Ldap Account Manager (LAM) is a web interface to LDAP.
With it, you can define Minimum password length, Minimum lowercase
characters, Minimum uppercase characters, Minimum numeric characters,
Minimum symbolic characters, Minimum character classes, etc.
http://lam.sourceforge.net/
--
To
Using 'security=share' or 'security=user', via Windows right-click any Samba
exported file and set the Read-only attribute. This works, but now can not
clear the Read-only attribute, Windows reports simply Access is denied.
This happens with 3.3.0 and 3.3.1, but NOT 3.2.3.
Working
Also, what is different from my config that is causing this problem vs. other
posters who report that it works ok for them? (...)
I simply reported that it is working for me (as it is) because I assumed
that you were using store dos attributes = yes as I am. I found this
to be the
After setting the option ldapsam:trusted = yes smbd doesnt start any
longer
I get the following error in /var/log/smbd.log:
[2009/03/09 22:01:31, 0] smbd/server.c:main(1063)
ERROR: failed to setup guest info.
Group mapping?
Domain Guests is a required group, along with Domain Users
Im my [homes] share i want to have two access rules. First one is
%D%w%S so that DOMAINdmarkey will only be able to access his own home
directory and nobody elses
But I only want users in the postgrad group to be able to access
their home directory.
That question has already been solved
I have set up a share with map hidden = yes, create mask = 0777
and directory mask = 0777.
Setting and removing the hidden attribute on a file works as
expected, but not on folders.
If I check the unix permissions on the folders, the execute bit is
always set for other.
Is this not
Hello all
I am now experimenting with samba 3.3.0 and acl_xattr. I can see that
there is another method of storing Windows ACLs: acl_tdb.
Can someone here tell me something about the relative merits and
demerits of those two methods?
I am using CenttOS with an ext3 filesystem.
Thank you!
The source code package includes a (almost) complete documentation.
See there, under docs, the following books:
- Samba3-HOWTO.pdf -- This 965-pages book contains a whole chapter
dedicated to vfs modules: Chapter 23 Stackable VFS modules
- Samba3-ByExample.pdf
The HTML versions of the
One word: LDAP.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Compilation options are not enough to enable vfs_acl_xattr support.
Does your smb.conf call the appropriate vfs module?
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
No, could you tell me what flags i need to set in smb.conf? In the
future, how do I figure out what flags should be used by reading the
source code? Is there any document about vfs module?
vfs objects = acl_xattr
Document? man smb.conf
Did you read the samba docs at all?
--
To
I did read majority of the how to document
http://us6.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/ and I
don't think I can find the answer there. Understandably that document
is for samba 3.0.x, but I don't see a version of howto for samba 3.3.
I also checked smb.conf file, I don't think
I have a CentOS 5.2 server with Samba 3.2.7 and an LDAP backend .
Everything is working well and smooth.
I noticed that the log files for some client machines (Windows XP)
contain the following:
[datetime, 0] smbd/trans2.c:call_trans2qfsinfo(2568)
call_trans2qfsinfo: not an allowed info
Hi,
How can the volume serial number of a share can be especified in the
smb.conf? I have a machine that each times it connects to the share
displays two differents volume serial number, not at the same time
The server uses samba 3.2.5-4 over debian and the disks are in a
software
Hi,
I have a little trouble with samba shares, I have a windows
application files inside a share, Windows XP clients use it to run the
application. This application uses the Volume Serial Number to check the
license, but in a same machine the volume serial number changes day by
day, so my
I have a Fedora 6 with samba 3.0.2465 working great as a PDC with
Win98 clients. The server has domain logon working and login scripts
running I have made a second server to replace the first but after
upgrading beyond Fedora 8 it no longer works. I can see shares with
Vista64 Business and
NOBODY ?? Noone here with successfull experience on User Lockout using
Samba+LDAP ??
It is working here. Samba 3.2.7 and 3.2.8 with LDAP, over CentOS 5.2.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Where is my PC getting the older version number from? I copied the
private folder, smb.conf, and smbpasswd from the old version to the new
install location. Could it be getting Samba 3.0.20b from one of these
files?
smb.conf
server string = - gives you the samba version.
Every so often I will see this in my log file:
smbd[1034]: [2009/02/02 08:47:21, 0]
lib/util_sock.c:get_peer_addr_internal(1607)
smbd[1034]: getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not
connected
smbd[1034]: read_socket_with_timeout: client 0.0.0.0 read error =
Connection reset
I have a PDC with CentOS + Samba 3.2.7 + LDAP serving a network of
Windows XP workstations. Everything is working very fast and smooth but
the following happens:
A user such as John Smith with username john normally appears as
John Smith under Windows XP, as can be seen when we press the Star
I believe this was supposed to be a bug in smbldap-tools however with
the latest release of that I still get that. It's no biggie though.
smbldap-tools is a set of scripts that do nothing to a running account. It only
works upon creating or modifying accounts.
