get nothing, same with "id -Gn user" or "groups user".
If I do:
samba-tool user list | grep user
The user is found and I can see it using RSAT tools from a Windows Server
2008 R2 box.
Any suggestions?
Thanks,
Chris.
--
ACS (Alavoine Computer Services Ltd)
Chris Alavoine
mob
Update on this.
It appears that the groups command is working, it takes a while to filter
through for some reason (like, about 15 minutes). Any ideas why it should
be so slow to update?
c:)
On 28 August 2013 16:17, Chris Alavoine wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I can't seem to figur
I need.
Can anyone suggest an alternative method or a fix for the groups problem?
Thanks in advance.
Chris.
--
ACS (Alavoine Computer Services Ltd)
Chris Alavoine
mob +44 (0)7724 710 730
www.alavoinecs.co.uk
http://twitter.com/#!/alavoinecs
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/chris-alavoine/39/606/192
--
ified new user. Has anyone had any
experience of using this tool?
Ideally I'd like to use a tool like profiles; something that I feel I
could fully understand, rather than a black box like Transwiz.
If anyone could shed some light on this I'd really appreciate it!!
Kind regards,
nsure all the UIDs and GIDs are
correctly set.
Any thoughts?
Cheers,
- --
Chris Hayes, Systems Administrator
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSC7QcAAoJELgO0A8EguAKrAMH/1
y other option would be to not use the
filesystem at all.
Does anyone know how NTACLs in XATTR compare to using 'vfs objects =
xattr_tdb' or any other options that I'm unaware of?
Thanks,
Chris Hayes
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
ins
is
inside.
Despite this not being a Samba issue, I was wondering whether anybody
has any encountered problems like this; and whether anyone could offer
me their experience or advice?
Thanks,
Chris Hayes
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructio
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 4:21 PM, How_F19 wrote:
> The XP lan base is 192.168.0.0 and the XP user "Owner" is on 192.168.0.1 and
> hostname is "WILLY".
I'm translating this all as:
XP box is named "willy" and has the IP 192.168.0.1.
what's the workgroup name? appears to be "workgroup" which is fine
t the security.NTACL glob should have been updated.
https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2011-February/160799.html
For that specific test, I was running quite an old file server (Samba
3.4.7) because it was what I had installed on an old machine.
Any information would be greatly appreciated.
Kind
#x27;t worked.
Can anyone confirm whether Winbind's IDMAP_RID backend is deprecated
in Samba 3.6?
Thanks,
- --
Chris Hayes, Systems Administrator
Tel: +44 (0) 845 123 2848
Fax: +44 (0)1273 808483
www.proporta.com <http://www.proporta.com/>
Everything covered
Proporta.com Ltd. Uni
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Chris Smith wrote:
> Only problem I had was that I needed to add Samba to run level 2 as it
> appears my CLI only install of Wheezy doesn't boot into run level 3
> (as Debian claims is their default).
Just read somewhere else the run level 2 is t
claims is their default).
Chris
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 9:00 AM, wrote:
> Thanks very much for your detailed reply. I’m sure it will be very
> helpful.
>
> Is there an easy way to search for your earlier posts? I’m looking
> in the archives, and opening them by month, then sear
o mess with those, although I prefer to use
different ranges for Windows users, and Machines (and also a different
group for Machines - just a nicety for scripting later on). Done
properly the users will see no difference when they login to the
domain, same profile, etc.
Chris
--
To unsubscribe from th
d. Any information would be enthusiastically received.
I'll update this with further information tomorrow (Samba versions -- I
believe that the DC is 4.0.6 and the fileserver 3.6.3).
Thanks for your time.
Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
I have a win 8 member on my test domain and it joined fine. Did you try
joining using full domain name as well as the NETBIOS name?
