On Tue, 30 Jul 2002 20:24:48 +1000
Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wish someone
would do a real analysis and write some practical documentation.
A volenteer! Great! I'll see what help I can be, but you might want to
This is such a crappy argument. I file this one
Michael B.Allen wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jul 2002 20:24:48 +1000
Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wish someone
would do a real analysis and write some practical documentation.
A volenteer! Great! I'll see what help I can be, but you might want to
This is such a
On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 09:29:44PM +0200, Simo Sorce wrote:
can you tell me which lines of proto do give you that error?
just cutpaste the line with error thanks.
Never mind about that one. After one big make clean, configure
and make went fine. Sorry for false alarm.
Makefiles creation still
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 11:15:50AM +0200, Rafal Szczesniak wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 09:29:44PM +0200, Simo Sorce wrote:
can you tell me which lines of proto do give you that error?
just cutpaste the line with error thanks.
Never mind about that one. After one big make clean,
Dear sirs!
We have following error messages in log.smbd, running samba 2.2.5 under
Redhat 7.0.19:
[2002/07/31 10:41:58, 0]
rpc_parse/parse_spoolss.c:spoolss_io_devmode(606)
spoolss_io_devmode: Unknown specversion in devicemode [0x40d]
[2002/07/31 10:41:58, 0]
Hallo,
I have to shares:
fstab.conf:
/dev/sdb1 /mnt/xfsxfs defaults0
1
/dev/sdb2 /mnt/ext3 ext3defaults0
1
smb.conf:
[global]
create mask = 0777
force create mode =
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 12:20:27PM +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 11:15:50AM +0200, Rafal Szczesniak wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 09:29:44PM +0200, Simo Sorce wrote:
can you tell me which lines of proto do give you that error?
just cutpaste the line with error
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear sirs!
We have following error messages in log.smbd, running samba 2.2.5 under
Redhat 7.0.19:
[2002/07/31 10:41:58, 0]
rpc_parse/parse_spoolss.c:spoolss_io_devmode(606)
spoolss_io_devmode: Unknown specversion in devicemode [0x40d]
I tried to connect a share directory (with security = user) from my PC
(win 2000) and the system works properly.
From all other PC's i tested in my company there's an error like:
The mapped network drive could not be created because the following
error has occurred:
The
(I should have sent this to the list, not directly to Tim. Sorry.)
- Danno
-Original Message-
From: Dan Coppock
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 9:16 AM
To: 'Tim Potter'
Subject: RE: winbindd_cm.c leak in failed connection cache
On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 10:40:54AM -0700, Dan Coppock
Its security thing
you configure samba for user security with encryption set to no i guess
you have to change it to domain or change the registry on windows 2k to send
passsword in clear text
-Original Message-
From: BIANCARDI, ROBERTO [RD/0467]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Andrew Theurer wrote:
3. The report claims 163.471 MBytes of data Transferred, yet a full
capture is larger than 334 MBytes (that capture dropped a few frames).
Generally my Netbench reported peak throughput is about 10-15% lower than
what I see in my sar report.
msg.pgp
Description: PGP message
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
[NON-Text Body part not included]
These messages that only consist of a PGP encoded piece are getting damn
annoying.
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
[ Ok, I've switched off gpg signing for all samba lists... ]
Hi!
I'm working on the new sam system currently and was wondering whether
the following patch should be applied to
source/sam/SAM-Interface-handles.txt:
Well, I would say you
Hi,
I am trying to clear up the fine points if ACL in Windows and POSIX.
Under windows, user asks for RPERM, and the ACL code walks the ACEs. I am
under the impression that it does:
1. If it encounters a DENY (negative) ACE that denies any of the bits
requested, it denies access.
2. If it
Has anyone ever run Microsoft IFSTEST suite against Samba shares?
When I try to run these test cases, the 3rd test () fails on a directory create with the temporary option.
This is considered invalid by Microsoft and Samba flunks this test.
