No idea from me toothanks for trying, though.
Let's see if someone else spots something interesing about this
Twain28
Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Testing on Canon MF6580PL
From: nicolas0martin at gmail.com
To: twain43 at hotmail.com
CC: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
Date: Thu
To: nicolas0martin at gmail.com
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 14:32:44 +
CC: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Testing on Canon MF6580PL
I'm not a Mac expert myself, but I'll poke around things and see what
I can do
Twain28
something more out of it.
Twain28
From: twai...@hotmail.com
To: nicolas0martin at gmail.com
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 14:32:44 +
CC: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Testing on Canon MF6580PL
I'm not a Mac expert myself, but I'll poke around things and see what I
I'm running the command from terminal at system boot, so there really should
not be anything else openis there some way to check this, anyway, so that I
might be sure of it?
Thank you for your patience
Twain28
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 18:45:03 +0200
Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Testing
2010 18:45:03 +0200
Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Testing on Canon MF6580PL
From: nicolas0martin at gmail.com
To: twain43 at hotmail.com
CC: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
Well, not exactly something new, the 2 logs are somehow equivalent, but one
gives a little bit more details:
[pixma
I'm not a Mac expert myself, but I'll poke around things and see what I can
do
Twain28
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 10:35:51 +0200
Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Testing on Canon MF6580PL
From: nicolas0mar...@gmail.com
To: twain43 at hotmail.com
CC: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
The process
to
#ifdef NDEBUGBL.
2. Same thing for backends/pixma.c line 70.
3. compile, install and test.
@Nicolas: if I understood your post below, you're suggesting I use #ifdef
NDEBUGPIXMA, instead of the aboveam I right?
Twain28
Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Testing on Canon MF6580PL
From
Ok, attaching today's logs: normal (all exported) and PIXMA-only.
I used the backends from 14-06 git (the one producing the PASS issues), modded
as Nicolas said. Can't really see many differences, myself
Just say the word, if you need me to test on newer builds.
Twain28
: if I understood your post below, you're suggesting I use #ifdef
NDEBUGPIXMA, instead of the aboveam I right?
Twain28
Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Testing on Canon MF6580PL
From: nicolas0martin at gmail.com
To: chris at cnpbagwell.com
CC: twain43 at hotmail.com; sane-devel
Point taken: I'm recompiling with all the 3-4 NDEBUG statements in those two
files changed to NDEBUGPIXMA.
Will test and post logs in a pinch, I hope.
Twain28
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 11:48:34 +0200
Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Testing on Canon MF6580PL
From: nicolas0mar...@gmail.com
To: twain43
Ditto: here are the new logs.
Something new sprouted out, at their very endhope it's useful.
Twain28
_
Avatar per Messenger e sfondo per il PC. Creali gratis!
Well, not exactly something new, the 2 logs are somehow equivalent, but one
gives a little bit more details:
[pixma] en1 is not a valid IPv4 interface, skipping...
[pixma] en1 is IPv4 capable, sending broadcast..
[pixma] scanner discovery finished...
[pixma] pixma_open(): Canon imageClass MF6500
ons 2010-06-16 klockan 10:16 -0500 skrev Chris Bagwell:
Probably binary blob from twain-sane links to a static version of
libusb (or distributes its own dyn library) and is compiled different
then when self-compiling from git.
The libusb available from the twain-sane page has some patches to
Mattias- would you characterize these patches as being fixes for
missing features of libusb, or fixes for something sane does wrong?
allan
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 7:58 AM, Mattias Ellert
mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se wrote:
ons 2010-06-16 klockan 10:16 -0500 skrev Chris Bagwell:
Probably
Mattias- would you characterize these patches as being fixes for
missing features of libusb, or fixes for something sane does wrong?
allan
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 7:58 AM, Mattias Ellert
mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se wrote:
ons 2010-06-16 klockan 10:16 -0500 skrev Chris Bagwell:
Probably
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 4:15 AM, twain43 at hotmail.com wrote:
Whooopssorry: my fault.
Here they are: redone today.
Twain28
Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Testing on Canon MF6580PL
From: nicolas0martin at gmail.com
To: twain43 at hotmail.com
CC: chris at cnpbagwell.com; sane-devel
Point is, for whatever reason, Pixma debug logs do not show up even when
setting SANE_DEBUG_PIXMA to a correct level, only SANE_DEBUG and
SANE_DEBUG_SANEI_USB produce logs, as showed up in the logs twain43 is
providing.
Just trying to figure out why this happens when compiled in this
environment.
Oh, OK. So one part of the problem is that pixma debug messages aren't
showing up.
