John E. Malmberg wrote:
Jason Hihn wrote:
Good comments, all of them.
I hate to say it, but it really comes down to the fact that you
are trying to hide behind a protocol, instead of doing a proper
firewall for your LAN. No offense intended
None is taken. *I* did not set it up this wa
Jason Hihn wrote:
Good comments, all of them.
I hate to say it, but it really comes down to the fact that you are
trying to hide behind a protocol, instead of doing a proper
firewall for your LAN. No offense intended
None is taken. *I* did not set it up this way, and I had thought of
s
Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 09:26:24PM -0500, John E. Malmberg wrote:
Jason Hihn wrote:
I've a need for Samba to work over NetBEUI. We have a file server
here that only speaks that way to bar out TCP-based hackers,
There is a popular misconception that you can use
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 09:26:24PM -0500, John E. Malmberg wrote:
> Jason Hihn wrote:
>
> >I've a need for Samba to work over NetBEUI. We have a file server
> >here that only speaks that way to bar out TCP-based hackers,
>
> There is a popular misconception that you can use NetBeui in this way.
I noticed references to interesting sounding netbeui patches for Linux
kernel from Procom at:
http://bazar.conectiva.com.br/~acme/patches/wip/
Based on the official kernel status looks like they won't make 2.5 though.
Steve French
Senior Software Engineer
Linux Technology Center - IBM Au
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 10:20:38PM -0600, Jim Morris wrote:
:
> I am not telling you someone out there has not developed a NETBEUI
> protocol stack that will run on Linux (I am assuming you are running
> Linux). But as a long time network administrator and programmer
> myself, I cannot imagine
Good comments, all of them.
> I hate to say it, but it really comes down to the fact that you are
> trying to hide behind a protocol, instead of doing a proper firewall for
> your LAN. No offense intended
None is taken. *I* did not set it up this way, and I had thought of some of
the very sa
On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 08:42, Jason Hihn wrote:
> Up until the other day we didn't have an internet-visible, Unix-based
> host behind the router. We do now, so that is a concern of mine more
> than ever.
It sounds to me like you are relying on the ISP's router to protect you
from the Internet. And
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Hihn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> While I feel competent enough to make a solid firewall, our
> router to the
> internet is controlled by our ISP, and that is one trust
> relationship that
> would be sloppy of me to trust. Unfortunately, this box need
ill a good technique to
hide the 'scent' of the box. Most
"s|mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John E.
Malmberg
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 9:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: NetBEUI as main protocol
Jason Hihn wrote:
> I've a need for Samba to work over NetB
On Tuesday, December 10, 2002, at 03:24 AM, Gareth Davies wrote:
Not sure what this thread is about exactly but if I catch the drift
correctly you may well find this useful:
http://www.nu2.nu/bootdisk/network/
Thanks - good resource if you need a boot floppy to get on the network.
However, t
- Original Message -
From: "Jim Morris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "John E. Malmberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 4:24 AM
Subject: Re: NetBEUI as main protocol
> On Monday, December 9, 2002, at 08:
I'm aware of someone hacked up samba years ago to run netbeui on
freebsd...
I looked at the samba code about 8 years ago for work with the idea
of being able to run netbeui -- I was impressed someone got it to work --
tcp was more heavily embedded in stuff then I would have wanted to see
(not sur
On Monday, December 9, 2002, at 08:26 PM, John E. Malmberg wrote:
The only advantage that I can see to running NetBeui is that a network
recovery disk for most PCs using MS-DOS can fit on a high density
floppy.
Actually, you *CAN* make a DOS boot floppy and fit the MSClient 3.0
with TCP/IP s
On Monday, December 9, 2002, at 02:06 PM, Jason Hihn wrote:
I am wondering if SAMBA can go over NetBEUI yet? I realize I'll
probably
have to re-compile my kernel (easy enough), but what if anything has
to be
done on the SAMBA side?
Microsoft themselves have deprecated the NETBEUI protocol, an
Jason Hihn wrote:
I've a need for Samba to work over NetBEUI. We have a file server
here that only speaks that way to bar out TCP-based hackers,
There is a popular misconception that you can use NetBeui in this way.
There is no security advantage in use NetBEUI in this manor.
It is just as ea
I've a need for Samba to work over NetBEUI. We have a file server here that
only speaks that way to bar out TCP-based hackers, and now I need to move
files between hat and the Linux box. Changing it to use TCP is out of my
authority too. I've scoured the archives, and the most I could come up with
17 matches
Mail list logo
