l-Nachricht
> Datum: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 20:21:08 +0100
> Von: Damien Dye
> An: Rhshshgs Sdasdad
> CC: samba@lists.samba.org
> Betreff: Re: [Samba] question difference of roaming profile between WinXP and
> Win7
> Also information about the differences and wor
link available "How to setup samba with win 7 clients"?
regards robert
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Sun, 4 Apr 2010 16:37:34 +0100
> Von: Damien Dye
> An: r...@gmx.at
> CC: samba@lists.samba.org
> Betreff: Re: [Samba] question difference of roami
27;t work in my production environment. I have the
>>> same settings, defined a new user but Win7 is logging on using a temp
>>> profile. I set log level to 4, inspected all messages but couldn't find any
>>> reason why a temp profile.
>>>
>>> Does someon
ll messages but couldn't find any reason why
>> a temp profile.
>>
>> Does someone have a good tip for me for further investigation or a reason?
>>
>> This there a link available "How to setup samba with win 7 clients"?
>>
>> regards robert
>>
>
efine
> > > "path = /BUERO/samba/nt-profile/%u.V2" (or something similar) in
> > > [nt-profile.v2] to differentiate between XP and 7. Who is adding the v2
> > > extension? Is it samba or Win7?
> > > I'm running Samba 3.4.3.
> > >
> > &g
link available "How to setup samba with win 7 clients"?
regards robert
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Sun, 4 Apr 2010 16:37:34 +0100
> Von: Damien Dye
> An: r...@gmx.at
> CC: samba@lists.samba.org
> Betreff: Re: [Samba] question difference of roami
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 8:17 PM, Linda Walsh wrote:
> John Drescher wrote:
>> Also. They can NOT point to the same path. That was the point of
>> having a .v2. Vista+ and XP profiles are not compatible with each
>> other.
>
> What part is incompatible? Or is it known?
> This this is som
John Drescher wrote:
> Also. They can NOT point to the same path. That was the point of
> having a .v2. Vista+ and XP profiles are not compatible with each
> other.
What part is incompatible? Or is it known?
This this is something that I ran into as well, but didn't have
time to chas
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Damien Dye wrote:
> Robert
>
> remove the .V2 share and then remove your profiles from vista/win 7 at this
> reg key
>
> HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\ProfileList
>
> then all will work as expected.
>
It's interesting to me that everyone gives
running Samba 3.4.3.
>
> regards Robert
>
> Original-Nachricht
> > Datum: Sun, 4 Apr 2010 00:00:40 +0200 (CEST)
> > Von: Christian Rost
> > An: r...@gmx.at
> > CC: samba@lists.samba.org
> > Betreff: RE: [Samba] question difference of roaming profile
g Samba 3.4.3.
regards Robert
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Sun, 4 Apr 2010 00:00:40 +0200 (CEST)
> Von: Christian Rost
> An: r...@gmx.at
> CC: samba@lists.samba.org
> Betreff: RE: [Samba] question difference of roaming profile between WinXP and
> Win7
> Hi,
>
>
10 658
fax: +49 (0) 2306 910 664
url: http://www.rocon-it.de
r...@gmx.at wrote----
Subject: [Samba] question difference of roaming profile between WinXP and
Win7
Date: 03.04.2010 17:02
>Hello
>I want to add Win7 machine to my Samba PDC with WinXP clients. Google
>tells me I h
On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 12:08 PM, John Drescher wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 11:00 AM, wrote:
>> Hello
>> I want to add Win7 machine to my Samba PDC with WinXP clients. Google tells
>> me I have to add a .V2 to my profiles. The samba log ask about a .v2 share.
>> Can someone explain me the di
On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 11:00 AM, wrote:
> Hello
> I want to add Win7 machine to my Samba PDC with WinXP clients. Google tells
> me I have to add a .V2 to my profiles. The samba log ask about a .v2 share.
> Can someone explain me the difference of the v2 extension at the profile
> names and the
Hello
I want to add Win7 machine to my Samba PDC with WinXP clients. Google tells me
I have to add a .V2 to my profiles. The samba log ask about a .v2 share.
Can someone explain me the difference of the v2 extension at the profile names
and the roaming profile share?
Following my settings:
smb.c
15 matches
Mail list logo
