from the man page:
netbios aliases (G)
This is a list of NetBIOS names that nmbd will advertise as
additional names by which the Samba server is known. This allows
one machine to appear in browse lists under multiple names. If a
machine is acting as a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Toby Bluhm wrote:
Frank Bonnet wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello
We are facing a bit boring problem
We are on the way to upgrade our PDC from 2.2.8 to 3.2.11
as we do not want to reconfigure the PDC IP address on
We are on the way to upgrade our PDC from 2.2.8 to 3.2.11
as we do not want to reconfigure the PDC IP address on several
hundreds of windows XP clients we have chosen to keep the same
IP address for the new PDC.
Why not keeping the same name for your server? Then with same name and
same IP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Olivier Nicole wrote:
We are on the way to upgrade our PDC from 2.2.8 to 3.2.11
as we do not want to reconfigure the PDC IP address on several
hundreds of windows XP clients we have chosen to keep the same
IP address for the new PDC.
Why not
Yes I know it now , it is logical captain but the preceding person which
installed the old samba version has written the samba version in the
server string statement !!!
Ouch!
and it would be very confusing for users and
admins ...
I don't think the users would notice, and maybe not even
Frank Bonnet wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Toby Bluhm wrote:
Frank Bonnet wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello
We are facing a bit boring problem
We are on the way to upgrade our PDC from 2.2.8 to 3.2.11
as we do not want to reconfigure the PDC
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello
We are facing a bit boring problem
We are on the way to upgrade our PDC from 2.2.8 to 3.2.11
as we do not want to reconfigure the PDC IP address on several
hundreds of windows XP clients we have chosen to keep the same
IP address for the new
Frank Bonnet schrieb:
We are on the way to upgrade our PDC from 2.2.8 to 3.2.11
as we do not want to reconfigure the PDC IP address on several
hundreds of windows XP clients we have chosen to keep the same
IP address for the new PDC.
Why you use IPs on the client instead of names? Here we
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marc Muehlfeld wrote:
Frank Bonnet schrieb:
We are on the way to upgrade our PDC from 2.2.8 to 3.2.11
as we do not want to reconfigure the PDC IP address on several
hundreds of windows XP clients we have chosen to keep the same
IP address for the
Frank Bonnet wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello
We are facing a bit boring problem
We are on the way to upgrade our PDC from 2.2.8 to 3.2.11
as we do not want to reconfigure the PDC IP address on several
hundreds of windows XP clients we have chosen to keep the same
IP
10 matches
Mail list logo