Hi,
In tracking down some problems with winbindd I have noticed that
namequery.c does not handle multiple IP addresses at all if a DC has
multiple IP addresses (in DNS, and the DNS name is given in passwd server
in the smb.conf).
I suspect that this will not cause a problem if the DC has mult
Hi,
I was messing with giving my Win2K DC IP aliases, and discovered that this
seems to cause a problem with Samba 2.2.x.
If the IP addresses sort such that the alias comes first, winbindd cannot
talk to the DC, because resolve_hosts only uses the first IP address
returned for the hostname of
[others not cc'ed]
hi,
On 03 May 2002 at 16:44, Lars Heineken wrote:
> ..
> The normal browsing via explorer works fine,
> but the selection of "Z:\" as Source of the win98-CD (during the dialog "new hadrware
> found" eg.) locks the win-machine completely.
> ..
have you tried unc path/other dr
Sorry but your patch is not ok as also '<' is a valid NetBIOS name
character.
I just put a fix into HEAD someday ago just to fix this problem,
it is not perfect yet but will work resonably well (I think my patch
will not correctly detect names starting or ending with spaces and to do
it we would
[others not cc'ed]
hi,
On 02 May 2002 at 8:54, Mike Pigott wrote:
> We are running Samba 2.0.7 for IRIX (v6.5.11m) and are receiving the =
> error "cannot copy file * parameter is incorrect" when attempting to =
> copy files > 2Gb. OS is Win98. Can you confirm if this is a known bug, =
> or s
On Thu, 2002-05-02 at 23:51, sidharth walia wrote:
> dear sir
> I have installed samba on a sun server and it is
> working fine as it is showing it in the network
> neigbour of every networked machine
>
> I have checked each and every configurations but when
> i open 901 port from internet explo
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 10:56:49AM -0500, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote:
> I found this in my log.nmbd with -d10
>
> [2002/05/03 10:54:04, 8] lib/util.c:fcntl_lock(1302)
> fcntl_lock 4 8 0 1 3
> [2002/05/03 10:54:04, 8] lib/util.c:fcntl_lock(1340)
> fcntl_lock: Lock call successful
> [2002/05/03
On Fri, 3 May 2002, PINTO ELIA wrote:
Hi Pinto,
This was the most detailed and useful answer I got.
Since I have to be able to find both NT4 and Win2K DCs, my approach will
be to try WINS first, and if that fails, try DNS as you outline below.
Of couse, I have to do all this in TCL, but that'
On Fri, 3 May 2002, Lars Heineken wrote:
> Hi Folks !
>
> Today I found another bug in vesrion 2.2.3a : Our unix-server hosts a
> samba-share that contains all files from the win98-CD. Every
> win98-client maps this share as drive Z. He uses this drive when win98s
> asks for the windows-cd. Afte
On Fri, 3 May 2002, Christoph Kaegi wrote:
> I am actually a little in distress about this one.
> They want to replace our main samba fileserver with a W2k one,
> if I can't get it to play nice with our new environment.
>
> So, if anyone could give me a hint, in what direction
> I can investigat
OS: FreeBSD 4.5-STABLE #12: Mon Apr 29 09:57:49 EDT 2002
Samba: 2.2.3a / 2.2.4
Printing: CUPS 1.1.14
According to the logs for 2.2.4, I've been asked to send this message
to samba-technical. I'm having problems with setdriver and enumprinters,
as well as a problem gett
On Sat, 4 May 2002, Richard Sharpe wrote:
> OK, they are now known as pipeacl etc, but I can see them. There is an SD
> on lsass, and it currently allows everyone to access it.
pipeacl is a different tool. It opens the SD of the named pipe, it doesn't
allow to view/change the SD of that's conn
On Fri, 3 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 09:38:33AM +0930, Richard Sharpe wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have run into a spot of bother with wbinfo and Win2K.
> >
> > We run Samba as a member server from a Win2K DC.
> >
> > We join the DC correctly, but wbinfo -t does no
On Fri, 3 May 2002, Jean Francois Micouleau wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 3 May 2002, Richard Sharpe wrote:
>
> > > btw, Tim, the restricted anonymous enumeration "feature" you had with W2K
> > > and winbind, the policy code in w2k is changing the SD on the LSA pipe.
> >
> > Can you explain that some m
Hi Folks !
Today I found another bug in vesrion 2.2.3a : Our unix-server hosts a samba-share that
contains all files from the win98-CD. Every win98-client maps this share as drive Z.
He uses this drive when win98s asks for the windows-cd. After Upgrading the server
from samba 2.0.7 to samba 2.
On Fri, 3 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> If sombody can come up with both reasons to keep this code, and time to
> maintain it, then I would like to hear it.
To second Andrew's (Bartlett's) comments, any proposal that
does not include a a maintainer will fall on deaf ears.
The removal is s
On Fri, 3 May 2002, Norbert Püschel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> WINS is only used for backward compatibility in Win2K. The DCs are found
> via their
My original problem was that I did not have WINS properly configured ...
