Hi Julien
Julien BLACHE schrieb:
abel deuring adeur...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi,
are you sure that the 32/64 bit problem is _not_ fixed for the
read/write interface, but only for the ioctl? If so, we should indeed
Yes; I've read the code in sg.c and in the ioctl compat layer, and
sg.c
Hi everyone,
I have managed to compile Sane 1.0.18 on Cygwin successfully. The
only backend that does not compile is the Pixma backend. I have
attached the output of the compile error.
If anyone has any ideas on this...
Hugh
Output:
pixma.c: In function 'map_error':
pixma.c:132: error:
Quoting Vishal Shah visha...@gmail.com:
Hello,
I am trying to get my OpticSlim M12 scanner from Plustek to run using
the sane-gt68xx backend.
sane-find-scanner
returns:
found USB scanner (vendor=0x07b3, product=0x0412 [600dpi USB Scanner],
chip=GT-6816) at libusb:003:005
I am not
abel deuring adeur...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi,
I think we can even get rid of the old SG interface entirely. SG_IO
exists in Linux 2.4 too, so it should be safe.
I must admit that I am one of these persons who cannot throw away
anything... But you are right: Doug Gilbert wrote the SG3 interface
Hi Julien,
On 29/04/07, Julien BLACHE wrote:
Hugh McMaster wrote:
Here is some output from 'saned -d':
[saned] main: starting debug mode (level 2)
[saned] main: could not find `sane' service (Operation not permitted)
[saned] main: using default port 6566
[saned] saned from
BERTRAND Jo?l joel.bertr...@systella.fr wrote:
Hi,
Bertrand, feel free to try this patch on your sparc64; as I said, it
works fine here (at least as long as nothing goes wrong ;), but better
keep your finger on the scanner's power button just in case. Tell us
how it goes.
I have
Hugh McMaster dasjour...@gmail.com wrote:
I have fixed this issue, by adding the sane-port to /etc/services.
Now 'saned -d128' shows the port and allows remote access, but normal
'saned' just closes down as before.
Are you running saned via inetd (or xinetd) ?
saned without arguments uses
Hi Julien,
On 30/04/07, Julien BLACHE wrote:
Hugh McMaster wrote:
I have fixed this issue, by adding the sane-port to /etc/services.
Now 'saned -d128' shows the port and allows remote access, but normal
'saned' just closes down as before.
Are you running saned via inetd (or xinetd) ?
===
== Neuer Eintrag
===
---
-- Formular: 'adddev'
---
1. Your email address:
'f.k...@jpberlin.de'
2. Manufacturer (e.g.
Hugh McMaster dasjour...@gmail.com wrote:
I am running saned via inetd. When you say that Saned uses the
Standard Input/Standard Output, what do you mean?
When run through inetd, inetd will pass the TCP connection over to
saned on stdout (fd 1).
JB.
--
Julien BLACHE
Hi Ralf,
On 29/04/07, Dr. Ralf Wepler wrote:
I try to get to work a Canon FB630u Scanner.
ERROR: I tried to call sane_start but it returned the following
error message: Device busy. I think that's a bug in the canon630u
backend.
Have you tried running the test backend/programme as the
Julien BLACHE a ?crit :
Bertrand, feel free to try this patch on your sparc64; as I said, it
works fine here (at least as long as nothing goes wrong ;), but better
keep your finger on the scanner's power button just in case. Tell us
how it goes.
Hello,
I have tried on my U2.
Julien BLACHE a ?crit :
BERTRAND Jo?l joel.bertr...@systella.fr wrote:
Hi,
Bertrand, feel free to try this patch on your sparc64; as I said, it
works fine here (at least as long as nothing goes wrong ;), but better
keep your finger on the scanner's power button just in case. Tell us
how
-
H?y gh? qua trang ch? Yahoo! Vi?t Nam!
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20070430/44bd1b90/attachment.htm
From yellow.peng...@edpnet.be Mon Apr 30 19:34:15 2007
From
Hi Ralf,
On 30/04/07, Dr. Ralf Wepler wrote:
I just tried to run the test-programm and xsane as root user. Both
worked. Running the same as user xx fails. Is it a problem of rights?
And, if so, in which files?
This is a result of user rights not being allowed. I am not sure how
to change
Hi Julien,
Julien BLACHE wrote:
abel deuring adeur...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi,
I think we can even get rid of the old SG interface entirely. SG_IO
exists in Linux 2.4 too, so it should be safe.
I must admit that I am one of these persons who cannot throw away
anything... But you are right:
--- sane-devel-requ...@lists.alioth.debian.org wrote:
Send sane-devel mailing list submissions to
sane-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web,
visit
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel
or, via email, send a message
17 matches
Mail list logo
