Re: [Samba] Question about how to reduce samba 3.3.3 install size or why it has been increased dramatically from 3.0.34 to 3.3.3

2009-04-19 Thread Volker Lendecke
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 03:06:36AM +0200, vot...@gmx.de wrote: Hello, can anyone give me some tips why the file size of various samba executables has been increased dramatically from 3.0.34 to 3.3.3 (e.g. smbd 3.5MB - ~7MB) The reason is that it is necessary for our project to keep the

Re: [Samba] Question about how to reduce samba 3.3.3 install size or why it has been increased dramatically from 3.0.34 to 3.3.3

2009-04-19 Thread vot...@gmx.de
Volker Lendecke wrote: On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 03:06:36AM +0200, vot...@gmx.de wrote: Hello, can anyone give me some tips why the file size of various samba executables has been increased dramatically from 3.0.34 to 3.3.3 (e.g. smbd 3.5MB - ~7MB) The reason is that it is necessary for

[Samba] Question about how to reduce samba 3.3.3 install size or why it has been increased dramatically from 3.0.34 to 3.3.3

2009-04-18 Thread vot...@gmx.de
Hello, can anyone give me some tips why the file size of various samba executables has been increased dramatically from 3.0.34 to 3.3.3 (e.g. smbd 3.5MB - ~7MB) The reason is that it is necessary for our project to keep the size as small as possible. You can have a look into the makefile