#x27;
> Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
> Subject: RE: [Samba] Closing sessions and smbstatus
>
> > On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 12:52:57PM -0700, Steve Rippl wrote:
> >
> > > But checking our server I find that the processes DO still exist!
So
> > > I'm getting a user se
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 12:52:57PM -0700, Steve Rippl wrote:
>
> > But checking our server I find that the processes DO still exist!
So
> > I'm getting a user session in smbstatus with a specific PID and when
I
> > ps -ef | grep PID there is the smbd process still running, yet the
user
> > has l
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 12:21:12AM -0200, Norberto Bensa wrote:
> Quoting Jeremy Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 10:03:46PM -0200, Norberto Bensa wrote:
>>> Locked files:
>>> Pid UidDenyMode Access R/WOplock
>>> SharePath Name Time
>>>
Quoting Jeremy Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 10:03:46PM -0200, Norberto Bensa wrote:
Locked files:
Pid UidDenyMode Access R/WOplock
SharePath Name Time
---
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 10:03:46PM -0200, Norberto Bensa wrote:
> Quoting Jeremy Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> When you find a process in this state attach using
>> strace -p (on Linux) to see what it's up to.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo smbstatus
> Unknown parameter encountered: "change not
Quoting Jeremy Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
When you find a process in this state attach using
strace -p (on Linux) to see what it's up to.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo smbstatus
Unknown parameter encountered: "change notify timeout"
Ignoring unknown parameter "change notify timeout"
Samba vers
Hello list,
On Monday October 20 2008 18:01:10 Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 12:52:57PM -0700, Steve Rippl wrote:
> > Is this just happening to
> > me on our particular setup or is this normal behavior?
I'm having this problem too. Ubuntu 8.04.1. Samba 3.0.28A (IIRC)
> No, tha
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 12:52:57PM -0700, Steve Rippl wrote:
> But checking our server I find that the processes DO still exist! So
> I'm getting a user session in smbstatus with a specific PID and when I
> ps -ef | grep PID there is the smbd process still running, yet the user
> has long since l
But checking our server I find that the processes DO still exist! So
I'm getting a user session in smbstatus with a specific PID and when I
ps -ef | grep PID there is the smbd process still running, yet the user
has long since logged out (days ago)?! It's not just that the .tbd file
hasn't bee
On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 21:10 +0200, Vlastimil Šetka wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > When are client sessions closed?
> >
> > Let me explain what I'm trying to do... we're in a School district and
> > we try to stop kids logging more than once. They way I did this before
> > was to dump the active sessio
Hi,
When are client sessions closed?
Let me explain what I'm trying to do... we're in a School district and
we try to stop kids logging more than once. They way I did this before
was to dump the active sessions from our previous Server2003 fileserver
into a file once a minute and process
Hi,
When are client sessions closed?
Let me explain what I'm trying to do... we're in a School district and
we try to stop kids logging more than once. They way I did this before
was to dump the active sessions from our previous Server2003 fileserver
into a file once a minute and process it w
12 matches
Mail list logo
