the one option in arc photo studio that we definitely need is the auto-adjust
something (not lamp, the second one), because the slides are all blurry with
that option turned off. auto-remove dust is also good, but only in low mode.
if you it turn too high it will just fubar the picture.
On Thu
Hi,
> I have an Epson 2480 and I'm quite satisfied with it. I haven't
> used it for negatives, only slides; for many purposes the results
> are quite good. Some random thoughts:
>
> * Sane support is very good, but native support (in windows) is
> still better. In particular:
> The windows dri
On Thu, 2005-10-20 at 20:00 +0200, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 12:49:09AM +0200, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
> > I have an Acer ScanWit 2720S negative filmscanner which works very well
> > under Windows 2000. I like, however, to have it running under Linux
> > (Fedora C
> Which other scanners in the 3900 series do exist?
>
I don't really know if other scanners than hp3970c exist. But HP's
software indicates in cd's cover clearly "hp scanjet 3900 series" and as
I can see, driver sends different parameters to rts8822 chipset
depending on ccd type (toshiba or sony
gerard klaver wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-10-20 at 11:11 -0400, lhs wrote:
>
>>Make HP
>>Model PSC 1610 All-in-One, PSC 1600 series
>>Bus USB
>>V ID 03f0
>>P ID 4811
>>Chip?
>>
>
>
>
> Did you check the hpiao (externel backend)
> http://hpinkjet.sourceforge.net/hplip_readme.html#D
On Thu, 2005-10-20 at 11:11 -0400, lhs wrote:
> Make HP
> Model PSC 1610 All-in-One, PSC 1600 series
> Bus USB
> V ID 03f0
> P ID 4811
> Chip?
>
Did you check the hpiao (externel backend)
http://hpinkjet.sourceforge.net/hplip_readme.html#Device
The PSC 1600 is reported to be
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 12:49:09AM +0200, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
> I have an Acer ScanWit 2720S negative filmscanner which works very well
> under Windows 2000. I like, however, to have it running under Linux
> (Fedora Core 3).
According to our scanner search engine this scanner is supported by
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 09:06:20PM +0200, JKD wrote:
> I write this mail only to announce that I've registered the project to
> create hp scanjet 3900 series (chipset Realtek RTS8822) backend at
> sourceforge.
Thanks for your effort! I added a link to your website to the
unsupported page of t
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 11:11:35AM -0400, lhs wrote:
>
Please avoid sending HTML mails.
> Make HP
> Model PSC 1610 All-in-One, PSC 1600 series
At least according to the hpaio web page, the PSC 1600 series is supported:
http://hpinkjet.sourceforge.net/hplip_readme.html#Device
Have you t
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20051020/6a151223/attachment-0001.html
-- next part --
T: Bus=05 Lev=00 Prnt=00 Port=00 Cnt=00 Dev#= 1 Spd=12 MxCh= 2
B: Alloc= 0/900 us ( 0%), #Int= 0, #Iso= 0
Miguel Bazdresch wrote:
>On 10/20/05, Alan Corey wrote:
>
>
>>I'd have to pretty much agree with breacher even though I'm not familiar with
>>the Epson Perfection 2400 and I'm a newbie with SANE. I've got one flatbed
>>scanner with a transparency adapter built in, and it makes me wonder why th
Genuine slide scanners usually have - or should have - additional
features like focus control (you need that if you have framed slides).
I am not sure that such a feature is built into an add-on to a
flatbed scanner, unless it is a really expensive model.
I think the resolution of commercial fine-
On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 08:03:09 -0700 (PDT)
Alan Corey wrote:
> On the other hand, because of the development cycle involved with
> open source software I've found it's often a good match with the
> used equipment market. Look over the SANE supported devices and
> research some of the models that ar
On 10/20/05, Alan Corey wrote:
> I'd have to pretty much agree with breacher even though I'm not familiar with
> the Epson Perfection 2400 and I'm a newbie with SANE. I've got one flatbed
> scanner with a transparency adapter built in, and it makes me wonder why they
> bothered except as a market
I'd have to pretty much agree with breacher even though I'm not familiar with
the Epson Perfection 2400 and I'm a newbie with SANE. I've got one flatbed
scanner with a transparency adapter built in, and it makes me wonder why they
bothered except as a marketing tactic. It's about useless.
Negati
Hello,
i have looked for the last daily snapshot of sane-backends, but the last
cvs snapshot ist from 2005/10/11.
I can i find a newer snpshot?
Regards.
Dietmar
16 matches
Mail list logo
