Am Donnerstag, 10. Oktober 2013, 17:13:28 schrieb Gerhard Stein:
> nope, it didn't help:
>
> gerstrong@ZController:~$ /usr/local/samba/bin/samba-tool dns add
> zcontroller calcdom.local Z37 A IP -k yes
> ERROR(runtime): uncaught exception - (-1073741811, 'Unexpected
> information received')
>F
nope, it didn't help:
gerstrong@ZController:~$ /usr/local/samba/bin/samba-tool dns add
zcontroller calcdom.local Z37 A IP -k yes
ERROR(runtime): uncaught exception - (-1073741811, 'Unexpected
information received')
File
"/usr/local/samba/lib/python2.7/site-packages/samba/netcmd/__init__.py",
I just found this:
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/DNS -> Under troubleshoot
Let me try it out first.
Am 10.10.2013 15:07, schrieb Gerhard Stein:
I have had an IP Address Record of the name Z37 which was
192.168.2.203. Using nslookup I find it, but samba-tool queries the
name and shows 0
So first of all winbind is the fastest and easiest solution with samba 4:
Just be sure winbind is loaded in your samba4 smb.conf. So winbind can read
from samba:
wbinfo -u
Administrator
Guest
krbtgt
dns-s4master
then do a ldconfig -v | grep winbind
If the result is ex:
ldconfig: /etc/ld.so.conf.d
o idea why 10.04 didn't work
except for the warning about sasl not being complete ...
- Original Message -
From: dahopk...@comcast.net
To: "steve"
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 11:23:33 AM
Subject: Re: [Samba] Question on approach to authenti
Thank you for the help ... seems like almost there but .. short version ..
getent passwd doesn't retrieve any information from the samba4 DC. Seems that
nslcd tries to use a simple bind and not kerberos but I think I have nslcd.conf
set correctly. Rest of story, see below.
>For good measure a
On Thu, 2013-07-25 at 20:59 +0100, Jonathan Buzzard wrote:
> On 25/07/13 20:14, dahopk...@comcast.net wrote:
>
> [SNIP]
>
> >
> > Step 6: I already have samba-common, and samba-common-bin (latest for
> > 10.04) installed. I'd assume I need to uninstall these and install
> > samba4 instead (especi
On Thu, 2013-07-25 at 19:14 +, dahopk...@comcast.net wrote:
> Thank you for the very quick response. But in trying to follow the
> suggested link, there are few steps are different.
>
> First, Step 3 is to install various packages. I already have
> auth-client-config installed which had inst
On 25/07/13 20:14, dahopk...@comcast.net wrote:
[SNIP]
Step 6: I already have samba-common, and samba-common-bin (latest for
10.04) installed. I'd assume I need to uninstall these and install
samba4 instead (especially as step 8 is to join the domain).
Not familiar with Ubuntu, but that is
On 25/07/13 17:59, dahopk...@comcast.net wrote:
1) will the unixHomedirectory be honored?
2) will I be able to easily add users so that the unix settings will
be properly configured? I currently use the IDEALX smbldap tools.
Being able to script account creation is very important to me ..
addi
ly as step 8 is to join the domain).
Sincerely,
Dave Hopkins
- Original Message -
From: "steve"
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 1:45:01 PM
Subject: Re: [Samba] Question on approach to authenticate Linux against Samba4
On Thu, 2013-07-25 at 16:5
On Thu, 2013-07-25 at 16:59 +, dahopk...@comcast.net wrote:
>
> I have read through the recent thread on winbind and honestly I am not sure
> that I want to pursue either winbind or sssd if it is possible to use
> nss_pam_ldap which seems closest to the current approach.
