Hi Jerry,
I guess my question now boils down to the following: when I access a
share as domain user DOMAIN\lz, is there a way to apply "valid users"
check based on the Unix group membership of the Unix user "lz". From
what you are saying I am getting the impression that the asnwer is no;
is this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Leonid Zeitlin wrote:
> I guess my question now boils down to the following: when I access a
> share as domain user DOMAIN\lz, is there a way to apply "valid users"
> check based on the Unix group membership of the Unix user "lz". From
> what you are
Hi Jerry,
Please see below.
The supplementary groups are determined by mapping the Windows group
to a gid. I'm having to remember what we already convered so apoligies
fotr asking again. Are you running winbindd? or just manually
mapping groups to SIDs ? Seems to be the former.
Winbind is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Leonid Zeitlin wrote:
>> DOMAIN\lz has a different SID and token than the local
>> user "lz". Therefore the search for the local group SID
>> of "webdev" will not be found in the domain user's (DOMAIN\lz)
>> token. You can view the user's complete
Hi Jerry,
Thanks a lot for your quick reply. Please see below.
Hi all,
I seem to be having a problem identical to this bug:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3940 in Samba 3.0.28, however
the
bug is supposed to be fixed by now.
I have a Fedora 7 box joined as a member to Windows 2003
Hi Jerry,
Please see below.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Leonid Zeitlin wrote:
Is webdev in the local gtroup mapping table ?
If I understand your question correctly, initally it
wasn't. Then I did "net sam mapunixgroup webdev", but
this didn't seem to have any effect.
Cor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Leonid Zeitlin wrote:
>> Is webdev in the local gtroup mapping table ?
>
> If I understand your question correctly, initally it
> wasn't. Then I did "net sam mapunixgroup webdev", but
> this didn't seem to have any effect.
Correct. That was my que
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Leonid Zeitlin wrote:
> Hi all,
> I seem to be having a problem identical to this bug:
> https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3940 in Samba 3.0.28, however the
> bug is supposed to be fixed by now.
>
> I have a Fedora 7 box joined as a member
Hi all,
I seem to be having a problem identical to this bug:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3940 in Samba 3.0.28, however the
bug is supposed to be fixed by now.
I have a Fedora 7 box joined as a member to Windows 2003 domain. All my
Windows users have accounts on the Samba machine,
