[Samba] uids/gids changed after upgrade from 3.021c to 3.023

Hi All, Yesterday, I've upgraded my Samba server from 3.021c to 3.023 through yum upgrade samba*. I'm running Fedora Core 4 Kernel 2.6.17-1.2142 on this server. After upgrade has been completed, I lost the attributes of ownership and groups. I noticed that the uids/gids have changed for all

Re: [Samba] uids/gids changed after upgrade from 3.021c to 3.023

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Richard Santiago wrote: Hi All, Yesterday, I've upgraded my Samba server from 3.021c to 3.023 through yum upgrade samba*. I'm running Fedora Core 4 Kernel 2.6.17-1.2142 on this server. After upgrade has been completed, I lost the

RE: [Samba] uids/gids changed after upgrade from 3.021c to 3.023

@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: [Samba] uids/gids changed after upgrade from 3.021c to 3.023 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Richard Santiago wrote: Hi All, Yesterday, I've upgraded my Samba server from 3.021c to 3.023 through yum upgrade samba*. I'm running Fedora Core 4

Re: [Samba] uids/gids changed after upgrade from 3.021c to 3.023

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Richard Santiago wrote: Thanks Jerry, I've noticed that the winbindd_idmap.tdb is different in size in /var/lib/samba from the new /var/cache/samba path. Did you upgrade via rpm? What platform is this? It sounds like perhaps you are on RHEL4

RE: [Samba] uids/gids changed after upgrade from 3.021c to 3.023

(Jerry) Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 11:51 AM To: Richard Santiago Cc: samba@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: [Samba] uids/gids changed after upgrade from 3.021c to 3.023 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Richard Santiago wrote: Thanks Jerry, I've noticed

Re: [Samba] uids/gids changed after upgrade from 3.021c to 3.023

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Richard Santiago wrote: Hi Jerry, Yes, I've upgraded through yum with the rpm. The platform is Fedora Core 4. The package may be broken. I'm not convinced yet that this is our problem. Is the yum upgrade coming from an official Fedora

Re: [Samba] uids/gids changed after upgrade from 3.021c to 3.023

On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 11:02:31AM -0500, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Richard Santiago wrote: Hi Jerry, Yes, I've upgraded through yum with the rpm. The platform is Fedora Core 4. The package may be broken. I'm not convinced yet

Re: [Samba] uids/gids changed after upgrade from 3.021c to 3.023

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jay Fenlason wrote: Jay, did the package layout for the Samba rpms in FC4 change ? Specifically, moving the $(lockdir) from /var/cache/samba to /var/lib/samba ? Looking at my spec file, I see --with-lockdir=/var/cache/samba so I don't think

RE: [Samba] uids/gids changed after upgrade from 3.021c to 3.023

- From: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 12:49 PM To: Jay Fenlason Cc: Richard Santiago; samba@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: [Samba] uids/gids changed after upgrade from 3.021c to 3.023 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jay Fenlason wrote

Re: [Samba] uids/gids changed after upgrade from 3.021c to 3.023

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Richard Santiago wrote: Hi guys, Thanks for your responses. So, what would be the steps to take to fix the problem then? $ mv /var/cache/samba /var/cache/samba.old $ mv /var/lib/samba /var/cache/samba cheers, jerry

RE: [Samba] uids/gids changed after upgrade from 3.021c to 3.023

:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 1:39 PM To: Richard Santiago Cc: Jay Fenlason; samba@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: [Samba] uids/gids changed after upgrade from 3.021c to 3.023 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Richard Santiago wrote: Hi guys, Thanks for your