Can the tester verify as a separate task if scanning is working with
twain-sane version of libusb though? It seems it may be working now?
On debug output part, I see pixma is using some custom stuff to disable
That's good clue indeed.
Also might be better to change the NDEBUG flag in the pixma code to
something more restrictive, like NDEBUGPIXMA
Or ... simply to reconsider this conditional code here and there, as it
was helpful at the time the pixma driver was standalone and not included
into Sane as
Whooopssorry: my fault.
Here they are: redone today.
Twain28
Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Testing on Canon MF6580PL
From: nicolas0martin at gmail.com
To: twain43 at hotmail.com
CC: chris at cnpbagwell.com; sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 19:22:23 +0200
2010 11:22:08 -0500
Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Testing on Canon MF6580PL
From: ch...@cnpbagwell.com
To: twain43 at hotmail.com
CC: nicolas0martin at gmail.com; sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
Here is a suggestion. Since twain-sane binary seems to work better for you,
perhaps it has a patched
but I guess they're of no use, if the
Pixma module has not changed
Twain28
Subject: RE: [sane-devel] Testing on Canon MF6580PL
From: nicolas0martin at gmail.com
To: twain43 at hotmail.com
CC: sane-devel
guess they're of no use, if the Pixma
module has not changed
Twain28
Subject: RE: [sane-devel] Testing on Canon MF6580PL
From: nicolas0martin at gmail.com
To: twain43 at hotmail.com
CC: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 22:16:45 +0200
Running a bit out
of SANE on my sys and try recompiling and
installing with the latest development snapshotsbut I guess they're of
no use, if the Pixma module has not changed
Twain28
Subject: RE: [sane-devel] Testing on Canon MF6580PL
From: nicolas0martin at gmail.com
To: twain43 at hotmail.com
CC
at some point, no PASS
statements)
Twain28
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 19:21:23 +0200
Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Testing on Canon MF6580PL
From: nicolas0mar...@gmail.com
To: twain43 at hotmail.com
CC: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
Meaning, you cannot get again the log you sent on 14 June, here
There's been no change to the git rep on 14th or 15th concerning the pixma
backend, changes affect only other backends. Latest changes to pixma backend
was on June 8
But to be sure, you could try to download the 14 June git image and test
with it.
Just go to the Web page:
Jun 2010 15:00:16 +0200
Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Testing on Canon MF6580PL
From: nicolas0mar...@gmail.com
To: twain43 at hotmail.com
CC: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
There's been no change to the git rep on 14th or 15th concerning the pixma
backend, changes affect only other backends
.
and got those PASSes! :)
Twain28
From: twai...@hotmail.com
To: nicolas0martin at gmail.com
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 13:44:55 +
CC: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Testing on Canon MF6580PL
Thanks.
Building right now against
http://git.debian.org/?p
Small footnote: I actually noticed TwainSANE's PrefPane now displays some
drivers in two copiesdon't know if this affects or not the usage, but maybe
it's important.
Twain28
_
Gratis
So now, are you able to get a log trace with [pixma] statements, using only
the export SANE_DEBUG_PIXMA=11 statement, and a scanimage -T or a scanimage
foo.pnm ?
The purpose is to get a trace to know where an error is encountered. Without
it, I'm afraid we will not be able to investigate too far
Here's the pixma trace logbut I'm afraid it reports nothing more than it
did last time
Twain28
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 17:36:32 +0200
Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Testing on Canon MF6580PL
From: nicolas0mar...@gmail.com
To: twain43 at hotmail.com
CC: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
So complete different behaviour here than on Linux.
And does the scanimage foo.pnm with the same export statement give more
information ?
2010/6/17 twain43 at hotmail.com
Here's the pixma trace logbut I'm afraid it reports nothing more than
it did last time
Twain28
: Re: [sane-devel] Testing on Canon MF6580PL
From: nicolas0mar...@gmail.com
To: twain43 at hotmail.com
CC: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
So complete different behaviour here than on Linux.
And does the scanimage foo.pnm with the same export statement give more
information ?
2010/6/17
Running a bit out of ideas why it behaves like this and why logs do not
come out from the backend.
Probably something runs differently on MacOS, but I cannot figure out
what exactly.
Nicolas
Le jeudi 17 juin 2010 ? 16:47 +, twain43 at hotmail.com a ?crit :
Already tried.
100% same log
at lists.alioth.debian.org
Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Testing on Canon MF6580PL
I'll try to do so, tomorrow morning. ;)
Twain28
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 18:11:21 +0200
Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Testing on Canon MF6580PL
From: nicolas0mar...@gmail.com
To: twain43 at hotmail.com
CC: sane-devel
You mean you cannot get anymore the same log that you produced and sent us
12 days ago, on June 4 ?
