Author: vlendec
Date: 2006-09-04 10:12:04 + (Mon, 04 Sep 2006)
New Revision: 18030
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=18030
Log:
When compiling with C++, nested structs lead to nested class definitions which
are not compatible. I am aware that this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Author: vlendec
Date: 2006-09-04 10:12:04 + (Mon, 04 Sep 2006)
New Revision: 18030
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=18030
Log:
When compiling with C++, nested structs
Volker,
When compiling with C++, nested structs lead to nested class definitions
which
are not compatible. I am aware that this would be a huge change in Samba4,
but
I would like to see it in the code that is shared.
this may be a step too far. C and C++ are different languages, and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: vlendec
Date: 2006-09-04 10:12:04 + (Mon, 04 Sep 2006)
New Revision: 18030
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=18030
Log:
When compiling with C++, nested structs
On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 07:37:12PM -0500, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
I've got to agree with tridge here. These kind of things
are just not going to go away. The entire autogenerated
code from pidl uses the nested structure convention.
And we're about to get a lot more of that in Samba 3.
