 (SPARC). I've run all the tests. testparm runs fine. Other tests:
# nmblookup -B
Hi list.
I'm new to this list, so please bear with me. I've got samba 2.2.8a on Solaris
9 (SPARC). I've run all the tests. testparm runs fine. Other tests:
# nmblookup -B stage __SAMBA__
querying __SAMBA__ on 192.168.18.25
192.168.18.25 __SAMBA__00
#
# nmblookup -B 192.168.1.9 '*'
found this solution or do you
have any thoughts as to why it might not be a good idea to implement?
Thanks,
Jeff Grant
Unix Sys Admin
EDS
Herndon, VA
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
I have a very simple Samba 3.0.1 install without LDAP/ADS/winbind
support compiled into it. I have noticed a strange problem with
supplementary groups I noticed with Mac OS X (10.3.2). The SAMBA
server is using 'ntdomain' authentication.
When someone connects to the SAMBA server and gives
forgot to mention: SAMBA server is Solaris 9 using SUN DS 5.2 as LDAP
backend for nsswitch.conf. Never get any problems with w2k pro clients
connecting to the server -- not even sure if this is a SAMBA issue at
all.
On 13 Jan 2004, at 17:02, Gordon Grant wrote:
I have a very simple Samba
$*.po.o.o $@
Any ideas, I'm really hoping to try to get 3.0.1 Samba built and running on
our machines over the holiday break. I've succesfully compiled it on a
number of other unix platforms(Tru64 and Linux) so it must be a Solaris
issue.
Thanks
-grant
--
To unsubscribe from this list go
The issue was a bug in the PrintPro export function of printers,
their printer/CUPS setup utility. The solution (from the PrintPro
support group) was to use
cupsaddsmb -v -U root PRINTERNAME
PrintPro says their export function will be fixed next release.
Grant Basham (305)361-4026
rcfhp.PPD*
Grant Basham305-361-4026[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
not work. Moved the files in drivers/WIN40 to
drivers/WIN40/0. Still the same problem. Further suggestions greatly
appreciated.
--Grant
On Thu, 11 Dec 2003, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
grant basham wrote:
| Errors shown below in the gim98
I have a samba PDC on redhat 9. Linux systems join the domain served by
the PDC without problem. Windwos 2k systems cannot joint the domain. The
message is:
*8
The following error occurred validating the name domain name.
This
Code locally on the PC: 7 minute build time.
Should it really be that slow off a Samba share? Could it be a config issue?
Are there any things that can be done to help this out some?
All machines are on a single 100meg Full duplex switch( and are 100 FD)
-grant
--
To unsubscribe from this list
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
enabled Kernels at 2.4.19 and 2.4.20.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Cheers, Grant
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
enabled Kernels at 2.4.19 and 2.4.20.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Cheers, Grant
way.
-grant
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
, Samba 2.2.7a, gcc-2.95.3-62
Cheers, Grant
OS/390 Technical Consultant
IBM Global Services Australia
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / Tel: +61-7-3213-2109 / Fax +61-7-3213-2013 / Mobile
+61-407-214-737
Lvl 5, IBM Centre, 348 Edward Street, Brisbane Qld 4000 (GPO Box 435,
Brisbane Qld 4001) BR06
Cheers, Grant
OS/390 Technical Consultant
IBM Global Services Australia
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Hi all, I am new to Samba and from what I understand Unix partitions can be
shared by NT machines how do I revers this that a NT drive is seen by Unix
as file system
Regards
Grant September
Oracle DBA
Norwich Union International
IFSC Dublin 1
Ireland
Phone : +353 1 8028466
FAX : +353 1
to
the way explorer browses, meaning it determintes that the path doesn't exist
and doesn't even try to do it.
-grant
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
browseable = yes
path = /home
public = yes
writeable = no
printable = no
-Original Message-
From: Schoep, Grant @ STORM [mailto:GSchoep;storm.l-3com.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 3:10 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: [Samba] Files are showing up as hidden
it in there while trying to get
it to work. He even commented the setting sith something that didn't make
sense at all... something like make the service hidden.
Probably just a case of assuming a flag did somethign else...
-grant
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read
to make them hidden.
Question, what was making them show up as hidden? The fact that they were
executable? Since some files did not show up hidden, just the executable
ones.
-grant
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman
is making it think these
files are hidden. They don't have a . prefix or anything.
Any clues?
-grant
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
they say ...any one could figure out Windows 2000 / XP
Thanks for your help in this matter. :)
Grant Taylor
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
76 matches
Mail list logo
