hi, guys
A question here.
In former Heterogeneous network filesystem Environments , there must
be a big problem, it is file locking. when I use Samba and NFS at the same
time, NFS client might can't understand the oplocks of Samba, and Samba
Client might can't know what NFS client has
On Sun, 7 Jul 2002, Conrad Minshall wrote:
Hmmm, I didn't explain what I wanted well enough :-)
I want to preserve case sensitive behaviour for NFS and UNIX clients,
while reducing the current high cost to CIFS users of providing
case-insensitive behaviour.
Nice goal. If you had a
On Sun, 7 Jul 2002, Jay Ts wrote:
At 3:24 PM -0700 7/7/02, Richard Sharpe wrote:
I want to preserve case sensitive behaviour for NFS and UNIX clients,
while reducing the current high cost to CIFS users of providing
case-insensitive behaviour.
You mean, you want case-sensitive clients to
On Mon, 8 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi, guys
A question here.
In former Heterogeneous network filesystem Environments , there must
be a big problem, it is file locking. when I use Samba and NFS at the same
time, NFS client might can't understand the oplocks of Samba, and
At 12:54 AM -0700 7/8/02, Richard Sharpe wrote:
It's not really an issue for Samba. It is an issue for the file system.
Samba is another client of the file system, and it would be nice for
Samba to be able to say:
Give me a case-preserving but non-case sensitive view of the file
system.
[please keep me in the CC line for replies, as I am not subscribed to
this list]
Since upgrading one of our servers that handles a number of print queues
to Red Hat 7.3, I started getting complaints about jobs not getting
removed from the print queues -- they would get printed, then their
Richard Sharpe wrote:
On Sun, 7 Jul 2002, Jay Ts wrote:
At 3:24 PM -0700 7/7/02, Richard Sharpe wrote:
I want to preserve case sensitive behaviour for NFS and UNIX clients,
while reducing the current high cost to CIFS users of providing
case-insensitive behaviour.
You mean, you
Hi,
This patch fixes a simple sgml syntax violation in the LDAP HOWTO.
Jelmer
--
Jelmer Vernooij [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://nl.linux.org/~jelmer/
Development And Underdevelopment: http://library.thinkquest.org/C0110231/
Listening to Error: The server (moosicd) doesn't seem to be running.
Hi,
Speed.sgml replaces Speed.txt and Speed2.txt. Speed.sgml should go
into samba/docs/docbook/projdoc
Jelmer
--
Jelmer Vernooij [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://nl.linux.org/~jelmer/
Development And Underdevelopment: http://library.thinkquest.org/C0110231/
Listening to Error: The server (moosicd)
Hi,
This is the SGML version of tridge's Diagnosis.txt
Jelmer
--
Jelmer Vernooij [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://nl.linux.org/~jelmer/
Development And Underdevelopment: http://library.thinkquest.org/C0110231/
Listening to Error: The server (moosicd) doesn't seem to be running.
13:42:59 up 2
On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
Hi,
This diff adds solaris info to the winbind howto, making
Solaris-Winbind-HOWTO.txt obsolete.
I've already done this in SAMBA_2_2. Sorry if HEAD is a little out of
sync.
cheers, jerry
On Thu, 4 Jul 2002, Tim Potter wrote:
On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 11:54:18AM -0500, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
Roadmap to 3.0
--
The following features are planned for inclusion in 3.0.
This list was compiled based on previous promises during 2.2
development and
David,
Someone is doing to need to own these. They sound like
solid ideas. I've not followed the threads on them
due to lack of time (but i do have a vague recollection).
However, they all seem like icing to me. In other words,
they would be great to have, but we have lived without them.
Title: RE: [Draft #2] Samba 3.0 roadmap...
About a year ago I suggested this and was told that something was being done about it. My impression was that there were some ideas about how to implement it, and work was in progress. It was suggested that I wait.
I'd like to pick up the thread on
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
* Full Windows NT 4.0 PDC support
- Trust relationships
- SAM replication
[And someone said]
I don't see this being in 3.0. Maybe a later release, but there is more
work 'todo' in this area that you might expect. Natrually,
Mind if I see it? Possibly test it?
