Hi Andrew,
it is Samba 4 and the server role is active directory domain controller.
Thanks and regards,
Fabian
On 28/01/2013 9:32, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Sun, 2013-01-27 at 11:48 -0500, Fabian von Romberg wrote:
Hi All,
Im thrying to setup a server with Samba4 with Kerberos. When I want
On Sun, 2013-01-27 at 11:48 -0500, Fabian von Romberg wrote:
Hi All,
Im thrying to setup a server with Samba4 with Kerberos. When I want to see
list all shares with smbclient with samba authentication, everything works
fine. But when I try to authenticate using Kerberos, I get and error.
Thank you, this is a Samba4 host as an AD DC.
-Original Message-
From: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org] On
Behalf Of Andrew Bartlett
Sent: January-28-13 9:32 AM
To: Fabian von Romberg
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba Authentication
Disregard, that, sorry.
-Original Message-
From: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org] On
Behalf Of David Salib, Mr
Sent: January-28-13 9:38 AM
To: Andrew Bartlett; Fabian von Romberg
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba Authentication
Hi Andrew,
it is Samba 4 and the server role is active directory domain controller.
Thanks and regards,
Fabian
On 28/01/2013 9:32, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Sun, 2013-01-27 at 11:48 -0500, Fabian von Romberg wrote:
Hi All,
Im thrying to setup a server with Samba4 with Kerberos. When I want
Hi All,
Im thrying to setup a server with Samba4 with Kerberos. When I want to see list
all shares with smbclient with samba authentication, everything works fine. But
when I try to authenticate using Kerberos, I get and error.
The command I execute is:
smbclient -L localhost -k
The error
On 25 March 2011 01:47, Xamindar junkxamin...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/24/2011 03:55 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 03:44:51PM -0700, Xamindar wrote:
On 03/24/2011 03:33 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote:
Share level security doesn't automatically mean no password.
Either use the
Little update.
I just found that if I chose Map Network Drive on the vista machine it
will authenticate and connect the share as a network drive. Why does it
fail when just browsing through network neighborhood?
It looks like it is still read only this way. But guest access for this
share
It seems samba has outgrown it's documentation and this is not possible
anymore despite what it states. It would have been nice if someone here
could have told me but maybe no one knows? Thanks to those who responded
earlier. I
found out through lots of searching and chats on irc that you
I'm coming back to this problem after giving it a rest for a while. I
find it hard to believe that no one sets up authentication with security
set to share. Is that really the case? Is share security deprecated and
untested or something? As no one was able to point out what I did wrong
in my
The is no /var/cache/samba folder.
Any idea what files im looking for?
-Original Message-
From: Dale Schroeder [mailto:d...@briannassaladdressing.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 7:50 PM
To: Brian O'Mahony
Cc: Samba
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba Authentication wrecking my head [ADS
Authentication wrecking my head [ADS]
The is no /var/cache/samba folder.
Any idea what files im looking for?
-Original Message-
From: Dale Schroeder [mailto:d...@briannassaladdressing.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 7:50 PM
To: Brian O'Mahony
Cc: Samba
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba Authentication
Ive recently installed three servers with RHEL5u5. After some messing on the
original, I got samba working with ADS authentication. I then went and got it
working so that users could log in using their domain name password to the
box. I got this working with both no restriction, and ADS group
Subject: [Samba] Samba Authentication wrecking my head [ADS]
Ive recently installed three servers with RHEL5u5. After some messing on the
original, I got samba working with ADS authentication. I then went and got it
working so that users could log in using their domain name password to the
box. I
that the idmap has been corrupted. Why
would/could this happen?
-Original Message-
From: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org] On
Behalf Of Brian O'Mahony
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 2:37 PM
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: [Samba] Samba Authentication
...@lists.samba.org] On
Behalf Of Gaiseric Vandal
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 4:28 PM
To: Samba
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba Authentication wrecking my head [ADS]
What version of samba? I found that samba 3.0.x (as bundled with
solaris) had problems with idmap. This was with LDAP backend, a Samba DC
Message-
From: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org] On
Behalf Of Gaiseric Vandal
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 4:28 PM
To: Samba
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba Authentication wrecking my head [ADS]
What version of samba? I found that samba 3.0.x (as bundled
From: Xamindar junkxamin...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 16:47:16 -0700
Sounds like a bug in your version of the cifsfs kernel
module. With security=share try connecting with the
same password using smbclient. If it correctly connects
then it's cifsfs screwing up somehow.