The full user's name is
http://fixunix.com/samba/142062-samba-windows-xp-userid-start-menu.html
Also happens with an NT 4.0 domain controller, so it might not be a
Samba problem at all ;-).
Well...
Thank you for the link!
(I still would like to have some more hints about the causes...)
--
To unsubscribe
Here is the patch I've committed to the 3.3 code tree
for this problem. It will be in the next release. Please
try it out and let me know if it fixes your problem (it
does here).
Thank you so much!
Will Sernet provide a 3.3.0-38 version as they did with 3.2.7?
--
To unsubscribe from this
3.0.34 is now installed. no change. 'net rpc list groups' returns
nothing, while 'net rpc group members group' returns the correct
data
The correct syntax is 'net rpc group list' ...
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
Is behavior of ACLs under Samba 3.3.0 (Sernet) completely different from
that under version 3.2.7? The release notes only talks about some fixes.
I installed version 3.3.0 and got completely different result with the
same filesystem and the exact same samba configuration. The ACLs behaved
Much of the ACL code has been rewritten to allow underlying
filesystems to implement native NT ACLs directly (...)
Good!
but the functionality should be the same as 3.2.x when not
using the experimental ACL modules.
I am not using the ACL modules and the functionality is definitely
I would describe the problem *slightly* differently from Miguel. I do
not think that ACLs are the real problem, because the bug behaviour
exists regardless of whether you're using filesystem ACLs or not.
You may be right. I didn't have the time to thoroughly test it because I
had
What your users can do with the file over Samba hasn't actually changed,
is they have write access to the directory they can still delete
the file, but the ACLs look funny.
No, they can't. I was alerted to this problem precisely because users
who have full access to the directory
How are they trying to delete the files ? Using Windows explorer or
cmd.exe or a custom app ?
Using Windows Explorer. This is a CentOS machine serving a network of
Windows XP workstations.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
Volker's changes are correct, in that delete access in POSIX does not
belong to a file itself, but to the containing directory. So really
we should remove the DELETE_ACCESS bit from both the file and the
directory ACL returned.
Without having the deep knowledge you have about this, it seems
Can you give me an exact scenario to reproduce. I can certainly
delete files I have created in my test env.
I have a directory from which getfacl --t obtains the following:
USER Adminrwx rwx
GROUP Admins rwx rwx
group Admins rwx rwx
group Editores rwx rwx
Effectively, we should remove the map acl full control parameter as it now
longer
has any use except to break things. I'll mark it deprecated with the patch.
Yes, I suppose you are right.
Thank you for your efforts. I really appreciate your work.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to
I have a question of a similar nature that I am going to post in a
separate message in this forum, but what I would like to know is
this: Is there a comprehensive list of ALL of the attributes of a
sambaSamAccount somewhere? I would like to know all of the various
things that you could
Is this expected behavior, or is there something seriously wrong with my
setup?
It seems to me that the latter does apply...
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
+Domain Admins
Thanks in advance for any help.
Best regards,
Miguel Duarte
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
I have a LDAP server as passdb backend but how it is possible? what
should I do?
One of the attributes for objectClass sambaSamAccount is
sambaUserWorkstations. It is one of the components of a Samba account
in LDAP.
What are you using to manage your LDAP backend? As an example, from a
I have a LDAP server as passdb backend but how it is possible? what
should I do?
One of the attributes for objectClass sambaSamAccount is
sambaUserWorkstations. It is one of the components of a Samba account
in LDAP.
What are you using to manage your LDAP backend? As an example, from a
I have a CentOS 5.2 server with Samba 3.2.7 and an LDAP backend .
Everything is working well and smooth.
I noticed that the log files for some client machines (Windows XP)
contain the following:
[datetime, 0] smbd/trans2.c:call_trans2qfsinfo(2568)
call_trans2qfsinfo: not an allowed info
Hello, is there any wat to limit users log on to some special machines? I
mean not all users can log on in to a machine.
It can be done with LDAP as passdb backend.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
I do use it, though, at it works fine mostly. I've heard it explained
that the reasoning for avoiding TDBSAM is that if you're running a PDC,
you probably also need features not provided by TDBSAM. In many cases,
that isn't exactly accurate. We have MANY users, but our needs are
fairly simple
I just turned dir_index OFF with tune2fs. Now the directory order is the
same as the inode order.