-Original Message-
From: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 12:54 PM
To: Johnston, Christopher (DCSA)
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Samba] RE: FW: samba woes
On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Johnston, Christopher
On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Gerald Carter wrote:
Someone is doing to need to own these. They sound like
solid ideas. I've not followed the threads on them
due to lack of time (but i do have a vague recollection).
However, they all seem like icing to me. In other words,
they would be great to
Title: RE: [Samba] RE: FW: samba woes
Why not make Samba LDAP aware, so that it can work with any LDAP server. Then, put an LDAP interface on Winbindd, so it can be queried by any client. Eventually, I think Winbindd would go away in favor of plain LDAP.
BTW, this is the suggested solution
Title: RE: [Samba] RE: FW: samba woes
I would like to get winbindd to
interface with LDAP.. and
allow my clients to bind to the LDAP server for the authentication... maintinaing a centralized winbindd server
is key..
-Original Message-
From: Esh, Andrew
[mailto:[EMAIL
Greetings!
Attached is the new revision (v.4) of cascaded VFS patch for HEAD.
Changes from Simo's revision:
-- connection_struct now contains a pointer to smb_vfs_handle_struct
instance which is an element of a linked list. Each element describes
completely one module [private data as
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 04:26:26PM +0800, James Henstridge wrote:
[please keep me in the CC line for replies, as I am not subscribed to
this list]
Since upgrading one of our servers that handles a number of print queues
to Red Hat 7.3, I started getting complaints about jobs not getting
On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Esh, Andrew wrote:
[Re: Winbindd .tdb sync in a cluster env ...]
About a year ago I suggested this and was told that something was being done
about it. My impression was that there were some ideas about how to
implement it, and work was in progress. It was suggested that
Hi,
Some of us were discussion how NetApp handles file names etc, esp when
sharing. Their on-line docs suggest that they install 8,3 names in the
file system when an ambiguity occurs for CIFS.
I created a file foo.c and Foo.c under UNIX.
What I got under Windows was foo.c and FOO~1.C. That
On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
This patch removes most of that - in an attempt to allow for easier
verification of its security status. I would also (but not included in
this patch) like to remove its use of includes.h (for the same reason),
but I know tridge has different
We have plans, we have discussed this thing just an year ago and I think
we will discuss it again at CIFs conference this year.
Unfortunately many members have been busy with other parts of samba and
other members with their work. Things should sort out soon.
On Mon, 2002-07-08 at 21:36, Richard
David Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote (edited for brevity):
Could I add a few things for consideration?
To a first approximation, I'm assuming that the foundation
work can only be done by the Samba Team. (Is this a fair
assumption in the items listed?)
In the case of the panic
David Collier-Brown wrote:
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
* Full Windows NT 4.0 PDC support
- Trust relationships
- SAM replication
[And someone said]
I don't see this being in 3.0. Maybe a later release, but there is more
work 'todo' in this area that
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 10:43:13AM -0500, Gerald Carter wrote:
We should probably apply the daemon tools patch if it is ok.
This has been brought several times in the past. Do you have a
link?
Hmm - can't find the link in the mail archives. I do have:
On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 04:30:27PM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
I've been messing about with some of the SAMSYNC stuff, in particular
hoping that a domain member might be able to request a list of users.
Unfortunetly not, it looks like this is restricted to BDCs.
Yes. You have to be a
Dear Richard and all,
RS == Richard Sharpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
RS Then, from the UNIX side, I created FOO~1.C. This succeeded! Under
RS Windows, I got FOO~~1.C. Interesting.
?
According to
http://www.netapp.com/tech_library/3014.html
It says that they have two names managed on their
Andrew,
I'll dig out some source I have laying around and see what it looks like.
cheers, jerry
On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Esh, Andrew wrote:
Include me in the discussions then, because I'm ready to design and
implement.
-Original Message-
From: Simo Sorce [mailto:[EMAIL
Gerald Carter wrote:
On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
I've never suggested that anybody put any work on hold. I'm just
worried about others promising features that I personally feel might not
be compleated in the timeframe and that I *know* have major hurdles in
the way.
Jay Ts wrote:
You mean, you want case-sensitive clients to receive preserve-cased
filenames, and non-case-sensitive clients to receive default-cased
filenames ... correct?
That is, there are:
- local Unix processes, on the Samba host, and ...
- NFS clients, which want the
33 matches
Mail list logo