Nicolas
2010/6/16 twain43 at hotmail.com
Today's log.
I manually deleted the printer from both System Preferences and
/Library/Printers, then tried again. No actual change.
Is there something
The only thing I can think of to get back that log result is to reinstall the
TwainSane interface and backends
I'll try uninstalling all and get back to them
Twain28
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 13:59:56 +0200
Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Testing on Canon MF6580PL
From: nicolas0mar
] Testing on Canon MF6580PL
The only thing I can think of to get back that log result is to reinstall the
TwainSane interface and backends
I'll try uninstalling all and get back to them
Twain28
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 13:59:56 +0200
Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Testing on Canon MF6580PL
on Canon MF6580PL
The only thing I can think of to get back that log result is to reinstall
the TwainSane interface and backends
I'll try uninstalling all and get back to them
Twain28
--
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 13:59:56 +0200
Subject: Re: [sane-devel
a miracle I managed to send even those few lines)
Hope you can make something out of this new log (hence the name).
Twain28
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 15:07:07 +0200
Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Testing on Canon MF6580PL
From: nicolas0mar...@gmail.com
To: twain43 at hotmail.com
CC: sane-devel
(hence the name).
Twain28
--
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 15:07:07 +0200
Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Testing on Canon MF6580PL
From: nicolas0martin at gmail.com
To: twain43 at hotmail.com
CC: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
So now, could you install the git version
Another strangeness here. I can read this from this log:
libusb/darwin.c usb_bulk_transfer: USB pipe is an interrupt pipe. Timeouts
will not be used.
meaning that Darwin libusb still does not handle interrupt timeouts.
So I don't yet understand how the previous scanimage -T could work !
Probably binary blob from twain-sane links to a static version of libusb (or
distributes its own dyn library) and is compiled different then when
self-compiling from git.
I believe we've seen several reports of sane on OSX having some USB issues
when self compiled.
I'm not sure if twain-sane web
I think I do
Same result happens using both basic user and with sudo su before command.
command issued: scanimage -T 2nameofthe.log
Twain28
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 16:09:54 +0200
Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Testing on Canon MF6580PL
From: nicolas0mar...@gmail.com
To: twain43 at hotmail.com
CC
at lists.alioth.debian.org
Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Testing on Canon MF6580PL
I think I do
Same result happens using both basic user and with sudo su before command.
command issued: scanimage -T 2nameofthe.log
Twain28
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 16:09:54 +0200
Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Testing on Canon MF6580PL
Here's the log. I attached the pnm file too, just in case
This time, pixma statements got through.
Twain28
Subject: RE: [sane-devel] Testing on Canon MF6580PL
From: nicolas0martin at gmail.com
To: twain43 at hotmail.com
CC: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010
But there's nothing in this log !
Something looks wrong with your installation, so could you try to get a
scanimage log as you did formerly, like the one sent on 4 June ?
Nicolas
2010/6/15 twain43 at hotmail.com
Here's the log. I attached the pnm file too, just in case
This time, pixma
Tell you whatI'll make uninstall and reinstall SANE from the daily git and
test with it.
Reporting in 10 minutes c.a.
Twain28
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 11:36:46 +0200
Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Testing on Canon MF6580PL
From: nicolas0mar...@gmail.com
To: twain43 at hotmail.com
CC: sane-devel
Mmmh...nice: today's snapshot won't compile at alltrying to cut out the
buggy files from the Makefile.
Twain28
_
Taglia i costi. Chiama e videochiama da Messenger
Having the hell of a time removing all kvsxx references in makefiles
Twain28
From: twai...@hotmail.com
To: nicolas0martin at gmail.com
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 10:17:01 +
CC: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Testing on Canon MF6580PL
Mmmh...nice
From: twain43 at hotmail.com
To: nicolas0martin at gmail.com
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 10:17:01 +
CC: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Testing on Canon MF6580PL
Mmmh...nice: today's snapshot won't compile at alltrying to cut out
type
make[2]: *** [libkvs20xx_la-kvs20xx.lo] Error 1
make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
that's the error log
Twain28
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 07:55:00 -0400
Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Testing on Canon MF6580PL
From: kitno455 at gmail.com
To: twain43 at hotmail.com
CC
] Error 1
that's the error log
Twain28
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 07:55:00 -0400
Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Testing on Canon MF6580PL
From: kitno455 at gmail.com
To: twain43 at hotmail.com
CC: nicolas0martin at gmail.com; sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
I just built the current snapshot
I'm on a hackintosh on MacOS X 10.5.8
Twain28
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 08:39:34 -0400
Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Testing on Canon MF6580PL
From: kitno455 at gmail.com
To: twain43 at hotmail.com
CC: nicolas0martin at gmail.com; sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
On my Fedora system, /usr
change kvs20xx.h from
#include endian.h
to
#include sys/param.h
allan
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 8:40 AM, twain43 at hotmail.com wrote:
I'm on a hackintosh on MacOS X 10.5.8
Twain28
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 08:39:34 -0400
Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Testing on Canon MF6580PL
From: kitno455
Excellent! Compiling great now.