This makes the order of files predictable and in fact turns out to solve
my problem.
With dir_index turned OFF on that filesystem, when a copy is made to
another directory (even from Windows on
This sounds to me like the dir_index option was applied to a file system
that didn't originally have it and an fsck -Df wasn't run at the time.
That may well be the most relevant information given here! I will
*certainly* give it a try.
Thank you!
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the
Did you consider sharing a directory from the machine running distiller
and cifs-mounting it on the linux side to get ntfs behavior?
That is out of question. The Windows machines are graphic workstations
which are not all connected all the time and the Distiller service is
essential to the
According to the Samba documentation, smbpasswd is not even recommended
for a PDC...
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
I was asking the same question not too many days ago.
I went with LDAP. It is not as difficult as some people think. It seems
somewhat daunting at first but then you quickly get the grasp of it.
It simply *works* and solves *a lot* of challenges at the same time,
leaving you ready for
I was under the impression that the Distiller app was running under
Windows. If it isn't, it doesn't make much sense for it to expect NTFS
filesystem semantics.
Yes, Distiller is running under Windows. When pages start to get ready,
one of the graphic operators opens Distiller on
I based my speculation on some observations I had made on some of my
own systems when I implemented dir_index. It so happens that, on that
system at least, a find /foo -print returns the filenames in sorted
order. Unfortunately, it isn't true on another system that I just
checked. So now I
I hope someone familiar with the way Linux processes files can enlighten
me on the following:
I recently replaced an old Windows 2000 server with a new machine
running CentOS 5.2. It uses Samba 3.2.7 to serve a network of Windows XP
clients.
We are a newspaper. We use Acrobat Distiller to
If you are processing on the linux side and not via samba, and
your program will take a list of files on the command line instead of
groveling through the directory itself, you might simply start it with a
wild-card filename on the command line. The shell will sort the list as
it expands it
That was not my question. Read my message again, please.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Right. The answer actually is You didn't read the help text
to 'getlocalsid'. I don't know which Samba version you're running, but in
the v3-3-test tree, the help text for net getlocalsid says Get the SID for
the local domain. The local domain for member servers is different from the
domain
I noticed the following:
Suppose that we have a server called SMALLSERVER working as a PDC for
SMALLDOMAIN**.
When I enter net getlocalsid I get the following output:
SID for domain SMALLSERVER is: S-1-5-21-x-x-x
But when I enter net getdomainsid I get:
SID
Hello
I am implementing a authentication schema with openLdap (Multimaster), but I
have a problem with the samba objects syncronization, they are missing
I have 1001 objects (total) in my provider(Ldap), and de slave have
932(Ldap), I was looking for the difference and I noticed that are
When I installed Samba 3.2.6 from Sernet, I got the following error:
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.54116: line 2: fg: no job control
error: %postun(samba3-3.0.32-36.i386) scriptlet failed, exit status 1
The error happens when installing the samba and winbind RPMs.
I got the same error when installing the
Maybe some people are using:
http://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/samba/STABLE/11.0/
Which is still serving 3.2.4 binaries.
Yes, but on the other hand:
http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/network:/samba:/STABLE/
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
Maybe the answer to your problem is here:
http://ftp.sernet.de/pub/samba/recent/
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Version 3.3.0 (Testing) is here:
http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/network:/samba:/TESTING/
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
There is a stable release 3.2.5, but no SuSE binaries. This was a
security patch. Will there be an update? Please update. Thanks.
What do you mean?
http://ftp.sernet.de/pub/samba/recent/suse/
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
not a native English
speaker and it is possible that I don't express myself in the best way.
Thank you for your work with Samba and again for your attention
Miguel
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 09:00:15PM +, Miguel Medalha wrote:
I thought that since Samba sits between the network and the unix kernel,
there would be a way to do a complete Windows ACL implementation through
a Virtual File System seen only by Samba and the Windows
Hello dear list members
I am not an experienced user of Samba, so I can be committing some basic
mistake, but it seems to me that there is something wrong with the way
Samba propagates ACLs. I tried versions 3.0.32 and 3.2.4 and the result
is the same. This happens with map acl inherit = yes
Are there any recommandations about the maximum size of a pst file hosted
on a samba server ?
The maximum ANSI size of a pst file is 2GB even on Windows. It can be
bigger with Unicode but it is not recommended for performance reasons.