Hi
Ok, I can unde
Am 2013-02-22 08:36, schrieb Günter Kukkukk:
Am Freitag, 22. Februar 2013, 05:09:58 schrieb Günter Kukkukk:
Am Freitag, 22. Februar 2013, 04:18:33 schrieb Günter Kukkukk:
> Am Montag, 18. Februar 2013, 20:16:15 schrieb Ray:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I suppose this question must have been posted a hundred
Am Freitag, 22. Februar 2013, 05:09:58 schrieb Günter Kukkukk:
> Am Freitag, 22. Februar 2013, 04:18:33 schrieb Günter Kukkukk:
> > Am Montag, 18. Februar 2013, 20:16:15 schrieb Ray:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I suppose this question must have been posted a hundred times, but
> > > Google brings up not
Am Freitag, 22. Februar 2013, 04:18:33 schrieb Günter Kukkukk:
> Am Montag, 18. Februar 2013, 20:16:15 schrieb Ray:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I suppose this question must have been posted a hundred times, but
> > Google brings up nothing useful:
> >
> > Consider "The Wall" from Pink Floyd in an MP3 collect
Am Montag, 18. Februar 2013, 20:16:15 schrieb Ray:
> Hi,
>
> I suppose this question must have been posted a hundred times, but
> Google brings up nothing useful:
>
> Consider "The Wall" from Pink Floyd in an MP3 collection. There's "In
> The Flesh.mp3" and "In The Flesh?.mp3" as tracks. Or, anot
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 5:45 PM, Rob Townley wrote:
>
>
> On Thursday, February 21, 2013, Jeremy Allison wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 04:38:13PM -0600, Rob Townley wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, February 20, 2013, Jeremy Allison wrote:
>>> > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:30:37AM +0100, Sven Tegethof
On Thursday, February 21, 2013, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 04:38:13PM -0600, Rob Townley wrote:
>> On Wednesday, February 20, 2013, Jeremy Allison wrote:
>> > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:30:37AM +0100, Sven Tegethoff wrote:
>> >>
>> >> What we have here is a problem of two inc
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 04:38:13PM -0600, Rob Townley wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 20, 2013, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:30:37AM +0100, Sven Tegethoff wrote:
> >>
> >> What we have here is a problem of two incompatible text fields, and
> >> it does not make a difference
On Wednesday, February 20, 2013, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:30:37AM +0100, Sven Tegethoff wrote:
>>
>> What we have here is a problem of two incompatible text fields, and
>> it does not make a difference if that incompatibility is a filenames
>> in a file system or some tab
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:30:37AM +0100, Sven Tegethoff wrote:
>
> What we have here is a problem of two incompatible text fields, and
> it does not make a difference if that incompatibility is a filenames
> in a file system or some table in some kind of non-filesytem media
> library. If you can'
On 20.02.2013 10:37, Jonathan Buzzard wrote:
The issue is that you have been abusing your file system to store
metadata in the file names. A practice that is always going to end in
trouble. For example what do you do when a filename for your chosen
metadata format exceeds the maximum length for
On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 20:50 +0100, Ray wrote:
> Hi,
>
> at home I only use Linux, so no problem there. Even all my Squeezebox
> radios haven't got any problem with "special" characters, which is not
> really a surprise, because under the hood they also run Linux.
>
> But I also run a site-to-si
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 08:50:39PM +0100, Ray wrote:
> Hi,
>
> at home I only use Linux, so no problem there. Even all my
> Squeezebox radios haven't got any problem with "special" characters,
> which is not really a surprise, because under the hood they also run
> Linux.
>
> But I also run a sit
but only the
allowed ones.
and no, i dont have problems with windows and unix with these files.
Louis
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: rob.town...@gmail.com
[mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org] Namens Rob Townley
Verzonden: dinsdag 19 februari 2013 0:34
Aan: Jonathan Buzzard
CC: samba@lists.s
a-boun...@lists.samba.org] Namens Rob Townley
>>Verzonden: dinsdag 19 februari 2013 0:34
>>Aan: Jonathan Buzzard
>>CC: samba@lists.samba.org
>>Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Question marks, asterisks, colons in filenames
>>
>>On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Jonathan Bu
blems with windows and unix with these files.
