en-an-einem-canon-mx700-nutzen.html
Great! Thank you. But you should not write "Scannertasen" in the
headline :-)
--
Viele Gr??e
Werner Holtfreter
2011-07-15 13:41 wrote Werner Holtfreter:
> 2011-07-15 12:35 wrote Stef:
>
> > I have re-tuned MD5345/6228 scan area.
> > With latest source code version the bug is now fixed.
>
> Thank you very much! That is really high speed debugging!
>
> (I will enjoy i
2011-07-15 13:41 wrote Werner Holtfreter:
> 2011-07-15 12:35 wrote Stef:
>
> > I have re-tuned MD5345/6228 scan area.
> > With latest source code version the bug is now fixed.
>
> Thank you very much! That is really high speed debugging!
>
> (I will enjoy i
I have sent now the report to mtek-bugs at mir.com.
Thank you for your help!
-Werner
On 22.07.2011, at 14:21, m. allan noah wrote:
> Well, according to the debug message, this model is untested. Perhaps
> you can email the author as directed?
>
> allan
>
-
this e-mail.
I have switched the debugging on for sanei_scsi and microtek.
I guess there might be a problem with the commands that are sent to the device.
Suggestions highly appreciated.
Werner
On 22.07.2011, at 12:51, m. allan noah wrote:
> Try changing /etc/sane.d/dll.conf. Disable agfafo
;AGFA DUOSCAN 2.30" at <0240a62d134c34f4a>
I think this is an improvement. Yet, the scanner device has just this strange
number, and
scanimage -L still states that no scanners were identified.
Any idea how to fix this?
-Werner
On 22.07.2011, at 10:52, Werner Randelshofer wrote:
ce number in the
scanimage command?
Below are the outputs of sane-find-scanner and scanimage -L.
TIA,
Werner
$ sane-find-scanner
# sane-find-scanner will now attempt to detect your scanner. If the
# result is different from what you expected, first make sure your
# scanner is powered
Hello Stef,
2011-07-15 12:35:43 schrieben Sie:
> I have re-tuned MD5345/6228 scan area.
> With latest source code version the bug is now fixed.
Thank you very much! That is really high speed debugging!
(I will enjoy it after distribution in Robert Ancell's ppa.)
--
Viele G
scanned.
Please give me detailed instruction to collect all needed info.
--
Viele Gr??e
Werner Holtfreter
r color scan in
such cases - I don't know why:
http://openlibrary.org/books/OL24347298M/Muhammedanisches_Recht_nach_Schafiitischer_Lehre
--
Viele Gr??e
Werner Holtfreter
he job in one step...
--
Viele Gr??e
Werner Holtfreter
greater a compressed file.)
gscan2pdf --> Preferences --> Blank threshold did not make a
difference. I need help to adjust the white level.
--
Viele Gr??e
Werner Holtfreter
it works fine and is a good
support for ubuntu newuser like me.
--
Viele Gr??e
Werner
h.debian.org
--
Viele Gr??e
Werner Holtfreter
In other case: Which switch on xsane
make a multipage-pdf?
Is the frontend topic in this mailing list?
--
Viele Gr??e
Werner Holtfreter
.995 is broken also in Suse11.0. My
result was readable only in some pdf-readers, in others not.
Today, I updated to xsane0.996 and can *not* reproduce this problem.
You should test with xsane0.996.
--
Viele Gr??e
Werner Holtfreter
Am Dienstag, 2008-08-26 20:45:01 schrieb stef:
> Le Wednesday 16 July 2008 16:39:18 Werner Holtfreter, vous avez
?crit?:
> > Am Montag, 30. Juni 2008 06:53:34 schrieb stef:
> > > the only difference I could spot is slightly different
> > > motor acceleration ta
to shake and does not move properly! The old problem.
--
Viele Gr??e
Werner Holtfreter
ening.
Done!
I hit CTRL-C in the first second after bad motor noise, but the
noise ended after 1/2 min and the prompt is back also after 1/2
min.
Therefore, in the next test, I made a copy in the bad moment:
cp scan.log scan.copy
then, I hit CTRL-C.
I send both files direct to you.
--
Viele Gr??e
Werner Holtfreter
n the UsbSnoop-window, but only 1 was
connected. Also, I have made a log with each device. Both works,
100 dpi, A4.
I hope it helps. Files are coming direct.
--
Viele Gr??e
Werner Holtfreter
ts with UsbSnoop:
1 all from plug in
2 prescan and scann
3 only scann, 100 dpi, gray, full A4.
Odd, the snoop-log grew while the mouse was moving, but not while
the scanning! Of course, the marker "installed" was set only on the
line "USB scanner".
(Files direct to you.)
