I'm using 2.2.4 and have same problem.
I don't see printers in explorer when browse the samba-server but in
add printer list of printer sharing machines I see it.
cheers.
-Alkuperäinen viesti-
Lähettäjä: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Lähetetty: 3. heinäkuuta 2002 0953
Vas
Hello, i think there is a "optical" bug in samba-2.2.3a and lower. The
problem i found is described in the messages below.
"Werner Kessel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hello,
> i have following problem:
>
> Everyone who want to install a printer on his Windows
My users have group
specific folders on samba-share.
when a user creates
new folder under one of those windows explorer tells:
if you create the
folder, it may be inaccessible.
do you want to
continue?
if the user clicks
on yes, it creates the folder nicely without any error and security
Bogdan Iamandei wrote:
>
> I have a little question to the list here. I have Samba 2.2.4
> running on a production swerver. All is nice and fine, as long as new
> users don't need to connect. The setup is done in such way that when a
> new user connects - if their home directory does not
I have a little question to the list here. I have Samba 2.2.4
running on a production swerver. All is nice and fine, as long as new
users don't need to connect. The setup is done in such way that when a
new user connects - if their home directory does not exist - it will be
created on the
On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 09:29:15PM -0500, Gerald Carter wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Richard Sharpe wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> >
> > > Just watch in that sync-up - tridge fixed up some (quite serious) bugs
> > > in the HEAD version (wins *registrations* in the clie
Is there a reason this hasn't made it into the Samba and mnt.smbfs main
trees yet? I would have use of it, but it seems odd that it isn't
included in many default kernel builds or in the main Samba build - I
don't want to mess up a production box by doing so.
Thanks,
Les Barstow
On Tue, 2 Jul 2
Jerry-
I have a good start on the following, and putting it on the list will
help keep it on my radar :).
For 3.0
---
*Conversion to NTSTATUS for return codes
Wishlist
*Pluggable backend for storing WINS entries (ie SQL, LDAP)
Matt Pavlovich
> Message: 8
> Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2002 1
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Richard Sharpe wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
>
> > Just watch in that sync-up - tridge fixed up some (quite serious) bugs
> > in the HEAD version (wins *registrations* in the client) and we don't
> > want them 'merged back'.
>
> Hey, watch it with the f
"Stefan (metze) Metzmacher" wrote:
>
> Approach to handle the SID mapping.
>
> I preferr to have a database (or config options in smb.conf) for the
> following DATA:
>
> (Builtin and OurDomain):
> SID: S-1-5-21-4158354609-2045536973-4240204567
> uid: 2-3000
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> Just watch in that sync-up - tridge fixed up some (quite serious) bugs
> in the HEAD version (wins *registrations* in the client) and we don't
> want them 'merged back'.
Hey, watch it with the flagrant misuse of adjectives there. They were not
(quite
"Gerald (Jerry) Carter" wrote:
>
> On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Richard Sharpe wrote:
>
> > > Is there a reason that this has to go into SAMBA_2_2?
> >
> > I don't work in any other area at the moment.
>
> That's not a real good reason IMO. The libsmbclient
> code should be sync'd between HEAD and SAMB
"Gerald (Jerry) Carter" wrote:
>
> Everyone,
>
> Here are the plans for getting 3.0 ready for release and the
> maintainence plans for SAMBA_2_2. Comments welcome.
>
> I would love to see this out sometime during the Fall of this
> year. Of course, none of this will get done without everyone'
On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, David Shapiro wrote:
> Okay, correct me if I did it wrong...
I think that Donald Fagan would say that line should be "Sue me if I
played it wrong."
However, you do appear to have a traceback. Would have been more useful if
there were line numbers, but for that you will nee
Title: RE: sessionid.tdb missing after build and client read failutre
Okay,
correct me if I did it wrong...
I ran
smbstatus, saw the pid of my connection, ran gdb smbd
#gdb smbd 17294GNU gdb 5.0Copyright 2000 Free Software
Foundation, Inc.GDB is free software, covered by the GNU Ge
David Orman wrote:
> I know it is possible to use "map archive" to keep track of archive
> bits, but this is not very useful if you have real UNIX users. I.e. I
> can't have samba arbitrarily playing with the execute bits.
>
> Does anyone know of any attempted implementation of archive bits thro
David Orman wrote:
> I know it is possible to use "map archive" to keep track of archive
> bits, but this is not very useful if you have real UNIX users. I.e. I
> can't have samba arbitrarily playing with the execute bits.
