Re: Proposed code cleanup

2002-05-27 Thread Andrew Bartlett
Jeremy Allison wrote: On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 01:01:05AM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote: (I was going to commit this, but decided that I should get some comment first) More code cleanup - this lot a bit more dodgy than the last: The aim is to trim pwd_cache down to size. Its overly

Re: Proposed code cleanup

2002-05-23 Thread Andrew Bartlett
Jeremy Allison wrote: On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 01:01:05AM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote: (I was going to commit this, but decided that I should get some comment first) More code cleanup - this lot a bit more dodgy than the last: The aim is to trim pwd_cache down to size. Its overly

Re: Proposed code cleanup

2002-05-23 Thread Tim Potter
On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 01:01:05AM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote: This allowed me to remove cli_pipe_util.c, which was calling cli_establish_connection. tpot: I'm not sure what direction you were going with the client stuff, and you may well have been wanting the init functions. If

Re: Proposed code cleanup

2002-05-23 Thread Tim Potter
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 11:17:59AM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote: Anyway - that looks like a good patch. I've been dying to get rid of all those silly make_nmb_name() calls everywhere but was not brave enough. I'll proabably add a cli_pipe_connection() function (feel free to suggest a

Re: Proposed code cleanup

2002-05-23 Thread abartlet
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 11:27:39AM +1000, Tim Potter wrote: On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 11:17:59AM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote: Anyway - that looks like a good patch. I've been dying to get rid of all those silly make_nmb_name() calls everywhere but was not brave enough. I'll

Re: Proposed code cleanup

2002-05-22 Thread Jeremy Allison
On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 01:01:05AM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote: (I was going to commit this, but decided that I should get some comment first) More code cleanup - this lot a bit more dodgy than the last: The aim is to trim pwd_cache down to size. Its overly complex, and a pain to