Louis
>-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
>Van: rob.town...@gmail.com
>[mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org] Namens Rob Townley
>Verzonden: dinsdag 19 februari 2013 0:34
>Aan: Jonathan Buzzard
>CC: samba@lists.samba.org
>Onderw
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Jonathan Buzzard
wrote:
> On 18/02/13 19:16, Ray wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I suppose this question must have been posted a hundred times, but
>> Google brings up nothing useful:
>>
>> Consider "The Wall" from Pink Floyd in an MP3 collection. There's "In
>> The Flesh.m
On 18/02/13 19:16, Ray wrote:
Hi,
I suppose this question must have been posted a hundred times, but
Google brings up nothing useful:
Consider "The Wall" from Pink Floyd in an MP3 collection. There's "In
The Flesh.mp3" and "In The Flesh?.mp3" as tracks. Or, another example in
an MP3 collection:
> -Original Message-
> From: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org
> [mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Stoica
> Sent: Thursday, 10 January 2013 12:22 AM
> To: sa...@samba.org
> Subject: [Samba] Question about implementing samba4 cleartext
> passwords
>
> Hello
>
> I wa
On Sat, 2012-11-10 at 23:23 +0100, Enrico Scantamburlo wrote:
> Hi,
> We are having some performances problems with users that have folders
> shared over their internal networks.
> We were wondering, when the user list files using dir *.dat or calls
> /FirstNextFile , is the filtering done on the
Hello Schorsch,
Yes, this is possible. You should not have to activate the Administrator
account for this, nor use it. Windows UAC (User Account Control) is there for a
good reason.
Most modern desktop oriented Linux distributions, such as OpenSuSE or Ubuntu,
have GUI's for configuring network
samba3x is essentially anything beyond the original Samba 3.0 packages.
However, the fact they didn't bump samba3x is actually not true. Redhat
started doing this with RHEL5.4 as a technology preview with Samba 3.3:
http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/5/html/5.4_Technica
On 25/07/12 15:39, Anthony Boccia wrote:
Hello All,
I haven been having issues joining my windows 7 client to a samba
3.5.10-125 PDC. I have been doing some reading online and have found some
pages that suggest that samba3x plays better with windows 7. The PDC OS is
RHEL and i am using RHEL 6 up
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 7:39 AM, Anthony Boccia wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I haven been having issues joining my windows 7 client to a samba
> 3.5.10-125 PDC. I have been doing some reading online and have found some
> pages that suggest that samba3x plays better with windows 7. The PDC OS is
> RHEL
On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 12:40 -0600, Daniel Patrick Sullivan wrote:
> Hi, Everybody,
>
> I sent an email to this list with a couple of questions in it earlier
> this week; this is kind of a 'repeat' question, so I apologize if
> you've read this one already; I wanted to flesh out the details of my
>
Andreas Oster
novanetwork.de> writes:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I have migrated an old Win2k Active
Directory to a Samba4 only
> domain. Because the provision step
has not been used I now do
> not have the dns.keytab file for secure
dynamic DNS updates
> with bind9. I have found a useful link
her
From: Dale Schroeder
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 12:23:48 -0600
> On 12/14/2011 4:35 PM, skull wrote:
> >
> > woudln't work because all the users are in one group anyway.
> > and i am not allowed to to give read rights do "any" (i.e. 755)
> >
> > but theres really no option in smb.conf like "read only
On 12/14/2011 4:35 PM, skull wrote:
woudln't work because all the users are in one group anyway.
and i am not allowed to to give read rights do "any" (i.e. 755)
but theres really no option in smb.conf like "read only users = " or
something like that?
read list = user1 user2
Am 13.12.2011
On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 16:38:41 +0100, "skull" wrote:
> I want to make a subfolder read only for certain users.
> for example: /data/pool is public rwx for all users.
> and now i would like to make a /data/pool/subfolder only rwx for user1
and
> grant read only permissions to user2 and user3
> how d
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Keith Lynn wrote:
> In particular, what I mean is, is it possible to have a printer shared
> through Samba so that everytime a user tries to print through the share,
> they are asked to reaunthenticate?
Not an answer (sorry), but I'm curious as to why you would w
n,
Andrea
-Messaggio originale-
Da: Dale Schroeder [mailto:d...@briannassaladdressing.com]
Inviato: venerdì 29 luglio 2011 19:31
A: Andrea Lanza
Cc: 'samba@lists.samba.org'
Oggetto: Re: [Samba] question about groups
Andrea,
How about doing 'chmod 2770 /path/to/share&
From: Dale Schroeder
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 12:30:31 -0500
> Andrea,
>
> How about doing 'chmod 2770 /path/to/share' and also on all existing
> subfolders of /path/to/share.