Chris
On 29 Jul 2013 18:46, "Marc Muehlfeld" wrote:
> Am 29.07.2013 08:00, schrieb Daniel Müller:
> >> I have one w8 prof in my Samba AD t
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 1:19 PM, Paul D. DeRocco wrote:
> I wonder if there's a way to build such a mini-Samba out of the existing
this is interesting...
https://code.google.com/p/impacket/source/browse/#svn%2Ftags%2Fimpacket_0_9_10%2Fexamples%2Fsmbserver
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to t
I'll bite...
smb/cifs is not a simple protocol suite, see my comments in-line
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 1:19 PM, Paul D. DeRocco wrote:
> The requirements for such a system are much smaller than what Samba
> provides:
>
> * It only needs to serve files, not printers or other resources.
smb withou
Hi there,
Just to add I've been using Ubuntu as my distro of choice (cos it's the one
I know best). Has anyone had any successes with other Distros they could
share? I am willing to jump ship if it works!
Thanks,
Chris.
On 12 July 2013 15:21, Chris Alavoine wrote:
> Hi there
til I try to change any permission on any shares
(or anything within the shares). I then get "access denied" errors.
Obviously, this is unworkable as a solution as I need to set permissions.
Any help much appreciated.
Thanks,
Chris.
--
ACS (Alavoine Computer Services Ltd)
Chris Alav
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Steve Litt wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I ask this question about once a decade.
>
> I have about 7 computers, all Linux or BSD. Are there any cool things I
> can do with Samba, even though I have no Windows computers?
Yes!
I've found samba and mount.cifs to be far fast
troller is simply refereed to as a 'DC'.
Thanks.
--
Chris Hayes, Systems Administrator
www.proporta.com <http://www.proporta.com/>
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
ry updates do
(https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Windows7#Windows_7_Registry_settings)?
That page doesn't mention Samba4, though. So perhaps it's obsolete??
Currently I'm using a Samba 4.0.6 domain controller; and a Samba 3.6.3
File/Printserver.
Kind regards,
- --
Chris Hayes, Syst
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 11:03 PM, wrote:
> Hi Cris,
>
>
>>> Hi there, Has anyone tried to configure a NAS server to authenticate
>>> users using a Samba PDC, or even a Samba4 DC (AD-compatible) or an IPA
>>> server?
>>
>>
>> not in a while, but I have done a samba 3 DC
>
>
> This was not my quest
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 11:00 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote:
>> but not all NASs do. there are
>> several commercial SMB/CIFS implementation out there.
>
> Sure, but non available to buy as a software-only
> product to my knowledge. They all come with hardware
> attached :-).
right, *I* can't buy the
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 8:44 PM, Fernando Lozano wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Has anyone tried to configure a NAS server to authenticate users using a
> Samba PDC, or even a Samba4 DC (AD-compatible) or an IPA server?
not in a while, but I have done a samba 3 DC
> I'm evaluating replacing some Linux f
before?
Thanks,
Chris.
On 9 July 2013 11:37, Chris Alavoine wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> This is what I have so far:
>
> - /etc/nslcd.conf should look like this:
>
> # /etc/nslcd.conf
>
> # nslcd configuration file. See nslcd.conf(5)
>
> # for details.
>
> #
groups were not being updated
correctly:
apt-get remove nscd
This works fine for the *nix side of things, am having further difficulties
getting the Samba side to work. So much so, that I'm considering building a
new Samba member server from scratch using Samba 4 instead of 3.
Thanks,
Chris.
is may be fixed.
Typical, you spend all day on something, finally decided to post on samba
lists and then fix it 5 mins later :)
Thanks for the swift reply though!
Cheers,
c:)
On 8 July 2013 18:05, Marc Muehlfeld wrote:
> Hello Chris,
>
> Am 08.07.2013 18:54, schrieb Chris Alavoine:
&
ice,CN=Users,DC=test,DC=internal,DC=com does not contain uid value
I've tried a few different conf attempts, but am confused why groups would
work and users wouldn't. Any help much appreciated.
Thanks,
Chris.
--
ACS (Alavoine Computer Services Ltd)
Chris Alavoine
mob +44 (0)7724 71
grade continued ok.
Thanks,
Chris.
On 5 July 2013 13:01, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-07-04 at 15:09 +0100, Chris Alavoine wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > I am trying to upgrade my old Samba3 (with LDAP backend) to Samba 4.
> >
> > I am doing this on a
my LDAP directory has anyone seen this behaviour
before?
