Hi Jeremy,
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Jeremy Davis wrote:
> Hello Amitay,
>
> On 02/22/2012 02:34 PM, Amitay Isaacs wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jeremy,
>>
>>
>> That error message needs to be fixed. :)
>>
>> Looks like "nsupdate" command is not in the path. samba_dnsupdate
>> script uses nsupdate to dy
Hi Jeremy,
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 4:01 AM, wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> Thank you for your help that you have provided so far regarding my issue. I
> have cleared out this email to reduce the confusion of my current issue. Here
> is a recap of my issue and the logs you requested below.
>
> Current
HI Michael,
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 7:06 PM, Michael Wood wrote:
> Hi
>
> On 22 February 2012 01:46, wrote:
>>> The default DNS backend has changed to BIND9_DLZ. This means the DNS
>>> records are stored in Samba4's AD tree instead of in a normal zone
>>> file.
> [...]
>>> If you're just start
Hi Michael,
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:57 PM, Michael Wood wrote:
> Since I provisioned samba4 before the DLZ option was available I have
> stuck with BIND9_FLATFILE for now.
I have pushed upgradedns script to upgrade DNS provisioning from BIND9_FLATFILE
backend to BIND9_DLZ backend or SAMBA_IN
Hello All,
On 02/23/2012 09:31 AM, Jeremy Davis wrote:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Jeremy Davis
wrote:
I forgot to mention that nsupdate command should also include -g
flag to
force
secure (kerberos) updates.
nsupdate command = /path/to/nsupdate -g
dlz_bind9 module only allows s
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Jeremy Davis wrote:
I forgot to mention that nsupdate command should also include -g
flag to
force
secure (kerberos) updates.
nsupdate command = /path/to/nsupdate -g
dlz_bind9 module only allows secure dynamic updates.
Amitay.
I added the -g to the sm
On 02/23/2012 06:33 AM, Jeremy Davis wrote:
Hello Amitay,
On 02/22/2012 10:07 PM, Amitay Isaacs wrote:
Hi Jeremy,
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Jeremy Davis
wrote:
Hello Amitay,
On 02/22/2012 02:34 PM, Amitay Isaacs wrote:
Hi Jeremy,
That error message needs to be fixed. :)
Looks li
Hello Amitay,
On 02/22/2012 10:07 PM, Amitay Isaacs wrote:
Hi Jeremy,
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Jeremy Davis wrote:
Hello Amitay,
On 02/22/2012 02:34 PM, Amitay Isaacs wrote:
Hi Jeremy,
That error message needs to be fixed. :)
Looks like "nsupdate" command is not in the path. samb
Hello Amitay,
On 02/22/2012 02:34 PM, Amitay Isaacs wrote:
Hi Jeremy,
That error message needs to be fixed. :)
Looks like "nsupdate" command is not in the path. samba_dnsupdate
script uses nsupdate to dynamically update DNS entries.
Try adding "nsupdate command = /path/to/nsupdate" in smb.con
Hello All,
Thank you for your help that you have provided so far regarding my issue. I
have cleared out this email to reduce the confusion of my current issue. Here
is a recap of my issue and the logs you requested below.
Currently, I have resolved the DNSSEC issue that I was seeing in my
/var
Hi Amitay
I think you may be getting mixed up between my issues with upgrading
and the original poster's (Jeremy/jdfire) issue with a new provision
:)
The messages from the logs are all from Jeremy. It's a new provision,
so there's no "migration" unless I'm missing something.
My issues with upg
On 22 February 2012 03:16, wrote:
> One note I would like to add. I am now using Bind 9.8.1 compiled from source.
> It seems to load the DLZ driver just fine. The issue I am having is that
> samba4 is trying to update DNS and can't. When I add a new server to the
> domain DNS can't resolve th
Hi
On 22 February 2012 01:46, wrote:
>> The default DNS backend has changed to BIND9_DLZ. This means the DNS
>> records are stored in Samba4's AD tree instead of in a normal zone
>> file.
[...]
>> If you're just starting out, you might want to try the DLZ backend.
>
> Thank you for your help! I
On 22 February 2012 00:58, Amitay Isaacs wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:57 PM, Michael Wood wrote:
>
>> Since I provisioned samba4 before the DLZ option was available I have
>> stuck with BIND9_FLATFILE for now.
>
> I have pushed upgradedns script to upgrade DNS provisioning
> > >> --
> > > Thank you for your help! I was able to get a new Bind version to somewhat
> > > work. I was able to join an XP machine to the domain but DNS seems to not
> > > be updating correctly. Below you will find the logs that I am seeing.
> > >
> > > /var/log/messages:
> > >
> > >
> > > F
steve wrote:
> On 02/22/2012 12:46 AM, jdf...@cox.net wrote:
> >> The default DNS backend has changed to BIND9_DLZ. This means the DNS
> >> records are stored in Samba4's AD tree instead of in a normal zone
> >> file.
> >>
> >> I've not tried the above, so am not sure exactly how to set it
On 02/22/2012 12:46 AM, jdf...@cox.net wrote:
The default DNS backend has changed to BIND9_DLZ. This means the DNS
records are stored in Samba4's AD tree instead of in a normal zone
file.
I've not tried the above, so am not sure exactly how to set it up.
There are some posts about it in the sam
> The default DNS backend has changed to BIND9_DLZ. This means the DNS
> records are stored in Samba4's AD tree instead of in a normal zone
> file.
>
> I've not tried the above, so am not sure exactly how to set it up.
> There are some posts about it in the samba-technical mailing list
> archives
On 02/21/2012 12:26 PM, JDFire wrote:
Hello List,
I am trying to compile and install Samba 4 using the wiki guide on Centos 6.2.
I am currently using the current source from git. It seems that the zone file
used for Bind is not configured and not installed in the private directory.
Is there a
Hi
On 21 February 2012 13:26, JDFire wrote:
> Hello List,
>
> I am trying to compile and install Samba 4 using the wiki guide on Centos
> 6.2. I am currently using the current source from git. It seems that the zone
> file used for Bind is not configured and not installed in the private
> dire
Hello List,
I am trying to compile and install Samba 4 using the wiki guide on Centos 6.2.
I am currently using the current source from git. It seems that the zone file
used for Bind is not configured and not installed in the private directory.
Is there any way to get this file generated so I c
21 matches
Mail list logo