> In the share definition, you could also add
>
> directory mask = 2770
> force directory mode = 2770
Also yo
Can I use Samba to transfer a image folder from Windows to Linux via usb flash
drive?
You don't need samba for that. Simply copy your image folder to the
flash disk. Then insert the flash disk in your linux machine, where
(normally) it should appear on your desktop.
Good luck.
--
To unsubsc
Andrea,
How about doing 'chmod 2770 /path/to/share' and also on all existing
subfolders of /path/to/share.
In the share definition, you could also add
directory mask = 2770
force directory mode = 2770
Dale
On 07/29/2011 6:03 AM, Andrea Lanza wrote:
Hi all,
I have a (simple?) questio
Andrey,
It is good idea, but you sure that no another ways to manage users\groups?
I know that LDAP is good and scalable solution, but in case of very small
network tdbsam passdb backend is more easy to use.
Best regards,
Artem.
06.07.2011, 15:12, "Андрей Гребенников" :
> You can try to use
Thx
James Peach sent something similar to me too..
darn vfs objects :) Thx james :)
I remember now on irix we had to do some stuff with these.
I do not see the "cacheprime" vfs object on FC13 but I
do see "readahead" so I guess I will start with that...
I also heard that there a
On 17 January 2011 08:14, Chris Duffy wrote:
> We are testing Samba 3 (and 4) on Fedora Core 13,
> 10Gbit connection with a Mac OS 10.6.4 system
> as the client. We will be adding some Windows
> machines sooner or later with 10Gbit interfaces.
>
> We are seeing 100-150MBytes/sec read or write
> p
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 10:14:04AM -0600, Chris Duffy wrote:
> We are testing Samba 3 (and 4) on Fedora Core 13,
> 10Gbit connection with a Mac OS 10.6.4 system
> as the client. We will be adding some Windows
> machines sooner or later with 10Gbit interfaces.
>
> We are seeing 100-150MBytes/sec r
Hello Jeremy,
> Unfortunately the patch link no longer works. Can you find a copy
> of it and I'll take a look ?
I tried to contact Martin Zielinski (no success :-() and I still wait for an
answer from SEH Computertechnik GmbH, but I found this in an mail archive: [1].
From what is written in t
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 02:42:06PM +0100, Timo Denissen wrote:
> I found this [1] in the samba archives. Has the patch been patched into
> samba?
> If so, has it been removed later? I am still looking for a way to change the
> location string for printer objects with rpcclient and haven't found
I found this [1] in the samba archives. Has the patch been patched into samba?
If so, has it been removed later? I am still looking for a way to change the
location string for printer objects with rpcclient and haven't found a solution
yet :-(
[1] http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/
At 07:25 AM 9/18/2010 -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
>On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 19:38:21 -0400
>starli...@binnacle.cx wrote:
>>
>> In both versions it seems like hard-links work and symbolic
>> links fail
>
>That's expected. The core cifs protocol as implemented in windows
>doesn't support symlinks.
Ah, wel
On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 19:38:21 -0400
starli...@binnacle.cx wrote:
> At 05:50 PM 9/16/2010 -0500, Steve French wrote:
> >On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 4:39 PM, wrote:
> >> Trying out a CIFS mount of a W2K8 x64 file system from CentOS
> >> 5.5 and running into problems, and trying to figure out how to
> >
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 7:00 PM, wrote:
> At 05:50 PM 9/16/2010 -0500, Steve French wrote:
>>On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 4:39 PM, wrote:
>>> Trying out a CIFS mount of a W2K8 x64 file system from CentOS
>>> 5.5 and running into problems, and trying to figure out how to
>>> proceed.
> ...
>>
>>This
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 4:39 PM, wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Trying out a CIFS mount of a W2K8 x64 file system from CentOS
> 5.5 and running into problems, and trying to figure out how to
> proceed.