I have done a quick LDAP search and not been able to find any RID's that
would cause such an inflated number so am a bit stumped.
Thanks in advance,
Chris.
--
ACS (Alavoine Computer Services Ltd)
Chris Alavoine
mob +44 (0)7724 7
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Chris Nighswonger
wrote:
> FS.log is from a Samba domain member server now running 3.6.9. This
> test share does not quite work. Members of the staff-faculty group can
> create/modify files regardless of user ownership but cannot
> delete/rename file
actly as FS with the exception of server name and shares.
The DC runs over an ldap backend and getent passwd and group behave as
expected on all Samba servers.
So any ideas on why the share on FS does not function as expected?
Kind Regards,
Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the foll
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Chris Nighswonger <
cnighswon...@foundations.edu> wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 5:45 PM, steve wrote:
>
>> Hi
>> OK, I'll have a go.
>> Either use acls or smb.conf. I've never been able to get a mi
p membership when calculating perms on that
box.
I can send along more detailed config and debug info if anyone would like
to see it.
Thanks for the help.
Kind Regards,
Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
No takers?
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Chris Nighswonger <
cnighswon...@foundations.edu> wrote:
> I am running Samba 3.6.6 on a Ubuntu 12.10 Samba domain member server.
> Users are authenticated against a Samba DC running 3.6.9 over an LDAP
> backend. I have a share configure
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 12:24 PM, Lukasz Zalewski wrote:
> Thank you for this. Unfortunately i do not even get that far. Windows claims
> that there is no driver found :(
>
> Does the driver have to be installed manually?
I'm using the standard CUPS drivers. They work with all of the
printers I ne
n my share configuration and so am posting that
first.
Kind Regards,
Chris
---
[Shared Drives]
comment = Staff-Faculty Shares
path = /netdrives/shared
browsable = yes
read only = no
inherit acls = no
inherit permissions = no
create mask = 0771
directory m
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Lukasz Zalewski wrote:
> According to
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/hardware/hh852373.aspx
> Windows 8 should be able to use level 3 drivers, but it does not seem to
> work for me.
>
> Are they any workarounds that can be applied (client or serve
quot;proprietary" and the decision to use
your packages not reversibel.
Regards,
Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
stions??
>
> Cheers,
>
> Steve
>
> --
> Steve Holdoway BSc(Hons) MNZCS
> http://www.greengecko.co.nz
> MSN: st...@greengecko.co.nz
> Skype: sholdowa
>
Hey Steve,
Have you checked the time on the client and PDC? They should be pretty much
the same.
Cheers,
Chris
--
To
t these are expected behaviours,
Thanks,
Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
gt; SYSVOL.
>
> CR>
> http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/DRS_TODO_List#Add_cifsfs.2Brsync_interim_script_for_group_policy_replication
>
>
> CR> Cheers,
>
> CR> Chris
>
>
Hi Greg,
I must admit, I haven't tried this myself having only just started testing
S
Hey Luc,
Samba 4 doesn't currently have FRS enabled and so doesn't replicate SYSVOL.
http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/DRS_TODO_List#Add_cifsfs.2Brsync_interim_script_for_group_policy_replication
Some people have had success with scripting replication using rsync etc.
Cheers,
*Il n'y a pas de quoi.*
Sometimes it is difficult to see the wood for the trees :-)
Chris
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 7:12 PM, Luc Lalonde wrote:
> Hello Chris,
>
> Thanks for the hint... I looked in the client's event logs. There was a
> permission problem accessing t
--
> If you are not paying for it, you're not the customer; you're the product
being sold. (Andrew Lewis)
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman
it might be worth mentioning that
dynamic DNS updates are broken in the internal DNS server at the moment
though :-)
Does installing BIND as per the samba wiki work OK then, or is there
anything else I need to be doing?
Thanks again,
Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
ome inspiring advice. :-)
Should setting up dynamic DNS updates for Windows clients be this hard?
Have I done something completely wrong?
Cheers,
Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
#x27;ll now find the appropriate security permissions for doing this.
Cheers,
Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
ord for my windows client.
