- Original Message -
From: "Stefan (metze) Metzmacher" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002
10:43 AM
> Hi,
> I've startet to make the group mapping code modulized in the way it is done
> in the auth and passdb subsystems.
I think modularising the group mapping code is a
Dear samba developer,
i think i found a bug. I run SAMBA HEAD on an AIX 4.3.3 ML 10 IBM RS 6000
Hardware. I compile with : ./configure --with-acl-support --with-tdbsam
The compile and install works great. Even the adding of userses to the
password backend tdbsam_nua works local.
But after i added
the is no
documentation on hidden share ability but adding $-sign to end of share it hides
it.
only problem is that
it's not accessible anymore.
for user who is not
allowed to access the share it asks for username and password,
but
user which is valid
is presented with: "network usage
At 09:53 13.06.2002 +0200, Kai Krueger wrote:
>- Original Message -
>From: "Stefan (metze) Metzmacher" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June
>12, 2002 10:43 AM
>
> > Hi,
>
> > I've startet to make the group mapping code modulized in the way it is
> done
> > in the auth and passdb subs
...
Compiling smbd/dir.c
smbd/dir.c: In function `get_dir_entry':
smbd/dir.c:608: void value not ignored as it ought to be
make: *** [smbd/dir.o] Error 1
...
Please fix. Thanks, Rich Bollinger
I've tried everything i can think of but i can't map a network drive.
Everything else on Samba is working ok. I can log on via the internet to
look at the shares etc (by doing \\126.12.250.24:901.) and the processes are
running ok. The /usr/local/samba/var/log.smbd shows (i set the log level to
A colleague who runs a benchmarking group noticed something
bizarre lately: while working with Netbench 7.0.2 running against
Samba version 2.2.1a on RH Linux 7.2 on a 2xPIII 1400Ghz machine...
| I can "net use f: \\lab39\files1" OK to the Samba shares. I
| can use WordPad to read and write fil
On Wed, 2002-06-12 at 18:10, Simo Sorce wrote:
> And samba is not the only application that do this kind of operation,
> the proper fix would be to make smbfs driver able to "hide" a file if it
> is unlilnked but yet open by some process, and then silently unlink it
> when the last process closes
"Stefan (metze) Metzmacher" wrote:
>
> At 09:53 13.06.2002 +0200, Kai Krueger wrote:
> >- Original Message -
> >From: "Stefan (metze) Metzmacher" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June
> >12, 2002 10:43 AM
> >
> > > Hi,
> >
> > > I've startet to make the group mapping code modulized in
On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Tom Vandepoel wrote:
> Ok, did this:
>
> # diff srv_spoolss.c srv_spoolss.c.orig
> 1415,1416c1415,1416
> < /* {"SPOOLSS_RFFPCNEX", SPOOLSS_RFFPCNEX,
>api_spoolss_rffpcnex }, */
> < /* {"SPOOLSS_RFNPCNEX", SPOOLSS_RF
I am the colleague David reefers to below. I haven't had time
to update Dave on what I learned about this problem.
There is NO problem with Samba.
My problem was caused by the fact that NT mapped drives are not
accessible in exactly the same way by an application launched by
a Remote Shell Daemo
Hi,
Here are some of the patches that were still in my queue:
pdb_test.diff - Some extra comments
pdb_init_sam_talloc.diff - Change names used in DEBUG() statements
pdb_fix.diff - Always fail when initialising one of the pdb backends
fails
These are not 100% tested:
I run in user security and use altiris software to send remote
commands to the clients. I ran into this same problem but was
able to solve it by having the remote command to the client be
a batch file that mounted the share and then invoked the netbench
client program. That way the share mount and
> This changes are not good for a normal samba installation.
They do not change anything on a "normal" installation. On a "normal" installation
unlink() and rmdir() never return ETXTBSY.
> First of all, Samba has been built to be run on posix file systems, and
> is not guaranteed to work 100% ok
On Thu, 2002-06-13 at 12:26, Cole, Timothy D. wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Mike Gerdts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > A similar solution could be used here. The equivalent of the .OLD
> > directory could be something that is not exported by samba. If an
> > unlink() fails beca
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Gerdts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 9:03
> To: Simo Sorce
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Samba Technical Mailing List
> Subject: Re: 2.2.5pre1: unlink design flaw
>
> Under HP-UX 10.20 I ran into issues with automated software
> u
On 13 Jun 2002, Simo Sorce wrote:
> And samba is not the only application that do this kind of operation,
> the proper fix would be to make smbfs driver able to "hide" a file if it
> is unlilnked but yet open by some process, and then silently unlink it
> when the last process closes it.
>
> It
On Thu, 2002-06-13 at 19:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > The race stay in the fact that you may rename the file and create a link
> > to an important file between the close and the second unlink, with very
> > bad results.
>
> On smbfs you cannot create links. Nor on fatfs.
But samba runs on po
On Thu, 2002-06-13 at 18:07, Urban Widmark wrote:
> On 13 Jun 2002, Simo Sorce wrote:
>
> > And samba is not the only application that do this kind of operation,
> > the proper fix would be to make smbfs driver able to "hide" a file if it
> > is unlilnked but yet open by some process, and then si
On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 08:28:08PM +0200, Simo Sorce wrote:
>
> I can't remember just now, but can you rename it while open?
Under POSIX, yes.
