Lat night I removed samba 3.0.3pre2 from the suse 9.0 box, then tried to
install 3.0.5 from rpms from the suse ftp mirror on mirror.ac.uk - I had
a lot of failed dependencies with it:
error: Failed dependencies:
liblber.so.199 is needed by samba-3.0.5-0.1
libldap.so.199 is needed by
On Thu, 2004-07-29 at 09:34, Hamish wrote:
> Thanks Craig,
> Will it work if I remove samba 3.0.3 completely (rpm -e) and then
> install 3.0.5?
>
> Craig White wrote:
>
> >This is an act of pure desperation and nothing that I could ever in good
> >conscience suggest to someone. Not charming does
havent done that , but should work
Hamish schrieb:
Thanks Craig,
Will it work if I remove samba 3.0.3 completely (rpm -e) and then
install 3.0.5?
Craig White wrote:
This is an act of pure desperation and nothing that I could ever in good
conscience suggest to someone. Not charming doesn't begin t
Thanks Craig,
Will it work if I remove samba 3.0.3 completely (rpm -e) and then
install 3.0.5?
Craig White wrote:
This is an act of pure desperation and nothing that I could ever in good
conscience suggest to someone. Not charming doesn't begin to describe
the consequences that may occur.
Craig
O
This is an act of pure desperation and nothing that I could ever in good
conscience suggest to someone. Not charming doesn't begin to describe
the consequences that may occur.
Craig
On Thu, 2004-07-29 at 03:36, rruegner wrote:
> Hi,
> i updated my systems with the killing method
> rpm --nodeps --
Hi,
i updated my systems with the killing method
rpm --nodeps --force
i know this is not charming but it worked with the suse packs since
samba 3.0 up to samba 3.04
but i strongly recommend to test this first on a test system
Best Regards
Hamish schrieb:
Thanks for you help, I tried to updat
Thanks for you help, I tried to update with rpm -Uvh and it found a lot
of failed dependencies: liblber.so.199, libldap.so.199, libpopt.so.199
etc - did you have these same problems?
rruegner wrote:
Hi, i have a big smb/ldap setup and running
with 3.04 but with kernel 2.4.21 suse 9
and i had no