>
> I mount up the Windows share, then run a script that expands
> about ten TAR format archives containin
At 05:50 PM 9/16/2010 -0500, Steve French wrote:
>On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 4:39 PM, wrote:
>> Trying out a CIFS mount of a W2K8 x64 file system from CentOS
>> 5.5 and running into problems, and trying to figure out how to
>> proceed.
...
>
>This is quite old kernel, but perhaps it was updated to i
At 08:44 PM 9/16/2010 -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
>RHEL6 is fairly current with mainline code (at least as of this past
>spring or so). If it works OK on Fedora, it should be OK in RHEL6.
Super. I'll try loading up the 6 beta in a VM and check it out.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the f
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 20:00:14 -0400
starli...@binnacle.cx wrote:
> At 05:50 PM 9/16/2010 -0500, Steve French wrote:
> >On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 4:39 PM, wrote:
> >> Trying out a CIFS mount of a W2K8 x64 file system from CentOS
> >> 5.5 and running into problems, and trying to figure out how to
> >
At 05:50 PM 9/16/2010 -0500, Steve French wrote:
>On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 4:39 PM, wrote:
>> Trying out a CIFS mount of a W2K8 x64 file system from CentOS
>> 5.5 and running into problems, and trying to figure out how to
>> proceed.
...
>
>This is quite old kernel, but perhaps it was updated to i
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 18:49:49 -0400
starli...@binnacle.cx wrote:
> At 05:39 PM 9/16/2010 -0400, starli...@binnacle.cx wrote:
> >Trying out a CIFS mount of a W2K8 x64 file system from CentOS
> >5.5 and running into problems, and trying to figure out how to
> >proceed.
>
> Oops. I see the problem
At 05:39 PM 9/16/2010 -0400, starli...@binnacle.cx wrote:
>Trying out a CIFS mount of a W2K8 x64 file system from CentOS
>5.5 and running into problems, and trying to figure out how to
>proceed.
Oops. I see the problem is that CIFS, at least in the older
stable versions, does not support hard
Figured out that logins require the domain\username as the username now
to login without kerberos.
Regards,
Mark
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 12:50:58PM +0100, Mark Adams wrote:
> Anyone got any thoughts about this?
>
> On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 12:32:28AM +0100, Mark Adams wrote:
> > Hi There,
> >
>
Anyone got any thoughts about this?
On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 12:32:28AM +0100, Mark Adams wrote:
> Hi There,
>
> I've just upgraded to 2 new 2008 R2 domain controllers, and had been
> using 2003 integration with samba successfully. After hitting this issue
> https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi
l-Nachricht
> Datum: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 20:21:08 +0100
> Von: Damien Dye
> An: Rhshshgs Sdasdad
> CC: samba@lists.samba.org
> Betreff: Re: [Samba] question difference of roaming profile between WinXP and
> Win7
> Also information about the differences and wor
t;
> > Datum: Sun, 4 Apr 2010 16:37:34 +0100
> > Von: Damien Dye
> > An: r...@gmx.at
> > CC: samba@lists.samba.org
> > Betreff: Re: [Samba] question difference of roaming profile
> > between WinXP and Win7
> >
> > Robert
> >
> > rem
link available "How to setup samba with win 7 clients"?
regards robert
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Sun, 4 Apr 2010 16:37:34 +0100
> Von: Damien Dye
> An: r...@gmx.at
> CC: samba@lists.samba.org
> Betreff: Re: [Samba] question difference of roami
27;t work in my production environment. I have the
>>> same settings, defined a new user but Win7 is logging on using a temp
>>> profile. I set log level to 4, inspected all messages but couldn't find any
>>> reason why a temp profile.
>>>
>>> Does someon
ll messages but couldn't find any reason why
>> a temp profile.
>>
>> Does someone have a good tip for me for further investigation or a reason?
>>
>> This there a link available "How to setup samba with win 7 clients"?
>>
>> regards robert
>>
>
e have a good tip for me for further investigation or a reason?
>
> This there a link available "How to setup samba with win 7 clients"?
