On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 11:02:31AM -0500, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Richard Santiago wrote:
Hi Jerry,
Yes, I've upgraded through yum with the rpm.
The platform is Fedora Core 4.
The package may be broken. I'm not convinced yet
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 09:22:20AM -0400, Douglas Corner wrote:
I am moving FROM:
RH EL AS 3.0, Kernel is 2.1.21-4, Samba is 3.0.0-14.3E
(This is what came with the RH distribution)
TO:
Fedora Core 5 Kernel is 2.6.16-1.2122_FC5 Samba is 3.0.22-1.fc5
(Both kernel and samba
Did you get the most recent FC5 update kernel? Try running yum update
and see how many packages on your system have updates avaliable.
Note that cifs has almost nothing to do with Samba--I packaged
mount.cifs there because mount.smbfs was already there, but the actual
cifs code is in the kernel.
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 07:09:51PM -0500, Cybionet wrote:
Greeting all,
Sorry, I previously send my message in a wrong topic. I have a strange
problem between Samba and OPenLDAP. Here the version.
Samba: 3.0.21
OpenLDAP: 2.2.28
Problem:
My Windows user can login to the domaine by a
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 11:04:18AM +0100, Christelle Ronce wrote:
Hi,
Excuse my poor english !!
I have a problem samba between linux and windows.
I explain my actual situation :
- windows 2000 SP4 - share a directory
my_windows : d:\jagodin\partage
- linux Redhat ES 4 - kernel version
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 11:55:51AM -0500, Barry Johnson wrote:
I did check the permissions of the directory and everything looks good.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] home]# ls -l
total 413528
drwxr-xr-x 2 baj baj 4096 Nov 12 10:35 baj
drwxrwxrwx 4 root root 4096 Nov 12
On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 11:39:17AM -0500, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
NIGGEMYER Brant wrote:
FYI updated kerberos libs from krb5-libs-1.4-3 to krb5-libs-1.4-5;
problem still existed.
==26396== Invalid free() / delete / delete[]
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 12:57:54PM -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
Rex Dieter wrote:
| $ grep interpret_long_unix_date */*.[ch]
|
| It's there in samba-3.0.12pre1/source/smbd/trans2.c:
| BUILD/samba-3.0.12pre1/source $grep -r interpret_long_unix_date *
|
On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 12:49:06PM -0600, Paul Espinosa wrote:
snip
I know it's not a samba problem per se. I'm giving a heads up in case this
is a purposeful shift by Redhat and also in case other distros go this route
also.
And yes, I've logged a bug with RedHat.
I see a changelog entry
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=132077
is a bug report saying that the UWX flags are lost when the passdb.tdb
file is upgraded from 3.0.4 to 3.0.6. Has anyone else seen this
behavior? Could this be responsible for some of the trouble folks are
having with 3.0.6 upgrades?
On Wed, Mar 31, 2004 at 05:07:27PM -0800, jamie wrote:
Does anyone know if on Redhat AS 3, The Samba 3 Rpms have ldapsam_compat
compiled in? I am trying to get it working and so far not having any luck. -
They don't. Red Hat never shipped a 2.2 version of Samba with LDAP
support, so there was
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 03:25:02PM +, John H Terpstra wrote:
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Pirkka Luukkonen wrote:
Hi!
Can anyone tell how many users with different uids can you add to samba/gnu
linux/ldap -environment? Is 5-20 users possible?
The key limitation is how many users
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 12:28:33PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, I'm not really taring. Right now I'm using following command to mount
a share on the windows box:
smbmount //ntsrvsr3/cmdhp5 /mnt/backupsmb -o username=kwhadm,dmask=777
I also tried mount -f smbfs ; but this failed
One of my users is reporting that his Samba configuration is behaving
differently now that I've upgraded to 3.0.0rc3. He is using nmbd -n
to set the netbios name of the machine. With samba-2.2.x, this worked
as he expected, and the machine name seen when browsing from Windows
clients whas the
What should testparm do if you provide only two arguments to it (a
config file and either an IP address or a hostname)? According to the
manual page, it needs both a hostname and an IP address. With the
3.0.0rc3 testparm, if you provide only two arguments, it ignores the
second one. With the
It the Makefile, the installclientlib target calls
-$(INSTALLCLIENTCMD_SH) bin/[EMAIL PROTECTED]@ $(DESTDIR)${prefix}/lib
and
-$(INSTALLCLIENTCMD_A) bin/libsmbclient.a $(DESTDIR)${prefix}/lib
However, on the AMD64 platform, ${prefix}/lib (/usr/lib) is reserved
for 32-bit compatability libraries,
Can someone remove this obsolete parameter from
packaging/RedHat/smb.conf before it confuses more people?
-- JF
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
In 2.2.8a days, findsmb would print the OS and Server version of the
machines it found, like this:
*=DMB
+=LMB
IP ADDR NETBIOS NAME WORKGROUP/OS/VERSION
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 09:46:52AM -0700, Jonathan Johnson wrote:
If you're looking to share the tape drive so you can use Windows' native
backup utility to write directly to the tape, sorry -- can't be done with
Samba. This is because a tape drive is not seen by the system as a disk
drive;
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 03:33:01PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 11:35:20AM +0100, Louis Sabet wrote:
Hi all,
Having a very specific problem here:
I have a working RedHat9 server running Samba 2.2.7 (the release that comes
with RH9), acting as a PDC/File
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 02:10:04PM -0500, David Jackson wrote:
To get back to SWAT, how do i get SWAT running on my Red Hat 8 Server?
Is the rpm located on one of the CDs or how else do i install it?
Thank you Open Source Community
It's located in the samba-swat RPM. After you install it, you
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 04:19:27PM -0200, Roberto João Lopes Garcia wrote:
At 15:04 09/01/2003, Chris Palmer wrote:
Anders Nordby writes:
I've got performance problems with copying small files over to a Samba
share in a directory that has lots of small files (1 to 2
files). It
22 matches
Mail list logo