--
Viele Gr??e
Werner Holtfreter
h the usb sniffer available at
> http://www.pcausa.com/Utilities/UsbSnoop/default.htm . Then send
> me the log file of a 100 pdi scan so that I check that your
> scanner has really the same hardware than mine.
The scanner works on windows. I sent the UsbSnoop.log direct to you.
--
Viele Gr??e
Werner Holtfreter
_DEVICE_CLASS is not set
# CONFIG_USB_DYNAMIC_MINORS is not set
# CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND is not set <-
# CONFIG_USB_OTG is not set
.
.
.
I'm not sure that it is, what you searching. I use:
Suse10.3 2.6.22.17-0.1-default
By the way: I've seen the same problem (scanner head starts to
shake) on a Window-PC. (My scanner was earlier on a other PC.)
--
Viele Gr??e
Werner Holtfreter
s to
shake and does not move properly. Sometimes means about 30 %.
(Log comes direct to you.)
--
Viele Gr??e
Werner Holtfreter
ub.
The same /other/ warnings are printed, but *usb* works!
"Only" the scanner don't move the head.
scan.log is very large, I send it not in the e-mail-list but direct.
--
Viele Gr??e
Werner Holtfreter
it
[genesys] sane_open: start (devicename = `genesys')
lt-scanimage: open of device genesys failed: Invalid argument
[genesys] sane_exit: start
[genesys] sane_exit: exit
--
Viele Gr??e
Werner Holtfreter
gt;
> > Do you mean I should test with my old Sane version or with the
> > new CVS?
>
> If the new CVS doesn't work, then please send me the log done
> with the newer version.
Sorry, Stef, I'm a stupid Suse10.3 user and install normally only
rpm. I'm still working with sane-backends1.0.19-0-pm.2 genesys.
If I should install a new CVS, then I would need instruction.
--
Viele Gr??e
Werner Holtfreter
happening ?
Do you mean I should test with my old Sane version or with the new
CVS?
--
Viele Gr??e
Werner Holtfreter
you for the completly commands.
The tar.gz.file is coming separat.
Other interested person welcome, please send a e-mail.
> ??BTW, is your model really a MD6228 ?
Yes, this is the number on the type label.
--
Viele Gr??e
Werner Holtfreter
*low* resolution and black/white for low data rate,
then the scanner head starts to shake and does not move properly!
All things are independent from the front-end and I have done tests
with Kooka, Xsane and Xscanimage.
Any ideas?
--
Viele Gr??e
Werner Holtfreter
I need to plug it into a Windows computer. If
it is then connected to my Linux box again, it is detected as an 'Acer
FlatbedScanner_21', and it works perfectly again.
What on earth can I do to make sure that the scanner is *always*
detected as an 'Acer FlatbedScanner_21' by Linux, even if it (the
scanner) is powered off or unplugged? I do not always have a Windows
computer nearby to 'reset' it. Is this behaviour a bug in sane or snapscan?
Thank you for your time!
Kind Regards,
Werner
and communication sniffs..
the canonscan testprog works fine out of the box with my lide35 ..
but .. it's neither integrated in sane nor does it support all
functions .. so please lets coordinate some work to have a running
backend soon ;)
greetings
werner
out
there) ;)
regards
werner
ested and will post
them later this day!
regards
werner
he logfile.
shall there be any "test-picture" scanned or is equal which picture is
been scanned?
also which dpi should i scan?
i hope that someone is able to write a backend cause i'm not a C
programmer but i would certainly do anything else to push this project
forward.
regards
werner
sane (test scans, protocol sniffing e.g.)
I got a LiDE35 here. Running WindowsXP and gentoo .. so give me anything
i can do and i'll do it (except hardcore programming which i
unfortunately never learned... bnut if anyone is willing to teach me
some things i can do later on alone..)
greets
werner
Am Di, den 07.09.2004 schrieb Gerhard Jaeger um 8:47:
> On Monday 06 September 2004 14:23, Werner Gast wrote:
> > Is anybody going to work on linux support for this product?
>
> Depends on the chipset, if it's a GenesysLogic chip, then there's some
> wip.
This is
Am Di, den 07.09.2004 schrieb Gerhard Jaeger um 8:47:
> On Monday 06 September 2004 14:23, Werner Gast wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I'm new to this list.
> > Got a Scanner MD41985 (Medion), which seems to be possibly a Plustek OEM
> > product. The Software driver for Win$ is
anner back to the shop?
Thanks for your answer in advance
cu
Werner
Hi,
I'm new to this list.
Got a Scanner MD41985 (Medion), which seems to be possibly a Plustek OEM
product. The Software driver for Win$ is: Slim U2 TA
Is anybody going to work on linux support for this product?
regards
Werner
40 matches
Mail list logo
