Hi Tim,
Just as a sanity check.
I did some testing earlier this year to characterize performance
differences btw 2.2.8a and 3.0.2a. I tested simple copies of one .5 GB
file, and also a directory with 5000 files (with very long names
including upper and lower case). As long as I was testing
> -Original Message-
> From: Holger Krull [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2004 11:56 PM
> To: Tim Harvey
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Samba] Performance of samba in linux vs windows
>
>
> > For windows I'm low-te
For windows I'm low-tech: stopwatch plus drag-n-drop of a large file (any
recommendations on a 'simple' windows program that will tell you how long it
took to copy a file, or even calc the BW for you?)
timethis from the windows resource kit
- why would I be getting half the performance via nfs
I'm doing some performance tests on a samba NAS server and I've found some
interesting statistics:
I'm doing my performance tests in linux using:
# time dd if=somelargefileovershare of=/dev/null bs=1M count=100
Then calculating the bandwidth
For windows I'm low-tech: stopwatch plus drag-n-drop