Jeremy.
Hi, I have asked around in other forums but no one seems to know why
this doesn't work.
I have a backup server with samba on it and am trying to set it up to
only allow write access when a user authenticates but to allow reading
from anyone (guest). At this time I have guest disabled and a
In further testing, changing security to user gets authentication
working. Does anyone know why the Samba team removed the possibility to
authenticate with share based security? I would find it very usefull to
be able to see the shares and then authenticate when connecting to one.
Also, the help
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 03:14:54PM -0700, Xamindar wrote:
In further testing, changing security to user gets authentication
working. Does anyone know why the Samba team removed the possibility to
authenticate with share based security? I would find it very usefull to
be able to see the shares
That is the version of samba that I am running, but it does not work.
This is an Arch system and I doubt they would have changed it.
On 03/24/2011 03:16 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote:
No, share level security, warts and all, still exists and
works in 3.5.8.
Jeremy.
--
To unsubscribe from this
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 01:00:51PM -0700, Xamindar wrote:
Hi, I have asked around in other forums but no one seems to know why
this doesn't work.
I have a backup server with samba on it and am trying to set it up to
only allow write access when a user authenticates but to allow reading
from
On 03/24/2011 03:33 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote:
Share level security doesn't automatically mean no password.
Either use the password for user xamindar, or add
Like I stated in the first post, it is not accepting the password for
xamindar. It spits back that it is wrong and in the logs I see
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 03:44:51PM -0700, Xamindar wrote:
On 03/24/2011 03:33 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote:
Share level security doesn't automatically mean no password.
Either use the password for user xamindar, or add
Like I stated in the first post, it is not accepting the password for
On 03/24/2011 03:55 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 03:44:51PM -0700, Xamindar wrote:
On 03/24/2011 03:33 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote:
Share level security doesn't automatically mean no password.
Either use the password for user xamindar, or add
Like I stated in the first
We are using samba with domain authentication against a windows AD.
The account domain is AA.
All our hosts (windows and samba systems) and a few generic user accounts
are in a domain TT which trust the accounts from AA.
In Short our smbd.conf has:
. . .
security = domain
workgroup = TT
. . .
I probably have an odd setup, so please bear with me. To simplify as much
as possible, I have two servers and a client. The first server is the
back-end file server and is accessible only by the second (gateway)
server. (The second server has dual ethernet, one of which is a crossover
to the
SNIP
Now the issue I'm having may not have a workaround, but I'm just
looking for
ideas. When users on the client (any computer on the network) write a
file
to the server that they see, it is in turn writing back to the Samba
share
on the file server. Thus, no matter who writes the
Hello Vishesh,
Thank you for the reply.
I'm not too familiar with the network, I've only been given access to the
linux machine so I'm unsure if there's a machine / workgroup name conflict.
It's something I shall have to investigate.
Here is a copy of the current smb.conf file (I've modified
Dear wispa
does machine name or workgroup name collide in your network.
Send smb.conf configuration for detail analysis
thanks
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 9:03 PM, wispa oliver.s...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to set up Samba on a client's computer so that it authenticates
the
Hi all,
I'm trying to set up Samba on a client's computer so that it authenticates
the users which are accessing it via a windows domain controller and
kerberos. I've been following various tutorials and it all seems to go
through correctly but when the client tries to access the shares, it
On Mon, 2009-09-28 at 18:37 -0400, Charles Yost wrote:
I'm attempting to setup samba authentication via PAM and more
specifically the pam_pwdfile module. So far I have had trouble
determining the right mix of global settings to get this to work. I
have read through many tutorials online,
On Sep 29, 2009, at 6:47 AM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
Because it doesn't work; at least not without hacking every Windows
client. [Does that even still work anymore? I don't know, it really
is not a reasonable/maintainable thing to do].
