Rod Regier wrote :
> I'm testing SAMBA 2.2.4 as a possible replacement for Pathworks V5.
> (DS10, V/A 7.1-2, TCPIP 5.1 ECO 4, ODS-2 on shadow sets).
Note that there are huge performance improvments in the
*latest* Samba version for VMS, 2.2.7a.
Is there some special reason *not* to use the latest
About the poor
performance if you compared it to Pathworks.
A Samba server on
Unix is also 4 times faster the a Samba
OpenVMS
Server.
It is also Twice as
fast to Export your Disk with NFS to a Unix
Samba Server and
then access it from Windows . And I'm talking
about
2.2.7a
There is roo
I'm testing SAMBA 2.2.4 as a possible replacement for Pathworks V5.
(DS10, V/A 7.1-2, TCPIP 5.1 ECO 4, ODS-2 on shadow sets).
My initial benchmark testing of SAMBA on the same VMS platform and same
small directory
(benchmark Pathworks, shutdown Pathworks, start SAMBA, benchmark SAMBA,
shutdown SAM
