Re: [Samba] Re: cifs verses smbfs for Linux clients -time stamp issue

2008-03-20 Thread Lukasz Szybalski
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 12:25 PM, Lukasz Szybalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 7:06 PM, Günter Kukkukk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, 6. März 2008 schrieb Lukasz Szybalski: > > > > > After mounting a windows share via cifs I have came across the same > >

Re: [Samba] Re: cifs verses smbfs for Linux clients -time stamp issue

2008-03-13 Thread Lukasz Szybalski
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 7:06 PM, Günter Kukkukk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 6. März 2008 schrieb Lukasz Szybalski: > > > After mounting a windows share via cifs I have came across the same > > issue as described here: > > > > http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2006-April/119813.

Re: [Samba] Re: cifs verses smbfs for Linux clients -time stamp issue

2008-03-06 Thread Günter Kukkukk
Am Donnerstag, 6. März 2008 schrieb Lukasz Szybalski: > After mounting a windows share via cifs I have came across the same > issue as described here: > > http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2006-April/119813.html > > "While using vim on files mounted under CIFS, when trying to write an > existi

Re: [Samba] Re: cifs verses smbfs for Linux clients -time stamp issue

2008-03-06 Thread Lukasz Szybalski
After mounting a windows share via cifs I have came across the same issue as described here: http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2006-April/119813.html "While using vim on files mounted under CIFS, when trying to write an existing file you will randomly be warned "The file has been changed since