You need to either setup an LDAP DSA and use that
I'm attempting to setup samba authentication via PAM and more
specifically the pam_pwdfile module. So far I have had trouble
determining the right mix of global settings to get this to work. I
have read through many tutorials online, but so far I have not found
good documentation on how to
David Markey wrote:
Otherwise you could do some pam hackery, perhaps stacking pam_winbind and
pam_krb5 for password changing. You would have to do this on all the nodes
on your network. and for the windows side of things you could write a
password change script, which would be called by samba
Hi,
please consider the following situation in a heterogenous, Windows
Server-less network, where users use both Windows and Linux:
- On Windows users authenticate against a Samba 3.3.2 PDC with tdbsam
backend.
- On Linux users authenticate against a combination of OpenLDAP and
Kerberos.
This,
Use the popular heimdal, openldap + smbk5pwd, samba3 combo
This will keep samba/ldap/kerberos passwords in sync no matter how or where
the password is changed.
Otherwise you could do some pam hackery, perhaps stacking pam_winbind and
pam_krb5 for password changing. You would have to do this
Hello,
I wonder whether there is a way to authenticate samba against NTLM2 enabled
radius server without using encrypt passwords = no.
I really have no other option than this. My situation is as follows.
I have an organization that runs Microsoft Windows Server 2003 which is used
as AD. This AD
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Have you tried putting the following line in the [global] section of
your smb.conf file?
client ntlmv2 auth = yes
Lukas Hejtmanek wrote:
Hello,
I wonder whether there is a way to authenticate samba against NTLM2 enabled
radius server without
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 04:24:31PM -0400, Robert Freeman-Day wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Have you tried putting the following line in the [global] section of
your smb.conf file?
client ntlmv2 auth = yes
and what should I put there if I want to authenticate with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
vishesh kumar wrote:
Does NT hashes require even if we use kerberos for authentication?.
I don't understand the context of this question. A Samba 3 DC
does not support kerb5 auth. So you can only use the NTLM
authentication (which requires the
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 4:22 AM, Volker Lendecke
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 03:41:12PM -0700, Christian McHugh wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 03:53:51PM -0500, Lenny Shovsky wrote:
Can Samba authenticate directly ( through pam_ldap ? ) via LDAP,
which
only has
Can Samba authenticate directly ( through pam_ldap ? ) via LDAP, which
only has Unix uids password hashes ? Thank you.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 03:53:51PM -0500, Lenny Shovsky wrote:
Can Samba authenticate directly ( through pam_ldap ? ) via LDAP, which
only has Unix uids password hashes ? Thank you.
No. You need to store the NT hashes somewhere, either in
LDAP or in another passdb backend.
Volker
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 03:53:51PM -0500, Lenny Shovsky wrote:
Can Samba authenticate directly ( through pam_ldap ? ) via LDAP, which
only has Unix uids password hashes ? Thank you.
No. You need to store the NT hashes somewhere, either in
LDAP or in another passdb backend.
What about the
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 03:41:12PM -0700, Christian McHugh wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 03:53:51PM -0500, Lenny Shovsky wrote:
Can Samba authenticate directly ( through pam_ldap ? ) via LDAP, which
only has Unix uids password hashes ? Thank you.
No. You need to store the NT hashes
Greetings
I need help in setting up my linux box with ADS authentication on Samba.
I know that it can be done using winbind and Kerberos. I tried some of
the online methods but I am not able to get a result.
Request you to please help me with this.
These are the steps I followed to
Try this:
http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba__Active_Directory
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
]
On Behalf Of Prashanth Adiyodi
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 7:42 AM
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: [Samba] Samba authentication using
Greetings all;
I currently have a task to put together a SAMBA (3.2) server that can
authenticate users to our local AD server. I was told recently that in
order for that to happen, the authentication needs to be in mixed
mode vice native (whatever that means), or it won't work. Can
someone a bit
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 12:59:36PM -0400, Gman wrote:
Greetings all;
I currently have a task to put together a SAMBA (3.2) server that can
authenticate users to our local AD server. I was told recently that in
order for that to happen, the authentication needs to be in mixed
mode vice
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 01:19:17PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 12:59:36PM -0400, Gman wrote:
Greetings all;
I currently have a task to put together a SAMBA (3.2) server that can
authenticate users to our local AD server. I was told recently that in
order for
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 10:28:49PM +0200, Volker Lendecke wrote:
Sorry, that's wrong. The only thing that native mode
prevents is a NT4 BDC, so old-style net rpc vampire won't
work anymore. Trusts should work. If they don't, please file
a bug.