> DNS entries; they have entries of type SRV in _msdcs.your.domain, where
> your.do
Gerald Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 3 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> This patch corrects a problem that occurs when a windows host name contains
>> a space. Previously, only the first word of the host name would be
>> displayed.
>>
>> ...
>>
>> This patch is against SAMB
IRIX binaries are available on the Samba sites
--
==
Herb Lewis Silicon Graphics
Networking Engineer 1600 Amphitheatre Pkwy MS-510
Strategic Software Organization Moun
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 10:56:14AM -0500, Ken Cobler wrote:
>
> Just a thought, here's an article at Microsoft's website that indicates Windows
> XP (as a client for SMB) may experience a delay. There is a client fix for
> Windows XP.
>
> http://support.microsoft.com/search/preview.aspx?scid=kb
Christoph Kaegi wrote:
> Dear list members
>
> We experience a 6 seconds delay when accessing a samba share, for example
> when copying a local file to the share, or accessing the share by
> doubleclicking on "my documents", which is redirected to the UNC sharename.
>
> When looking at the netw
On Fri, 3 May 2002, Mike Pigott wrote:
> Andrew,
>
> Thanks for the mail. Can you let me know the latest version of samba
> avalable for our version of irix and where I can get it from?
>
> Mike P
Herb's working on IRIX packages now I think. Will be up on samba.org
(or at least a link) maybe
On Fri, 3 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> This patch corrects a problem that occurs when a windows host name contains a
> space. Previously, only the first word of the host name would be displayed.
>
> NOTES:
>
> 1. It may not be "proper" to have spaces in host names, but Win98, at least
I found this in my log.nmbd with -d10
[2002/05/03 10:54:04, 8] lib/util.c:fcntl_lock(1302)
fcntl_lock 4 8 0 1 3
[2002/05/03 10:54:04, 8] lib/util.c:fcntl_lock(1340)
fcntl_lock: Lock call successful
[2002/05/03 10:54:04, 5] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(492)
tdb(unknown): tdb_brlock failed (fd=5) at
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 07:56:43AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> This message is a warning:
> --with-ssl will die.
> Ok, thats enough with the dramatics, but the general consensus amoungst the
> samba team is that --with-ssl really isn't a particulary smart idea, and
> it is better implme
I'm getting the following on 2.2.4
rns02# smbstatus -d -L
using configfile = /usr/local/etc/smb.conf
Opened status file
Failed to open byte range locking database
ERROR: Failed to initialise locking database
Can't initialise locking module - exiting
the locking database should be /var/lock as
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 06:03:02PM +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> We talked with tridge on Wednesday and agreed that better change is to fix
> copy_service() to handle parametrical options. I hope to do it during this weekend.
>
Just as a note: by the time you play 'follow the function pointe
This patch corrects a problem that occurs when a windows host name contains a
space. Previously, only the first word of the host name would be displayed.
NOTES:
1. It may not be "proper" to have spaces in host names, but Win98, at least,
allows it, so findsmb should print the names corre
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 04:15:14PM +0200, Juergen Hasch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is an extension to the recycle bin VFS module for head. It adds serveral
> options to the recycle bin, like the ability to preserve the original file
> tree and touching the access date for automatic removal of old fi
This message is a warning:
--with-ssl will die.
Ok, thats enough with the dramatics, but the general consensus amoungst the
samba team is that --with-ssl really isn't a particulary smart idea, and
it is better implmented by external tools.
So what is --with-ssl exactly? And why kill it?
--
> * Several fixes relating to serving PC database files such
>as (Access and FoxPro) from a Samba file share.
Anyone have details on this?
Any particular applications affected?
Bug ids?
Anything that:
oplocks = no
level2 oplocks = no
or something like:
veto op
Hi,
this is an extension to the recycle bin VFS module for head. It adds serveral
options to the recycle bin, like the ability to preserve the original file
tree and touching the access date for automatic removal of old files.
The patch needs the cascaded-vfs and vfs-options patch from Alexand
Ooops... forgot to attach the patch..
Index: source/passdb/pdb_interface.c
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/samba/source/passdb/pdb_interface.c,v
retrieving revision 1.12
diff -u -3 -p -r1.12 pdb_interface.c
--- source/passdb/pdb_interface.c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Andrew,
This patch fixes:
- - make_pdb_context_name should return negative when none of the
specified methods can be loaded
- - don't free pdb_methods structs with SAFE_FREE. They're in
a talloc and init functions might fail before a pdb_meth
Hi!
I read that someone made foxpro test with oplocks enabled.
We have a terrible corruption problem with oplocks and we have a LOT of
foxpro files with concurrent editing. I wish to do test to try to
confirm what is the problem and I think that this foxpro testcase can
help me.
May someone s
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 07:50:35AM +0200, Norbert Püschel wrote:
> WINS is only used for backward compatibility in Win2K. The DCs are found
> via their
> DNS entries; they have entries of type SRV in _msdcs.your.domain, where
> your.domain is
> your DNS domain _and_ your W2K-domain.