>
> regards robert
>
> Original-Nachricht
> > Datum: Sun, 4 Apr 2010 16:37:34 +0100
> > Von: Damien
link available "How to setup samba with win 7 clients"?
regards robert
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Sun, 4 Apr 2010 16:37:34 +0100
> Von: Damien Dye
> An: r...@gmx.at
> CC: samba@lists.samba.org
> Betreff: Re: [Samba] question difference of roami
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 8:17 PM, Linda Walsh wrote:
> John Drescher wrote:
>> Also. They can NOT point to the same path. That was the point of
>> having a .v2. Vista+ and XP profiles are not compatible with each
>> other.
>
> What part is incompatible? Or is it known?
> This this is som
John Drescher wrote:
> Also. They can NOT point to the same path. That was the point of
> having a .v2. Vista+ and XP profiles are not compatible with each
> other.
What part is incompatible? Or is it known?
This this is something that I ran into as well, but didn't have
time to chas
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Damien Dye wrote:
> Robert
>
> remove the .V2 share and then remove your profiles from vista/win 7 at this
> reg key
>
> HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\ProfileList
>
> then all will work as expected.
>
It's interesting to me that everyone gives
running Samba 3.4.3.
>
> regards Robert
>
> Original-Nachricht
> > Datum: Sun, 4 Apr 2010 00:00:40 +0200 (CEST)
> > Von: Christian Rost
> > An: r...@gmx.at
> > CC: samba@lists.samba.org
> > Betreff: RE: [Samba] question difference of roaming profile
g Samba 3.4.3.
regards Robert
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Sun, 4 Apr 2010 00:00:40 +0200 (CEST)
> Von: Christian Rost
> An: r...@gmx.at
> CC: samba@lists.samba.org
> Betreff: RE: [Samba] question difference of roaming profile between WinXP and
> Win7
> Hi,
>
>
Hi,
IMHO both profiles can stay within the same share, so you don't need a separate
.v2 share. It's the same with Windows 2003 Server and a mixture of XP/
Vista/Seven Clients.
What you need to keep in mind is that Windows XP profiles are not compatible
with Vista/Seven profiles - hence the ".v
On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 12:08 PM, John Drescher wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 11:00 AM, wrote:
>> Hello
>> I want to add Win7 machine to my Samba PDC with WinXP clients. Google tells
>> me I have to add a .V2 to my profiles. The samba log ask about a .v2 share.
>> Can someone explain me the di
On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 11:00 AM, wrote:
> Hello
> I want to add Win7 machine to my Samba PDC with WinXP clients. Google tells
> me I have to add a .V2 to my profiles. The samba log ask about a .v2 share.
> Can someone explain me the difference of the v2 extension at the profile
> names and the
Yes I did. I have tried all of the options below:
passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://server1.sample.edu \
ldap://server2.sample.edu
passdb backend = ldapsam:"ldap://server1.sample.edu \
ldap://server2.sample.edu";
p
Did you put your entries in double quotes as previously mentioned by Götz?
See
http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Replicated_Failover_Domain_Controller_and_file_server_using_LDAP
Dale
On 03/11/2010 2:21 PM, Gary Peck wrote:
Looks like LDAP fail over was removed for some reason in Samba
3.0.23.
Gary Peck schrieb:
> If I have read the documentation correctly, it looks like you can not
> have a fail over LDAP server defined in the smb.conf file for the passdb
> backend. It looks like this feature was taken away in an earlier
> release. Is this correct? If not could somebody steer me in t
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 10:59:43AM -0800, mogambo wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I am trying to come up with a solution to the current Samba authentication
> voes on the gateway server for our distributed file system. We currently
> use smbpasswd file on the gateway server for authentication, which is no
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 09:50:16AM -0800, john_debe...@notes.teradyne.com wrote:
> Thanks again for the reply Ray.
>
> We are running a current version on the Netapp side and from what I can
> tell, there is no tweaking we can do there. I'm looking into this with
> RedHat and thus far they have no
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 08:37:56AM -0800, john_debe...@notes.teradyne.com wrote:
> Hi Ray,
>
> Thanks for the reply.