Module nttrans.c needs the following code added in
On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 02:54:06AM +0930, Richard Sharpe wrote about 'Re: New sam
system':
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
[ Ok, I've switched off gpg signing for all samba lists... ]
Weird that mutt generates encrypted files when I tell it to only sign
it... :-(
I'm working on
Javid Abdul-AJAVID1 wrote:
am exhausted for solving this.
using samba2.0.7 and 2.2.5 in 5000 nis/nis+ and win2k domain environment
samba member server in domain giving access to nfs home directories
everything working smooth since last 3 years
lately couple of users unix home directory are
I though I'd share some NetBench results on one of our servers.
Server:
4 x 1.5 GHz P4, 256K L3, 32MB L4, 2 GB memory
4 x 1Gbps acenic ethernet
14 SCSI disks in hardware RAID1 with 128 MB writeback NVRAM
SuSE 8.0, 2.4.18 kernel
Samba 2.2.3a
Ext3 fs
Clients:
48 x 866 MHz PIII running Windows
In a hurry...
At 17:53 31.07.2002 +0200, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
[ Ok, I've switched off gpg signing for all samba lists... ]
Hi!
I'm working on the new sam system currently and was wondering whether
the following patch should be applied to
source/sam/SAM-Interface-handles.txt:
-NTSTATUS
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 08:12:04PM +0200, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote about 'Re:
New sam system':
-NTSTATUS sam_get_user_by_sid(NT_USER_TOKEN *access, uint32
access_desired, DOM_SID *usersid, SAM_USER_HANDLE **user)
-NTSTATUS sam_get_user_by_name(NT_USER_TOKEN *access, uint32
1. If it encounters a DENY (negative) ACE that denies any of the bits
requested, it denies access.
Correct
2. If it encounters ALLOW ACLs that allows any of the bits,
but not all,
it continues? Is this true. Does it accumulate permission
bits until the
requested bits are available
On Wed, 2002-07-31 at 19:13, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 02:54:06AM +0930, Richard Sharpe wrote about 'Re: New sam
system':
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
[ Ok, I've switched off gpg signing for all samba lists... ]
Weird that mutt generates encrypted files
Title: RE: New sam system
They are not encrypted, they are simply signed. The problem is, it attaches them to the email as a separate attachment. Some email readers don't automatically display certain attachments, so the main body of the message is all that is displayed. Since there isn't one
As you suggested, I checked how other NSS libraries deal with this problem.
The libnss_files module in glibc doesn't leave files open like
libnss_winbind.
E.g., getpwent() (I should say its implementation in libnss_files) and
setpwent()
open /etc/passwd and endpwent() closes it. getpwnam() and
Bert Buckley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] writes (edited for brevity):
Synopsis:
I do daily dumps from a Linux box of the Windows machines on
my network. (Kernel 2.4.7-10, Redhat 7.2., samba-2.2.1a-4 )
These are done overnight.
I mount the appropriate shared directories as a samba
Hi,
I have now got some profiling data from a single user NetBench run.
NetBench claims that it transferred 97.821 MB in 599.961 seconds and thus
gave the server a throughput of 1.304Mb/s!
Actually multiplying out the numbers gives the same result.
However, when you look at what Samba says,
Kai Krueger wrote:
P.S. perhaps adding const all along would make it clear which parameters are
in parameters and which are out paramters
Yes, that would be a very good idea.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Manager, Authentication
Jim Myers wrote:
Has anyone ever run Microsoft IFSTEST suite against Samba shares?
Probably not - but it sounds like a good idea. Is it publicly
available, or only in the IFS development kit?
When I try to run these test cases, the 3rd test () fails on a
directory create with the
The IFSTEST suite is only available as part of the IFS development kit.
There are a number of other differences I have found running other parts of IFSTEST.
If I fix (some of) these, what should I do with the fixes?
Am I correct in assuming that Samba shares should produce exactly the same
Jim Myers wrote:
The IFSTEST suite is only available as part of the IFS development
kit.
OK.
There are a number of other differences I have found running other
parts of IFSTEST.
If I fix (some of) these, what should I do with the fixes?
Send them here, and (possibly, but I don't
Hannes Schmidt wrote:
As you suggested, I checked how other NSS libraries deal with this problem.
The libnss_files module in glibc doesn't leave files open like
libnss_winbind.