> Your DNS m
On 2002.05.02 11:45, Christoph Kaegi wrote:
>
> We experience a 6 seconds delay when accessing a samba share, for example
> when copying a local file to the share, or accessing the share by
> doubleclicking on "my documents", which is redirected to the UNC sharename.
>
> When looking at the net
Title: RE: wbinfo -t and Win2K DCs ...
This doesn't match my results. I get good wbinfo replies when I have Samba 2.2.3a joined into a Win2K domain. In fact, we did a bunch of domain controller failure testing in such a domain, to make sure we had our solution right. We didn't see any differen
On Fri, 3 May 2002, Tim Potter wrote:
> On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 02:36:31PM -0500, Gerald Carter wrote:
>
> > And I thought I was so close
>
> It's not really a supported tool, more of a hack done in the hotel room
> last year. (-: I rewrote it in about 80 lines of Python yesterday though.
Title: ´ºÄ޽ýºÅÛ
Title: °¡ºñ¾ßºìº¸Çè·á
Á¤º¸Åë½ÅºÎ ±Ç°í »çÇ׿¡ ÀÇ°Å Á¦¸ñ¿¡ [±¤°í]¶ó°í Ç¥±âÇÑ ±¤°í¸ÞÀÏ ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
¼ö½ÅÀ» ¿øÄ¡ ¾ÊÀ¸½Ã¸é ¼ö½Å°ÅºÎ¸¦ ´·¯ÁÖ¼¼¿ä
Pleas try asap 2.2.4 there have been merged in several patches that
solved some file transfer problems.
On Fri, 2002-05-03 at 12:16, Christoph Kaegi wrote:
> I am actually a little in distress about this one.
> They want to replace our main samba fileserver with a W2k one,
> if I can't get it to
I am actually a little in distress about this one.
They want to replace our main samba fileserver with a W2k one,
if I can't get it to play nice with our new environment.
So, if anyone could give me a hint, in what direction
I can investigate further, I would be *very* grateful.
Thanks
Christop
Andrew,
Thanks for the mail. Can you let me know the latest version of samba
avalable for our version of irix and where I can get it from?
Mike P
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Mike Pigott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 10:31
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 09:54:44AM +0100, Mike Pigott wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We are running Samba 2.0.7 for IRIX (v6.5.11m) and are receiving the error "cannot
>copy file * parameter is incorrect" when attempting to copy files > 2Gb. OS is
>Win98. Can you confirm if this is a known bug, or shall
On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 03:46:19PM -0500, Gerald Carter wrote:
> On Thu, 2 May 2002, Gerald Carter wrote:
>
> > I need smb.conf entries for
> > * winbind use default domain
>
> Still need this one too.
>
Users wanting to use this functionality are advised to consider the Samba 3.0
or HEAD br
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 10:47:30AM +1000, Matthew Geier wrote:
> I'm a bit wary however of installing the moving target of a 'alpha'
> samba on a production server.
> The server is not the PDC, thats another Samba machine, It does however
> serve printers to a small number of people - users with
Hello,
We are running Samba 2.0.7 for IRIX (v6.5.11m) and
are receiving the error "cannot copy file * parameter is incorrect" when
attempting to copy files > 2Gb. OS is Win98. Can you confirm if
this is a known bug, or shall I triple check the code of the developer who is
attempting to
Try standard DNS query as follow.
A windows 2000 domain is represented by a DNS domain name. Each domain
controller
register its address with DNS using the standard DNS dynamic update (RFC
2136 ). In
addition to register its host name (A record ), the domain controller
registers pseudonym(s)
(SRV
On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 08:31:38PM -0400, Bradley W. Langhorst wrote:
> I'm not able to add a new user to LDAP using
> smbpasswd -a because it does not seem to set the
> required RID field.
I'm assuming you are using Samba 3.0/HEAD.
You have to have the unix user setup first, or be running wit
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 09:38:33AM +0930, Richard Sharpe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have run into a spot of bother with wbinfo and Win2K.
>
> We run Samba as a member server from a Win2K DC.
>
> We join the DC correctly, but wbinfo -t does not work.
Then you have not joined the domain corrrectly...
>
On Fri, 3 May 2002, Richard Sharpe wrote:
> > btw, Tim, the restricted anonymous enumeration "feature" you had with W2K
> > and winbind, the policy code in w2k is changing the SD on the LSA pipe.
>
> Can you explain that some more? Do you mean that Win2K implements it by
> placing an SD on the
Thank you for your answer. I found the problem.
The Win98 PC also had an ethernet connection to another network. Even though
the ethernet cable was unplugged, the ethernet interface in Win98 still had
an IP address, and that was probably causing the problem... After doing an
winipcfg and relea
Hi,
WINS is only used for backward compatibility in Win2K. The DCs are found
via their
DNS entries; they have entries of type SRV in _msdcs.your.domain, where
your.domain is
your DNS domain _and_ your W2K-domain.
Your DNS must support dynamic DNS for this to work. W2Ks DNS-server does
this, as d
54 matches
Mail list logo