Ah, thanks Volker. Thanks for the correction !
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Henning Evers wrote:
Hey there everybody.
I am new to the list, so bear with me if make mistakes :)
I updated my Server from FC7 to FC9 and with it came Samba
3.2.0pre3-9.fc9 (heaven knows why it had to be a pre version).
I reused my old
Hey there everybody.
I am new to the list, so bear with me if make mistakes :)
I updated my Server from FC7 to FC9 and with it came Samba
3.2.0pre3-9.fc9 (heaven knows why it had to be a pre version).
I reused my old config and noticed that displaying all hosts in my
workgroup as well as
On Thu 3 Apr 2008 5:00:36 pm Wes Modes wrote:
Volker Lendecke wrote:
On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 01:34:30PM -0700, Wes Modes wrote:
The question and the challenge: Any leads on how I might convince Samba
to pass the input password on to OpenLDAP so that OpenLDAP can
authenticate it against
On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 01:34:30PM -0700, Wes Modes wrote:
The question and the challenge: Any leads on how I might convince Samba
to pass the input password on to OpenLDAP so that OpenLDAP can
authenticate it against Kerberos?
The only chance is that you modify each client's registry to
So far answers I've received on this list have been inconsistent at best
and downright inaccurate at worst. I'm going to try one more time and
see if, at the very least, someone can give me a lead. I ask you to
consider what I'm asking remotely possible, and then seek a solution.
On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 02:00:36PM -0700, Wes Modes wrote:
It is already moderately-well documented how to connect Samba up to use
Kerberos authentication. And my guess is that the Kerberos model would
not allow passwords to be sent plaintext. More likely an encrypted hash
gets passed? I
Volker Lendecke wrote:
On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 01:34:30PM -0700, Wes Modes wrote:
The question and the challenge: Any leads on how I might convince Samba
to pass the input password on to OpenLDAP so that OpenLDAP can
authenticate it against Kerberos?
The only chance is that you
That's it!
public need to be set as no
Thanks for your help.
Wiadomość Oryginalna
Od: Sadique Puthen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Do: czezz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kopia do: John Drescher [EMAIL PROTECTED], samba@lists.samba.org
Data: 4 lutego 2008 12:38
Temat: Re: [Samba] SAMBA authentication
@lists.samba.org
Data: 4 lutego 2008 8:37
Temat: Re: [Samba] SAMBA authentication ?
czezz wrote:
Wiadomość Oryginalna
Od: John Drescher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Do: czezz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kopia do: samba@lists.samba.org
Data: 3 lutego 2008 19:59
Temat: Re: [Samba] SAMBA authentication
PROTECTED]
Do: czezz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kopia do: John Drescher [EMAIL PROTECTED], samba@lists.samba.org
Data: 4 lutego 2008 8:37
Temat: Re: [Samba] SAMBA authentication ?
czezz wrote:
Wiadomość Oryginalna
Od: John Drescher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Do: czezz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kopia do
On Feb 4, 2008 5:48 PM, Charles Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please post your smb.conf without comments.
Is there a command to generate this output?
There probably is a better way but this is the first thing I can think of:
grep -v ^# /etc/samba/smb.conf
John
--
To unsubscribe from this
John Drescher wrote:
On Feb 4, 2008 5:48 PM, Charles Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please post your smb.conf without comments.
Is there a command to generate this output?
There probably is a better way but this is the first thing I can think of:
grep -v ^# /etc/samba/smb.conf
John
Please post your smb.conf without comments.
Is there a command to generate this output?
--
Best regards,
Charles
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Charles Marcus wrote:
Please post your smb.conf without comments.
Is there a command to generate this output?
#testparm -s /tmp/smb.conf
Attach the /tmp/smb.conf.
--Sadique
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
I have set up samba and configured resources /pub for pcguest account and it
works perfect (read/write access for for everyone. No authentication is needed)
Now, I want to set new resource called /pub2 where access is limited only for
user userx.