This article explains it:
How to configure the size
Just place the .PST files in redirected folders on the server.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
If your users are seeing folders other than their own under homes, it
means that you made some mistake with the configuration, probably with
the path directive to homes. That is NOT the normal behavior. You still
didn't show us your [homes] entry in smb.conf...
--
To unsubscribe from this list
Solutions you have gave me doesn't solve my problem. Thanks anyway, but I'm
still searching
Why do you insist on using the [homes] share for that atypical use, then?
You are searching for a solution to a problem you see in a certain way,
but perhaps you should think in some other
You could separate your [homes] entry into a file called
Novagroup.homes then do:
include = %g.homes
Then only the Novagroup members will get a home directory served up.
Yes, it certainly seems the best solution.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
The parameters output by testparm -v are *349*, not 348 as I
previously said. Sorry!
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
When I run testparm -v (note the -v parameter), I get the output of 348
parameters, including defaults and parameters which have no default. And
that's how it should be. In this way, I can see my own settings, the
settings that are in use by default even if I did not set them, and
possible
by the Samba team. I must thank and congratulate you for this
amazing piece of software.
Best regards to you
Miguel
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Hello. I have a 3.2.3 Samba-LDAP PDC which shares the database with heimdal (so
samba passwords are also kerberos passwords). I am able to use kerberos
credentials to connect to the PDC shares with smbclient -k, both on the
server and linux workstations.
The problem is that, as soon as I try to
Hello. I am using squid with ntlm authentication against a samba PDC. It has
worked for me perfectly in debian etch with samba version 3.0.24, and ubuntu
Gutsy with samba 3.0.26a.
But when I have upgraded those servers to hardy (samba 3.0.28a) and lenny
(3.2.3), thn sqwuid auth has stopped
socket options = IPTOS_LOWDELAY TCP_NODELAY SO_SNDBUF=4096
SO_RCVBUF=4096
I would remove this line. With modern kernels, it can actually degrade
performance.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
Ray, Tito wrote:
Hello,
I am using samba 2.2.2 in AIX 5.1 environment and planning to upgrade to
a more stable samba.
1. Which version is most stable?
2. Do I need to pay for the Licence?
3. How can I upgrade?
http://www.samba.org
Also, don't send messages without a subject.
Thank
On Samba main web site, the link to the tarball of the daily docs
build at
http://www.samba.org/~samba-bugs/docs/samba-docs-latest.tar.bz2 has been
broken for several months now.
If the Samba team has no intention of fixing it in spite of the numerous
reports on the matter, why not just remove
Volker Lendecke escribió:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 09:09:55PM -0300, Miguel Da Silva - Centro de
Matemática wrote:
Dear users, I'm asking myself... what if I use posix locking = no to
a share in a Samba server?!
Here goes 3 URL's describing the some problem I have right now:
http
authentication and the protocol used
in client-server negotiation, maybe could be of some help use max
protocol = LANMAN2 or max protocol = NTLM.
And also try to use plain text passwords.
Greetings.
--
Miguel Da Silva
Administrador Junior de Sistemas Unix
Centro de Matemática - http
issue: data consistency. And also, what
kind of negative impacts could affect the server?!
Suggestions?!
Greetings.
--
Miguel Da Silva
Administrador Junior de Sistemas Unix
Centro de Matemática - http://www.cmat.edu.uy
Facultad de Ciencias - http://www.fcien.edu.uy
Universidad de la República
, the message Windows gave me was something like Access denied.
Greetings.
--
Miguel Da Silva
Administrador Junior de Sistemas Unix
Centro de Matemática - http://www.cmat.edu.uy
Facultad de Ciencias - http://www.fcien.edu.uy
Universidad de la República - http://www.rau.edu.uy
--
To unsubscribe from
card or
airline points just for searching! Hit the link below to join for free and we
will both get points!
http://scour.com/invite/lram/
I know you'll like it!
- miguel rosa
PLEASE READ THIS IMPORTANT ETIQUETTE MESSAGE BEFORE POSTING:
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
card or
airline points just for searching! Hit the link below to join for free and we
will both get points!
http://scour.com/invite/lram/
I know you'll like it!
- miguel rosa
PLEASE READ THIS IMPORTANT ETIQUETTE MESSAGE BEFORE POSTING:
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
I have installed a SAMBA Server, I have created users and I can log in to
the server, nevertheless, everytime I access the server, I lose my local
Windows profile (I use the same user and password).
Is the Samba server a domain controler?
If so, you are now loging in as a domain user.
I had the same behaviour of disapearing files. I was able to trace the
problem to the parameter map hidden = yes. The advice given to you by
kissg seems correct to me.