>
> I'm trying to understand what the risk is of turning off the posix
> locking for the [home] shares? I don't fully understand the issue and
> further more, why this is now raisi
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 05:06:21AM -0800, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 07:48:19AM -0500, john_debe...@notes.teradyne.com
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Volker,
> >
> > Thanks for the response. To clarify, we are not re-exporting via NFS but
> > via Samba. We've run in this mode for seve
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 07:48:19AM -0500, john_debe...@notes.teradyne.com wrote:
>
> Hi Volker,
>
> Thanks for the response. To clarify, we are not re-exporting via NFS but
> via Samba. We've run in this mode for several years, (samba server mounting
> home dirs via automounter over NFS and shari
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 01:49:51PM -0500, john_debe...@notes.teradyne.com wrote:
> We have SAMBA 3.0.33 running on RedHat 5. We are sharing home directories
> to users via Samba using the [homes] share. The home directories reside on
> a Netapp filer, (actually multiple), and are accessed by
Now i have Samba samba-3.3.9.
Problems with refreshing remains.
When i connect from one machine with speciffic user - everything seems
to be OK.
When i connect from other machine with same user - refresh doesn't work.
I observed same behaviour when i reconnected from same machine.
Reconnection
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 10:45:17AM +0200, Hristo Karatonev wrote:
> Hello to everyone!
> I'm new here, pls don't be cruel with me :)
> My question is about refreshing explorer after creating (with a right
> click ->"New Folder" action) on Samba share.
> My configuration is:
> FreeBSD 7.2
> Samba
I had some similar problems with samba 3.0 about 2 years ago, but
i have no such problems with Samba 3.3 an I would suggest using this last
stable version (surrently 3.3.9 from FreeBSD ports)
I think RAID (hardware or GEOM) has nothing with that.
Sorry for answering in English, but this is the of
> Then I'm using smbclient command to get shares from every ip.
> I have one problem to solve.
> How I can check if share needs password and user ?
Can you use "smbclient -N" to log in anonymously and check for success?
If it fails it means you'll need a password.
Bear in mind that servers can
"Jobst Schmalenbach" wrote in message
news:20090903032607.ga4...@senna.barrett.com.au...
>
> Hi.
>
> How do I give access to shares from the LOCAL administrator account to a
share(s) on the samba server?
> (workstation is domain member, without the need to specify a password).
>
>
On 3/09/2009 11:26 AM, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote:
How do I give access to shares from the LOCAL administrator account to a
share(s) on the samba server?
(workstation is domain member, without the need to specify a password).
I don't believe this is possible. The local administrator does not
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 01:29:00PM -0600, Gary Peck wrote:
> I keep getting an error in my Sun DS 5.2 error log about a schema
> violation complaining about sambapwdhistorylength attribute. I am using
> the DS 5.2 schema from the tar file I download and I have checked and
> their is not sambapw
and "User1" can modify files.
Thanks again for your help,
Bill D.
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Allison [mailto:j...@samba.org]
Sent: Monday, August 17, 2009 5:26 PM
To: Dorrian, William M Contractor ace...@saj
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] Questi
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 03:15:59PM -0400, Dorrian, William M Contractor
ace...@saj wrote:
> We're running Samba 3.3.4 on RHEL 5 Linux, using Active Directory
> authentication.
>
> I've noticed that we are able to assign NTFS "Full Control" permissions to
> directories; however, we are unable to
Gary,
I recently configured a build of Samba 3.3.4 to auth/integrate with
an existing SUN DS 5.2 ( with users already in the DS) and would be
happy to provide you with my notes as this should help you move in
the right direction. The schema update file John Terpstra refers to
was useful to m
On 07/22/2009 04:32 PM, Gary Peck wrote:
> I have been asked to implement Samba and integrate it with our Sun
> Directory 5.2 servers. I am looking for any advice that will point me
> in the right direction. Such as Schema modifications and such. I have
> found articles talking about openldap b
murrah boswell wrote:
The add user script I use is "/usr/sbin/useradd -g users %u". The
script should only add one user at a time as far as I know. Here is
what the SWAT documentation has to say about it:
>>
add user script (G)
This is the full pathname to a script that
1 - 100 of 313 matches
Mail list logo