What I did:
I created userx in /etc/passwd and
On Feb 3, 2008 11:38 AM, czezz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have set up samba and configured resources /pub for pcguest account and
it works perfect (read/write access for for everyone. No authentication is
needed)
Now, I want to set new resource called /pub2 where access is limited only for
Wiadomość Oryginalna
Od: John Drescher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Do: czezz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kopia do: samba@lists.samba.org
Data: 3 lutego 2008 19:59
Temat: Re: [Samba] SAMBA authentication ?
On Feb 3, 2008 11:38 AM, czezz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have set up samba and configured
Ammm... John, whats the point of unix permissions?
If the unix user has no access to the share on the unix filesystem.
Samba will not have any access either.
I can browse content of /pub2 from any workstation on LAN.
The problem is that when I click on PUB2 resources I should get window to put
czezz wrote:
Wiadomość Oryginalna
Od: John Drescher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Do: czezz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kopia do: samba@lists.samba.org
Data: 3 lutego 2008 19:59
Temat: Re: [Samba] SAMBA authentication ?
On Feb 3, 2008 11:38 AM, czezz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have set up samba
Until recently I had the computers organized in workgroups, without Active
Directory.
Also, we had a Linux server with samba. Some users had disks maped to some
directory on the linux machine.
Now, we migrated the users and computers to an Active Directory Windows
2003. Now they cannot connect
Hello guys,
I have my linux system configured to authenticate/authorize (windows XP
and Vista) users for several services, like PPTP, SMTP and POP3, against
a radius server (using PAM), and now I want to add support for samba
authentication also. I was planning to do it by using one tdbsam
I have my linux system configured to authenticate/authorize (windows XP
and Vista) users for several services, like PPTP, SMTP and POP3, against
a radius server (using PAM), and now I want to add support for samba
authentication also. I was planning to do it by using one tdbsam backend
(I can
This is really frustrating me - I cannot seem to resolve the problem.
Some users can connect no problem and others take a long time. The users
that take a long time leave lots of entries in the messages file:
Jun 5 13:00:33 dfgsrv2 smbd[9148]: [2007/06/05 13:00:33, 0]
Hi,
I have just upgraded a server from Samba 2 to Samba 3 and some of the
Windows clients are taking a long time to authenticate shares (1 or 2
minutes). Eventually the username/password box appears and then when you
enter a correct password, all is fine - it is just the initial
authentication.
Hello,
We have a RHEL 4 Update 4 server that was configured to store its Samba
passwords in eDirectory via LDAP. This was accomplished by adding the
following three lines to the [Global] section of smb.conf:
ldap admin dn = cn=admin,o=budget
ldap suffix = o=budget
passdb backend =
Hello,
We have a RHEL 4 Update 4 server that was configured to store its
Samba passwords in eDirectory via LDAP. This was accomplished by
adding the following three lines to the [Global] section of smb.conf:
ldap admin dn = cn=admin,o=budget
ldap suffix = o=budget
passdb backend =
Hi,
Is there a way to configure Samba w/o using /etc/passwd but only Samba's
local password file only?
I'm looking for a simple way to configure it to avoid using /etc/passwd, if
there's a way.
Thanks in advance!
- Young
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
Hi,
Suse 10.1, Yast, authentication, choose samba
greetings
daniel
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 09:05:19 -0800
Von: Young [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: samba@lists.samba.org
CC:
Betreff: [Samba] Samba authentication w/o using /etc/passwd?
Hi,
Is there a way
Dear SAMBA Mailing List
I am using Samba samba-3.0.9-1.3E.10, OS Centos 4.4
We have got the problem. when I am issuing a net rpc trustdom list
command some time it is showing ok and sometime it is showing error
message. and some time not. It is creating a problem to authenticate other
Samba
Hi all,
I am trying to configure samba (3.0.23d) on my linux machine. This
is my smb.conf file,
[global]
workgroup = BSIL
netbios name = MDT506
security = share
server string = samba testing
[data]
read only = No
guest ok = yes
Hi I´m new here.
Here is my question : We have severals servers running on our net. We have
one Win NT4.0 (domain manager), one SUSE Linux 8.1 running Samba 2.28.