I've tried running ipconfig /registerdns on the win client but get an
unable to update DNS error.
I'm sure I'm missing something here. Can anybody help?
Thanks in advance,
Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instru
My blog has the method I've used for years:
http://blog.realcomputerguy.com/2010/12/samba-and-guest-shares-with-security.html
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 6:44 AM, Michael Wood wrote:
> On 3 May 2013 12:42, Michael Wood wrote:
> [...]
>> Maybe the "map to guest" option will help you solve your proble
Filed as bug 9847:
Customer, in the 3.6.x series, has run 3.6.10 through 3.6.13
successfully. After upgrading to 3.6.14 Winbind crashes and their data
is no longer accessible. Reverting to 3.6.13 brings back stability.
[2013/05/01 23:15:16.303789, 0]
winbindd/winbindd.c:212(winbindd_sig_term_han
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 1:24 PM, thomas wrote:
> Are you sure this is working ?
> I tried it and it doesnt.
Yes, I have static entries that are still there from months ago.
> I have winbind installed and can findsmb / smbtree .
> pinging the NetBIOS names found by previous commandes works.
> pin
believe you must stop Samba (or at least nmbd) before editing. I use
the #20 entry as well as in:
"MADMAN#20" 0 192.168.1.2 66R
Edit the the entries for all of types and then restart Samba/nmbd:
"MADMAN#00" 0 192.168.1.2 66R
"MADMAN#03" 0 192.168.1.2 66R
"MADMAN#
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Hef wrote:
> After doing an nmap scan and some googling, I discovered Comcast, One of my
> ISPs, blocks outgoing ports 135, 139, and 445.
>
> Does anyone know a good way around those ports being blocked?
> Can I reassign them in samba, and then update srv records
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Jon Heese wrote:
> My next idea was to use Samba to create an anonymous share, and following
> this quick-n-dirty HowTo:
> http://www.debuntu.org/samba-how-to-share-files-for-your-lan-without-userpassword/,
> I set up a Lucid Lynx box with samba (3.4.7~dfsg-1ubun
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Chris Smith wrote:
> ==
> Native OS: Linux version 2.6.35
> Native LAN Manager: CIFS VFS Client for Linux
> ==
It advertises these protocols:
===
Dialect
===
Doesn't seem to be any detail about what CIFS version they're using.
Thanks,
Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Is there a way to determine (or at least get close) what version of
Samba an embedded client may be running (or based on) via packet
sniffing (tcpdump, wireshark)?
Thanks.
Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman
es go to another
DNS server which, for the special subdomain, forwards only those
requests to the Samba server?
Thanks,
Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
track down this problem and make it stop.
TIA
Chris Kukuchka
Sequoia Group, Inc.
On Mar 15, 2013, at 10:25 AM, Chris Kukuchka wrote:
> On Mar 14, 2013, at 3:57 AM, Volker Lendecke wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 02:13:47PM -0600, Chris Kukuchka wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 4:59 PM, TMason wrote:
> What I would like to do now is have different /etc/skel directories for
> different groups. So, for example, if someone from the Finance department
> logs in one set of default settings are copied for that person but if
> someone from sales logs in
On Mar 14, 2013, at 3:57 AM, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 02:13:47PM -0600, Chris Kukuchka wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I had just completed reconfiguring Samba so it would
>> authenticate against Active Directory. After user side
>> testing s
been unable to determine what can be done to
stop these panics. Any help would be appreciated. If you need any further
information, please feel free to ask.
Thanks in advance.
Chris Kukuchka
Sequoia Group, Inc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
Hi Nico
Tried with make clean and with a fresh build from the 4.0.3 source. Yielded
same issue.
Regards
Chris
Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 8:11 AM, Chris Lewis wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Today I tried to upgrade from samba 4.0.0 to 4.0.3 on my test environment.
>
reliable. The second part would be to think
about migration to winbind.
So i have time to find a good solution for managing postfix and cyrus
accounts via a directory in our company.
Regards Chris
Am 19.02.2013 12:56, schrieb Thomas Simmons:
Hello Chris,
It's pretty simple to add posix at
trying to use the credentials in this setup file. We've tried different
servers, rejoining the domain, turning off firewalls, making everyone an
admin etc...this leads me to believe that perhaps it's samba.