>
> Does anyone know of any attempted implementation of archive bits thro
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Richard Sharpe wrote:
> > Is there a reason that this has to go into SAMBA_2_2?
>
> I don't work in any other area at the moment.
That's not a real good reason IMO. The libsmbclient
code should be sync'd between HEAD and SAMBA_2_2
so you should be able to work in either bra
I am trying to make the vscan-sophos module (from www.openantivirus.org) work on IBM AIX 5.1L but it will not load as it does on Linux (RedHat 7.3 distribution). I have it working "out of the box" on Linux but it seems like there is some problem with loading the module when it is linked to the Soph
On Fri, 28 Jun 2002, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> Hi jerry,
>
> Here's the ADS HOWTO converted to sgml..
Adding it to HEAD now. Thanks.
cheers, jerry
-
Hewlett-Packard http://www.hp.co
Everyone,
Here are the plans for getting 3.0 ready for release and the
maintainence plans for SAMBA_2_2. Comments welcome.
I would love to see this out sometime during the Fall of this
year. Of course, none of this will get done without everyone's
help :-)
Roadmap to 3.0
--
On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Johnston, Christopher (DCSA) wrote:
> Excellent.. however we are attempting to try and put together an LDAP
> solution here at ML to keep a centralized database of SID->UID
> mappings.. than letting the LDAP client make calls against the database
> for a UID.. what we would n
Just for test of the samba.
-Original Message-
From: Richard Sharpe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 12:56 PM
To: David Shapiro
Cc: 'Andrew Bartlett'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: sessionid.tdb missing after build and client read failutre
On Tue, 2 Jul 2002,
I know it is possible to use "map archive" to keep track of archive
bits, but this is not very useful if you have real UNIX users. I.e. I
can't have samba arbitrarily playing with the execute bits.
Does anyone know of any attempted implementation of archive bits through
extended attributes? Thi
On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Richard,
>
> Is there a reason that this has to go into SAMBA_2_2?
I don't work in any other area at the moment.
> It looks
> like it could potentially de-stablize the libsmbclient library
> and
On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, David Shapiro wrote:
> A note to this:
>
> The share is:
>
> [samba]
> comment = samba smb.conf
> path = /usr/local/samba/lib
> read only = No
> valid users = INS+DavidSha
> force create mode=775
> force group= @users
Hmmm, wh
Title: RE: sessionid.tdb missing after build and client read failutre
Don't step at that point. The process has already run the CPU into the wrong segment, or accessed memory using a bad pointer. Stepping will only destroy information.
Do a 'bt' instead. That will dump the call stack, and sho
On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 08:51:19AM -0500, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
> This is the first report I've seen of failed memory allocation,
> so my bet is that there is a hardware problem What is the
> load on the machine at this time? I mean, if one malloc fails,
> you would expect to see m
On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> Thanks. I recently got another error message from that machine, running 2.2.4:
>
> [2002/07/01 07:56:17, 0, pid=3781] passdb/passdb.c:pdb_init_sam(116)
> pdb_init_sam: error while allocating memory
>
> This essentially means that process 3781 can n
On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 08:43:36AM -0500, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
> On 28 Jun 2002, Simo Sorce wrote:
>
> > I may be wrong but I remember a fix in 2.2.5, I think jeremy or jerry
> > may tell you more however.
>
> Not for tdb corruption.
Thanks. I recently got another error message from t
On 28 Jun 2002, Simo Sorce wrote:
> I may be wrong but I remember a fix in 2.2.5, I think jeremy or jerry
> may tell you more however.
Not for tdb corruption.
> On Fri, 2002-06-28 at 11:11, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 11:08:00AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > - F
Thanks. I checked, and it was my note that had the error, but the line in
smb.conf was fine. I wrote a script called smbpanic.sh and tried using it,
but I get the same error about execvp:
#!/usr/local/bin/perl -w
my $pid = shift;
my @program = `/usr/bin/ps -efo pid,comm`;
foreach (@program) {
A note to this:
The share is:
[samba]
comment = samba smb.conf
path = /usr/local/samba/lib
read only = No
valid users = INS+DavidSha
force create mode=775
force group= @users
Note that I can get into the share called home:
[homes]
comme
Trying to get better at this gdb here. I see a segmentation fault:
which has no line number information.