We need to validate user/pass from Win NT4.0 from , for example , an
external application ( made in Java ) .
Is there some command we
SunFreeWare Samba 3.0.10 on Solaris 10. Installed,
and able to authenticate locally on the samba box
after 'smbpasswd -a userid'.
Butattempt to map a network drive from W2K
fails at authentication (the UNIX protocol in use
is NIS). Heres' what's gacked up in the log file:
===
Hello,
I have an unusual problem and I've only found a small amount of material
after searching for other posts on this topic. We have a production
server running Samba version 2.2.7a which I'm told has been working
perfectly for many years. Every day over the last week Samba stops
Hi,
I'm trying to setup a samba server that will serve linux shares out
to users accross the network. I'd like authentication to be done
locally, and I want it to authenticate against pam using the already
existing local linux user accounts. I am not authenticating domain
users, or
Michael Thrift wrote:
I am not authenticating domain
users, or windows users, and I don't want to use smbpasswd. Is there
some way to force samba to authenticate against pam, and only pam? My
goal is to not add an administrative load whatsoever.
The last goal is not one you can achieve.
Actually, I figured out what I wanted. I wasn't expressing it well,
mainly cause I couldn't think straight after staring at the monitor for
so long. Basically, what I didn't realize earlier is how pam_smbpasswd
worked. After stepping away from the problem for a few hours it hit me
with a
Hello all
I need some help about Nas Blade authentication mode with CIFS Active
Directory.
My question is, if the PDC (DC Server Name) fail:
- Active Directory authentication will be able to connect BDC (Slave DC
Server Name)?
Thanks in advance
Best regards...
Renato Shimizu.
--
To
First let me give my thanks inadvance for any help
offered
I am tasked with setting up a Samba server to
authenticate against the windows2003 ADS(LDAP server).
With the msSFU3.5 schema extensions already installed
and configured.
We have an existing Samba server that is
authenticating
Hello,
I'm trying to setup my first Samba server on a Suse Linux system. I
have configured by krb5.conf file and checked thing using kinit
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and it all worked. I have configured Samba and joined it to
our windows domain using 'net ads join -u username%password' and this
seems
I've set up Samba 3.0.9 with ADS support and open LDAP 2.2.23 on freeBSD
5.3. I've got all the essential services working as far as i can tell.
Nmbd, smbd, and winbindd are running. I've created a machine account in
the domain with the net ads join command. Wbinfo -u returns a list of
my
The x in 3.0.x is interesting. There has been a serious optimization in
3.0.10, significant more work there is to come in 3.0.11
Volker
Actually the PDC and BDC are both running Samba v3.0.10 while the
troublesome server is running 3.0.9. Commenting out the username level
setting seems to have
Just an update on what the fix for this problem was. It was an entry called
username level which in our smb.conf file was set to 8. This caused the
samba server to query ldap 256 times per user which caused the CPU on our
PDC/LDAP server to peg. After setting this entry to 0 everything is
We are currently running three Samba 3.0.x file servers which authenticate
against a Samba PDC running LDAP. 2 out of the 3 samba servers authenticate
quickly(5 seconds) when using smbclient -L localhost -U username however
the third will eventually time out saying Server did not respond in
We are currently running three Samba 3.0.x file servers which authenticate
against a Samba PDC running LDAP. 2 out of the 3 samba servers authenticate
quickly(5 seconds) when using smbclient -L localhost -U username however
the third will eventually time out saying Server did not respond in
Paul,
Thanks for your reply.
How many clients do you have running against your server(s).
Just shy of 1000. 952 total clients.
ever considered a BDC?
We do have a BDC although it doesn't take as much of a load off of our PDC
as I would like. The PDC will run around 70% utilization during
On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 04:22:09PM -0600, Chris Snider wrote:
We are currently running three Samba 3.0.x file servers which authenticate
The x in 3.0.x is interesting. There has been a serious optimization in
3.0.10, significant more work there is to come in 3.0.11
Volker
--
To unsubscribe
Hello all
I'm trying once again to get a Samba server set up on a Slackware Linux
system for a small office (much less than 100 users). There will be
multiple domains on this system (say foo.com, bar.com, ...) with the users
scattered between these domains. We want to use LDAP to authenticate
1 - 100 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
