On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Michael Cronenworth mike at cchtml.com wrote:
Chris Bagwell on 12/18/2011 09:56 PM wrote:
Not really. ?I'm sure upstream libusb is the best place to discuss.
As long as libusb project has a suggested work around/file location
for dealing with w64, we can
Chris Bagwell on 12/18/2011 09:56 PM wrote:
Not really. I'm sure upstream libusb is the best place to discuss.
As long as libusb project has a suggested work around/file location
for dealing with w64, we can accommodate it as well as standard usb.h
easy enough.
After thinking about it, I'm
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Michael Cronenworth mike at cchtml.com wrote:
MinGW thread time again.
The MinGW world has been split into two trees. The original mingw.org tree
and the new w64 tree. Fedora, and other distros, are migrating from
mingw.org to w64. Sane-backends will compile
On 12/18/2011 09:56 PM, Chris Bagwell wrote:
I looked at this change but as it is, it breaks compiles on Fedora 16.
It looks like including the DDK files is the only option there. Is
there a standard way to check when your on a w64 platform? I guess we
could move some header file checks to
MinGW thread time again.
The MinGW world has been split into two trees. The original mingw.org
tree and the new w64 tree. Fedora, and other distros, are migrating from
mingw.org to w64. Sane-backends will compile and run under the w64
environment with a few caveats.
1. The DDK includes are