> If you can, then you may rename the file on unlink to a very rare name
> and then delete oin close().
This is what NFS does.
> > I have no idea what
On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, Don DeVitt wrote:
> My problem was caused by the fact that NT mapped drives are not
> accessible in exactly the same way by an application launched by
> a Remote Shell Daemon as they are from applications that
> are launched by the user from the desktop. The authentication is
On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, Don DeVitt wrote:
> > My problem was caused by the fact that NT mapped drives are not
> > accessible in exactly the same way by an application launched by
> > a Remote Shell Daemon as they are from applications that
> > are launched by the user from the desktop. The authentica
Hi,
This patch adds two functions to pdb_get_set.c:
pdb_set_{user,group}_sid_from_string
These functions are useful for pdb backends. Especially since using
pdb_set_user_sid combined with string_to_sid would require allocating
data for a new DOM_SID.
Jelmer
--
Jelmer Vernooij <[EMAIL PROTE
Hi,
Here's another patch. This one makes the testparm utility use popt.
Also did some reindenting, the current testparm.c contains a lot of
spaces..
Jelmer
--
Jelmer Vernooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://nl.linux.org/~jelmer/
Development And Underdevelopment: http://library.thinkquest.org/C0
#define _AA_FDLIST_SIZE 1024
connect function contains ...
extern unsigned char *_pwsFiles;
_pwsFiles = (unsigned char *)malloc(_AA_FDLIST_SIZE);
crashes share ... con't connect
Hi,
After some discussion with idra and metze updated patch to use more
virtualization (use pdb_get_user_sid(sampass) instead of
&sampass->private.user_sid).
Jelmer
--
Jelmer Vernooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://nl.linux.org/~jelmer/
Development And Underdevelopment: http://library.thinkque
Browseable = No
--Matt
-Original Message-
From: Nieminen, Jooel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 3:58 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: working with hidden shares 2.2.4
the is no documentation on hidden share ability but adding $-sign to end of
share it hides
use talloc and keep the memory context somwhere you can always reach it
and free it.
On Thu, 2002-06-13 at 21:37, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> #define _AA_FDLIST_SIZE 1024
>
> connect function contains ...
>
> extern unsigned char *_pwsFiles;
>
> _pwsFiles = (unsigned char *)malloc(_AA_FDLIST_SI
Hi,
Here's my latest patch for today :-). This one brings:
- convert lp_passdb_backend() parameter to a list
- fix bug in sid_copy(), which crashed whenever a NULL pointer was
given as an argument. (sometimes caused errors when user doesn't
have access to secrets.tdb)
Good night!
Jelmer
> A similar solution could be used here. The equivalent of the .OLD
> directory could be something that is not exported by samba. If an
> unlink() fails because of ETXTBUSY, rename() could be used to move it
> out of the shared directory to a directory that is monitored by a
> "deleted file reap
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > On smbfs you cannot create links. Nor on fatfs.
>
> But samba runs on posix file systems too, and they have it.
Thats not the point. I said that the race condition does not occur
under posix file systems, cause unlink NEVER returns ETXTBSY.
I did not seen it
Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> After some discussion with idra and metze updated patch to use more
> virtualization (use pdb_get_user_sid(sampass) instead of
> &sampass->private.user_sid).
NO!!!
That function is const, and that is deliberate.
The previous patch was better, but I really wo
Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Here's my latest patch for today :-). This one brings:
>
> - convert lp_passdb_backend() parameter to a list
Looks ok.
> - fix bug in sid_copy(), which crashed whenever a NULL pointer was
> given as an argument. (sometimes caused errors when user doesn't
>
Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Here's another patch. This one makes the testparm utility use popt.
>
> Also did some reindenting, the current testparm.c contains a lot of
> spaces..
You really should try and make sure that patches don't add 'const'
warnings.
I'll chase these up myself thi
does anyone know what the following means?? thanx.
-ryan
[2002/06/13 20:08:45, 0]
nmbd/nmbd_responserecordsdb.c:find_response_record(236)
find_response_record: response packet id 15479 received with no matching
record.[2002/06/13 20:08:45, 0]
nmbd/nmbd_responserecordsdb.c:find_respons
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 09:11:12AM +0200, Tom Vandepoel wrote:
> # diff srv_spoolss.c srv_spoolss.c.orig
> 1415,1416c1415,1416
> < /* {"SPOOLSS_RFFPCNEX", SPOOLSS_RFFPCNEX,
> api_spoolss_rffpcnex }, */
> < /* {"SPOOLSS_RFNPCNEX", SPOOLSS_R
Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Here's my latest patch for today :-). This one brings:
>
> - convert lp_passdb_backend() parameter to a list
> - fix bug in sid_copy(), which crashed whenever a NULL pointer was
> given as an argument. (sometimes caused errors when user doesn't
> have acce
I was talking to tpot recently, and he found an interesting bug in the
current mulitple pdb code.
If we don't implment setsampwent() in a backend, and that is the only
backend then we segfault...
Now the is relitivly easy to 'fix', but I wonder if there is a better
way to do the design:
How abo
In Samba-JP, a following problem was reported.
Since the "enum_csc_policy" struct doesn't terminate appropriately,
it may occur buffer overflow.
I confirmed this problem using by SWAT.
The "csc policy" entry includes "enum_map_to_guest" struct entry.
This problem exists in 2.2.4 and HEAD.
Ple
39 matches
Mail list logo
