true.. if you use a unix filesystem, but there's reasons to still use
samba :)
samba with ssl would be much more secure (for several reasons) over nfs
(and easier to use than the afs/etc).
We have some machines that I don't trust enough to give NFS access to (and
I don't particulary like havin
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 09:12:44AM -0600, Hunsberger, Mike wrote:
> Hi, I am new to this list.
>
> Does samba 3 support ntfs permissions or a way to map them?
> Creating a share for a user is easy but can you set different file
> permissions in that share with separate ntfs permissions to give dif
Hi
Samba 3 now supports ACLs, it can either use POSIX ACL (kernel level)
or a built-in engine (Correct me if I am wrong)
Using the builtin one, I heard many reports of people login in the
domain as admins and setting the permissions using the windows file
security dialog box. Note that you mus
Hi, I am new to this list.
Does samba 3 support ntfs permissions or a way to map them?
Creating a share for a user is easy but can you set different file
permissions in that share with separate ntfs permissions to give different
users permission to different areas of the share? This is on an Activ