E.g., getpwent() (I should say its implementation in libnss_files) and
setpwent()
open /etc/passwd and
Andrew, you mentioned that Samba should produce the same error codes as a Windows remote share.
Here's an interesting case: The test below runs correctly on native NTFS, but fails as shown below with a remote Win2K share.
Samba produces the same error code as the remote case which means it fails
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 05:00:43PM -0700, Jim Myers wrote:
:
Also, please explain about NT vs DOS error codes.
I just finished writing something up about that. See:
http://ubiqx.org/cifs/SMB.html#SMB.5
Basically, DOS codes originally mapped to the DOS format, which had a
one-byte error
NULL?
how do i set the logging level?
brad
{Logging Options, P_SEP, P_SEPARATOR},
{admin log, P_BOOL, P_GLOBAL, Globals.bAdminLog, NULL, NULL, 0},
{log level, P_STRING, P_GLOBAL, NULL, handle_debug_list, NULL, 0},
{debuglevel, P_STRING, P_GLOBAL, NULL,
Hi,
I looked at this issue, and it looks possible to accumulate the timeouts
that have occured in receive_message_or_smb and count those up.
Given that the resolution of the dead time parameter is in minutes, this
would seem to not get too far out of whack.
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe,
On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 11:37:30AM +0930, Richard Sharpe wrote:
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Bradley W. Langhorst wrote:
NULL?
how do i set the logging level?
Ummm, debug level = x
or, log level = x
... in the smb.conf, *not* in the source.
brad
{Logging Options, P_SEP,
Hi all,
Is samba implments CIFS.
I thought CIFS is based on SMB
am assuming SMB is opensource protocol
Just wondering if am running samba 2.2.5 does it mean am running CIFS
also what version of CIFS?
when i sniffing SMB packets which commands should i be looking at CIFS or
SMB
Is samba implments CIFS.
I thought CIFS is based on SMB
am assuming SMB is opensource protocol
CIFS is the new name microsoft gave to the smb protocol their clients
speak.
Just wondering if am running samba 2.2.5 does it mean am running CIFS
also what version of CIFS?
It does mean
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 09:20:03AM -0500, Javid Abdul-AJAVID1 wrote:
:
Is samba implments CIFS.
Yes, Samba is a CIFS implementation.
I thought CIFS is based on SMB
Yes, CIFS (Common Internet FileSystem) is Microsoft's marketing name for
SMB.
am assuming SMB is opensource protocol
No.
SMB is properiety of whom
just curious how does samba team cope up with changes that microsoft makes
in their cifs.
do they put it out there in open as what they are using and what not
thanks
-Original Message-
From: Christopher R. Hertel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 12:06:23PM -0500, Javid Abdul-AJAVID1 wrote:
:
SMB is properiety of whom
It's all in my book. http://ubiqx/org/cifs/
SMB was created by IBM, but is now under Microsoft's control. Almost
entirely.
just curious how does samba team cope up with changes that microsoft
I was just wondering why does samba look for Desktop.ini when i am mapping
to my home directory from w2k
running samba 2.2.5 on sol2.6 , client is w2k
am troubleshooting an weird issue where am not able to see all my unix home
directory files on w2k
log level10 is showing me that samba is
exactly, because its not causing to every unix user who is mapping
but just curious why samba is looking for it
-Original Message-
From: Green, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 5:06 PM
To: 'Javid Abdul-AJAVID1'; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
samba is NOT looking for it.
windows clients asks samba to tell if it exists!
On Thu, 2002-08-01 at 00:26, Javid Abdul-AJAVID1 wrote:
thanks
but why do you think samba is looking for it
--
Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xsec s.r.l.
via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano
tel. +39 02 2399 7130 -
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Javid Abdul-AJAVID1 wrote:
thanks
but why do you think samba is looking for it
Samba is looking for it because Windows is asking it to look for it!
-Original Message-
From: Bradley W. Langhorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 5:22 PM
Thanks
here is the brief info
user on nfs mounted unix share ( home directory ) : platform solaris 2.6
samba 2.0.7 and samba2.2.5 running on independent ultra suns
users win2k clients
smb.conf ( homes section )
[homes]
available = yes
comment = Home Directory for [%u]
48 matches
Mail list logo