Twain28
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 08:47:37 -0400
Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Testing on Canon MF6580PL
From: kitno455 at gmail.com
To: twain43 at hotmail.com
CC: nicolas0martin at gmail.com; sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
change kvs20xx.h from
Getting back on the job:
I make installed latest git snapshot and fired up the thing with the three
exports.
The MultiFunction wheezed this time.
Here's the log.
Now I'll make uninstall, compile with your patch and make install again, to
provide a log with it.
Twain 28
Thanks for the report- I will commit a patch.
allan
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 8:49 AM, twain43 at hotmail.com wrote:
Excellent! Compiling great now.
Twain28
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 08:47:37 -0400
Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Testing on Canon MF6580PL
From: kitno455 at gmail.com
To: twain43
Looks this time, your scanner is locked by some other application.
Maybe you should try to unplug/replug it ?
[pixma] scanner discovery finished...
[pixma] pixma_open(): Canon imageClass MF6500
[sanei_usb] sanei_usb_open: trying to open device
`libusb:005:002-04a9-2686-00-00'
usb_os_open:
New log. Same result. Tried plugging/unplugging before: nothing changed.
Twain28
_
Non sei a casa? Accedi a Messenger dal Web.
http://www.messenger.it/web/default.aspx
-- next
Are you running some kind of software from Canon?
allan
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:34 AM, twain43 at hotmail.com wrote:
New log. Same result. Tried plugging/unplugging before: nothing changed.
Twain28
Messenger Radio. La radio che si fa cliccare!
--
Sounds like you cannot get to same state as you were on June 4.
Did you try to reboot the Hackintosh ?
Did you try to run these commands as root ?
2010/6/15 twain43 at hotmail.com
New log. Same result. Tried plugging/unplugging before: nothing changed.
Twain28
-- next part
Not that I know
Twain28
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 11:41:32 -0400
Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Testing on Canon MF6580PL
From: kitno455 at gmail.com
To: twain43 at hotmail.com
CC: nicolas0martin at gmail.com; sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
Are you running some kind of software from
Not sure.
Canon printer SW may have locked the USB port.
Could you ty to disable printing at least for a test ?
2010/6/15 twain43 at hotmail.com
Rebooted, run as root. Log reads indentical.
regarding allan's question: do canon's printer drivers count as software?
If so, yesbut I really
I'll try to do so, tomorrow morning. ;)
Twain28
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 18:11:21 +0200
Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Testing on Canon MF6580PL
From: nicolas0mar...@gmail.com
To: twain43 at hotmail.com
CC: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
Not sure.
Canon printer SW may have locked the USB
that after your patch, the
scanner makes no longer wheezing noises (kind of preparing to acquire images
signal, IMHO), as it did before. So maybe something is still missing
Twain28
Subject: RE: [sane-devel] Testing on Canon MF6580PL
From: nicolas0martin at gmail.com
To: twain43
Yes ... the interesting log with [pixma] statements was send to your
console !
This little image filled up with 0s is strange, to understand what's
going on, could you try to get another log with the following commands:
export SANE_DEBUG_PIXMA=11
scanimage 2 scanimage.log 1 foo.pnm
You
This log looks good indeed ;-)
A suggestion: did you try
scanimage foo.pnm
and look what you get in foo.pnm ?
PS: the previous log did not contain the [pixma] statements, meaning you
may have omitted one of the 3 export commands to enter before running
the scanimage -T . Could you try again,
Here's the new log, after recompilation with your hack.
I attached it all, zipped, since its end looked somewhat promising, to me. ;)
Twain28
Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Testing on Canon MF6580PL
From: nicolas0martin at gmail.com
To: twain43 at hotmail.com
CC: sane-devel
Here's the new log, obtained following your instruction.
I'm on Mac OS X 10.5.8, Libusb 0.1.13 beta 2009-09-10 (got from TWAIN SANE
project page).
Crossing my fingers for a miracle
Twain28
Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Testing on Canon MF6580PL
From: nicolas0martin at gmail.com
To: twain43
I don't know the current status of Darwin libusb against usb interrupts,
but it used to not support timeouts in older versions, which makes pixma
backend unusable for some PIXMA models.