We're running Samba 3.3.15 with an LDAP password backend, has anyone else
e
at has changed between the versions to cause this and how can I
fix these errors?
Cheers
Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
e the need to have linux
auth on the DC and one member server (NAS). So it would nice to get the
same behavior on both servers.
Thanks for your advice.
Chris Fischer
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
3am for automatic updates. Samba 4 does not recover replication
until samba4 service is restarted.
Best regards
Chris
root@inview-dc2:~# samba-tool drs showrepl
Default-First-Site-Name\INVIEW-DC2
DSA Options: 0x0001
DSA object GUID: 9f7b6201-cd1c-40dc-b930-f826cf9cad82
DSA invocationId
this before. ;-)
Samba: 3.6.6
Ubuntu: 10.4.4 LTS
Kind Regards,
Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Gregory Carter wrote:
> I would like to submit a RFP for Group Policy Implementation on Linux
> desktops.
this seems relevant, I've not tried implementing though.
http://www.thevarguy.com/2011/04/27/likewise-enterprise-a-hands-on-look/
--
To unsubscribe from this
Might be related to my bug:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9561
Unfortunately I'm not getting any traction on it. From my testing
there still hasn't, after 10 releases, been a fully usable 3.6.x and
now it's claimed to be in "maintenance mode" due to the release of
Samba 4.x, which I g
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 09:09:43PM +, Benjamin Huntsman wrote:
>> Ok, now I'm stuck...
>>
>> We have several stand-alone UNIX (AIX) systems that we need to share a few
>> SMB shares from. None of these are joined to our domain.
>>
>> W
No worries - thanks for the notice! If it's not already listed, is there a
place I can recommend the feature to be implemented?
Thanks again!
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 6:02 AM, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-01-11 at 22:54 -0500, Chris Stoneburner wrote:
> > First off,
Anyone? If this is the wrong list or if no one can answer I can definitely ask
a different list - just point me in the right direction?
On Jan 11, 2013, at 10:54 PM, Chris Stoneburner
<200406...@panthers.greenville.edu> wrote:
> First off, I apologize if this is a duplicate - I had so
On 11/01/13 12:22, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Thu, 2013-01-10 at 16:50 +, Chris Lewis wrote:
Hi All,
I have joined a samba4 instance to en existing W2k8 AD domain as an
additional domain controller.
When I do
samba-tool dbcheck
I get (example) :
ERROR: wrong instanceType 4 on CN=INVIEW
Any thoughts on the quoted email below?
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 10:54 PM, Chris Stoneburner <
200406...@panthers.greenville.edu> wrote:
> First off, I apologize if this is a duplicate - I had some issues with the
> first email I tried to join this list with!
>
> I'm curre
ogin attempts to a domain account (e.g., the
default domain administrator) and "lock" the account once a certain threshold
has been reached and if so how is that configured?
Thanks so much for any information you can provide!
-Chris Stoneburner
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
gacy and not used when the active role is DC with a 2008_R2
functional level?
My question with respect to samba is two fold: is it even POSSIBLE to have
samba detect multiple failed login attempts and "lock" an account once a
certain threshold has been reached and if so how is that configured
would have any unwanted ramifications?
Can anyone explain what causes these errors and if fixing them might
break something?
Thanks in advance
Chris
--
Chris Lewis
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options
(and AD garbage collection) I was able to add the
DC successfully.
Has anyone else come across this? It could be some peculiarity on this
particular domain.
Thanks in advance.
Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org
I'm not referring to Active Directory, the Domain Controller is a Samba 3 box.
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Adam Tauno Williams
wrote:
> ??? With Active Directory I'm pretty sure that happens via a DNS query
> (or series of them).
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Gaiseric Vandal
wrote:
> If your windows clients use login scripts to map drives, then they don't
> need WINS at all, since they resolve hosts via DNS.
I think that WINS is necessary for the clients to find the Domain Controller.
> However, if a client isn't usin
from registering themselves?
Thanks,
Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
On 19.11.2012 16:04, Dominique wrote:
Does anyone have the 'right' solution?