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0xff132e84 in strcmp () from /usr/lib/libc.so.1
(gdb) step
Single stepping until exit from function strcmp,
which has no line number inf
Hi David,
It looks like you might have misspelt "gdb" in your smb.conf line
(in your message it is spelt "gbd"
Don
-Original Message-
From: David Shapiro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 8:56
To: 'Andrew Bartlett'; David Shapiro
Cc: 'Richard Sharpe'; '[EMAIL PRO
On Mon, 1 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Modified Files:
> Tag: SAMBA_2_2
> clientgen.c clilist.c libsmbclient.c
> Log Message:
>
> Include the patches by Tom Jansen. I have fixed a couple of problems, and it
> compiles, but I have not tested it.
>
> However, this week I will,
I am fairly new to gdb. After I sleep it for 9000 or during that time, what
should I collect? I did an smbstatus and saw the pid it reported for the
connection and ran gdb smbd . I stepped a bit through it and saw the
stuff here (not sure if this is enough):
Program received signal SIGABRT, Ab
On Tue, 2 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have also tried:
>
> http://www.hojdpunkten.ac.se/054/samba/index.html
>
> with exactly the steps whatever they are:
> But no luck i have used kernel 2.4.16 and samba 2.2.2.
You have probably not patched both the kernel and samba, rebuilt and
David Shapiro wrote:
>
> Thank you Andrew. I was looking at joining because it was mentioned that to
> get sessionid.tdb, you needed to join domain. I looked ing smbd.log and saw
> a connection from davidsha, and then in my workstation log and saw at the
> bottom:
>
> ==
Approach to handle the SID mapping.
I preferr to have a database (or config options in smb.conf) for the
following DATA:
(Builtin and OurDomain):
SID: S-1-5-21-4158354609-2045536973-4240204567
uid: 2-3
gid: 15000-25000
TrustDomainA: (w
Thank you Andrew. I was looking at joining because it was mentioned that to
get sessionid.tdb, you needed to join domain. I looked ing smbd.log and saw
a connection from davidsha, and then in my workstation log and saw at the
bottom:
user_in_list: checking user |INS+DavidSha| against |INS+Davi
David Shapiro wrote:
>
> getent group shows davidsha is in domain admin. I list using a net from a
> server I buildt 3 months ago and have not updated, and the new net command
> from yesterday cvs build of head. Both report I joined the domain, but I do
> not have a sessionid.tdb after it is do
getent group shows davidsha is in domain admin. I list using a net from a
server I buildt 3 months ago and have not updated, and the new net command
from yesterday cvs build of head. Both report I joined the domain, but I do
not have a sessionid.tdb after it is done. I can not access shares as
It did join successfully though, as far as I can tell (net scrolls debug
information now for some reason). It says joined INS domain at the end.
Things like getent passwd/group work. There just is no sessionid.tdb..
.
On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, David Shapiro wrote:
> Thanks. Any idea on why wbinfo -t
Hi Andrew,
here's the next version.
remove some comments...
this patch handles the use of usrmgr.exe much better...
I'm not shure about the debuglevels
metze
-
Stefan "metze" Metzmacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff -Npur
Damn, mailing is hard :(
Again, an attempt to mail a 2 line patch.
Yours,
--
Tom Jansen -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ninja ISD -- www.ninja.nl
Index: libsmbclient.c
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/samba/source/libsmb/libsmbclient.c,v
retrievi
- Forwarded message from Tom Jansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2002 12:56:56 +0200 (CEST)
From: Tom Jansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Tom Jansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PATCH: context based libsmbclient (85K attachment)
To: Tom Jansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > I hav
Tom Jansen wrote:
>
> > > Fixed. Attached is the patch. (complete one again)
> >
> > I have applied this patch with a few minor corrections to Samba-2.2.x. I
> > had to write a couple of extra compatibility functions, and had to apply
> > much of the patch by hand.
>
> Shouldn't 2.2.x be stable
> > Fixed. Attached is the patch. (complete one again)
>
> I have applied this patch with a few minor corrections to Samba-2.2.x. I
> had to write a couple of extra compatibility functions, and had to apply
> much of the patch by hand.
Shouldn't 2.2.x be stable ? Hmm.. I'll test it like hell :-
Dear All,
I am mounting NTFS file system from few of my windows NT m/cs to Linux backup
server.
Few files among them are very big in size around 5 GB. My problem is, when i does
'ls -l /ntfs-share'
then
it shows weird size of that file i.e
[root@backup yash]# ls /mnt-sybase/ -l
Hello Jeremy,
I want to change my mailing id. from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can you tell me how to do it?
Regards
Sastry
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free
http://sbc.yahoo.com
51 matches
Mail list logo
