[sane-devel] Epson Perfection 1660 photo -> Driver(s)

2002-10-04 Thread John Williams
The end to my problems with the Epson 1660 scanner! You wrote: > That's a bit depending on your distribution. You can put "options > scanner vendor=0x048b product=0x011e" in /etc/modules.conf to avoid > entering the option numbers every time. For autoloading the driver, > you can put "scanner" in /

[sane-devel] Epson Perfection 1660 photo -> Driver(s)

2002-10-04 Thread Karl Heinz Kremer
--VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable You should not have to manually edit the file modules.usbmap: It gets created / updated when you run /sbin/depmod -a=20 This also means that the next time your syst

[sane-devel] Permission denied on parallel port Epson Expression636

2002-10-04 Thread Karl Heinz Kremer
--SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Did you change anything since it worked? And I really mean anything, even if you think it's absolutely unreleated to scanning (e.g.=20 connect or turn on a parallel

[sane-devel] USB scanners page.

2002-10-04 Thread Henning Meier-Geinitz
Hi, On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 10:25:28PM +0100, Jonathan Buzzard wrote: > I have just uploaded another update based on the responses so far. > If people could take another look. Comments on spelling and grammar > are also welcome, Agfa has been spelled Afga for the last three years... > until someon

[sane-devel] Epson Perfection 1260 problem

2002-10-04 Thread Jaeger, Gerhard
On Thursday, 3. October 2002 01:46, E V wrote: [SNIP] > [sanei_debug] Setting debug level of epson to 255. > [epson] sane_init: sane-backends 1.0.8 > [epson] sane_init, >usb /dev/usb/scanner0< > [epson] sane_init, >usb /dev/usb/scanner0< > [epson] attach(usb /dev/usb/scanner0) > [epson] SANE Epson

[sane-devel] New Epson Scanners

2002-10-04 Thread Jaeger, Gerhard
On Thursday, 3. October 2002 20:01, antoine wrote: > > modprobe scanner vendor=0x04b8 product=0x011d > - > Hi, > > How do you know these numbers : vendor=0x04b8 product=0x011d ? Hi, simply load the USB subsystem on linux and plug in the scanner. Then dmesg will show someth

[sane-devel] USB scanners page.

2002-10-04 Thread Jaeger, Gerhard
On Wednesday, 2. October 2002 17:00, Theodore Kilgore wrote: [SNIP] > I thought it is the case that the Canon N670U has an LM9933 chip in it? > Maybe my memory is playing tricks? [SNAP] Hi, AFAIK, the N670U uses the LM9832 and the N676U uses the LM9833, rather the same chip, but the LM9832 has an

[sane-devel] (patch) Small fixes for canon630u, coolscan and microtek2

2002-10-04 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
The following small compile fixes should be included. Index: ChangeLog === RCS file: /cvsroot/external/sane/sane-backends/ChangeLog,v retrieving revision 1.1200 diff -u -3 -p -u -w -r1.1200 ChangeLog --- ChangeLog 2002/10/02 19:40:1

[sane-devel] Several comments on Canon N670U support

2002-10-04 Thread Jaeger, Gerhard
Hi Theodore, thanks for the feedback, here are some comments: On Friday, 4. October 2002 06:51, kilg...@khayyam.math.auburn.edu wrote: [SNIP] > 3. The zoom features work; I can scan any small rectangular area of the > image which I choose, but the brightness and contrast need to be adjusted > dra

[sane-devel] (patch) Small fixes for canon630u, coolscan and microtek2

2002-10-04 Thread Frank Zago
> === > RCS file: /cvsroot/external/sane/sane-backends/backend/microtek2.c,v > retrieving revision 1.10 > diff -u -3 -p -u -w -r1.10 microtek2.c > --- microtek2.c 2002/05/24 22:41:34 1.10 > +++ microtek2.c 2002/10/04 13

[sane-devel] New Epson Scanners

2002-10-04 Thread Jaeger, Gerhard
On Thursday, 3. October 2002 19:36, Till Kamppeter wrote: Hi Till, good to have you back as tester :-) > Sorry, for the delay, our release and the www.linux-kongress.de needed > to much time. But now I tested the Epson Perfection 1260. In terms of > the rating of linuxprinting.org > (http://www.l

[sane-devel] (patch) Small fixes for canon630u, coolscan and microtek2

2002-10-04 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Frank Zago] > What's the point of this one? If sizeof(size_t) is bigger then sizeof(u_int32_t), than the call to sanei_scsi_cmd() will write outside the space allocated for ms->n_control_bytes. If it is smaller, the value in ms->n_control_bytes will be wrong. It only work as it should if size_t

[sane-devel] New Epson Scanners

2002-10-04 Thread Till Kamppeter
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --010407080800010702020709 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Jaeger, Gerhard wrote: > This was my fault, change the entry enableTPA to option enableTPA, this > helps. But before that. p

[sane-devel] LT 9452 works only after replugging

2002-10-04 Thread Bjoern Franke
Hi, after discussing on irc with hmg about the lt 9452 (which is similar to the Mustek 1200 UB Plus) I got the the scanner work with the gt68xx-backend. But when I load the scanner-module with "modprobe scanner", the scanner is only detected if I unplug/replug it. Before replugging the only detect

[sane-devel] (patch) Small fixes for canon630u, coolscan and microtek2

2002-10-04 Thread Frank Zago
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > [Frank Zago] > >>What's the point of this one? > > > If sizeof(size_t) is bigger then sizeof(u_int32_t), than the call to > sanei_scsi_cmd() will write outside the space allocated for > ms->n_control_bytes. If it is smaller, the value in > ms->n_control_bytes will b

[sane-devel] Permission denied on parallel port Epson Expression636

2002-10-04 Thread Petr Hlustik
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 07:14:27AM -0400, Karl Heinz Kremer wrote: > Did you change anything since it worked? And I really mean anything, > even if you think it's absolutely unreleated to scanning (e.g. > connect or turn on a parallel printer). I don't think that you've > changed anything on the s

[sane-devel] (patch) Small fixes for canon630u, coolscan and microtek2

2002-10-04 Thread Frank Zago
Hi Andras, Petter, >>If sizeof(size_t) is bigger then sizeof(u_int32_t), than the call to >>sanei_scsi_cmd() will write outside the space allocated for >>ms->n_control_bytes. If it is smaller, the value in >>ms->n_control_bytes will be wrong. It only work as it should if >>size_t and u_int32_t i