You could try to remove the computer from the domain. Verify that it is
no longer listed in /etc/passwd and pdbedit. Rename the computer. Join
the domain again. Sometimes it's working then. Normally, there souldn't
cess. It seems
like it's checking access rights in a rather strange way.
Is this a known issue? Is there any solution? I set force group to
+departmentD, but it didn't work. Is it possible to say UserA this
folder (and all files within) are owned by UserA and UserB it's owned by
UserB?
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 8:00 AM, Dmitrijs Demidovs
wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> Can someone please clarify the difference between variables %S %U %u in
> smb.conf?
>
> It is not clearly defined in man smb.conf page (at least for me)
>
> %u - username of the current service, if any.
I think this would be
to an email and making it unreadable,
does anyone have an OS X 10.6 machine as a PDC? Or does anyone have any ideas
why an older linux machine can bind and pass on authentication requests but a
newer one can't?
Regards,
Chris
The Institute of Cancer Research: Royal Cancer Hospital, a
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Harsh Shah wrote:
> Can I configure Samba4 in such a way that I have two separate **forests**
> on a single machine– let’s say one for CompanyA and other for companyB?
>
> So essentially does Samba4 support multiple server instances like Samba3 as
> described here
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 10:29 PM, Mario Codeniera
wrote:
>
> Any ideas how to implement roaming profile under Linux as the clients?
pam_csync http://www.csync.org/ seems to be pretty close to a direct
feature-equivalent for linux.
though such a thing is not always appropriate, nfs or pam_mount wi
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Rowland Penny wrote:
> The cure is folder redirection or as microsoft now call it 'user
> virtulization', with this the users documents etc stop on the server and the
> My Documents folder, for instance, gets pointed to the new location.
> I can email you the instr
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 12:44 AM, Traugott Simon wrote:
> ? NT_STATUS_IO_TIMEOUT listing \Daten\Titelseite\*
how many files in the folder? I know windows gets very slow to list
the contents if there more than a couple thousand, this could cause a
timeout depending on how smbclient handles that.
Ubuntu AFAIK has never fixed their Bug 951087 which is one reason I
cannot recommend it as a server where Samba is a critical package.
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 7:33 AM, Eitan Orgil wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have installed an Ubuntu server 12.04.01 with Smba 3.6.3
>
> I have configured it to be a file serv
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 1:37 PM, JIA Pei wrote:
> Hi, all:
>
> Two questions.
> Environment: Ubuntu 12.04
>
> 1) mount: unknown filesystem type 'smbfs'
> With default Samba 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.3 installed, all the following 3
> commands failed:
> a)
> $ sudo mount -t *smbfs* -o username=MYNAME,passwo
0x009ca1a2 in winbindd_getpwent ()
#8 0x009c6d82 in ?? ()
#9 0x009c7a48 in ?? ()
#10 0x009c8fd0 in main ()
A debugging session is active.
Inferior 1 [process 21708] will be detached.
Kind Regards,
Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instr
uot; module corrected the
problem. Interestingly enough, IE8 appears to be the only browser affected
this way.
Incidentally, AFAICT there is no protected mode for IE8 installed on XP.
Thanks again for helping break me loose on this!
Kind Regards,
Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this li
No takers?
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Chris Nighswonger <
cnighswon...@foundations.edu> wrote:
> Samba: 3.6.6 PDC
> Client: XP Pro SP3
>
> Background:
>
> 1. Started with a clean installation of XP Pro SP3
> 2. Joined the client to the samba domain
> 3. Logg
all users including both local resources and
domain resources.
This is happening on eight clients, all with clean installations of the OS.
I'm suspecting this is a hidden permissions problem, but am really at a
loss for where to start looking or debugging.
Any help would be greatly appre
address 0x89fffa3e
//25796: No such file or directory.
No stack.
[2012/08/06 13:01:20, 0] winbindd/winbindd.c:1258(main)
winbindd version 3.4.7 started.
Any thoughts on what direction to walk it to troubleshoot this?
Kind Regards,
Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL
1 - 100 of 1678 matches
Mail list logo