Also, remove the parameter socket options. It is no longer necessary
with modern kernels and can actually degrade
Miguel Da Silva - Centro de Matemática wrote:
Dear users, some days ago a user of the local network told me that she
was not able to change ACL's through Windows. I've done some tests and
indeed, when I right click a file/folder that is on the Samba server,
the Security tab is no longer
not found any
useful information.
Some change from F8 to F9 or from samba 3.0 to samba 3.2 that could be
responsible?
Test page and jobs from Microsoft Word are printed without problems.
Thanks in advance.
Miguel
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read
local file.
The clients are running Windows XP Professional SP2 and the Samba server
is being running on a Solaris 10 system. The system is already using ACL.
Any suggestion?!
Greetings.
--
Miguel Da Silva
Administrador Junior de Sistemas Unix
Centro de Matemática - http://www.cmat.edu.uy
Karolin Seeger wrote:
Hi Miguel,
On Di, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:30:02 +0100, Miguel Medalha wrote:
Am I missing something or the version of Using Samba included in the
samba-3.2.0rc2.tar.gz package is in fact still version 2?
That will be fixed until the final release.
Thank you very
Karolin Seeger wrote:
Documentation:
o Inclusion of an HTML version of the 3rd edition of Using Samba
from O'Reilly Publishing.
Am I missing something or the version of Using Samba included in the
samba-3.2.0rc2.tar.gz package is in fact still version 2?
Thank you for your good
of the books:
- Attribution
- Contents
- Lists of Examples and Figures
- Foreword
- Preface
- Introduction
- Acknowledgements
From Part I on, they are always correct. The first bookmark (About the
cover artwork) is correct too.
Excuse me for being picky, perhaps ;-)
Thank you.
Miguel
No virus found
package can be downloaded individually from
http://samba.idealx.org/dist/
End of quote.
That is no longer true. smbldap-tools now reside here:
https://gna.org/projects/smbldap-tools/
Thank you.
Miguel
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 269.24.4
The tarball of the daily docs build is still unavailable after
several weeks. The link to
http://www.samba.org/~samba-bugs/docs/samba-docs-latest.tar.bz2 is broken.
Is this on purpose or just an overlook?
Thank you for the amazing work on Samba!
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Pappas, Bill wrote:
When I try to open a specific file from a samba share (LSP), the application
(on WINXP) says that it could not open the file
Did you verify that SELinux is not getting in the way?
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database:
be there.
Which Linux distro are you using? Samba version?
Miguel
--- Helio Calaça Filho [EMAIL PROTECTED]
escribió:
Hi everybody!
I'm trying to implement a samba server with kerberos
and auth on the AD. I
installed all program and configured all. I join my
samba on my win2003
domain
In my case, changing in valid users DOMAIN+group or
DOMAIN+user to @DOMAIN+group solved the issue
Miguel
--- Helio Calaça Filho [EMAIL PROTECTED]
escribió:
I use samba 3.0.23c-2 and Red Hat Enterprise 5.
When i use my shares with guest configuration, all
domain users works well.
Just
only = No
create mask = 0777
directory mask = 0777
guest ok = Yes
if anyone could help... i don´t know what to do anymore...
thanks...
--
Att.
Guilherme Fernandes de Souza Miguel
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https
wrong?
Thanks,
Miguel
__
¿Con Mascota por primera vez? Sé un mejor Amigo. Entra en Yahoo! Respuestas
http://es.answers.yahoo.com/info/welcome
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https
I'm stumped. Same configuration in Debian sarge with
kernel 2.4 works fine, however, with kernel 2.6,
breaks.
boddingtons2:/var# smbclient -U THREESPOT+mgonzalez //10.0.6.41/www -c 'ls'
Password:
Domain=[THREESPOT] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.24]
tree connect failed: NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED
I'm stumped. Same configuration in Debian sarge with
kernel 2.4 works fine, however, with kernel 2.6,
breaks:
dpkg -l |grep samba
ii samba 3.0.14a-3sarge a LanManager-like
file and printer server fo
ii samba-common 3.0.14a-3sarge Samba common files
used by both the server a
and will
be included soon on stable branch of Debian
Just to point out that might be something broken
Miguel
Michael Smith escribió:
Hello Michael:
On May 28, 2007, at 2:31 AM, Michael Cleghorn wrote:
Hello list,
i'm going to try very hard not to rant here, but i've been trying to
get Samba working for 3
You might want to check this. I'm experiencing ADS problems. I haven't
checked myself whether these etch samba packages actually work for me,
but you might give them a try
Miguel
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org
service?
Miguel
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
201 - 300 of 378 matches
Mail list logo