Looking at the Darwin libusb 1.13 source files, comments show this may
be working now, but not sure (source
Will give it a shot as soon as I can and post back the results(today is a
busy day :P ...)
Twain28
Subject: RE: [sane-devel] Testing on Canon MF6580PL
From: nicolas0martin at gmail.com
To: twain43 at hotmail.com
CC: peter at schoenrank.ca; sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
Date
at lists.alioth.debian.org
Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Testing on Canon MF6580PL
Will give it a shot as soon as I can and post back the results(today is a
busy day :P ...)
Twain28
Subject: RE: [sane-devel] Testing on Canon MF6580PL
From: nicolas0martin at gmail.com
To: twain43
UhmI have to point out the log I attached a minute ago reports just the
first lines of the original one: over 300mb in less than 2 minutes
Twain28
_
Gratis per te Avatar per
Just looked at the logs (only the beginning is interesting for me), but
it fails at the same point even after having fixed the checksums
(although the scanner did not seem to care they were misplaced)
But one thing surprises me: in the usb dialogs, I don't see any USB
Interrupt messages like in
Just Committed a few bunch of modifications to latest git.
Could you give a try with it, and get another scanimage -T logfile as
you did previously:
export SANE_DEBUG_PIXMA=11
scanimage -T 2 scanimage.log
We will see how it behaves from there
Nicolas
Le lundi 07 juin 2010 ? 09:20 +,
Ok, here's the log, obtained following the instructions provided. I'm also
posting the steps I went through, just in case I missed something:
1. Fired up Canon's scan interface on Win Vista and selected a very small area
to acquire;
2. Started Snoopypro, unpacked the driver, installed the
I'm running SANE on a Hackintosh, so the answer to you both is a definite Yes.
;)
If you explain me how to obtain the usb snoop on Windows (I'm assuming it'd be
the fastest way), I'll do it on monday, as soon as I get back to office, and
post back.
Twain28
You can use Snoopypro.exe to get a usb snoop on Windows, this is a very
old program, but hopefully, still working on Vista.
Download from Snoopypro from sourceforge.net here:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/usbsnoop/
Read and follow exactly the instructions in SnoopyPro.exe, then try to
record
Looks this will require some logs to be taken first.
Turn debugging on this way in order to grab some additional data.
Run scanimage after some export commands:
export SANE_DEBUG_PIXMA=11
scanimage -T 2 scanimage.log
Send back the scanimage.log file you'll get.
Nicolas
Le jeudi 03 juin
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 21:17:01 +
CC: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Testing on Canon MF6580PL
I surely willas soon as I get back to my office. ;)
(Here in Italy it's quarter past 23)
Expect the log in, let's say, about 12 hours (maybe less
at lists.alioth.debian.org
Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Testing on Canon MF6580PL
I sent the log, but it's currently awaiting for moderation (3.5 megs logfile).
If you'd like, I could chop it down to the first 30-50 lines (after, it's just
a loop, AFAIK), or post it as plain text in a mail: just let me know
Thanks for the log.
I'm wondering whether this model acts like the MF4600 series, giving the
point where the scan sequence fails.
Do you have the possibility to run a Windows PC with this scanner, to
get a usb snoop (I can explain you how this is pretty easy) ?
Nicolas
Le vendredi 04 juin 2010
On 10-Jun-04, at 12:20, Nicolas Martin wrote to Twain28:
Do you have the possibility to run a Windows PC with this scanner, to
get a usb snoop (I can explain you how this is pretty easy) ?
If Twain28 does not have access to a Windows PC, a similar tool, USB Prober, is
available for Mac OS
Hello,
I see you're looking for a tester for Canon MF6580PL.
We got that multifunction model at the office, and we could really use Mac
compatibility. :)
I tried basic communication:
sane-find-scanner
reads:
found USB scanner (vendor=0x04a9 [Canon,Inc.], product=0x2686 [MF6500]) at
scanimage foo.pnm
then look at foo.pnm :)
allan
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 1:06 PM, twain43 at hotmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I see you're looking for a tester for Canon MF6580PL.
We got that multifunction model at the office, and we could really use Mac
compatibility. :)
I tried basic
Hello there!
Had already tried that: scanner makes wheezy noises and seems to prepare for
duty, 0 byte file gets actually generated, but then all stops.
Is there some special configuration I have to try?
Twain28
I surely willas soon as I get back to my office. ;)
(Here in Italy it's quarter past 23)
Expect the log in, let's say, about 12 hours (maybe less).
Twain28
_
Taglia i costi. Chiama
88 matches
Mail list logo
