Cant say. Most likely it wont for next year or so. But on its own, i think,
really bad for RH line of linux..
On Sun, Oct 28, 2018, 20:33 Adam Jensen wrote:
>
>
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 10:08 AM John Pilkington wrote:
>
> I have successfully used mock in Fedora 27 and Fedora 28 to build rpms
> to run under Scientific Linux (as well as ones to run natively.)
>
> At first I used a locally written config file, but more recently
>
On 10/28/18 2:24 AM, Yasha Karant wrote:
On 10/27/2018 07:08 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 10/27/18 10:42 AM, Yasha Karant wrote:
Using yumex, rather than doing a full update to SL 7.5 production, I
attempted to update over the network the kernel, firmware, and libgcc,
allowing yumex
Thank you Bruce and Nico.
Nico I will try to use the auto-config tools and auto mounts again on my test
VM.
Best,
Adil
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 28, 2018, at 7:50 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 10:18 AM Alvi, Adil H wrote:
>>
>>
>> Good Morning,
>>
>>
>>
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 10:18 AM Alvi, Adil H wrote:
>
>
> Good Morning,
>
>
> I was trying to bind a workstation running SL 6.5 to AD, so that users can
> login with their AD accounts, and mount a Windows File Share Server binded to
> AD.
Stop here. You should update to the latest version of
On 27/10/18 17:42, Yasha Karant wrote:
Using yumex, rather than doing a full update to SL 7.5 production, I
attempted to update over the network the kernel, firmware, and libgcc,
allowing yumex (essentially yum) to establish the needed dependencies
(other applications, etc., that also needed to
On 10/27/2018 07:08 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 10/27/18 10:42 AM, Yasha Karant wrote:
>> Using yumex, rather than doing a full update to SL 7.5 production, I
>> attempted to update over the network the kernel, firmware, and libgcc,
>> allowing yumex (essentially yum) to establish the needed
